Open your eyes to the crime around us all

I am certainly not impatient with the news, as some stories have been knocking around for up to a year now while life and business worldwide carries on as usual. Iran has not blown anyone up (that's a good thing when it comes to speculating incorrectly), while Greece appears to have sealed its debt issues (as someone on this very blog predicted although I'd celebrate if it fell apart) and no one's been hauled up over Climategate as it involves the highest level of government corruption so impossible to allow it to be exposed in court or otherwise. I have been trained to allow my investigative abilities, and once you have opened that set of eyes then you can see it all, as people can't really lie to you for very long or carry out a fraud without the signs being as clear as when you shine a black light on fluorescent paint. It's a very limited scope, the same situation reworked in a few ways but basically a 360 degree system of mutual protection and blackmail, ensuring all the chains remain linked as if you get someone else into trouble you get everyone into trouble. Above that is they who must be obeyed, the top tier which can't be touched or removed as they are the law, so are happy to announce every now and then what they are doing as they know perfectly well they've done it already and there is no authority above them to hold them to account. Who could prosecute the UN for treason? Good question, answer, no one.

So basically the mafia now run most of the world. Not local mafias any more, as now they have joined together much like the previously isolated band of obscure climate departments in universities, so each now makes the laws in their own country while being fed the script from above. Is it a coincidence that the interest rates and bank bailouts have been almost identical around the world (except for Iceland) while no new regulations have been introduced to stop the banks continuing 40 times leveraged deals, short selling, structured derivatives etc, which are basically the same as mock auctions and ponzi schemes but legal if carried out by a bank or government.

Once you learn the mafia ways it's dead simple, they are no different to the internet scam emails except they are authorised by law. Invent profits for a company based on non-existent assets and quite rightly you will go down for fraud, but call them carbon credits and tell the public they will save the planets and they become a way to slice portions of wealth from every company and individual not in on the game on earth. Nothing is complicated, it's all based on legalised and justified wealth removal, and the cruder the method the larger the sum. This latest and largest of all is the equivalent of walking through a train, clubbing each passenger on the head, stealing their wallets and walking off with the guards tipping their hats to you. Not subtle or complicated, a basic primitive raid no different to the Vikings or Huns. Rape and pillage, but with suits and calculators. If you imagine and see your taxes as being a Viking raid then all but the decapitations and fields of burning shells of buildings will have occurred, much like the neutron bomb which kills the people but saves the buildings for occupation by the enemy.

Once you see this fraud as if watching Penn and Teller without the screens and camera angles the magic goes and it's like being bound and gagged while the police look for the person who did it in front of you. You make a sound but no one can understand you. But that lovely man Barack Obama could never be working for anyone else, he's the president. George Soros gives millions to charity, how could he want to sell arms to both sides so they can wipe out thousands of people while he takes the money and turns his back. How could Chris Huhne lie to the police to save his driving licence? How could FIFA officials ask for bribes to get countries to host the world cup? You see, half these scams were proved, others are under investigation while others may never be made public. But I see them all regardless if convicted, accused or ignored. They are all the same, but only those whose eyes have opened are able to see them for what they are. Maybe by writing this it may open a few more eyes, I can only hope and teach.

Letter to an MP- how to fix politics.

I'm saving this for my own records so thought I may as well share it online:


 I do have a few suggestions totally going against the grain of every single western government who have collectively conspired to crash the economy in favour of the bankers and bureaucrats who profit. I am a law graduate and researched all this in great depth and these are the main changes as the tip of a greater iceberg.
Flat rate income tax: No one tries to avoid paying and injects real money back into the economy. Already in parts of Eastern Europe.
Realistic interest rates. QE and low rates encourage bulk trading and market manipulation on small profit margins on millions, and raises commodity prices. They also penalise everyone who has worked and saved for retirement.
Stop subsidising renewable energy. As yet it is at a development stage and could never work in a free market as is not yet able to replace conventional fuel.
Any subsidies should go to bring back home based manufacturing and possibly public transport. And if the money was there renationalise all the public services. You cannot compete with a single product, it can only create a cartel by default.
And finally I would suggest leaving the EU. In 1975 I campaigned outside Chelsea Town Hall saying whatever we voted for now would grow until it took over most of our laws. Nearly 40 years later I have been proved right.
Do one of these and the economy will improve, do them all and we'll catch up Germany, and be free to make our own laws. No government has broken the Keynesian model for decades now and the failure all around us is the result. That is not even taking a risk as we've seen the alternative.

Education, education, education

My knowledge of world economics, focusing on the EU as that is my location, has not unearthed any conspiracy theory, but a system which favours a handful and steals from the others to do so.
The whole affair is pretty well dictated by UN Agenda 21, dressed up for the environment but containing the mechanisms to bring down everyone's standard of living, and the population, while redistributing their wealth to the leaders and their friends and associates. This is now well into its stride and after the energy taxes we've been paying now for years (petrol would be 82p a litre without them for example, not 1.32p) food had to be next as if you keep them hungry and poor you can pretty well carry out anything else you like as they will be too weak and busy surviving to stop you.

I don't think it's ever too late to stop them. At the moment 99.9% of people aren't aware of these plans, and most who are reject them as a conspiracy. Our fuel taxes and renewable subsidies aren't a conspiracy, they're the 2008 Climate Change Act. VAT on food isn't a subsidy, it is an EU working document. A world currency is not a conspiracy, the plans are already drawn up by the UN. All this is already going through while people still worry about which Miliband brother should lead Labour. I don't want to get myself targeted, but that's a bit like worrying which pile of dog poop you want to tread in. Enough said. So while everyone's busy reading what the papers do want us to know and watching ice melt all day on the BBC (if you channel hop it's virtually possible 24/7) the plans are already some way to controlling us all not from the EU but the UN itself.

