Sunday, February 22, 2015

Playing the race card

Continued on part 2, it seems these pages have a size limit.

Having come across so many tweets and comments using racism accusations to shut down opposition, or anti-white racism the numbers are growing so great (a symptom of fashion and groupthink arising) I have had to open a special page now to collect them all so you can see the disgraceful division of society created by social workers, councillors, politicians and activists whose motivation is to cause splits in society and watch the carnage follow. These are generally innocent brainwashed individuals who genuinely believe there is some kind of race war going on, and it is their role (as black or white, it doesn't matter where they speak for themselves, or in what I've found to be the majority of cases, for others) to defend this oppressed minority from the terrible phenomenon of racism, although when it's directed at white people it's cutting them down to size so they know how the others feel, so to them that's part of the fight.
 
20m20 minutes ago
Why are most climate change deniers also racist and homophobic?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ALL white people are racist. White middle class, white working class, white men, white women, white gays, white children they can ALL geddit

Shocking study reveals Trump supporters respond to pictures of black faces with anger and defensiveness

Feb 6
Donald Trump really hates black football players, except when he needs to use the death of one of them to push his racist agenda against hispanic immigrants.

I am an Italian American woman, professional, daughter, sister, and aunt. I call Donald Trump a white supremacist.

56m56 minutes ago
White women always look so happy eating salad in stock photos

@andieiamwhoiam Students applying for college won't get into Yale with a 2.0 because they are black or a woman. Get real. 😂


Oct 31 Philadelphia, PA
olivia (o Y o) Retweeted Paige Sand
I HATE WHITE PEOPLE


Also white people are evil. Whiteness is evil.

Replying to 
hardly, when you say "my skin is not privilege." Are you daft? Nevermind. I really don't care.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A white Ivy League professor has taken to the pages of the Huffington Post to condemn her own race, declaring that she chose never to reproduce because her children would simply inherit white privilege.
Ali Michael, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s (Penn) Graduate School of Education

.@AdamBaldwin Maybe Hollywood can explain why the black character in a movie is the first to die. It's like he is wearing a red shirt.



10m10 minutes ago Atlanta, GA
When you don't have to worry about how are you going to prove your citizenship.

Cam  ☄️‏@MemesCamFollowMoreReplying to @MemesCam @Communism_Kills- youcould use your white privilege to make things change so that black people have nothing to complain about no more? Crazy right? 

23h23 hours ago
White people get so uncomfortable talking about race when it's about their wrong doing past, but have no problems speaking on other races when it pertains to crimes.


22h22 hours ago
The sense that black people should be extra grateful for their success or talents is the most infuriating thing.

7m7 minutes ago
Y’all niggas just gonna have to admit that white passing biracial or white passing mixed people will never have the black experience because they don’t face the same struggles. It’s her privilege and for some reason a big portion of y’all will not admit this

Yes, ALL white people are racist. Yes, ALL men are sexist. Yes, ALL cis people are transphobic. We have to unpack that. That's the work!

8h8 hours ago Donald Trump Jr. has a lot to learn about environmental racism. Every dollar that you spend will go into a fund...


WOC and POC can headline movies and act well and make bank. Yet we keep getting the same movies with the same white actors

Happy Thanksgiving!... to everyone except lightskinned women who don't acknowledge their privilege over dark skinned women

13h13 hours ago Replying to
Racism can be very settled and one can be one without knowing. Thank you for speaking out. The privileged may not get it but we do
Replying to 
Many BAME hve hidden disabilities:dyslexia,dyspraxia Autism tht r nt & Justice& education inherently racists
Replying to 
Statistics in USA for black male incarceration is even worse than here. Shocking stuff. Why. Is it racial prejudice? A good chance it is 😔🙁

White women: your hands may not have held most torches this wknd, but you birth, feed, caress, screw, raise, and love the systems killing us


Replying to
For my daughter and for every young black child growing up, I want them to see successful black women doing any job they want to do. And I know white women will have had an advantage over them.

Being a black man in London is one of the hardest things, we spend a lot of time making everyone else feel comfortable & it has negative effects on us mentally

Nothing scares me more than a mediocre white man.

It sure is interesting how overwhelmingly White these new stickers are. So interesting.


14 minutes ago

This is the whitest blandness panel they all look the same, same accent, same mannerisms. Middle class white politics.

In 2015, only 15 black men were accepted to Cambridge as undergrads. They got together to show just how insanely bad that is.

i just want to say i'm so, so sorry. all white people are responsible for this system's thrive and fall. we have to do better. i'm sorry



A movie poster with no white women. My soul is fed.

Replying to @omniJLO

Most of the whites don't understand the ethnic barriers JLo has broken in her career, as well as other barriers in general. Let me help them


You sound very naive Matt, the UK is a racist society. You probably don't have a clue because you have white privilege.

The people coming out in droves for rapists is astounding but not really at all. Scrolling thru most their pages - also racist. All bad. 🤢



Jul 15

Because… He's not black, brown, a woman, Muslim, LGBT or poor. Privilege has its privileges.

Replying to

Y'all keep wanting this race war-Blacks are not slaves-remember that-this is heartbreaking for me but at the same time, I will protect mine

Replying to  
All white males in this picture. Time to ask "what's wrong with them"? Why they so hateful? Address harm caused by WP for centuries
What happen in Manchester last night was disturbing despicable horrible & heartbreaking but PLEASE remember, white people kill children too

Replying to 
the main thing to avoid with this kind of thing, as far as social justice is concerned, is getting racist about ethnic foods

May 28
Replying to
Muslims and Black Americans better strap up and defend themselves against white terrorism.. 2000+ Hate crimes and Murders since Nov 2016

So we're just going to ignore how white Christianity created slavery, jim crow laws, and lynchings...
Tweet












































Conversation

Is open mindedness inversely proportional to the level of white, fat, balding, middle agedness in this audience? #BBCQT9:55 PM · Jun 2, 2017 from York, England
2m2 minutes ago
There's lack of diversity in education leadership. BAME underrepresented. You could discuss this issue in your programme soon

Jul 9
Racism is everywhere in the form of systematic white supremacy, which dominates ALL areas of activity. And denial & deflection maintains it

Replying to   and 
I'm afraid feminism & human rights are not for brown female children


Rapper Nelly was accused of rape in Auburn Wa. Sounds like he had sex with a white woman. That area is 82% white.
12h12 hours ago
ALL sex between Black men and white women is considered rape, EVEN if it's consensual, in a system of white supremacy. Nelly got caught up

This is as much the predictably boring support for a white woman in the face of scary black & trans criticism that I'd expected. Hard pass.

19h19 hours ago
Make America White Again: Donald Trump Just Made History: That's what the lying-press fear the most from Trumpism.

, April Day Trump is not a Racist. He just thinks ALL Blacks look alike, know each other, live in hellish conditions

Tell Republicans to treat Trump like they did the Black President. and the problem will disappear 💨

Trump loses popular vote->Blames woman Trump caught colluding->Blames black man and woman Flynn caught red handed->Blames black man Get it?


May 28
Replying to
The very particular brand of criticism directed at Abbott has to be understood through the prism of misogynoir

As per usual bigoted Whites moan about immigrants and immigration. lazy types happy on Benefits...

May 28
Maybe that's why poc & others in Portland reacted strongly to the "cultural appropriation" of Mexican cuisine by 2 white chefs.

Replying to   
All the white folks in the comments unable to wrap their head around Trump's blatant racism and violence against people of color.

Whether in 1942, 1978, or 2017, this country tells youths of color over and over again: “You do not belong here.”


" wants to be Home Sec of OUR country" It's Diane's,too Dusting off anti playbook

3m3 minutes ago
cannot believe what I am listening to re racial profiling!! Stop erasing the experiences of ur black caller

Deplorables don't care how much Trump's policies harm them, just so long as non-whites get it worse. Full stop.
Tweet













































Conversation

Am I being daft about seeing two older white males asking concerned questions about foreign aid ? #bbcqt9:09 PM · Jun 2, 2017

North of England is racist. Labour will have to adjust policy accordingly to succeed there
-----------------------------------------------------------------
White people are the devil


2h2 hours ago
why do white people always refer to Africa when talking about poverty 🤔

I'll take "What white people with unearned privilege say" for $600, Kara

Drake is lik a viking who goes to different peoples countries and steals pieces of their cultureTweet

























































Conversation

This is why North Korea, Russia, Iran and every other country don't take us serious. Our own country is fuk'd up & racist! #AltonSterling4:02 AM · May 3, 2017

35m35 minutes ago
Dear white people Stop commenting, I know society & media has reinforced your importance. Nevertheless at times you can NOT offer an opinion

24h24 hours ago
You ever see a poor white person and wonder how the hell they fuck up privilege?

White guy can't figure out his privilege.


That the missiles are callled tomahawks must enrage a lot of Native Americans

Cause the UK is racist and views the mass slaughter of black people as a rather small issue.

Black folk, once you realize that they fear you for disagreeing and just being BLACK you'll understand that you don't need their help
Tweet













































Conversation

#bbcqt @jeremycorbyn comes on and the only ones not smiling are the fat white old male Tories9:18 PM · Jun 2, 2017 from Stockholm, Sweden
Jan 25
reminder: our president's mother was an immigrant. his wife is an immigrant. this. is. about. race.





Tweet














































Conversation

#bbcqt @jeremycorbyn comes on and the only ones not smiling are the fat white old male Tories9:18 PM · Jun 2, 2017 from Stockholm, Sweden














































Conversation

#bbcqt @jeremycorbyn comes on and the only ones not smiling are the fat white old male Tories9:18 PM · Jun 2, 2017 from Stockholm, Sweden













































Conversation

#bbcqt @jeremycorbyn comes on and the only ones not smiling are the fat white old male Tories9:18 PM · Jun 2, 2017 from Stockholm, Sweden













































Conversation

#bbcqt @jeremycorbyn comes on and the only ones not smiling are the fat white old male Tories9:18 PM · Jun 2, 2017 from Stockholm, Sweden













































Conversation

Am I being daft about seeing two older white males asking concerned questions about foreign aid ? #bbcqt9:09 PM · Jun 2, 2017
@jimmydolittle1 sane "of sound mind; not mad or mentally ill", its debatable as an irrational fear of people who aren't white isn't normal!8:10 PM · Feb 8, 2017




2 tories? #bbcqt good going on that impartiality - no people of colour - tip top on diversity they 👍🏾👏🏽11:08 PM · Feb 9, 2017

@LeahRBoss By an old white man who also had the help of votes from a bunch of other mostly old white men

The picture of Dr Evil is more diverse than the picture of the GOP. That's fucking sad.


