tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7479077.post114633001036279089..comments2023-09-24T17:05:28.010+01:00Comments on David's Kingsbury blog: Technical data- am I right?Davidhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16062717140344359936noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7479077.post-1147037101681840352006-05-07T22:25:00.000+01:002006-05-07T22:25:00.000+01:00Thanks Kathleen, I'll certainly try that.But my ow...Thanks Kathleen, I'll certainly try that.<BR/>But my own theory is far from scientific,as coincidences have a science of their own, far more interesting and totally against logic. But present the data and it still works. Maybe I'll find the reason behind it but there's already a lot of circumstantial evidence, like a smoking gun.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16062717140344359936noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7479077.post-1146977646495299172006-05-07T05:54:00.000+01:002006-05-07T05:54:00.000+01:00Nope, my female mind believes you are in error.Fir...Nope, my female mind believes you are in error.<BR/><BR/>First off I do not put a lot of faith in this choosing relationships based on an affinity for a name. But if you really wanted to test it out then all you need to test for is your current positive association for a name.<BR/><BR/>Regarding your current data? Karen is a variant of Katherine so, imo, should be included in that category.<BR/><BR/>Also I counted 48 women that you identified as knowing 'well' enough to subject to a rating system.<BR/><BR/>Have you known all these women in person? What is your criteria for knowing them 'well'? Is it one date or 4 dates or dating them regularly for a few months.<BR/><BR/>Also, did you 'date' them at different times. If you dated a few of them at the same time? I suggest your data may be corrupt.<BR/><BR/>Perhaps another way to test your theory, which in reality is entirely subjective for you, is to use visualization exercises and record their results instead.<BR/><BR/>Imagine the ideal woman for yourself. Develop the fantasy until it is as close to reality as you can achieve. Like imagining she had hairy armpits once in a while and that being okay with you. Or imagine her with habits you don't like but still the two of you can 'work it out'.<BR/><BR/>Imagine arguments. Imagine her too thin, too fat, too tall or not even very pretty. Remember the trap some men fall into by staying with a woman just because she looks hot.<BR/><BR/>But the woman of your fantasy can be good looking just not 'model material'. She can also be hooker, angel, mother and witch. Most women are combo packages.<BR/><BR/>She just can't be perfect. She must be flawed but always a good fit for you for YEARS of companionship. (scary stuff!)<BR/><BR/>Once you've got a 'functional fantasy' developed you can then ask the question to gather data for your theory.<BR/><BR/>Ask yourself what you think her name is.<BR/><BR/>Repeat experiment as often as you like. Change anything about her and try it again. Imagine the worst case companion and record those names. Then take all those results and crunch THOSE numbers according to 'winner' or 'dodgy'! ;-)<BR/><BR/>Bet the results would be fascinating but then again it's just one of my 'wierd' ideas. lol<BR/><BR/>Kathleen<BR/>(also a variant of Katherine)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com