I have written a single article on this, virtually everything I say and a lot more is included, and not a single publication has touched it. I doubt all but one who asked to see it (and took no notice when it did) have even bothered to look as they must get heaps of this sort of stuff and only publish what their staff and their friends write, and see no need to write further on related topics as the direct plan to invent a problem of man made warming to create a world tax and currency pretty well covers all the smaller areas in itself. The banks being fed almost free money despite losing it all last time continues to sap the world's economy and prevent any recovery as they can still manipulate the market with ghost bids, short sell commodities they can't deliver if lost, lend five times more than the standard amount they should hold in deposits despite risking default if enough people cash their accounts, do not have to separate customers' money and their own for trading purposes, can still sell mortgages of 100%, etc etc., all held up by interest rates 5% below the market requirement, which mean anyone who has worked for decades can no longer pay all their bills on retirement as investments can't guarantee more than a few percent, well under inflation.

You can teach most people basic economics if they want to learn, my problem is not they can't follow all this, but no one wants to. That is how and why it is still happening. I actually believe just my single article (with maybe a page of the economics of market manipulation based on the structure of the mafia) is enough to show everyone that their governments are working for the same ends, pretty much the opposite of what they say they are doing, and as working on a majority vote the few honest dissenters are always cancelled out. So you don't need everyone to be dishonest, just those with the power to make policy. And people can't say they haven't noticed it now. Energy prices across the board have more than doubled regardless of wholesale prices. And if they manage to get VAT on food then everyone will pay 20% more for it overnight. That will drop Britain a good few places on the richest country list instantly as the power of the same income will be reduced accordingly so we will be drifting towards Poland and once the petrol taxes come in again in August maybe the Poles will start leaving and British people will head there to work instead. It's all relative and Britain is getting relatively poorer.


Some economic disasters are unavoidable, oil shortages, strikes and the like. But low interest rates and high taxes are not out of control outside events, they are policies. The same policies which caused he crash the last time and unchanged since. Who can spend your money better, you or the government? And they can't even spend it on railways and water pipes now as they don't own them. So besides the NHS and benefit payments, a huge amount of government spending vanished when they sold off the public services. And why train and bus fares are now the highest in the world. Those two alone should tell people all they need to know, but the Post Office will follow when they find a way to do it, and Air Traffic Control if they didn't do that already and I missed it. So basically we have the lightning strike, the act of god, and then the flood, and the differences are whether or not you can be insured for them as to the consequences. But the low interest rates and travel taxes are not acts of god, but had David Icke been right acts of the devil. Someone has chosen to impose these austerity measures on us all and actually make the vast majority of the population poorer. Of course the kickbacks to energy companies and EU mafiosi mop this excess cash up continuously, and like a tapeworm continue to collect a portion of our wealth and for all I know may even cause segments to come out in our shit. But these are all concrete planned methods to cause a worse economic problem for nearly everyone when they don't have to.


All prices are driven up by fuel costs so the money the government gain in the short term is lost in the long term as people simply have less to spend and the retailers net less overall as more has gone on energy. They then have to lay people off so more claim benefits and don't buy things and it just feeds on itself like cancer. House prices go up as interest rates are so low, so mean people spend more on them anyway as the principal is higher before the interest is added. O level maths, maybe even primary school if my own experience is anything to go by. If you add the sale price and total interest paid over the 25 years or whatever then a graph used by all mortgage brokers shows you the comparison between higher prices and lower interest rates. But when you come to buy it becomes obvious. And over 25 years throughout history interest rates pretty well even out from high to low, and probably still will over the same period ahead. But the selling price is fixed the day you buy it, and you pay interest on that so if it's higher then the total interest will be higher regardless of rates as it's 5% of a higher number for the term of the mortgage. Obvious when pointed out but missed by the wallies who spend £250,000 on a house at 5% when they may well not be able to cope when it hits 7% let alone 12. If they spent £200,000 at 7% or so they would pay more for the first few years, and then less and less as it is only a percentage of 200,000 and is just as likely to go down in the future whereas if you buy when low can only pay more ahead.


Governments know exactly who gains and loses from their policies, and as well as using fuel everyone has to live somewhere. So put house prices up even more by lowering interest rates then people will all be poorer. Except those who buy and sell them for a living. So 100% of people live somewhere, less those on the streets and the like, while a few percent are property developers or estate agents, who get a percentage for selling whether high or low, and valuers. So utilitarianism (benefitting the most people overall) is not part of modern politics. High house prices help a few groups of business people. High fuel prices help even fewer as the energy companies still have to buy everything affected by inflation including their own fuel. Only the top executives make so much they clear a massive profit, plus the oil sheiks, while everyone else can't. So high fuel prices hurt more people than any other policy, yet is the greatest source of revenue for the British government and increasing annually. It's just a shame maybe 100 people will read this hear than a million or more in a newspaper. I am ready.

Beating the new world order

Knowledge of the way they do their tricks is the only real power the people have over magicians. These do not really print more money, they just devalue what they have and know most people think there's more. In fact commodities and resources are measured daily by organisations worldwide to set prices, and are incredibly price sensitive. If supply goes down the price goes up, and if cash goes down the price goes up as you need a certain number of calories a day for life, but the cost of them will change from week to week. Therefore the true value lies in the constants with actual physical functions and benefits.

In Britain they pretend renewable power works. They apply the same trick to firstly tax fossil fuel till it's a lot closer to wind and solar, then subsidise renewables with the money they've taken from fossil, and Chris Huhne lies to millions on TV and says they now cost almost the same. Now if you own Persil and buy Omo and Daz, and then own all three, then any price changes can be evened out and you still get it all, and the same amount. If Omo can wash 10 shirts and Daz can wash 100, if you just buy both companies and prefer to sell Omo as the profits are far higher, you just fix the market and hope people don't notice.

The trouble is people are like alcoholics. They rarely wake up till it's too late and they are in such deep trouble they may die. When the idiots paying the price of a car for a solar panel can't heat their houses a few years down the line they'll wake up one day and realise they've been had. I could see it before they even called the bank to make a loan, and before the salesmen even knocked on their door, but all they could see was the promise of 'free energy'. Now the word 'free' is an absolute term, like 'pregnant'. It is not subject to qualifications, something is free or not. Solar power is a very clear set of figures. You spend a lot up front, and due to government subsidies, if you go away during the spring or summer, they will pay 10 times over the market price for the power you generate and are not there to use.

