You can't always do the right thing on blogs, either you wait till you've got something to say and people find no new posts, or you come back regardless of what could be reported. But I always saw that as a challenge and looking back can see I always find something once I open the box.
Looking as an accountant would, I've had a pretty raw deal recently. No real profit, and although no real losses a company that only breaks even will not be a successful or happy one either. Having a rival article printed on the day mine could have been used was yet another setback as well as the huge contract jam on the last TV programme I did that's been struggling to stay alive for years since being filmed. The little government issue generates new queries to be answered almost daily, and no, it doesn't serve us right, benefits are either gained legitimately or fraudulently and are not awarded as a matter of opinion or discretion, they make the rules of eligibility and you either qualify or not. Anyone who's fraudulent is stealing and the others by law are entitled to them, whatever the working people think. But I'm not going to filter what I talk about just because others don't approve. I'm sure if I was gay (as was also suggested) I'd get all the other lot after me but that is the structure of the internet. The minority actually create and the others like to destroy it rather than do anything constructive themselves and be open to the comments of the many millions of others like them I meet daily on Youtube. Had I the heart to read them again I'd save a few of the best so you can see the standard collected in the one place but if you go to any Jewish graveyards that have been desecrated then you'll see the same comments there with the swastikas.
No doubt at least one reader will say it's their own fault for being Jewish and why don't they go to Israel/leave Israel/convert to a proper religion or whatever the current preference they have to cleanse the world of the ethnic filth that is the Jew. If you think I'm exaggerating just look at the comments on Jewish videos on Youtube. I said to one how ironic it is if you mentioned the 'N' word anywhere on the public internet the CIA would probably abduct and imprison you, but antisemitism is happy to be represented 100% in the open. And for the hard of thinking out there (you know who I mean) I mean both should be stopped rather than both represented, but nowadays I know I need to spell things out in words of few syllables.
Besides all that I have run out of ideas. Till now I'd been working a day in advance but there's only so many ideas that way. I'll have to let the world direct me now and that usually means rejecting invitations from people I don't want to see or go out with and being left with sod all else. My postcards will arrive in a week or so and although they cost me more than the shops charge will see if I can twist any arms in local shops just in case. I can't see asking 75p or so for a postcard is that bad, except the others cost 50p as they are printed in thousands. Or I'll just give them away.
It did occur to me today that if any of you met me in person I'm far more controversial online than I am in person. Literally the only time I'm assertive in the real world is in my car as on the road we are all equal. They can't see the person inside from afar and only the car so never allow anyone to take advantage by trying to push me out of the way. But of course most of them use the same principle as they'd never dare to try and push others out of the way unless they were in their cars, so driving is the nearest activity to the internet as people behave far worse in cars and online than they ever dare normally as anonymous. There you go, stream of consciousness insight process.
I just hope in a year the imagined future hasn't materialised and nothing new has happened. And in two years. Mind you, I did just have the first message from someone I knew that had seen me on TV (after 2 years). So that patience has been rewarded. Which is why I imagine the comparitive effect in a newspaper (a BIG one). Which may well not be possible to discover in reality. And be sure, any work I may not be doing now was made up for in the past. But as I wasn't blogging in the 80s and 90s you can only see what I'm doing now. But they were rewarded at the time. And a final thought, has anyone besides the communists ever criticised the aristocracy who see working people with contempt as they have never needed to work despite going to the best schools and colleges before retiring. Most people still look up to them yet like to piss on the ordinary people who have hit hard times for whatever reasons. And they are often MPs as well, look at the new benefits laws. A study was made once in Paris that showed it was cheaper to let people ride the trains for free but they decided it wouldn't look good politically. The Green Party found one useful statistic amongst all their other dross, most western countries could let everyone go on benefits with no tests as the reduced admin and huge workforce to administer and enforce the money would be available for everyone, working or not. It was called the basic income policy, and actually considered in Ireland. Many of the Monster Raving Loony policies became law decades later (I'm sure a list is around somewhere but I can't be bothered to spend ages digging it up), but it takes the vested interests at least that long to be pulled off their gravy trains. Look at what they did to hereditary peers. Their poor kids won't be able to sponge off the rents of the tenants any more for an infinite time ahead. What does everyone think of that?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
18 comments:
As per usual, nothing but a ramble of words. Verbal vomit is more accurate to describing your "wordy" ways.
