Global warming, case closed.

My personal research into global warming has reached its conclusion and I reckon enough evidence for every neutral (not carbon neutral!) to agree. What started as a light hearted extra in the end of a few news reports as a wonderful relief to the impending ice age predicted for the previous 20 years became a man eating monster within a decade. People can, however deceived, see through a lie if it carries on long enough. It can't be maintained as evidence of the truth slowly creeps through the farago of nonsense they put up.

In the last few weeks the final nails went in the coffin. Studies showed world average climate stopped rising in 1998 (and only rose and fell for a few decades at a time prior to that regardless of industrial activity). So there is actually nothing called global warming, in the present anyhow. It's actually global cooling now as temperatures have been dropping now since December.
Then it was announced hurricanes and tornadoes did not increase with temperature, and actually went down a little. Another fear removed. And (this takes some research currently as it changes so much it's hard to find the full picture) after the great polar melts followed the great polar freeze. What melts big time freezes big time, that's nature.

Other experts are now admitting there are unlikely to be many deaths should there be global warming as the number of people dying of the cold now would more than cancel out anyone dying from heat or flooding, except the sea level figures which are rising have risen steadily at almost bugger all for over a century. And if they carry on at that level for another century they will have risen at very slightly more than bugger all, making bugger all difference even for the many generations to come that haven't yet been born the global warming promoters are warning of.
I could go on, but as a panel said on the radio, if this lot alone was presented in defence to a jury having heard the case for the prosecution none in the world could find them guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Firstly a crime has to have been committed first, and the propaganda continues to repeat old predictions of 2-10' in a century as they haven't got a lot more to go on, plus the long discredited 'hockey stick' diagram, which started this whole fiasco off and moves now under its own momentum even after the engine's gone off. I have a legal background and smelt a rat as soon as the words 'carbon tax' were mentioned, plus the fact no one had reported any of the phenomena we were told would be associated with global warming. In fact studies taken from the many times it had been warmer in the past showed few people suffered and as we all know, it costs money to heat a house and nothing to freeze in the winter if you don't. There's no historic precedent for said disasters predicted, quite the opposite.
Anyhow, one by one scientists are having to admit each guess or measurement was wrong and sooner or later the governments will be forced to stop taxing us for something that no longer warrants the payment. In legal terms that would be called obtaining money by deception and the same juries would have no trouble finding them guilty of that. Criminal at worst and naive at best, but led by criminals who knew exactly what they were up to.
But do you think they'll give our money back when the gaff has been blown? My bum they will...