Nice diverse audience they got together thenight. *mugs to camera* #bbcqt



CONSTITUTIONALIST Retweeted FreedomsSafestPlace
Tell me how many minorities and women does Donald have in his cabinet?


Arguments for "law + order" are white supremacist code for control + contain. Historically law + order = control + contain Black people.


White people know their reign of terror here is coming to an end. The U.S. is becoming less & less white each year. It's driving them crazy.

22m22 minutes ago


16h16 hours ago
Mikki Kendall Retweeted Slate
Well I see Glamour continues to want to tell people if it's all white it's all right. Yaay feminism...or something. NO WOC NEED APPLY

you'll NEVER live to see Black people oppress white people in America because it's not possible!

Replying to @LeahRBossIt's always those whites trying to tell us.....about us. They can't help it, it's in there blood to be "white so you got to be right"
3h3 hours ago

what your actually saying is you are choosing to believe the white people over the victims.

Old straight white Republican men. What a joy.

The only difference is the fact that Hannity is white. Roles reversed if any black person did what hannity did they would be fired.



pathetic, disgraceful & a slap in the face to our incredibly diverse country. we are not a nation of old, white men, nor will we ever b
21m21 minutes ago
Those who see nothing wrong with this makeup have an aversion to diversity.

19h19 hours ago
Shaad D'Souza Retweeted MTV News
my main questions 1. why would anyone want 2 see a war film ever 2. why would anyone want 2 see a film where literally EVERYONE is white men

Gentle reminder to my fellow white people that we have all been raised to behave like complete sociopaths

52m52 minutes ago
At a guess: Because they feel America is no longer a "safe space" for their white privilege.


Why all white people smell like cat shit ???


MY LATEST. Without Obama, the Democratic Party is painfully & disproportionately white.

I'm in facebook jail because I voiced how sick you black men are for dating white bitches 😂😂

Nov 6
white people are not allowed to tweet me. I can smell the musty wet dog through my screen.
29m29 minutes ago
think they can come in my mentions and call me racist for saying hate whites lol
Nov 10
today was crucial, i was walking around looking 4 any white people smiling 2 much & punching them in the throats
    WHITE PEOPLE ARE LITERALLY HITLER
  1. White people are literally worse than Hitler.
  2. Daily reminder that all white people are literally Hitler
  3. white people are literally Hitler and ISIS combined
  4. I HATE WHITE PEOPLE SO MUCH YALL LITERALLY ELECTED A MODERN HITLER BECAUSE OF SOME STUPID ASS EMAILS THE FBI CLEARED
  Nov 11
white people are so fucking embarrassing and gross like we got a lot of nerve for a race thats unmoisturized and smell like hanes socks 

3h3 hours ago
pretty girl privilege is real

its cool though, ur skin gives u privilege, ur gender doesn't...anything goes down/ur the 1st under the bus..mark my words 😙😙

constantly being discouraged about taking a higher level math course.
(note, probably no good at maths, numbers don't know your race)

3h3 hours ago Manhattan, NY
Sarah A. Harvard Retweeted josie duffy rice
black boy: Im scared for my future white guy: stop playing victim thug white moderates: wow we live in a bubble

13m13 minutes ago
Without white supremacy + misogyny, Trump could not have won. But the rubble created by neoliberalism is a major factor too.

27m27 minutes ago
Teresa Mays' constituency seems to be a a load of posh white people.

Nov 9
Whether Trump wins or not, the next most important thing is to seriously address America's endless and constant love for white supremacy.

8m8 minutes ago
= london broadcasting caucasians. No at all and its a station the effort they go to keep colour out must be great 😂😂

2h2 hours ago
read Trump quotes and imagine how mad the Republicans would be if a black man said the same things.


Bobby Hall Retweeted Big Kahuna
7 were acquitted thanks 2 white privilege & a broken system that never would have let minorities off in the same situation. I sound perfect

Nov 9
John Stevenson Retweeted Jess Phillips MP
This. If you think following the political lead of rich white men is sticking it to the establishment, you have been conned.

People in the dominant society act helpless when it comes to assisting Black ppl with racial injustice. But they know how to take action

Nov 9
Ian Dunt Retweeted Sophy Ridge
When Farage says 'in charge of their lives', let's be clear that he means white people.

Nov 9
Well you certainly are going to have MORE race issues, moron. You have elected a white, privileged male.

16m16 minutes ago
A black man kneels the white public go crazy an unarmed black man is murdered white silence. But somehow" there's no racism anymore"


White people cant ever let go of 9/11, a single day in our history, but want you to get over 300 years of racial oppression lol


you really don't think white people are privileged?


10 minutes into this movie & the white privilege is so evident😐



Propane Jane™ Retweeted Leah the Boss
There isn't one because Black isn't a real race but a social construct designed by White supremacists who brought us here to build America.

2h2 hours ago
Subject black and brown people to centuries of oppression and then use those effects to say they deserved it. Wow.

6m6 minutes ago
stop and search allows white police officers to practice their discrimination without fear.


sometimes I'm embarrassed to be white and I'm not ashamed to say that.

13m13 minutes ago
it's white mans logic. Cause white man has never had to deal with being murdered and persecuted for your skin color.

4m4 minutes ago
I agree with everything that Dr said whites just ignore the problem and carry on with their white privileges picking up best jobs & ££

23m23 minutes ago
Who are any of these people kidding, when you say "Un-American" your really saying "Your not complying with White Supremacy"

21m21 minutes ago
it is strange though, everyone who seems to disagree just happens to be a beneficiary of white privilege ! 🤔

The best scam ever run on poor white people was the idea that their financial struggles are the fault of POC & not rich white people.

8h8 hours ago
Black Olives Matter is proof that racism is alive and well and drenched in White Privilege. That murder and racism would be taken as a joke.

8m8 minutes ago
For Racists & White Supremacists its about the MYTH that Whites are SUPERIOR & get to MURDER Blacks as part of White Privilege.



22m22 minutes ago
A majority of White People are Racist. I have many White fans but that still doesn't stop them from being racist.

31m31 minutes ago
' is a reaction against the emancipation of black people, we have seen this since the 1950s' -

2h2 hours ago
This is a old rich white man's world

ask yourself, would you want to be a non white? More stop searches, treated as if you're a criminal? Racism exists, stop being blinded.


Congrats to the newly elected MPs. This new less pale and less male group is the future! Real progress
  1. Old white man tells black man that he's wrong about the EU supporting rights for minorities and women.

In reply to
The Tories still valiantly trying to faceoff Jews against Muslims, so they vote for a white guy
6 minutes ago
White folk are trash. Absolute trash. All of you.


maybe you're a silent pseudo racist. You see too much colour and that bothers you.
 
4h4 hours ago
People who assume anyone with a non-Anglicized Chinese name is a "he"

white people as a unit just need to go
2m2 minutes ago
everyday white people give me reason to hate them

5m5 minutes ago
Re: "I'm a woman of colour" KIM) She. couldn't sound posher or more superior. I work with people like her. NOT NICE😈

9h9 hours ago
Too much benefits from having poverty. Benefits systematic racism and can't have everybody equal cause that would obliterate capitalism.


I cannot wait till white majority is gone, u guys get everything & still complain when other groups want the same bye👋🏽
In reply to
if you were Asian, Katie, you wouldn't be working in the media. Companies only tolerate you because you're white.


why do certain black people hate or downplay the idea of being black? ex. "my grandma Dominican" or "i have Indian in my family".
1h1 hour ago
sgj Retweeted rashawty
Because society has taught us black isn't beautiful and being foreign or white is.


ALSO. I am all in favor of ending "white culture" which is a nice way to say white supremacy.

Jun 25
What do you call it when a white person robs you? Capitalism.


1h1 hour ago
If you are white...you are privileged. No there is not reverse racism...only racists think that.

9h9 hours ago
BLACK ON BLACK CRIME IS A MYTH. Don't fucking @ me. Don't DM me. Do not speak to me if you try and perpetuate that bullshit.
Feb 16
2015 was the deadliest year on record for black trans and gender non conforming women. [May be triggering]

52m52 minutes ago
Ava Vidal Retweeted Toby Young
No. I am worried that the actual racism at Oxford will deter black students from applying.
Ava Vidal added,


4m4 minutes ago
Blacks also get harsher jail terms. Most orgs will only push whites into higher posts. A BME has to be superman to get recognised.

Also, the casual racism of labelling parts of a campus as "ghetto"? 
11h11 hours ago












































































































































































































































































































  • Great 2016 Shark™ ‏@colocha_rachel 11h11 hours ago










































































  • Great 2016 Shark™ ‏@colocha_rachel 11h11 hours ago
































































































































































































































  • 11h11 hours ago
    Related: I have privilege along other axes in addition to being white: I'm cis, have a college degree, am able-bodied, etc.

    Don't get me wrong. It needs to be said far and wide that 53% of ww voted for trump, while POC did not. White women are gross. And racist.

    White people should be thankful they have the opportunity to even relish in White privilege. One of these days that won't be so.
    Fun fact: said we must "wake up and smell the falafel" regarding ISIS and Islam.
    Calling out racism among my friends is really hard, but I'm carrying SO little of the burden from my position of extreme privilege.

      People can only treat us in the way in which we allow. With much respect in the midst of deep disappointment. J (pt 3)
    1. Retweeted
      But we are rarely recognized for our artistic accomplishments. Should people of color refrain from participating all together? (pt 2)
    2. Retweeted
      At the Oscars...people of color are always welcomed to give out awards...even entertain, (pt. 1)
    Returning from the toilet in the Indian restaurant, I am thanked for a lovely meal by a departing customer.