Several things need to be noted:
You said: It did occur to me today that if any of you met me in person I'm far more controversial online than I am in person. Literally the only time I'm assertive in the real world is in my car as on the road we are all equal. They can't see the person inside from afar and only the car so never allow anyone to take advantage by trying to push me out of the way. But of course most of them use the same principle as they'd never dare to try and push others out of the way unless they were in their cars, so driving is the nearest activity to the internet as people behave far worse in cars and online than they ever dare normally as anonymous.
Okay, you seem to be the only one that is allowed to be "anonymous", especially in a car. However, it is not okay for someone else to? Whether it be on the internet or in a car? Just you. Okay, I see you want what you want, and do not really care what others want.
Not a good thing for someone who claims superiority. Tsk, Tsk.
Another point that you mentioned:
The little government issue generates new queries to be answered almost daily, and no, it doesn't serve us right, benefits are either gained legitimately or fraudulently and are not awarded as a matter of opinion or discretion, they make the rules of eligibility and you either qualify or not. Anyone who's fraudulent is stealing and the others by law are entitled to them, whatever the working people think. But I'm not going to filter what I talk about just because others don't approve
Seems as if the government's original inquires were not enough, as they must not believe you. Gee, I wonder why. Oh and by the way, legitimate claims can also be falsified. Since you have been in the system for a long time, like you have said, you know how to play the crazy game...all in an attempt to bilk the government and people that really and truly do need help.
Again, it seems that you just don't
"get it". You, are the last person in the world that should be attempting to mooch off the government. After reading your blog all these years, if your father were as well off as you claim, you would not be living the way you do, and certainly would not be trying to get free money. Oh, wait! Did daddy cut you off? Cannot imagine why?
David, I seriously think you need to find a full length mirror, stand in front of it, and tell yourself the honest truth: "Mirror, mirror on the wall, my name is David, and a I am a loser. Can you please help me to be able to tell the truth?"
Maybe one of these days, I will actually read the truth on your blog.
Strange? I never said my father is well off. Goodness knows where you got that from, my parents are both on pensions.
The cars I clearly meant everyone is anonymous in a car so behaves far worse than when seen. You made a real federal case out of that one, I suspect you have a lot more time on your hands than you care to admit.
Now if I wanted to make things up I'd make the blog far more interesting than it actually is, but mine reflects whatever is happening in my life. OK it's not always that well expressed as I don't plan or rewrite anything but have never had any interest in reading or writing fiction. What you see as contradictions were either badly expressed or understood. I can't see the point of making things up.
Strange? I never said my father is well off. Goodness knows where you got that from, my parents are both on pensions.
Sure you did, back about three years ago, you mentioned that your father was a lawyer. That to me would indicate a substantial income, and therefore, would or rather should mean there is no reason for you to mooch off of the government.
The cars I clearly meant everyone is anonymous in a car so behaves far worse than when seen. You made a real federal case out of that one, I suspect you have a lot more time on your hands than you care to admit.
I made a federal case out of it? Hardly, I only brought up the fact that you only have balls while driving and not anywhere else.
I am not the one with so much time on my hands. I, unlike you, have a real job, one that I pay taxes from, so that loafers like you can collect from my hard earned money with the taxes I pay.
Now if I wanted to make things up I'd make the blog far more interesting than it actually is, but mine reflects whatever is happening in my life. OK it's not always that well expressed as I don't plan or rewrite anything but have never had any interest in reading or writing fiction. What you see as contradictions were either badly expressed or understood. I can't see the point of making things up.
You can’t? From what I have been reading on your blog all these years, you do make a lot of things up. Oh, yes indeed. Too bad the others that read your blog have not found out yet. Eventually they will…they all will.
Un-fucking-believable. Now the anonymous person picks David's posts apart, comments 500 words at a time, and formats them!
This man or woman needs to start their own blog lol.
You can't see the point of making things up? Then why do you "make up" your fantasy world?
Clearly, you are in the habit of making things up (i.e., "I'm claustrophobic and agoraphobic, but wait, they're actually the same thing; I've worked 1 week, then I've worked several months, then I've worked for 5 years.")
You know what I think? I think your mother and father both fantasize about having a normal son who actually works...sad thing is they have you.