Otherwise you both have already paid, and are then paying maintenance costs and actually discover that the percentage of your total household energy a panel produces (I must check the new figures now) is under 10%. The only free option is simply because someone else pays for you, if the company use your house as a site and collect all the power profits it generates. So technically it still isn't free as someone else has paid for you hoping they can make a profit.

I use solar power as one of the clearest examples where the knowledge is already out there but cannot explain this to a single person who is blinded by fear of the climate. Unfortunately we don't have the time to wait for these weak minds to climax, as the majority of the civilised world will be broke long before enough of them have their personal epiphanies. If there was such a thing it really would be time for divine intervention. I hadn't even reached world tax and government yet.

I write these as source materials for everyone. I have been slowly putting these together for years and now is the time we all need to be fully informed. Copy, paste and share!

International politics

I have totally turned off on Libya. Vietnam was a total fiasco, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc etc. Other countries always have civil wars and by their very nature there is little outsiders can and should do. If they were genuine they'd have stopped the genocide in Rwanda which was widely reported and known about and somehow the UN and NATO filtered it from their agendas. But Libya is an internal issue miles away and you don't see foreign powers running to help or invade, depending on your point of view, when the west has issues. The sole consequence here of invading/helping Libya was a huge rise in the oil price, so it's going down now but only as it looks like it all might be over soon, if we hadn't gone there it would probably have been far less of an effect. But we can't be involved in everyone else's business without an extremely good reason. Rwanda was a rare one and we didn't, Zimbabwe is another, ditto. Very selective and in my opinion if there are far worse atrocities elsewhere and you choose somewhere different it's clearly a bad move. So if the Iranian people kick off next (and they really should under that regime but would be wiped out in days compared to elsewhere) will we go there as well? Syria has been well avoided so far, despite being a lot smaller than Libya, and I really no longer know or want to know why, Britain has major problems with debt, investments down to almost zero and prices doubling, and all we're doing is falling at the same rate China is rising till we meet in the middle and then end up like Zimbabwe. Pre-Nazi Germany printed money when they didn't have it and it started off the last war. We are going the same way, making the same mistakes and at this rate we'll be invaded by the Chinese when weakened enough and the few troops we have left will be in Afghanistan getting themselves shot by terrorists. Does it make sense? Not to me.

Political points

The role of government is to look after those in trouble and protect citizens from harm. Anything more is simply ideological interference.

The law of socialism (maths not included): Anyone having more money than most people reduces the total amount available and has to be claimed back from them in tax. In fact each person has the potential to become rich independently, and if so they create what economists call 'growth', ie the total wealth has actually increased. This means they are either too thick to add up or thieves, neither of which are a good thing.CO2 emissions have shown despite huge taxes the only time they went down was the year of the world recession, showing only a correlation with reduced growth. Therefore, by further reducing the economy by growing restrictions the politicians will guarantee a long term depression which will indeed reduce CO2. In a pyramid scheme the product is the means to an end, not important in itself. They use it as a reason to move money up the pyramid from the bottom to the top until it collapses through lack of people to add. Solar and wind power are using this principle to pay users with the money taken from those who use other sources. The products don't work and it just moves the money around.

Money comes in two basic types, earned and created. They are not the same. If you create money it is akin to forgery, and in the UK and US has proved worthless to fuel the economy. But the government are in the know, and rather than use this newly created cash to pay their own debts they take it from us in taxes. They have proved the difference, as the only money they can use is real earned money based on production. The only way to fuel the economy is to reduce taxes, which they don't do.

The new totalitarian state

A democracy is a political organisation where every qualified individual has the regular opportunity to choose who represents them. The EU is slowly taking over the functions of individual governments, and has now reached the point it is about to impose restrictions not seen since the fall of the Soviet Union and worse. Had they been democratic the people would have objected, and voted such measures out at the next election, problem over. But the EU policies are not made by the European Parliament (I'm still not quite sure what they do do but that's another issue) but the permanent EU Commission. They debate in private and do not require published minutes, all we usually know about it is when they announce their latest policies.

So, as the EU have reached the point where they make the majority of decisions in Britain at least then whatever we vote for we always get the same, and have no means of redress or accountability. That actually means all EU members are in the start (or worse) of a totalitarian state. For example no EU member state can actually choose on carbon reduction programmes, they are compulsory. Commodity prices mainly in the area of food are set by the EU by holding back goods and paying producers not to produce. In individual countries this would normally be illegal but in the EU it's de rigeur and always was. Protectionism and price fixing are also indicative of totalitarianism, so they qualify on that count as well. And with the imminent removal of rail subsidies, road pricing and banning cars altogether in cities can you think of a single country who would have actually voted such measures in? Or one with a constitution allowing them if they were attempted?

This is realpolitik

The economic news is simply boring. The US debt is just a symptom of wild lending and fraud, and technically the UK is not affected but is hardly going to lead the world much longer in their current position. The Euro crisis is about to be settled with a debt pool, so says the smart spokesman, as then no one country will be affected and in true communist style all the rich countries will have their debts increased to even the problem despite not being responsible for them personally. It's a bit like if your sewer floods, and rather than it overflow your house you make holes to the houses next door and have a lower level of sewage through them all. That's communism, everyone sinks to the lowest level, and although Britain won't be hooked as we're not Euro users the others will be economically unified to do so. No national tax or much else when that happens, basically a single state. If they hadn't had the Euro debt zones they would never have had the chance to unify the whole zone, so you could say that if they wanted a unified state all along then creating a currency that would fail and need unification to hold it together, then that has now been achieved. It can all be set up in advance more or less as reckless lending will always lead to a crash and if the solution was in place before the crash then the cart was put before the horse, many many years before in this case.