    7h7 hours ago
    It really makes me twitch how people who dont experience racism/people who dont experience on the same level as black women TALK SO MUCH.

    May 28
    Perhaps the reason why blacks couldn't invent these things, they were withheld education for centuries under white rule.


    My mums casual racism astounds me


    Jeet Heer Retweeted Jamil Smith
    They got him alive? Man, whiteness is better than a bullet proof vest. 

    23h23 hours ago
    Right. We should stop giving kickbacks to white men.

    Oh sorry, Happy Miranda is currently buried under a pile of discrimination, microagressions and casual racism. You'll have to settle for me.

    2m2 minutes ago
    The POISON of white supremacy is in the minds of most white people in Missouri and throughout America!!!

    2h2 hours ago
    Black people being described as "articulate" is 100% casual racism.
    6m6 minutes ago
    Being means I can't tweet exactly what I feel or experience as a faculty member.

    11m11 minutes ago
    You can't without being abused and you can't be Black in your neighborhood w/out being targeted by police. Where do u go?

    4h4 hours ago
    Pointing out the inherent of treating deaths as special, is not the same as "celebrating."
    4h4 hours ago
    "Someone is making me uncomfortable about my historical colonialism - let's call it a fake"
    Again, you don't get to decide what race another person is.
    First day on Twitter and the , , , and is absolutely staggering. A nest of !

    6h6 hours ago
    I don't know what's more frightening, the attacks in or the amount of casual racism im seeing on social media!

    55s56 seconds ago
    automatically being seen as intellectually inferior just because black

    The POISON of white supremacy is in the minds of most white people in Missouri and throughout America!!!!

    IV. We demand that by the academic year 2017–2018, the University of Missouri increases the percentage of black faculty and staff campus wide to 10%.

    4m4 minutes ago
    N Appalachia, if u muster the temerity & ask 4 a Black professor or 2, U will B unfairly awarded the epithet “complainer.”

    6m6 minutes ago Milledgeville, GA
    Being a black female philosopher means being questioned for the rest of your life.

    White people look at me funny when I'm on my bike because they don't believe it's mine.  

    because I'm articulate makes me less black?


            When you're not allowed back on your own university even with a student ID because you're with your black friends...  (really? really??)

    The Joy of Andy‏@SH_MisterSir 23 hours ago
    I can't tell most of these white guys apart in the new season of American Horror Story.

            Constantly hearing admin bitch about challenges of diversity hiring yet using the same job descriptions from the last hire

    mindy isser ‏@mindyisser 46 minutes ago
    some casual racism overheard at : "I thought she was going to be Chinese because her name is Joyce"

    59m59 minutes ago New York, USA
    The vitriolic response from privileged haters directed at is a disgrace to humanity. Solidarity.

    People who say racism doesn't exist have you considered that you just don't experience it? Why invalidate MY experiences?

    1h1 hour ago
    being afraid that your adviser won't take you serious because of your 'ethnic' look

    when will white people stop making and about their own fucking race?

    Having your roommate ask you if where you live is poor

    7h7 hours ago
    I just want to enjoy the game without these fucking Canadians shitting up the game with their semi-racist...

    Why is it so hard for people to recognize that racism still exists?
    that's beyond feeling like an outsider, it's intentional and casual racism and racial microaggressions aimed at POC students.

    5h5 hours ago
    Sports radio is full of racist trolls. It's crazy that those guys have huge audiences that listen to their casual racism all day long.

    This is something I'm struggling with...when to call ppl out on their casual/unconscious racism & sexism, and when to let it go? (note- who are you, the trainee thought police?)

    Wendy Ogden ‏@Eastbournewrite 8 hours ago

    Adam Kotsko ‏@adamkotsko Jun 25
    Whether or not your individual ancestors owned slaves, you as a white person have benefited from slavery and are complicit in it. Sorry.
    Zemrag‏@Zemrag7 23 minutes ago
    yeah well go ahead and it will be nice to watch a movie knowing there is no in the theater.

    if you claim to be a but your white ass NEVER has time to advocate for Black or Brown 's issues

    4h4 hours ago
    There's a reason why comic book culture is dying. When they're written to please an antiquated demographic, it's time for it to die. Period.


    38m38 minutes ago
    being white and texan pretty much guarantees there's a 103% chance you are racist

    Jul 9
    if you think that casting all white people in movies/TV isn't a problem
    Jul 9
    if you don't think white privilege is a thing 
    if "But I'm not privileged" is your response when white privilege gets mentioned

    Lollipopmargex ‏@lollipopmarge 7 minutes ago
    hate these phone ins that bring out all the closet racists that aren't blessed with compassion or facts we are all human beings
    7h7 hours ago
    What it looks like when you edit out all the white people from big Hollywood hits

    3h3 hours ago
    is just another way racist use to keep blacks down & attack us.

    The thing about white racist cops is they feel that you are beneath them. Firstly, because if your skin. Secondly, because of their badge.

    36m36 minutes ago
    the same people who get offended when you tell a violent racist to kill himself are probably into alllivesmatter

    1m1 minute ago
    The only people saying Britain isn't racist are mayo crackas looking to protect their privilege. RT if you're a POC & agree

    So in short of course it is. Everyone can be prejudiced but white people have structural power to actually be racist


    8h8 hours ago Poplar, London
    Yeah is being wildly racist on again this morning again. Encouraging stereotyping and prejudice. Again.

    are you trying to say I'm racist? Because reverse racism isn't a real thing

    jamilah retweeted Piers Morgan
    Warning to Black Twitter: membership will be revoked if you read or share his article
    jamilah added,

    Believing that Jesus was white is the epitome of white privilege.

    denying is sick and ignorant

    I used to work in DC and attempted to portray me as many times. I am Buddhist. namaste

    Excuse me. There are way too many white men represented. Sit down.


    2h2 hours ago
    As a black person I can't act like racism or slavery has no bearing in today's society

    3h3 hours ago
    As they watch Iranians cheering in the streets White men here in America think the Iranians will spend the money to vex Israel.
    NostraAdeptus retweeted Robert Costa
    Must be nice to be white and able to find silver linings in the rise of racist demagogues 
    While Black women are under open and brazen attack I'm not feeling Black man caping up for Caitlyn Jenner right now.
    Jul 14
    NostraAdeptus retweeted Cesar Chewy Augusto
    White people are so judgemental and spoiled they think even when they're dicks people should love them


    28m28 minutes ago
    Pino Saracino retweeted Jaden Goodrich2⃣5⃣
    You're just another white overseer who views the complexity of oppression as abstract = you are racist. Stop denying
    Pino Saracino added,

    Ⓥ ‏@meliajaynesmith Jul 2
    ok but ur a white male who are u to decide what is racist and what isn't shut the fuck up ur such a problem
    I'm a white person and I am so sick of white peoples shit. seriously we need to sort it out


    I saw a film the other day about ancient Egypt and the kings and queens were white actors

    http://independentfilmnewsandmedia.com/graphic-quotes-robi…/
    “My white skin disgusts me. My passport disgusts me. They are the marks of an insufferable privilege bought at the price of others’ agony. If I could peel myself inside out I would be glad. If I could become part of the oppressed I would be free.” Robin Morgan, a key radical feminist member of the American Women’s Movement

    Adam Kotsko ‏@adamkotsko 4 hours ago
    "With appropriate tax incentives, most white Americans can be induced to commit suicide within a 10-year window."

    zanabism:
    being called “racist” isn’t an insult or something mean that people are saying to you because they want to bring you down. if you’re being called racist you shouldn’t be brushing it off because you “can’t see the haters” you should be assessing your behaviour, your language, and mindset for signs of prejudice, discrimination, and sympathy/support for unfair and violent treatment towards racially persecuted people in your country
    Keith B. Still‏@NaYaKnoMi Jun 26
    Tell me 3 things you like about You can't because White supremacy won't let you.

    Stacey Patton ‏@DrStaceyPatton Jun 21
    From Rachel Dolezal to Dylan Roof, last week in America was about black erasure: if u can't beat us then appropriate our flesh, or kill us.

    34s34 seconds ago
    The show is about defending the ingrained privilege of rich white males & stigmatising all who challenge to it.


    We go to Spain and Italy Iv never seen a black person driving a cab even on TV vey few people black

    Why are so many white men trying to save the planet without the rest of us?

    Silky ‏@FineSilk_Sundas 13 minutes ago
    They really really can't stand a muslim Middle East country hosting it a rich one at that 🏾
    Mohammed Ansar ‏@MoAnsar 25 minutes ago
    "Labour political forced diversity" - look around sunshine. The world is mostly brown. Get used to it. Things are changing.

    4m4 minutes ago
    why are there no black or Indian Presenter at Lbc? Well done BBC.

    12m12 minutes ago
    Lack of sleep make you more racist? Yeah cos White people don't have enough excuses for their racism already. They are just racist.

    14m14 minutes ago
    because race is a social construct that exists to further white supremacy. And culture is passed down from generations.

    heathcliff ‏@blueberryluna 4 minutes ago
    The audience is looking so diverse tonight

    DJ Dfuse @dfuseuk 13h13 hours ago
    @DavidAHoward @Rebartic @LBC @Nigel_Farage @UKIP you affraid of the black rebellion against assholes like both of you.

    2m2 minutes ago
    "whatever happened to getting a job on merit" says white male likely to be positively favoured just for being a white male

    35m35 minutes ago
    A white woman dancing as a bellydancer with a Arab name is in blackface. As a white man you can justify it all you want.

    13m13 minutes ago
    We always expect white people to defend arguments like . It's white privilege packaged to defend racial/cultural appropriation


    "if I wanted to be white.. I could say I felt white all I wanted. I'd never get a day of white privilege. Ever."

    11m11 minutes ago
    BME young people don't want to join the police service because it's racist. Why would they put themselves through that?

    LBC presenters are all white. Why doesn't LBC have a mixture of people? 
    How about LBC radio having a mixture of people to represent LBC rather than the presenters all being white.