What a pity! My condolences to your mother and father because they have you as a son.
You seem to be such an expert on what other people should do, where did you get the idea you knew so much more than everyone else about life?
Big Kahuna, you said it. And they don't even follow the details so blame me for making it up, even after I explained why. And repeated said facts so they might even actually understand them.
they don't even follow the details so blame me for making it up, even after I explained why. And repeated said facts so they might even actually understand them.
First, let me start off by saying that there are several different anons, and if you actually took more than two seconds to read the posts you would be able to tell.
Second, as far as I can tell from reading your blog all these years, is that you still continually misrepresent yourself, not only to those that read your blog, but to the government as well.
Third, if you or any of your readers actually read the anons posts, you would be able to tell the different writing styles etc., etc., apparently none of you actually read what we all have written and just assume that it all the same person.
Fourth, you know what they say when someone assumes right?
Finally, before you attempt to make anyone look stupid by saying you have repeated said facts so they might even actually understand them. I honestly think you need to re-read everything that I have written and then maybe I can write in infantile terms that you can understand.
There are two anons the same, God help me...
One or two, you seem to be taking the principle 'Know thine enemy' to extremes. And you say I haven't got a life?
David said...
You seem to be such an expert on what other people should do, where did you get the idea you knew so much more than everyone else about life?
-------------
No, David, that would be you. You think YOU are the expert about life all because you’re a so-called psychotherapist. You’re only one half of a psychotherapist…the psycho part. Were did you get your degree, from a newspaper?
Before you can speak of life and enlightenment, you first have to be knowledgeable about enlightenment (and not just repeat what’s online) and you need to really get a life (i.e., a job).
By the way, saw a few of your YouTube videos, and have to say they’re the second biggest piece of cack next you, as you are the biggest piece of cack.
you need to plan a career you'll have to do one with a practical aim like I did, although it didn't interest me enough to do the professional year it at least got me into my diploma course and teaching so still vital. Without it I'd probably have had to work in a shop the rest of my life as even the office jobs I liked required secretarial qualifications or accounting, and I probably squeaked into the ones I did because we all had degrees whatever the actual job required.
Hmm. You do not lie correct? Okay then please tell your readers why you are lying in partial post from above? You may have degrees, but you have never done a damn thing with them. You get free money off of the government.
Practical aim like you did? Since when have universities starting giving lessons on how to get public benefits from the government? I can see you graduated top honours in that class!
You said: Without it I'd probably have had to work in a shop the rest of my life as even the office jobs I liked required secretarial qualifications or accounting,
Right, as if you ever worked at all! What job do you have, other than being an out and out liar? None. Not one single thing have you done since you got your degrees, if, in fact, you even have any!
But David does not lie, right? Yeah total B.S. is what you are, and the quote above proves it!
Wow, a true obsessive. You read but you still don't understand. If you don't get it this time I'm not wasting any more time trying.
1)Just because I'm not on benefits now doesn't mean I went on them after leaving college 24 years ago does it?
2)As you haven't read my CV and have no right to then the rest is just taking the piss. There are over 3 million other people in the country on benefits, you have a lot of work to do as this one's just the first. Go and find some others to interrogate next.
Wow. 12 comments. You RULE, David!
I think you should install a DONATE button linked to 'comment moderation' to allow your anonymous friends to pay for the privilege of advising you. It'd be a win-win situation lol.
You stated
"Just because I'm not on benefits now doesn't mean I went on them after leaving college 24 years ago does it?"
I am confused and you say you state things clearly? Above you say you are NOT on benefits now - what is is it, you are or you aren't! Small wonder it is just about impossible to keep anything you say straight.
There seems to be another person, questionsaboutfaith, besides those of us who are Anon that thinks you are full of it and yourself too.
Bollocks, I made a typo. Maybe it was rubbing off...
"questionsaboutfaith said...
Good post."
Where does that imply I'm full of it?
You remind me a lot of someone else, but not quite enough to be sure.
"questionsaboutfaith said...
Good post."
"Where does that imply I'm full of it?"
All you need do is read the post above his comment to see that. He said good post in reply to one that basically took you apart in pieces. I would venture he is agreeing with that post, yes?
I assumed he meant mine, we'll have to ask him.
let's make it lucky 13!
Post a Comment