There is a big picture in politics and economics, and once you see it then it all makes sense. Wars make arms traders rich. Opec zone wars make Opec rich as it shoots the price of oil up, they already have reserves and it's like saying your savings have suddenly tripled in value for doing nothing. Create a small war every now and then and you can keep the oil producers happy and get your donations in for the next election from the big arms dealers. It all fits together like a jigsaw made from faeces. Each piece of dirt fits nicely with the next one and basically the whole scene is one of filth and corruption, as threats and bribes have always oiled the wheels of politics better than votes and helping people ever can.

So basically the world governments operate like an international mafia. They will let the ordinary people have a reasonably good life otherwise they may turn against them, so they turn the screw but only enough to keep the cash flowing and not enough for a full revolution to occur. You won't get the town to keep silent when they witness a murder if you don't give them some kind of freedom. So it's a balance of oppression and limited liberties, just enough so people feel free and don't realise they could be a lot freer. Those hippies in the 60s were a rare diversion from the tracks, and actually many of their communes were left in peace and seemed it was easier to leave them alone than stir things up and only shot at them when they demonstrated about unpopular issues like Vietnam. But if they kept quiet and out of the way smoking a little weed didn't usually cause too many ructions.

But that was a short diversion into an oasis among the rest of the storm. Like the bible says (they did invent a lot of wisdom that works without the slightest need for god) you can't lie openly, you have to hide it in truth, and you can't mistreat people openly (except in half the world as the people are so poor that they haven't the resources to revolt) but in the west they pretend to be nice and only suck your blood at night when you're asleep and don't notice, like a mosquito. You hardly ever know when you're being bitten but you sure know afterwards. They offer the moon before an election, they get in and miraculously continue 80% of the policies of the precious government they'd spent four years running down. In fact for decades now the policies have hardly changed whoever has got in, the differences are now the exception and whatever they say in opposition virtually the same crap happens in power. Tuition fees, fortnightly bin collections, the congestion charge, the Climate Change Act, petrol taxes, all things the opposition criticised and now they're in charge have all been kept, although the congestion area has been reduced none of the others have happened at all. They scrapped one policy immediately, medical waiting times were deregulated so we can wait two weeks to see the doctor and a year for a consultant again after that had actually been fixed.

It doesn't often get better nowadays, does it?

Wasted efforts?

Today's theme is delayed reactions, or technically no reactions. If I stay up till 4am doing research it's because I don't get interrupted that late so get on with everything without a break, and the end result is blog posts and articles from what I've discovered. Besides a handful of comments from those who already know these things the reactions and responses I've had have been precisely zero, besides a genuine shock from a radio presenter I called. Nothing happened but he knows. And that's the only result, the bare minimum. People have been told. They can't then say whenever it comes out 'Wow, who'd ever have expected that', much like the poor simpleton Gordon Brown, an economist who genuinely thinks we're dumb enough to think he couldn't see uncontrolled lending would mean a mass default. They hear it, ignore it, but it's there.

So I won't give up digging and sharing the dirt, but now realise people don't care. Otherwise efforts are expended similarly in other areas, and the rule is quality not quantity for success. You don't succeed by almost killing yourself, but by focusing and knowing where to focus. Not that I do, but even when you do then it doesn't guarantee results, it just buys you a ticket. Funnily enough I've just joined the first dating site for years and waiting for their activation link, and although it took two years I did meet my last girlfriend on one, and basically if this one is actually free (the site is blocked until you join, go figure) I have nothing beyond the wasted hours on the phone to total strangers plus the embarrassing evenings in dodgy pubs continuing said phone calls with women I'd never dreamed of even approaching had I met them face to face first. But I'll try it in case. The media work is no different. My focus was the only way you can succeed without an Equity card or being a qualified journalist. I networked, my one known contact needed what I could offer and took off ever since. But the media has levels like any other career, and I'm on step one, voluntary usage in fringe areas. Beyond that level we can't dictate who uses what, I've had many leads which could have got me on step two or even higher, but is pure chance which projects get completed or not.

But as far as the news goes, I've never seen things like this before. The world situation is at a lifetime low, the signs are all out there (I compiled a list of world commodity prices, which have been shooting up the last few years as well as the population which has tripled!), and what do people do? Ignore it. What this man made recession has done is to increase prices and regulations threefold while keep incomes where they are, or a fraction if you live off investments. We're not at third world rates yet but if you graph the pay over price ratio ahead, if nothing stops the trend we soon will be. So people ignore the trend and wait for the disaster and then realise. What can they do about it then? Search me, it's never happened before in my lifetime. The graphs show stability since the end of rationing in the 40s, and then the last few years before the crash prices rocketed. That money's going somewhere- Russia, China, politicians, bankers, and away from us. The total hardly changes but the shift is to the already super rich from everyone else. If prices go up we all lose except the retailers. Do you own an oilfield or a wind farm? Or a supermarket? If not then all these price rises will slowly cripple you all. Houses now cost three times the multiple of income they did a few years ago. So there's already a lot less left. I don't know how people even manage now but somehow they seem to as they aren't rioting on the streets or even writing to the papers. But if you can't see it now you soon will believe me. The mechanism has already been put in place to put the recent price rises into the big time and then you'll notice. And guess what, I told you.

Of course the first thing I want is action- people realising they are fucked and they must start telling everyone else how and why as once you know this you will stop accepting it. Currently I am blamed as paranoid although all the data is in, as it always is before I begin any campaign. But no one who hadn't worked it out already even believes me, or cares. They feel rich so they think they are. They feel free, unless they want to buy a light bulb, park your car or take a photo without being stopped and questioned. Those are the very beginnings of restrictions, and must come in slowly or we'll all notice and object. So look for them and realise if you can be taxed on something new at a low level then it will rise, like car parking outside your own house. This is happening worldwide in one way or another as there is only one connected economy, there's one pool of cash and it's moving away from you and me.

Practice and theory

I am crossing my fingers blogger isn't in terminal decline as it really is a unique and free way to write literally whatever you want, with optional pictures, for the world to see and interact with. Facebook doesn't, although has now created a blog option is hardly as easy to follow as these.