    Glen Coco ‏@MrPooni May 14
    London's , which has NO non-white presenters or senior staff in a city that's 60% non-white, wants to talk racism

    how has LBC gotten away with having all white presenters for so long? youre trying to represent/speak to london right? im confused

    Let's have/create NEW heroes - why not one black, one female, one gay - instead of poker faced posh white men.

    1h1 hour ago
    London's radio, which gave a slot to Katie Hopkins today, has NO non-white presenters in a city 50% non-white

    Kelvin Mupungu retweeted Sunny Hundal
    recruitment has to reflect their is multiracial & not 100% white.Its a fact 
    I don't want to hire people based on colour, I want them to stop the positive-discrimination towards white people

    1h1 hour ago
    what's your explanation for why a radio station in such an ethnically diverse city is so homogeneous?

    57m57 minutes ago
    Nope he's not alone - the lack of diversity is astounding & needs to be highlighted.

    10m10 minutes ago
      The radio host need to be more ethnic oriented. Why is radio host against black
    yes we are still living in racist society. I face that mow. No person want to see black progress

    Holy Moly.A Black Human Being can play ANY role in ANY story.Don't worry.We are all conditioned to be racist.Let's Look To The Future!

    5m5 minutes ago
    This WHITE person wants to know how black and ethnics are negatively treated


    LBC @LBC 5m5 minutes ago
    Margaret Hodge says London is ready for a non-white mayor as she drops out of race http://l-bc.co/sG29HJ

      Back on from 8am tomorrow: do we need to focus more on "the white working class"? Thoughts from and .

    Discriminate against white teachers to ensure 'ethnic mix', says Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw


    Head of schools inspectorate says ethnic make-up of staff room should "reflect" the backgrounds of pupils 

    BBC race card fail. Radio 4 29/4/14
    Interviewer: " But isn't the Tea Party just a reaction to the first black president?"
    Member: "No, it began under president Bush".

    tony coffey @TheTonyCoffey 2m2 minutes ago
    There ends the whitest hour of British Television ever broadcast. ‪#‎BBCQT‬

    Jack_the_Biscuit @TW33T_ME_RIGHT 12m12 minutes ago
    @GuidoFawkes @CCHQPress @LBC @IainDale you're just a bloody racist. ‪#‎ShameOnYou‬ frown emoticon


    DEAR OLLIE HERES THATCHER SHE HATED ASIANS AND BLACKS


    slavery alive and well , fat old men being served by poor black humans



    your words on shows you up for 1) a racist 2) an apologist for racism and 3) an ignorant twat!

      53s54 seconds ago

    the law does not mean justice or fairness. white privilege trumps black skill.

    5m5 minutes ago
    Where are the black presenters on , ? Plenty of privately educated ones though like you - are LBC anti state educated people?
    I know: calling ppl on their racist or sexist jokes is hard. they say you have no sense of humor, that no one can have any fun around you +
    that you are "too sensitive." that you are "the only one who objects." these are all lies. you know it. if you have privilege, speak!

      11m11 minutes ago

    Why are there no black or Asian presenters on LBC?


    I'm sure disillusioned young Muslims are so relieved this middle-aged, middle-class, white panel know how to solve the ISIS issue.

    20m20 minutes ago
    The police attempting to arrest the black victim is a historical thing.

    8m8 minutes ago
    WHEN LBC put up a black presenter I will feel the blackman features are being accepted !!

    46m46 minutes ago
    Haha right now Welsh conference, a small audience of

    Ed Darrell ‏@EdDarrell 29 minutes ago
    My experience is that racists often attack good environmental policies, as a distracting tactic. True in this case?

    Relationship Coach ‏@Oloni 10 minutes ago
    Get this racist off he can't define 'white culture' but is throwing it about.
    D. ‏@danusiattacks 39 minutes ago
    look up White Flight from the 1950s-now. Look up why most of the U.S. Is still segregated
    D. ‏@danusiattacks 33 minutes ago
    if you did have a history degree, you would know racism only works in one direction, so "one side"
    Steve Austin ‏@Owernne 3 minutes ago
    ukip are racists, end of.
     

    Wednesday, February 04, 2015

    Being an intuitive

    Here is my experience of what is now 55 years of knowing my intuition and being able to both recognise it for what it is, and apply it. This is described as what you know without having had any direct experience, and what you feel accurately without any direct evidence. Often time will provide that evidence after the time, but unless some others share your specific intuition it is hard or almost impossible to convey your certain knowledge and awareness to others as they are trained to expect solid evidence and according to science intuition does not even exist. But you have it as well, but unless you have also reached the point I have of realising it is a higher level of knowledge than physical then you would have seen it and dismissed it as either coincidence or picking up subtle clues. Both of those happen as well, but are not connected with that.

    Some things feel wrong. A cat or dog runs out of a room when someone walks in. They don't have the level of thinking to question their intuition, we do, so when it grows we push it down. If you follow and accept it then it will grow and become reliable, and without needing the acceptance of others can apply it to protect yourself and avoid all sorts of trouble simply by feeling what is wrong. Then public issues all have their place on the feeling scale. Many on the left use the word 'bigoted' or 'prejudiced' to describe the feelings when maybe confronted by a group of black youths in the street at night, or trying to interact with a man who is dressed as a woman. Each provides a conflict of feelings between positive feelings for our fellow men and fear or confusion. Animals cannot be bigoted or prejudiced, so it is impossible to blame them personally for their reactions, but as people can then they cover all our intuitive feelings with the blanket of disapproval when it goes against their personal beliefs.

    That further serves to quash our natural abilities. After all, isn't it bad enough to rely on feelings over evidence, but to further demonise people not like ourselves is surely almost criminal? Such accusations have shut down even more of people's natural abilities, as when they feel certain individuals or groups have bad vibes they are then told they are breaking race relations law. Even when they are later proved to be right.

    Forget the science. They know what they know, and they can't explain gravity or find dark matter so they are not the place to go for your approval. You are. I use the name satguru online, because it means you are the true teacher. Other people tell you three things and you are the only one who can decide which is right. Using partly your intuition. Find it, test it and trust it. And then insulate yourself from the naysayers and destroyers who will do all they can to dismantle your abilities. Let them look after their own lives, you have your known abilities and anything others do to close them down is only a test to strengthen them. Maybe if you feel something about them or something they know then when you've told them and proved correct you may convert a disbeliever to the light. In the end intuition is here either way and all you do by denying its existence or trying to shut it down won't mean it isn't there, it will only allow others to exploit you.

    Thursday, December 11, 2014

    Extending the climate industry

    Following a suggestion of climate change dating and training for pets, my suggestions for widening the scope of the climate machine was as follows.

    There's already an unofficial climate drama movement, TV programmes and films with subtle or overt messages designed to frighten the kids to do something about their parents' carbon footprints and freeze to death as a result if they actually do by turning the heating down. There's already a very successful Climate Change Investment Fund, run by a BBC director, so that niche is already filled, as is the proposed UN climate currency, annual credits which expire when are left over and stop you using energy if they run out too early.

    Then I would open climate change wards in hospitals for those so terrified of the consequences (I'd prescribe an umbrella myself but where's the profit in that once the demand has been exhausted?) where instead of driving ordinary people crazy the whole time and then calling them murderers when they are politely told after the ninth time of harrassment to go fuck themselves, could share predictions and compete to imagine the worst of the worst case scenarios, like Mount Everest being the only place left above water, or the gulf stream sweeping away Al Gore.

    In fact not only would the patients benefit (well we would as the world could be eliminated from the worst believers) but the doctors could go on grant funded courses to become climate therapists, trained to administer therapy to those obsessed with different weather at an unspecified moment in the far distant future. In fact they would only lessen the symptoms rather than find or administer a cure or they'd lose a rich fund of customers. If a cure existed the last thing they'd do is share it let alone use it as then the funds would dry up within a few months or so.

    Then the UN could coalesce all the media worldwide into a single Climate Channel, run 24/7 through every free TV system, preaching non-stop about how the seas will rise and IT'S YOUR FUCKING FAULT FOR BEING HUMAN AND WANTING TO LIVE AT A CONSTANT 22C INDOOR TEMPERATURE. And finally the ultimate application, the climate change prison, for everyone involved in misleading the public, and taking their money and energy systems away from them.

    Wednesday, August 06, 2014

    Guided by an outside force

    The first thing that hit me in various conversations tonight was the larger force driving us all, whether we are aware of it or not, to our personal missions in life, and in some cases like my own can see how nothing I could have done would have stopped the force, as every single aspect of my life directed me to complete the mission even long before I knew it. I'll add details tomorrow, but basically after losing my job twice in the late 90s/2000 I used the difficulty of returning to work to raise my level of qualifications, following a letter from my organisation I was now entitled to do so. I stretched it out to take one for the other group after, and then a two term weekly course in spiritual healing (only as the teacher left before the year was up, but we got the certificates anyway). Then came my meeting with the British UFO expert, who by total coincidence was my friend's brother from the 80s (ie when I used to see him, not when they became brothers), which led to a series of TV appearances in the late 2000s. That dried up and he now lives abroad since he got married, although other people within the community still put me up for programmes none have yet succeeded although even I'd admit they were all variations on a theme but with different people.

    By then I'd got hooked on global warming, which led me to seeing the network of international conspiracy generally, staying up reading and discussing, and then writing half the night, much to the annoyance of friends and family as I ended up getting up at lunchtime, but I was being swept along by the larger system, with at no time any more idea I'd be used in the media besides trying to publish my written material while a thousand similar people also write about that sort of thing.
    Then David Icke set up a web TV studio a couple of miles away, and while I was considering volunteering (my nerves were the reason I didn't go straight there as per normal), and before I did his regular presenter announced on Twitter he'd done a programme on global warming fraud, I told him I had material on it, and bingo, many year's worth of material ended up in a 30 minute interview, hopefully the first of more as he's asked me to, and I have at least 1-2 more prepared.