I've continued my photo trips as per, with the rest of the day entering them on the map which mops up any remaining time to do anything else online. Late grandma's house is going on Tuesday at last, so also spent many days there clearing out junk and doing the garden, that has been hard work for two years now and wonderful when actually over but still at least one visit left. Outside the news has been busy but on closer scrutiny meaningless to us. Bin Laden's dead, yes, so what? Will the fanatics give up now? The best that will happen is they'll lose some funding, but presumably most of his money will be shifted long before anyone else can get their hands on it and continue paying for arms.

The other news like the royal wedding isn't actually news at all, as people get married every day and also divorced as most of his family have done already. It's not as if I'm going to be offered a crack at her as well so why should I care? My news has had to remain personal, mainly in the way of insights and discoveries, and as a result filter through to friends and clients who often use them for themselves as the truths of life are universal.
The best one I read at the weekend explains why so many scientists are both up themselves and so frequently wrong despite often having doctorates. They can see the small picture very clearly but very few people overall can put the pieces together. That is the difference between learning and originating, and the academics can never be at the top of the pile. I had to get a degree simply as I knew no one would ever listen to me without one, and ideally a master's as nowadays any cunt can get a BA in the UK now they've replaced the dole for school leavers.

So my specific area has been highlighted, I add each part of new information to the jigsaw, while others simply file them separately and can't even follow the connections when spelled out to them. The vast majority of idiots who despite three now being convicted of fraud (ie those set up as an example while many more escaped) believe most politicians are still honest is one example, and while people accept the shit fed to them from above will never get any better than we have now. David Icke's reptilian theory is a good analogue, hold them up to the light and you'll see the equivalent of a snake inside, but only in how their minds work. If you know what to look for- the small lies, inconsistencies and other slipups you'll soon realise who you're dealing with, much like bad boyfriends or husbands where everyone else can see what they're like except their woman, until possibly she's in intensive care.

Well we are almost there now. Carbon taxes and the EU are going to make basket cases of us all, and the old eastern bloc will be repeated now throughout the west as well. The leaders in their cars and the citizens driving ox carts through the street with bicycles for the party members. History has begun to repeat itself, I see the big picture and like all higher intelligence, the view is shared by so many people there aren't anywhere near enough to do a thing about it besides come on blogs and tell everyone. At least you've been told and I've made my point to be confirmed possibly long after I've gone and it's all happened. Unless we stop them.

World domination has come

I wonder how many people here have been blogging for nearly 7 years (it would have been longer had I know of this site earlier) without a gap- none of the people I read at the start even have blogs mainly let alone add to them, and most of the ones I've followed since haven't posted in months or years. I do find more at Facebook myself now as well as blogging on a small site where I know everyone as well as this, but it's in the archives and Sky-Hi Lee is still one of the only mentions of him on the web and gets regular hits, like my main site which was built to fill spaces where other data hadn't been posted anywhere else.

I am currently in the first stages of my latest spiritual work, but one I believe to be capable of delivery. I'll mention more if there's more to mention but the results seem to be fairly hard to question so far. In the material world I've been making long photo runs a few times a week now this year, and starting to run out of reasonable trips within my current capabilities. No doubt something else will turn up and as long as I've completed that mission will be quite happy as it is. The news outside is dismal, on the verge of a nuclear disaster in Japan, not if but when of course as it's a monster only safe while contained. And the bill do decommission our own in the UK came out today, many billions over decades to mop up any savings while they were working. Madness.

Otherwise we have Libya, where the whole Arab world operates in more or less the same way (as they are today) simply replacing one savage dictator and regime with another as that is their personal version of government and should be left to rot in their own filth. Many who do object to such regimes do not challenge them but escape and come here and similar places like Norway and Canada who revel in welcoming refugees from around the world regardless of quality and room available (precisely zero in the UK for one). Despite fraud cropping up in virtually every graph the global warming wars are ploughing ahead full speed- the EU will ban cars from cities now by 2050, confirming their total hatred of freedom and in fact turning Europe tomorrow into exactly the same as the Arab world today. Indeed, instead of trying to raise the Arabs up to our current level (as if it was possible) in fact we are falling towards theirs and the Chinese levels of totalitarian collectivism and god help all of us if they complete this mission.

Left wing- politics of misery

Try as I might, for all my life I never understood the left. I think some are misguided in assuming taking money from the rich willl somehow make the poor better off, but Robin Hood was only a legend and that money goes to governments and their friends and rarely seen by anyone lower down. But the actual views I hear every day make me wonder if their proponents are sharing the same dimension and race as I do, as everything they appear to recommend would make our lives worse if put into practice. Just look at Cuba. It is divided into a few basic tenets. No one should have 'too much' money, whatever that means, or if communist, everyone should have the same, unless they run the country in some way. Or to each according to their needs. Well unless you're old or disabled I'd say they're pretty similar so not that different.

Then you have the state control and collectivism. Don't choose when and where you want to go, but have it restricted by law and enforced by police. Why is that exactly? Didn't we vote these people in to look after us and carry out the policies we chose, why should they be allowed to issue travel permits and fuel rations? Apart from places like Soviet Russia most of these are the wishes of the extremists rather than actual policies, but they don't seem to realise if they make everyone else suffer whatever restrictions they believe are necessary for man's sinful ways, they will be affected as well! No, many of these guys do not live in tents or mud huts and go to work by horse and cart or bus, they live in the same suburbs as me and usually have far more expensive cars. But they want other people to get the bus and burn wood in their houses but so would they if it became law.

They also seem to have a very liberal view of human nature. It's roughly called moral relativism, otherwise known as accepting all cultures as both equal and able to share spaces together. The fact that before arriving on our shores within their own countries the standard culture in many parts of the world is to kill the neighbouring tribe as they are ethnically different. Eastern Europe as well as Asia and Africa have small enclaves of ethnic tribes who consider themselves outsiders in whichever place they share, while the socialists accept such as equal when they flee to the London boroughs of red, and somehow forget every fight they've had with the infidels and oppressors since birth when they suddenly start earning a living wage. And amazingly the ethnic minorities the socialists tell us are equal do not follow their own beliefs in their own countries, but ones normally associated with the opposite end of the political spectrum. Multicultural actually means we can all hate the others equally and avoid them even when they move in next door. And hear black people running down Asians and vice versa, and Chinese running down everyone else.

If you set up a camp where everyone had to live by the sort of principles normally associated with victims of remote plane crashes, no private vehicles, renewable power, no income above the average etc, these people would nearly all wake up within a few days, and the ones left over would probably end up like the men who live in the woods with beards made of matted wool and talking to themselves as people cross the path to avoid them. And the number who actually earn well above the average wage now would be the first to pay an accountant should a new socialist government actually raise taxes the way they request, as the general rule appears to be on the left that every idea is for you, and not for me. You mustn't drive to work, earn so much, have two houses, send your children to private school, have a gas boiler, make successful investments (they destroy the third world economy you see), complain when the waiting list for the doctor runs into weeks as the local borough of Havana on Thames invites a few more Pakistani villages to relocate to the newly built stalags which used to contain private housing, whinge when your five year old struggles to handle English grammar as he is one of only three English speaking children in the class and the teachers have to concentrate on the others, or take your holiday in Brighton or Blackpool instead of flying abroad to save the planet, encouraged by the fact the taxes would make flying so expensive it would only be possible by party members.


It seems freedom is anathema to such people, who fear so much the idea of other people encroaching on their lifestyles or causing some kind of damage to their planet that we must impose such dire rules and regulations on every areas of our lives lest other human beings become so wild and uncontrolled their animal instincts make their lives a living hell. That's apparently political altruism for you, and a type only a few weeks in North Korea could cure. I wish I could arrange it for every single one I know.

Mass hypnosis

Here's the formula. Decide on world policy, place each major country with your people programmed to deliver it, and watch the carnage from a distance. Obama's latest speech confirmed every aspect of this, the empty emotionless tone, full of predictable empty words told me he is not thinking and aware of much of it, but just told to recite a prepared speech in order to have a very good life after he retires from office. Around the world other leaders in the UK and Australia have already given almost identical speeches regardless of party or official policies, which should not actually happen if each is voted in independently to carry out the wishes of its own voters.

Instead we have the same plans imposed worldwide, one country at a time, regardless of who voted for what, meaning the rules have been planned in advance and whatever we choose within the major parties the people have been hijacked by the same source. This is no longer a theory or a projection, but now a reality. If he spends the US pot on 'clean energy' that's another country heading the way of Zimbabwe, and the land of the free will become the land of the broke. Let's hope now the shit has truly hit the fan a few people will suddenly realise and rise against it.

I've been a hypnotherapist some time now, and if you see someone in a trance mindlessly parroting someone else's material, that's Obama, Gillard, Cameron, Bang-Ki Moon, and all the rest of the buggers who make the orders for us ordinary people, speak from a single voice. That's programming, the empty eyes and faces of them all, Ed Miliband the Tony Blair graft, cut from the rib and grown in a petri dish. All cells and no heart or mind. They all seem like they're on morphine and answer like machines whenever questioned. And since when has radiation been clean I wonder? Possibly in Obama's own dimension it us but when he brings it into ours even his body will suffer the same effects if exposed to it. This man has now said CO2 is a pollutant, radiation is clean and he's the fucking president of the world's most powerful country? If you don't stand up and fight as a result then you are as programmed as them.

Time off

It's hard to blog when you've got a visitor staying with you, my ex was kicked out of where she was staying last week and been here on and off ever since, which is more a responsibility than anything else but mops up a bit of time when I'm not actually alone in the house for a change. I'll appreciate the freedom more afterwards as well. Otherwise it's been raining most of the time and into week 4 uploading photos to Geograph, I hit 1000 yesterday since Christmas Eve and is really addictive.

No other plans or ideas as such, just looking forward to my freedom and a few photo trips set up for when the clocks go forward. I've also spent a couple of weeks trying to sow a few seeds of doubt on a scientific global warming propaganda site, and gave up as they are no less certain the climate is already affected by us as the sun rising. What a bunch of narrow minded dogmatic idiots. The world is being wrecked by policies to save the climate from fuck all and destroying civilisation from every angle. I've done my best and can only hope now someone else better informed and connected can take over as I won't be able to get through to them. I no longer care about trying though as I've done all I could and now know I've done my total best. None of the new data that arises has any effect, they just say 'it's been discredited'. No, theirs has and is still used regardless. Not my job any more.

Politically however why anyone besides one who has developed the equivalent of Stockholm Syndrome through religion or oppression would want an authoritarian government restricting their every move god alone knows. Governments are there to serve and protect, telling people when and where they can travel is totalitarian and completely immoral, and these wankers are choosing to vote for them over and over again. They will cry as loud as everyone else when the power cuts arrive and their grandparents die of cold, but they asked for it. People can be so thick and deluded that nothing gets through until rock bottom, just like alcoholics. This is a worldwide political disaster and can only either win or lose and with nothing like it before can't see a thing ahead, like the IPCC if they'd be honest about it.

So just taking each day as it comes at the moment, I haven't had too much time to stop and think and have plenty of housework to do next as well as finish my paintings and a few more jobs delayed by having a visitor. It makes a change but ideally would like to choose the person as well.

Back to me

I may be busy on the global warming project, but still have my philosophy working and observing. All the division between people is based mainly on misunderstanding, as well as greed where those either want what they don't have to be shared with them, or want it for other people who haven't asked them to work for them. In the end we all need the same things, and want more or less the same things albeit from many different ways. But people focus on the differences, see others as not like them and fight them as they aren't. I may as well use global warming as a good example as any, if there was global warming we'd have to deal with the consequences. Trying to learn the causes is one thing, but trying to prevent it before we know and before it's happened isn't going to change anything besides what they've done to our world through their policies.