    My point is at no time since losing my second job did I either expect to drift off into research, get on TV and into the media through it, and learn so much simply through being concerned about global warming and how it hadn't done what they claimed. And now the current long process has completed I've looked back on it and decided it was something I was part of, rather than random or planned by me, as everything fitted perfectly, like all my other known short term examples of guidance, and even my financial needs were totally looked after to allow me to get on with the work only I could do as it drew on my legal work and knowledge of psychology, and tremendous persistence and compacted memory. That means the facts (mainly due to learning cases) are all in boxes and mainly able to be recalled and strung together to continue the thread once I start at any point. And I love to speak and teach. Therefore due to my innate qualities and specific education it was down to me to do this particular job, I was then provided with the means- time and money- to do so, and shown after the event how it was guided and completed. It is so tidy even a script would be considered unrealistic as supposedly nothing in life works so cleanly, but I've seen in many cases it certainly does.
    That goes full circle to my spiritual work, as those lessons continue to be taken as well, and state we are only part of infinity, and as such are directly connected and accessible to any and all of it as required. My mission is not to convince anyone of it, but mainly become aware of it myself directly as part of my own development. Of course that is called enlightenment, and although that is the ultimate human goal you then start all over again learning as an enlightened person, as infinity never stops growing its knowledge and power.

    Wednesday, July 16, 2014

    It's called discrimination for a reason

    The BBC are now calling for ethnic minority quotas, along with a few others. It is technically illegal as all discrimination is, but why no one has bothered to use the Race Relations Act (I expect they found a loophole, they always will if it suits them) I don't know. Unless it excludes white people from it, which presumably it must do. But that would mean if a black club in Brixton or an Asian shop in Southall refused to serve a white person they would be allowed to, and how could that be legal?

    Legal or not, by setting the precedent of social engineering the BBC are creating one of the most dangerous and totalitarian rules we have seen in the 21st century. Think about it, besides women and ethnic minorities, like everyone else, only applying for the jobs they are qualified for and interested in, they must now reject qualified candidates for the only criterion of being white while there may not even be a qualified ethnic candidate to replace them. And then imagine if this extended to professions like medicine and law? Would you really accept doctors' jobs being restricted to certain races as they hadn't yet reached their quota? But the really clear picture forms when you turn it round the other way, and not just in Britain but any country in the world. That could allow quotas for white footballers and boxers, and a minimum number in the 100 metres. And if not why not?

    Further consequences of such policies mean white unemployment will directly fall, with more accusations they are lazy as a result, and calls for even more immigration to do those jobs they will not, except they are not being allowed to. This in turn will continually increase the ethnic makeup and increase the quota ad infinitum. Using the principle fairly and evenly you would have to make sure every third shop in Southall was white run, schools in Brixton had to have a quota of white pupils (schools are already making efforts to introduce at least some mixing with ethnic minorities, since a school in Devon was classed as 'too white'). Imagine them saying it the other way round, yet they easily got away with that. In the end once you outlaw discrimination then women, ethnic minorities and the disabled have a free run at every job as anyone else, it is a level playing field. Simply comparing the ultimate numbers with society as a whole, complaining if it isn't the same, and then forcing more people in until it is, despite there being no tolerance of deliberate exclusion, is simply creating discrimination by law instead of stopping it. There are endless reasons certain types of people prefer any job. The latest study saying forcing women into technical jobs is pointless as most simply aren't that interested in them is the first example of solid academic evidence. Just as not many women I spoke to cared at all about the World Cup or competitive sport in general. You may as well force every football crowd to be 50% female for the same reasons, dragging them off the street each Saturday and kicking men out until the numbers are even. If you think that's crazy why don't you think the other ideas are as well?

    Sunday, July 06, 2014

    Take back your freedom, without it you have nothing

          
    I realised something the other day, the major reason for my entire attitude to life is based on the freedom my parents gave me from day one. I was never told what to do in any way, just guided and advised, and was trusted to go out and come back whenever I wanted and never did worse than get lost when I didn't know where the bus went. The contrast when I spent a month away with my grandparents, the exact opposite, who watched me the whole time and interrogated me- have I washed my hands, combed my hair, been to the toilet, why do you want to eat that, why are you wearing that, told me (they actually phoned my bedroom every morning) when to get up, and I was so relieved after a month when my parents arrived on holiday and I had my freedom back.

    The same thing applied when I worked in their shop. The manager had a daily schedule which kept us busy cleaning and stocktaking every spare moment for years. I assumed as it was so busy we needed to do this, until he went away for a couple of weeks, no schedule, and we got everything done on the list in half a day a week. What had been a really tough and demanding job turned into a relative holiday although exactly as much got done.

    This taught me a lesson that people are best left to their own devices, with simple rules for work and school and otherwise trusted to know or learn themselves. We are not designed to be ruled by anyone, but helped and guided, our governments are our servants not our masters, and this has set my philosophy in life through direct experience at home and at work equally. You can either enjoy your life or it can be a chore, but it's the only one we've got so may as well be left to make the most of it with as few restrictions as possible. The difference is total between the two.

    The same principle applies in every single aspect of life. Rules and limitations must be only if necessary rather than by default. This means you can do everything you want unless it isn't safe and only applies the minimum amount of force and restrictions required to do so, while if you look around you you will see this is far from the case, especially compared with the last ten years. Try driving in Britain, and perfectly safe roads used for a century with no problems have now had their speed limits reduced, often to 20mph, and covered with the enforced cancer of humps.The excuses given of increased safety etc are not even justified by reduced accidents and injuries, partly because the emergency services have an annual report (actually published a few years ago in the Hendon Times, much to my amazement) of how many people die or lose vital treatment as they are delayed by having to slow down for them both on the way to a call and with a patient in the ambulance, often with tubes or needles attached to them which would be displaced if they went over a hump at more than 10-20 mph whatever the speed limit.

    Anyone wanting to extend their house in the last ten years will also find it a lot harder, with the building regulations now imposing combinations of EU and local impositions of added insulation (which often causes condensation and reduces ceiling height), fire doors and smoke alarms in every private house despite no others ever being there until the extension is added, and bans on new side windows even when they overlook the street with a hedge between them. What are the reasons for all these increasingly restrictive rules on what was till now a fairly safe and harmless set of activities (driving) and physical requirements (building) making it harder and harder to both get anywhere easily (remember public vehicles all have to use the same roads as well as everyone else) or choose what you want to do and pay for in your own house which does not affect anyone else besides the immediate neighbours? The reasons for my purposes are less important than the principles. Wherever you pay a greater price for an item or a service than you get in return you have been shafted. You do not spend twenty pounds to earn fifteen. The simple answer is it is based on power for its own sake, and politicians and businesses working together to provide work for each other and keep the businesses supplied with work to build road humps at £10,000 a go, and double the time required to convert a loft as so many more materials are now required. Cynical but true, as if you look back to the 60s or 70s when speed limits were generous, road humps were illegal, and new rooms had to be built so as not to overlook or block the light from neighbours and not fall down, rather than become a fortress ten times stronger than the rest of the house which was clearly fine as it was. Look at the MoT test for cars. When they brought in emission tests they were either passed or failed by all vehicles. Then, when under an EU plan to remove cars from cities, Boris Johnson brought in new requirements for vans and lorries which either cost thousands to convert or were impossible, despite every single one of them already passing the MoT test. That meant legally he had declared by implication the MoT test was inadequate, or his test was superfluous. You be the judge of that.

    A normal road journey, as well as my initial example of a job which can be done better without a slave driver in charge, is a fairly easy to follow one to represent every single other area of life, where the welfare of others has to be considered, but especially in the case of drivers, their own welfare is reduced equally when having an accident as all parties suffer. We are all familiar with the uncontrollable traffic jams, so when the council narrow roads and remove lanes, they are creating more ways to ruin a journey by a fairly large amount. The humps are not suitable for road vehicles as the suspension and bodywork were not designed for a vertical drop more than occasionally, not many times a day. Councils have a fund for claims which costs each hundreds of thousands every year for broken exhausts and suspension which they rarely dispute as the damage from them is well known. Even small alterations, like fixing the traffic lights to stay red longer all add up as negative marks to spoil a journey. You get the general picture. How many drivers would have not missed a hazard without the humps to stop them, or worse still the barriers that make people have to overtake them and face oncoming traffic head on. While you're busy watching them and speed cameras your attention is diverted from children and animals running into the road, so they do the exact opposite of what they are supposed to.

    So to sum up, whether bringing up or educating children, right through the workplace and public and private spaces, every journey is harder to gain exactly the same things with more rules than the bare minimum. It is the principle of libertarianism, which we all enjoy but few understand and many wish to impose the opposite on others while not wanting it themselves, (it's called hypocrisy, conscious or unconscious), where left wing intellectuals whinge about equality while paying accountants to reduce their tax bills, or send their own children to private schools as they abolished the free grammar schools which they would have gone to otherwise. People are generally not stupid and all aim for self preservation. So once a child knows why it's better not to stay up late before work the next day they will self police, as will drivers or anyone else going about their normal lives. Businesses need regulations to stop them cutting corners with shoddy goods and waste dumping etc, as they are dangerous and need regulating as a consequence, as their interests conflict (in their eyes, they don't really) with the customers. In fact any business who supplies what people want at a fair price will do better than the ones trying to cheat them.

    But as citizens we are all working together, we are not essentially enemies however many cults and religions tell you otherwise, and apart from criminals and idiots who the law has no effect on anyway as it does not stop them breaking it, just punishes them if they are caught doing so, meaning everyone else will drive safely and look after themselves without an outside authority both forcing them to, or using measures ten times more than required to enforce it. Think of that next time you go on a trip somewhere and apply the comparison to everything else.

    Sunday, June 08, 2014

    Are the liberal left founded on fear and immaturity?

    I rarely see anyone on the right demonise individuals they don't agree with, those on the left have the dirtiest mouths I've ever come across and that only represents what's in their hearts. They are at base scared misanthropists who trust no one and believe you must curb human nature in every possible way to protect the world from humanity. They are pretty much stuck in one of Freud's earlier stages of development and see the world as a terrifying place full of potential danger while in fact most people are quite nice. This was extended even further to its ultimate conclusion in the 1970s environmental movement, led by Margaret Mead, Stephen Schneider and the current proponent still going, David Suzuki. They have refined liberal (funny how so many political labels do exactly the opposite of what they say) misanthropy to its ultimate level, seeing all humans as bad and need to curb all their power and ideally reduce their numbers to a bare minimum, as they are a threat to the planet, useless eaters (what about all the other animals I wonder) and ultimately a cancer on a planet which of course is made of inert minerals and would be like Mars or the Moon without life which we can see makes them a far less inviting place altogether as a result.