But we all want to avoid disaster, but some have less understanding of our limitations, more so even less understanding of what a disaster is. So even though if there was a disaster we'd all want the best ways to lessen its effects, but until then simply imagining a disaster and then trying to stop it in ways which are nothing more than giving experts and investors money and restricting as many aspects of our life (eg coal and light bulbs) as they can is not helping anyone except those who are in receipt of that money. So if you ask people generally do they want to be ripped off they'd say no, do you want to travel freely, yes, do you want the cheapest possible energy as long as it doesn't cause pollution, yes, etc etc.

So this is about understanding, information (ie needing it all before being able to make a decision) and agreeing. Look at what we agree on, we want all the things we need and the things that make us happy. People forget that so easily, they get sidetracked on things they aren't aware of (can you tell it's getting warmer? I can't) which once become real overshadow everything else and act as if they were not watching Towering Inferno but in it. That's hypnosis, converting a clear fantasy into a personal reality. Once you're in that nothing else is real in comparison and you're lost.



But all the people preaching for greater government don't know what it's like to have greater government. Give away your power and those who take it will look after themselves and give you back as little as possible to avoid a revolution, except in Zimbabwe there's no revolution so Mugabe just keeps going. Just go there if you want a good lesson in what happens when you let powerful governments rule the masses. Trust the people to deal with the general issues in the world and they will. You don't feed your children because it's law to, but because it's the right thing to do. People didn't stop feeding their children when they found they didn't have to, and animals do it without knowing what law is. Animals in general, including us, are programmed to look after ourselves and others yet prefer for many to hand it over in case it's easier to let others do it for them. And why would those others want to do it unless they were better off as a result?



So rather than divide and rule, look at what we all need in common, and if you want to work against an enemy then work against anyone trying to tell you and others how to live and pay them to do so if it's not in the same places you want it. If resources weren't limited no one would allow an energy saving bulb in their house, they only exist out of a shortage mentality combined with institutional creation of fear. They are the 21st century symbol of the useless and expensive, along with the even worse solar panels. Again, no one would dream of spending half a year's average wage on a piece of kit that powers the TV for an hour a day and packs up in 25 years. Those are the figures from the sales people themselves, they can only sell as our taxes pay the government to pay the owners 10 times more for the energy than it costs normally. All these crazy rules are only accepted as people assume there's a good reason for them which of course was never there. If something's useless it always will be. You can't make excuses to buy or impose something useless on people without their consent and lack of thought. In the end it's fear and trust that fucks us every time, divide, rule and fight. Who would ever dream of going to war as attackers if not either thieves or misguided, yet we see it around us every day. And who decides it? Those with power. Think about that.

Why are people left wing?

Peter Hitchens said in yesterday's Mail that the left are "Pro EU, pro PC, anti Israel and fanatically believe in global warming". He summed it up pretty well for me, and while noting this for the future, my only comment was "Yes they do, but why?". I think I'll do an essay on this actually as have roughly in the past, but he's tied it down very well. It's actually saying they want powerful and unaccountable government (EU) lack of freedom of speech (PC) anti Jewish and gullible. In the same people. Feh!

As we all the want same things ultimately- food, comfort, friends and family etc, why would we then not just try and deny other pleasure to not just other people but ultimately themselves? Do they really want to live with power rationing, unelected politicians, Jews wandering the world whenever their country decides to expel them (currently being persecuted in ex-Soviet Union, as if that gets reported), being prosecuted or sacked for calling someone a spastic (not because they're insulting them but because the term has been changed), and basically leading a miserable regulated life much like under Mao?

Remember finally the leaders of all totalitarian states don't live like the people- the Soviet Communist Party, Fidel Castro, and any other throughout history, yet these citizens of democracy are calling for it here as well? Beats me, and if they were analysed would beat them as well once it dawned on them what they were wishing on themselves. Pain is pain and they haven't yet got the point

Living like savages

I'm still learning a lot at the moment. Despite nothing actually being wrong at the moment my mind is quite able to imagine things just to ruin the peace, and have to learn to deal with those. It's all based on past events but if anyone's come across hypervigilance then you'll know what I'm talking about. I always had the tendency but once a fear is experienced in reality it really kicks in.

I've done very little as far as I know since the last visit, I found one of the rarest signs in the country on Thursday night which I think had happened before I was here last, and since then have just been going with the flow of very little. I've been playing a guess the word quiz every hour and am in 5th place, and won 4 times in the last couple of days, the game hasn't been going long and first place is 35 wins. I've been 5th for a while and needed to win consistently to get back from 6th. It looks like it's chance but it isn't unless everyone plays the same way. It uses simple odds to calculate when to play and once you know is easy to stick to.
The week ahead is free thank goodness, I'll take the sign again in daylight and a few things nearby, sort out a haircut (I need to book for mine), deliver more election leaflets and one booking. I did find a sign today but so unfamiliar I'm not deciding 100% if it's one of the proper ones until someone else says so. Likely but not certain.

Nothing more is expected, I think any of the few possibilities won't happen now, but must learn to enjoy my freedom even when I pick up nonsense around me to ruin it. This week's lesson clearly. On the supernatural front I am still in no doubt all of this is being guided, as it often fits together far more than life should outside a fictional script. The woman I met last weekend would have made a decent friend had she lived in driving distance, but unlikely any more than that. But what's the point of encouraging someone who can't get to me by train and I won't go by car? Again, it must be for a reason, ie she probably wouldn't want to see me anyway, or a total loony like most of the others. I suppose if I was going to get another loony one with a PhD would be the best type, but too many other factors to wreck it for me. I am expecting a DVD of the party though which will be nice.
Maybe I'll finally play golf again as well soon, the combination of constant rain and the local course closing put me off for a few years, but after some lessons want to see the results. There's another course a mile away from the old one so will check that out sooner or later.

So as always the possibilities appear to be within the normal range but never know till they happen, last week provided far better than expected and made some good calls to the radio (more now due to the election) which people I know heard. It'll never make me famous but may teach a few people something which is why I do it mainly. It's no use knowing things if you can't share them, unless they can help you personally. Voting and politics are not like that, everyone needs to know the truth or we'll get more green taxes till we're living like savages. Won't be long then.

Talk of an election

This is interesting, and for my many phobic friends here will also understand the preliminary anguish of spending a whole evening in a party after some years off the scene. That now being done and besides being woken by the bell early and spending the early part wanting to go back to sleep went pretty well. I had nearly a month for it to hang like a tethered fart over my life, and the window has now been opened to blow it away.

The freedom is something I haven't felt for a long time, partly as it's the biggest thing I've done for a long time. Anything we find tough is an achievement, however easy it is for others, and for phobics it can be close on impossible, whatever the 'normal' people (who we all once were I'll add) think. Now I have the freedom I must make the best of it. I've pissed around since then, partly as I can and partly there was little else to do. Housework is slowly getting done, I've called the radio, made more music and delivered some election leaflets, and tomorrow's booking is now off which is only a shame as there was some more business to do which would have made some more space in the house that now has to wait another week.
This is another test, but this time an easy and enjoyable one. No guilt if I do nothing although a sign cropped up yards from its two brothers in Homerton, which besides being this side of the river is part of hell itself. I expect I'll get there eventually, it's not one I desperately need but a variation of others in the same set or I'd probably be there now. And the woman I met at the weekend lives round there, and when I thought of the journey more or less confirms the folly of getting involved there, although my remarks of a reasonable right wing straight talker probably put her right off from the go. We need reasonable right wing straight talkers before the left wing waffly sheep who don't even want the sort of society they promote take us over completely, which until our election have already here.

Maybe there should be a right wing bible, with essential truths like the commandments:

1) Call a spade a spade
2) Let the people travel freely
3) Let people keep the money they earn and leave it to their family
4) Let people rise to their own level in society without being held back by crap like comprehensive schools or positive discrimination

You get the picture, honest, straight talking Libertarianism. Common sense. No jealousy, pretence or outright lies (like global warming or multiculturalism) but let people get on with it without interference and 'guidance' from any ideology like the insidious socialism. Freedom is not an ideology, anything that restricts your freedom for an opinion of how things should be is. Keep them out.

Voting our lives away

It's been some time since I opened the box and had nothing to say. The activity was wearing me out and just hope I can find as many easy things to do when it's over this week. Assuming it is. Meanwhile our government has managed to become the totalitarian collection of mafiosi I said Labour were as soon as I was old enough to tell the difference.
They made it in the end. Fuel rationing. Under the latest plans to rob the poor (as they will be hurt the most) each person will be given an annual energy allowance and once it's used will be taxed an all the remainder used. It's possible it may be beaten by the next election but unlikely.

People either know this already or don't want to. How much they'll have to be robbed before they realise the concept of global warming was developed solely for this purpose is the equivalent of a negative IQ test. The longer people fall for it the lower their IQs are. And that seems bloody low to me as I suspected for a long time. I want them to show me I'm wrong yet each time this and last month more green taxes were announced no one besides me and Petrie Hosken on LBC seemed to care. Clive Bull there wondered what difference it made why they taxed us as they've got to do it anyway, the simple answer is that you can't have a unicorn tax if there aren't any unicorns. If they do need to clear us out then just say so and admit they've fucked up the economy no better than pre-Nazi Germany and Zimbabwe today. I saw the debt crisis coming, my cat did, and even my flaky ex probably did. But Gordon Brown, the most powerful man (officially at least) in the country was too fucking thick to realise? Of course he knew, but with hands in the till how could he stop it?

So I see the political system of democracy crumble in front of me, and without bloggers and other independent individuals reminding as many people as possible our governments are as bent as a nine bob note, maybe more people will vote for the other lot in the next election. The ones with principles who won't imitate every other bugger like the main three do. Just don't vote Green obviously. These extremists are against freedom and everything we were supposed to have won the war for. Now the EU is taking over, just like Germany tried to twice before but this time with the Lisbon Treaty signed have now succeeded. And the biggest green taxes come from that very EU, so the only way to stop them is choose a politician who wants to leave it. Enough said.

A little Nazism is OK

I was just asked by a fellow campaigner for the truth on climate change about how there can be a correlation between increased taxation and affecting the climate? As the major (only?) political weapon against perceived climate change is taxation then they expect us to accept that raising money can reverse the harmful effects we have had on the climate. Watch this space.
Secondly, and I said it before in the forums and nearly got my head bitten off, one of the highest causes of CO2 in the atmosphere are animal exhalations. While plants breathe it in and exhale oxygen, sadly animals do the reverse, so the most effective way to repair the delicate balance of the atmosphere is to remove all animal life from the planet (nb, plants will also die as there won't be enough CO2 left for them, but a small price to pay I'm sure).

When it comes to political power, Europe lead the world in unification. They are slowly unifying an area the size of the Roman Empire, Ottoman Empire and if it had succeeded the Third Reich. One by one countries are asked to change to fit in, first the currency, then the measurements, and when each is in place something else will be added until we have a homogenous and increasing area speaking the same language, driving on the right, and using the same currency. Then of course principles will be extended to previously imperial measurements for harmonisation within the community. Time, being base 12, is an anachronistic reference to imperial times, so will be decimalised with 100 seconds in a minute and 20 hours a day. And as time is not restricted to Europe the UN will declare the rest of the world will have to switch instantly to harmonise intercontinental flights and trade. And one further step, suggested by my deputy Roger Hooton, is that rather than have time zones which are divisive and isolate nations, from now on all countries worldwide will be on the same time. Then each country will be able to make appointments to call and the time will not vary between nations, and flights will be able to be timed universally with no alteration for local differences.

Communication is also vitally important with local variations excluding outsiders, so Europe will lead the way, democratically choosing the language spoken by the highest population, which of course is German. Because of the political correctness not allowing any country to exclude others through language barriers, a UN diktat will therefore order every country in the world to follow, as it cannot be enough for one continent to speak German, it must spread to all corners of the earth, and if other planets are colonised or found to be inhabited, as the established world language then become the universal language.

Some people may say these regulations go to far, and I agree. But if they do, where do you draw the line before they become unreasonable?