    Going back to the mainstream (although it is more and more becoming infected by the environmental virus) elements of fear and loathing abound, the poor (and ironically many of the ultra-rich) despise anyone with more money than the average, see society as divided into them and us groups- black/white, women/men, bourgeoisie/proletariat etc, and then sets off a class/race/gender war as they always claim one half has the advantage over the other so must be cut down to size or the others won't ever succeed on their own efforts. That is called social engineering, which believes mankind is so awful on its own every possible part of their lives from birth to death must be uniformly regulated by the state (ironically again made up of people identical to those they are ruling), as otherwise there will be exploitation, slavery and chaos. Of course history shows such attempts such as Stalin's purges and Mao's great leap forward did nothing but kill thousands of people and imprison many more for not going along with state requirements. There is little difference between sacking a state employee for saying the wrong word for black people or women and wrecking their careers and imprisoning enemies of the state. It is the same mechanism and only a matter of degree. Bearing in mind incitement of a crime is a crime in itself, if someone uses a currently bad word or phrase it does not mean they want to hurt that group or are calling for others to do so. There is a huge difference. Similarly words used 50 years ago were the norm, and anyone of that age who still uses them does not mean anything different to someone using the current buzz word today, they just aren't under any legal duty (yet, thank goodness) to keep up. But they are treated no different to any political extremist who has just managed to be part of a group who is hateful but knows how to do it within the law. Your grandma could be treated with the same contempt as Nick Griffin for calling someone coloured, even though that was the accepted word till the 70s.

    I would say taking a maybe single number percent figure (probably in the low numbers) of actual nasty people and extending them to around 90% is bound to wreck ones view of the world and humankind. They trust their own (until they go out of step), and everyone else is mistrusted, and they look for examples to prove their theory every time by scrutinising every word and action to try and catch people out. I see it every day online, idiots mining other people's pages looking for any dirt, just as the media do for politicians. This shows they expect most people to let them down sooner or later, and therefore en masse they are like a herd of wild bulls. The state must be strong and powerful to contain the dangerous mass urges of humankind, greed, the need for power, fraud, theft, slavery, you name it they'll think of it. Of course with such a fearful view of humanity, presumably everyone else except yourself as you're right on and would never take advantage of another human being, everyone else, as the feminists say, is a potential rapist or racist, or in the case of god forbid white men, the cause of all ills in the world apparently (see Monty Python's "What did the Romans do for us" for a similar accusation taken apart). Then the hard liners narrow down their fear and hate and home in on the enemies of the people, who nearly always turn out to be Jewish ('The Zionist Threat'). Then the really far gone claim because the Zionists created all our current problems they must also have invented the holocaust (never mind the bodies and death certificates connected to millions of real dead people) to gain support and carry on with their evil agendas as an apparent victim.

    The anti-Zionist trope is just one (and probably the worst) example of where pure misanthropy can lead. Of course it caused the very real holocaust only 70 years ago, when we actually had films, recordings and fields full of bodies as well as the soldiers who arrived to see the camps four years after the allied powers agreed not to do anything about them, so technically Churchill was partly responsible for it as he knew about it long before then and decided to do nothing to make sure Hitler didn't realise we'd decoded their messages. But it only represents one extremely nasty branch of what are equally nasty roots, and it just depends how much fuel in the way of unfounded fear and folk tales such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion will inflame the built in fear and convert it to hate. But ultimately it is a psychological failing, a lack of maturing in individuals who still believe everyone else is potentially dangerous so needs controlling to protect them. Whether it is stopping people from putting the lights and heating on to protect the planet from global warming, or councils printing 'anti'dictionaries' with lists of A-Z words they must not use. The reason people have been tested to become less left wing with age is because they discover most people can be trusted to manage their own lives without strict rules and regulations, and only the right believe this so they literally grow out of their assumptions. Freud described such steps in development quite clearly, and psychologists have refined them ever since, including Karl Roger's ladder from blaming everyone else to taking full responsibility for your own life.

    If you compare the average lefty on Roger's ladder you will see they all share the second or third rung on average as they all see society's problems as someone else's fault, whether the rich, the bankers, Wall Street, The Zionists, or any other powerful (or imagined powerful) group they feel impotent against. Those on the right have long since worked out if a black female lesbian with cerebral palsy from a council estate (to roll every imaginary drawback to success in one) is as talented as Albert Einstein, Whoopi Goldberg, Helen Keller or anyone else in one or more similar situations, they will probably succeed as western society (unlike the third world where people are ruled by tribal or religious dictators and everyone outside that group is enslaved equally) everyone pretty much has the opportunity to convert their individual talents to results, given we have free education (although some now charge for degrees, which is a retrograde step, after abolishing grammar schools which had a similar effect in the 70s for poor talented people) and universal benefits for the sick and unemployed. If anyone genuinely believes one or more 'disadvantages' (how can being female actually be a disadvatage outside the Muslim world, where the majority of women claim to consent to being treated like slaves?) can hold back a single person whether black, gay, disabled or anything else, seeing as the most important element of success in this society is education, and they both allow readers for the dyslexic and most importanly mark papers anonymously  so officially at least the examiners can only mark the words and not the person. Once anyone gains such qualifications, which are impossible to fail eventually if you are good enough, it is an equal playing field afterwards (albeit with the best work going to Oxbridge graduates, not from bias but they only accept the best to join them initially) whatever people try and tell you otherwise. Forget the toxic positive discrimination, which is much as an oxymoron as 'happy cancer' or 'fun tooth decay', if someone is really that good then being any of the above cannot stop them succeeding and the glass ceiling is an excuse made by failures. And any glitches in the system which do exist, such as the long gone 'old boy network' had been addressed by equality legislation decades ago so are no longer possible without the threat of major redress usually in five figure sums (remember loss of an arm gains a few thousands, loss of a job you never had can be ten times higher or more).

    Judge my words by your own experience. Do you really think your own failure was because of your race or gender or because you didn't try hard enough and gave up too easily? If you put an imaginary glass ceiling in front of you that is all you will see. No one else has created it but you and using auto-suggestion whatever you create in your mind becomes real to you but to no one else. Looking in reverse, very few gay or Jewish people can be picked up that easily by outsiders so 90% of the time (unless you are stuck with a very Jewish name and had the guts not to change it to prove it didn't stop you)  it can't be used against you, while if you genuinely think you have been stopped in your car (at night) or given a yellow card not because you did something wrong that would have been the same for everyone else, but because you're black, again, only you have the problem. No examiner has the genuine ability or motivation to mark anyone down whatever their race or gender, and why on earth would they? And if you are qualified, why would an employer really care what ethnicity someone was if they had a decent CV and attitude? But in fact if you are already defensive and go into an interview with a chip on your shoulder expecting to be discriminated against, you will give off bad vibes and lose out because of your attitude alone. Again a totally self-fulfilling prophecy.

    So standing back from all the specific examples I could think of, the basic premise you can only believe in a powerful collectivist state if you believe individuals cannot be trusted to run very much of their own lives, and are at base dangerous to others so need strict controls to stop them taking advantage of their power. It is all a matter of degree, but if it goes from sacking people for using the wrong words to wiping out most of humanity to save the planet, anywhere on that scale is still part of the same viewpoint, and like psychopathy just a matter of where each person stops on it. In a way you can compare it with prison hierarchy, where they have all hurt someone (or themselves if in for taking drugs) but still sort out the levels of each crimes into bad and worse and attack those they see as the very worst. The fact they are no different, like the leftists are, blow me down, human as well, goes straight over their heads. Whatever they are like everyone else is different, a threat, and only trusted if part of their small tight similar group.

    That is currently what the world is in the grip of, you can't reform the far gone, but you can recognise and avoid them if nothing else.


    Wednesday, May 21, 2014

    The left- divide and rule.

    Karl Marx, class war. Look for every possible difference in society, tell people about it, and tell them they're being persecuted. This took some genuine and some not so genuine problems in society and either way even when most of these problems had been addressed and dealt with by things like anti-discrimination laws they refused to go away. They make an art of searching meticulously for every possible group causing or suffering discrimination, letting them know, and even, in some cases like the disabled and many Muslims make rules about how to treat them whatever they actually want for themselves. And then they use or invent 'isms' to accuse anyone not on their side to demonise them regardless whether all they are doing is presenting a different opinion to the 'right' one. This has the main effect of setting groups in society against each other, and seeing those on the other side as the enemy, leading to such results as claiming 'all men are potential rapists' and looking for racism every time a white person opens their mouth.

    So each formula works to destroy society, the working class despise the bourgeoisie, and are told never to trust them as they are slave owners, and rather than have aspirations to succeed mistrust anyone who has done well, especially those from their own backgrounds who have done so and as a result could be ostracised. The absence of such false or exaggerated differences allows people to be themselves and succeed or otherwise on their own unique merits, and not blame imaginary discrimination every time they fail, rather than the current fashion of playing the race or gender card each time a person gets stopped by the police, doesn't get a job, or a promotion. Instead of taking individual personal responsibility for being a unique person capable of doing anything and everything they could do, they look for trouble and assume anyone who does not offer them more than the average is discriminating against them, and anyone who does not give them anything has to be a racist or a sexist. This creates a permanent perception of 'them and us', the paranoid cloud hanging over their eyes seeing a group of men hanging around in the street at night as potential sex offendors, or any white person holding an interview or police officer being institutionally racist. As if an institution can even hold an opinion. The abandonment of individual values and opinions to the collective, 'The police are institutionally racist' 'Men are all potential rapists' etc simply means the 'victims' genuinely begin to believe huge groups of people, up to half society in the case of women, and nearly all of it if all white people are racists, and what does that do to their psychological makeup and welfare? It makes them see trouble all around them, which is responded to with a combination of fear and anger, and ends up with riots and wars. No  one at all benefits from imaginary and false divisions, society becomes a collection of different 'them and us' groups, so a Muslim woman for instance can see both rapists, racists and religious bigots every time they go shopping in exactly the same people, and then think and act towards them as if they genuinely are at the extreme end.

    The left basically work on principles of division and difference, and mistrust and suspicion of those who are not 'us', with their policies designed to force society to react as if these delusions are correct, attempting to outlaw any speech or opinions different from their prescribed templates, forcing companies and organisations to employ black people and women above white men and poor students above others for example, regardless of the individual's suitability for that position. Besides the obvious legalised discrimination the psychological effects of such attitudes are toxic to the individuals and society around them, seeing more and more people as the enemy, and stirring up others to fight against them. Rather than allow society to arrange itself naturally and have laws to stop discrimination against anyone, they go beyond making everyone be treated equally and try and reduce the chances of those they perceive to have an advantage. That is the same as shortening the legs of high jumpers and giving people drugs to reduce their intelligence to make them get similar exam results. Fearing difference between people is behind so many wars and discriminatory policies worldwide, being terrified the powerful will subsume the remainder so will do everything they can to reduce their power down to the average, including spreading false beliefs everyone is the same whatever their background, race and intelligence, which they all claim are only produced by their environment besides science proving they are not.

    So clever children can no longer be sent to different schools (unless people pay, which discriminates against the poor majority who cannot afford it), police are criticised for criminal profiling, despite the fact large amounts of crime are carried out by organised gangs from a single cultural group, and everyone everywhere is condemned for pointing out the obvious like very few non-Muslims are currently terrorist bombers. It reaches full circle now, with the accusations from the left whenever someone associates a crime with the fact the perpetrator was a Muslim they are Islamophobic, when many Muslim countries (as well as individuals, as it is taught in the koran) discriminate against homosexuals, as they simply can't support both. The old primitive view 'The enemy of my enemy is my friend' can never work in the end, so while they defend Islam to the hilt, protecting their rights and culture even when they were not called upon to defend it as non-Muslims, their total commitment to equality (read 'homogeneity') means they cannot tolerate any negativity aimed at homosexuality, which creates quite a problem where some of the most genuinely homophobic people on the planet are indeed Muslims. I don't care how they try and resolve the problem as frankly such outcomes become inevitable when a group who view all cultures as equal, and they should all live together, and do not have a solution as they are based on a false foundation.

    Besides the odd banana skin the general weight of such views does nothing but create a society of small and large groups who all feel persecuted by the others, and do not believe they can succeed under their own individual merits so must stop the competition and bring them down to size otherwise society will not be 'fair'. They cannot see that strangling everyone's individual potential by claiming they are the same whether male, female, disabled or whatever, when in fact although every life is equal and every person must be treated equally, each individual is unique and ultimately responsible for their own fate in life. You do not fail once and give up, you have endless chances to try again and differently, and if you blame others for your failure that is the only true failure to every type of success.

    Thursday, May 08, 2014

    Information, the current position

    My new blog, the Information Revolution, is still a work in progress, as whatever your experience and knowledge it can always be refined ad infinitum. That's not saying it's wrong, but of course presentation can always improve as can some of the principles themselves. But the base facts which cannot be disputed form the solid skeleton of the material, while the others if nothing else are thinking points. But I can summarise that for example economic figures, where a large percentage lose out from certain policies, mean they are facts. Low interest rates hit 60-70% of savers, including everyone with a private pension. Therefore keeping them low is against the people. That in turn leads to higher house prices, where no one profits except property dealers, if you live in it then it's an illusory rise as you can't sell the asset and liquidate the money unless you downsize or move abroad, in which case forget any chance of going up the market again. Otherwise every single person loses from high house prices as it works as a multiple of your income and no one can ever spend more than a certain proportion of it before they go broke.

    Shutting down alternative opinions and beliefs is the next element I highlight. Calling people names because they disagree with your group view is simply totalitarian and can lead to laws outlawing freedom of speech. If gay marriage was the only way it could be then why wasn't it there till 2013, only in a handful of countries, and voted against by many politicians who insist you cannot change the definition of marriage by government diktat. Or the latest radio presenter who said someone who cared about Britain's ethnic makeup was a racist simply for not agreeing it didn't matter. Dangerous territory. Speaking for others was an earlier version, where able bodied, rich, educated white people in North London told everyone which words they should use for non white and disabled people, even though they hadn't asked them and many weren't the least bit bothered about using terms doctors had used previously to name them for hundreds of years. But if you used certain of these words while working in their councils you'd be sacked.  Never mind the fact few Muslims care about people celebrating Christmas, or people with disabilities using the names the left have outlawed for themselves, this is about control and nothing to do with protecting anyone.

    Other facts dressed up as the exact opposite include one of the worst known current examples, wind farms. Let's face it, without government rules to ditch burning fossil fuel, as apparently keeping ourselves warm is allowing nature to do it for us (it isn't, really) would never have dreamed of using a single turbine connected to the grid, as frankly, they do nothing. Actually they do less than nothing, as while they produce no actual additional power as the backup has to be on constantly and produce power for all the times the wind doesn't blow, so may as well just use the backup, they consume power for the brakes, motors and heaters, and waste all the power produced when not used as it can't be stored. Add the manufacturing, grid building and maintenance costs and the losses are eye watering. But try and tell that to a supporter and they accuse you of being a murderer or even a racist (yes, I have heard this as well). Madness grows, and this madness has taken over those on one particular side of politics, those who genuinely want to believe that as well as all being treated equally and fairly, every single person is born equal. The fact we have genes and DNA, all of which can now be traced to almost what we eat for breakfast, and separated twins have followed similar lives half way across a country or the world regardless of their environment falls on blind eyes and deaf ears. They are so naive they truly want to believe a disabled person can run in the 100 metres and beat someone able bodied, or someone with Down's can get a degree with enough encouragement, and it is totally unfair if we are all the same why some should have a lot more money and wealth than others, as we are all equal.

    That is like inventing a society in a work of fiction, reading it for so long you start imagining that is real, and then trying to adjust the actual society to fit it. Das Kapital, and even more sinister works such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and Mein Kampf are read by millions, and treated as gospel by many of them, as they are convinced those writing them were doing so as an academic work of fact, and again represent a long term pattern of treating opinion as fact and vice versa.

    It is impossible to dispute the annual production of a wind farm less the costs and associated losses, and the association of genes with intelligence, but they simply shout all the louder as if disliking scientific material will make it go away somehow, while imposing their own version of nature on us in replacement, where men can marry men and maybe one day their relatives or two or three men or a man and a woman, and if you stretch marriage to include the same sexes why not more? Then you could legislate when death occurs (they have really with abortion, by pretending an embryo is not alive, despite it having its own DNA, not it's mothers, and many aborted foetuses which are aborted alive and left to die of neglect). It is equally impossible to claim it is racist if you personally prefer a society with an overall domination in numbers of the people who have lived there for millennia, rather than a random mix of growing pockets of ethnic minorities. It may not be very socially acceptable in some circles, but applied to the rules of most countries around the world till the 21st century so were clearly the majority opinion once, and can only ever remain an opinion. Therefore wanting mass immigration and a preference for a mixed society is one person's preference, while preferring the opposite, something which represented most countries until the mid 20th century where many populations were shifted during and after the war, was the norm until then. I cannot say either are right or facts, as they are no different to choosing where you want to live. But claiming mass immigration and multiculturalism is the only way to be is simply imposing your preference over others, and demonising the alternatives. There are plenty more examples, but all equally guilty of imposing a total lack of options over the opposing opinions.

    I am not interested in good intentions if the results are bad. Societies in Africa, India, the West Indies and South America still grade their social status by colour, Brazil being the worst example, the reason they do is that is how their society has arranged itself. If the Brazilian government want to do something about it then they can do the same as we have in Britain with the race relations act, and make it illegal to pay black people less or banning them from renting accommodation, but beyond outlawing direct discrimination whose role is it to engineer society to iron out its current ills, as if there won't be others once you get rid of one? If there is a genuine problem you can legislate to get rid of it, and look elsewhere to see how they did it before you, but there is a limit to how far you can rebuild any society, more so anyone else's abroad. And if anyone disliking a gradual change in the makeup of our society is racist, then how different is that from all the people using skin whiteners to try and get further in their own societies, as even though nearly everyone is black or brown they are blacker or browner and discriminated against. That is more something universal in people generally, and not for outsiders to come along and try and cause a revolution, rather to recognise the only way to deal with genuine (as opposed to imaginary) racism is to legislate it away and then must leave society to arrange itself.

    It is a complex area but not too complex to fathom out once you get the general picture and see the tricks the opposition use to try and confuse us. Once you see one or two examples clearly the rest are all variations on a theme, lies presented as truth, opinions presented as facts, and enemies demonised. They want society to be the way they wish it could be, and then extend their wishes into actual claims that is how it is. But you can't beat nature, you can only shackle it in chains.

    Friday, May 02, 2014

    How judgemental is it OK to be?

    Having three blogs now will explain why if you only check one they may not update as often as before, as they are now split between fraud, information and then anything else goes on here. They're all on my profile here so can check them directly.

    Being a therapist one of our foundations is not being judgemental. But of course we are both human, and although we don't express any judgement doesn't mean there isn't any. But then again there is another area treated like judgement but is actually a motivation to encourage certain people to help themselves as no one else can help them as well as they can. There are a few areas in particular, whatever the research we can all (especially those of us who do it for a living) find exceptions, with the main one for me being addiction. Now the amazingly surprising news has been revealed Peaches Geldof probably indeed did die of the dare I say top option of a fashionable heroin overdose, twitter and other places have been going mad divided by people for and against. To me it represents the entire area, and can say that addicts go through three stages, the pre-addiction phase when they aren't yet aware they are addicted, the full blown stage where they live for their addiction at the expense of everything else, and really don't care about it, and the recovery stage when they realise they have a problem and want to stop.

    Until stage three then we can't do a thing, as the rule in both counselling and Buddhism is you can't help people who are content as they are. They may be abusing themselves, and certainly those around them, but they are introspective and only concerned with their next hit, as if they are in an actual trance. Once they reach the recovery point then they either succeed or fail, and that's where the judgement comes in. The rule here is it really is a lot easier to not do something than to do it. Otherwise you would hear people being accused of being addicted to breathing or drinking water. The things we need to do to survive are clearly not the same as addiction, as we'd die sooner or later if we stopped eating and drinking, so by denying ourselves food as anorexics we are addicted to not eating as we have to eat to live a healthy life. So that's an inverse addiction as the urge to eat is so strong it takes an addict to override it. So technically an addiction is an addiction however it expresses itself, and the question is to me, how can any urge to do something once you know it's harmful be too strong to overcome? Using hypnosis I am aware, whether or not I can fix it, there is a feeling before giving in to an addiction, an illusion that you won't be able to relax unless you do it. Until stage three you give it no thought, and neither know nor care you are hurting yourself and others, so are not treatable. But once you do and still do it, is it fair to be judgemental then in order to provide the extra energy for the person to get better, where they clearly can't on their own?

    I am not a parent but understand parenting, and that is the approach you would use when treating addicts, a parent loves their children and wants the best for them, and as a result neither allows their children a free run at the sweetshop however much they would eat, as they know it would hurt them, and ditto with heroin, cigarettes or gambling. The fact parents have no training in treating mental health issues means they usually fail, but their motivation is both genuine and often judgemental, but in what I see as a positive way. A therapist cannot stop someone doing something, only they can. We can provide foundations for dealing with other problems as they generally work from previous trials, but only an individual can control their own actions. Therefore once you both know that action is negative and harmful, and the desire (except with a very few short term physical addictive chemicals) is a total illusion, then how many times do they make the same mistake before you start to judge them as responsible for their own actions and not an illness?

    I would say based on past experience no one is not strong enough to stop doing anything, therefore if they don't after many times intending to, it is their own choice. If for example their children suffer as they are not looked after as the parent is drunk or high, then are they judgmental for wanting to be fed when their parent is lying on the floor unconscious? We are not living as isolated units, and our deliberate behaviour does not just hurt us, but nearly always hurts others, from the wasted time of NHS staff and those they can't treat as they are treating your overdose, or your children who are hungry as you gambled away their lunch money. Isn't accepting that sort of behaviour actually collusion with the addict and only acts to encourage them and say 'it's an illness, nothing you do is your fault even if you kill your child indirectly as a result'? I don't think so. I would say classifying a gambling addiction along with cancer is an insult to people with cancer, as you can't use will power to cure an illness, but thousands of people stopped smoking and drinking either suddenly or gradually as total addicts where others did not. It is not like passing an exam where some will simply not have the capacity to do it, but simply not doing something harmful.

    I leave the opinions to the readers.

    Wednesday, April 02, 2014

    The three horsemen

    The three methods of control by the extreme (there's no doubt about that once you read on) left of the 21st century have been the three horsemen, racism, sexism and homophobia. Between them they are like 'browns, seasons, thickens, all in one go', or 'beats as it sweeps as it cleans', ie can be used to cover every situation they oppose and block it.

    How exactly can three forms of discrimination manage to work to cover, like rock, paper, scissors, every issue the left feel is eroding their view of society, and accuse its perpetrators of a combination of the three, sometimes bringing in an inappropriate second just to enhance the impact of the tenuously relevant first. Such as comparing climate change deniers with racists.

    First we must begin with the definitions. Sexism and racism refer to treating those of a different race worse than others, or as inferior. Homophobia appears to have been invented in the 21st century as an essentially meaningless term, as no one sane is actually scared of homosexuals, but technically they range from a mild discomfort to direct discrimination, with no distinction being made in degree on their part.

    Clearly genuine discrimination is a bad thing, and as a result the Race Relations Act and sexual discrimination laws were brought in long ago to make these all illegal. Job done. But this did not satisfy the left, they wanted to ban even mentioning such views in conversations as opinions, shutting down all sides they disagreed with although had they genuinely been discriminating then they could be prosecuted for doing so, and clearly are not. However, in practice these transgressions are not entirely restricted to their opponents, as what they call racism and sexism is not applied universally at all, but just to the groups they see as their chosen victims. Anyone else is fair game, so rather than apply the same rules to themselves they claim to enforce against others, they throw their full force against anyone not 100% positive about any black person, from a footballer to president Obama, regardless of the fact they are deserving of the accusations of being useless or incompetent or whatever, if they are black then all attempts to criticise them are closed down, even though for example there are plenty of black US Republican members who are totally accepted by their own supporters of all races. But like the black drivers who complain to the police they only stopped them because they are black, until it is pointed out it is dark and the police couldn't see who they were till they were stopped, the race card has become the blunt instrument of the left in attacking any criticism of a group or individual regardless of the validity of such criticism. And the new phrase adopted by the liberal left, first heard a year or so, describing Newcastle as 'hideously white' was repeated only again today on BBC Radio 4 about the BBC itself. Imagine getting away with that about any other colour at all. Yes, the left are at least as racist as those they claim to expose, but only against white people. Is that any better? Not in my eyes.

    However, when they then go on to enforce rules forcing ethnic minority police and female board members by law, meaning the right candidate may be rejected for no reason other than they had to have someone different by law, they are simply discriminating differently. And as for racism the greatest anti-semites I have ever come across are on the far left, blaming the Jewish lobby for running the media, like Jenny Tonge and David Ward from our LibDem government, repeating the same memes straight out of Mein Kampf, which led to the destruction of six million Jews, and apparently trying to finish the job the Nazis didn't get the chance to complete. Then they further devalue the holocaust by calling people who refuse to accept the certainty of man made global warming deniers, as if claiming the Nazis didn't really kill 6 million Jews, all dead, bodies and property thoroughly accounted for, with something which hasn't actually happened at all and doesn't look like it ever can.

    In the end it is nothing more than an attempt to say 'Our opinion is the only opinion', and pervert genuine methods to quell discrimination as weapons to maintain order in society their way. They are far more dangerous than a single person they are fighting against, as if the BNP or even Ukip (as if they would) are genuinely that racist then just let them say it and judge them as a direct result, not as the champion of the thought police, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown wants to do and silence Ukip altogether, a valid and legal political party set up to expose the lies her own side have been using since the 70s in North London council chambers and trendy universities onwards. If you really think someone is anything -ist then let them say it and the law deal with them appropriately. Stopping debates on immigration or even leaving the EU, let alone the validity of gay versus traditional marriage by accusing anyone raising them of being a dangerous criminal and who should be silenced by law is far more dangerous than making jokes about black people or not having equal numbers of female MPs as not enough want to waste most of their time doing it unlike men.

    Sunday, March 16, 2014

    Crying wolf like a professional

    My life, like most people's, has heard news of impending disasters since day one, and without exception not one of them has ever happened. There have been plenty of disasters, but these were all sudden and had no possible way to foresee in advance. I also had many periods in my younger life where I was unaware of the news, so until our lights went out in the 70s wasn't really aware of recessions, inflation, and most government policies generally, knew there were wars in places like Vietnam but didn't touch our lives here, and was basically going about my life the same every day and year whatever did or didn't happen on the news. In fact, apart from the power cuts and petrol shortages I wouldn't have known virtually any of the news if I hadn't read it or seen it on the TV.

    Some people have gone to the effort of listing the media-led impending disasters since time or newspapers began, the millennium bug, SARS, swine flu, the third world war (still waiting), acid rain, the coming ice age, basically anything either based on what was happening on a small scale they were unable to control, so assumed it would all go out of control, or worse something based on whispers from interested parties whose stock and power would rise sharply if people thought their oil was running out or they would run out of sugar so have to stock up in case. Whatever the cause, from trivial media led shortages due to saying the Finnish wood crop had failed and there would be no toilet paper left in a week, to scaring the shit out of everyone imagining they were all going to die, the single element they all had in common was nothing more ever happened. Not once. The 2008 financial crash of course will be costing us for decades, and no one at all (except Vince Cable and a stockbroker who got sacked for spooking the market) who saw lending rise from 7 to 40 times the total held, and company borrowing, with mortgages rising from three times annual income to 10X plus, along with mass marketing of credit cards gratefully accepted by most householders who mistook the plastic coming through their doors unrequested for actual free money.

    So, when our world temperature has risen less than a degree in 160 years, which is pretty standard really, while the CO2 has risen 50%, which as far as we know (we haven't measured it long enough to be certain) hasn't been standard, it's still assumed this will be many times worse in the future, and as they know the rate of CO2 rise, set the danger point so far ahead we can't know either way anyhow so a totally void experiment. But of course they were saying this in the 90s, so surely by now in 2014 people have seen the temperature stopped rising in 1997 overall and the CO2 did not, and new data on things like cloud cover show the sun is being blocked by evaporating oceans thus cancelling out any effects from CO2 on the downside.

    But unlike every other scare story, this is a long term one. By setting the end point at 2100, even though anyone with a brain can tell the experiment cannot ever be completed, it allowed the governments and media never to let it go, even when 25 or so years later the expectations of the 90s were proved to be utter bollocks. The sea level rise has crept up the same rate at 7 inches a century, proving beyond all doubt it can never break a foot let alone a yard as without a few degrees of temperature rise there's nothing to melt the Greenland ice shelf (the Antarctic is below -40C so can't join the party) or expand the ocean to make it rise any more than that. But instead of reminding themselves of every other disaster which never happened and working out this one's had far longer and hasn't happened either, because the consensus among not scientists, as hundreds of them (just the ones who published papers saying so) disagree, but politicians, the real 97%, has stayed so solid the people assume it's still going to happen, despite the evidence of their own eyes, although admittedly apart from one article last year in two papers they do otherwise have to take the effort to look themselves, nothing is happening, and I can say exactly why as the water evaporating from the sea has not created the humidity they relied on for more than a very minor warming.

    Until people remember the past they can never understand the present or ignore the future as we never know what'll happen tomorrow, let alone a year or century ahead unless it's astronomical.