Angel progress

Having been harnessing the divine power now for a couple of weeks how am I doing? I've certainly kept busy, with more old road signs turning up within easy reach and using up the last weeks before it gets too dark for photos more than round the corner till the spring. Otherwise it's been pretty well business as usual, nothing's actually gone wrong which is at the high end of normal, but the current issue is 'no finishes'. There are some small ones which don't change my life like finding more old road signs,

but major ones which do make a difference never quite get there. I fully accept they don't for anyone else, but as they are possible and see others who have them then as I've aimed myself in those directions have completed my half (the starts) while normally the other half is out of our hands calling on the angels is supposed to add the extra power to complete the missions. I know exactly the sort of jobs I would like done, and would like to have enough time and energy left if I ever do to actually enjoy them. It's also a scientific experiment as part of my research, so for the first time keep official records of requests and results to prove one way or another after a reasonable amount of time if it helps. One or two new starts have happened, every one has the potential to complete but like buying a house or applying for a job we all know how many reach the end of the road to the destination. This goes for outside events as well as my own life. I watch the world being openly run by liars and cheats and no one believes me. I can present 50 pages of properly collected evidence and they still couldn't get the point. Only this week after 23 years they found the police altered all their evidence after Hillsborough, and as well as being the first example of this revealed to the public outside the private sector it to me stands not as an exception but a precedent showing how business is always done.

If it works just to ridicule your accusers to stop an inquiry then the system is clearly run by the crooks or accusations would be followed up and dealt with. Obama alone has a list of unanswered questions, his and his family's records have been wiped from the public domain, even to his alleged college alumni. This is not normal business, and am guessing if you check any other president in the western world their college records will not just be complete but proudly displayed. And why wouldn't they be? He is the prime example of a stooge with absolutely no personal influence who is purely there to do a job he has been put there to do, by George Soros, David Rockefeller and all their friends and associates working for a world government with no national powers remaining. It's all on record and proudly announced by some as if they expect the world to agree with them, but the media don't like it and only come across a single article on all places as The Guardian. The IPCC admitted openly it's now about economic redistribution and not the environment, yet the media haven't caught on. When an authority knows so well it can admit its true plans and get no effect then it means everyone who counts is looking after them. Maybe a local paper could sneak in a small paragraph somewhere with no relevant headline but if The Times (run by Murdoch) had an article anywhere "IPCC admit they are about money not climate" he'd be under concrete by the following day. Now for someone, a single person, to be above Murdoch at all means there is a level even worse and stronger than the antichrist of the 20th century himself. Al Gore has taken that mantle, although being such a figure of fun makes him appear harmless that's a simple clown costume hiding the devil behind. Obama's not exactly evil, as he's an empty shell like a newsreader who just reads off his autocue and if it said we are going to kill all the first born sons wouldn't raise an eyebrow. If human cloning was possible I'd say he'd been made in a lab and just designed to do the job and has no past to record. That's certainly what you'd think if looking for it as well.

So one task for the angels is to get people to discover what I already know, whether from my work or generally, and have been told (I have a channel speaking to them for me as well) to summarise it on a single page and send it door to door. That is fairly expensive and takes weeks of damn hard work as I've done it before for my own business and got one reply from an old friend who lived in a house I leafletted. I can't see that as a good idea somehow but breaking it up into a few gradually growing lessons and one short page does make sense. I'm learning a lot though and each new idea becomes part of the teaching. Looking past the surface is the biggest lesson, like wind turbines or electric cars. Good selling, bad product. Don't buy the product to find out the truth. Misleading advertising is illegal unless by the government, so they have taken over the wind industry and force it on us although unlike the climate (another area people must do their own checking) the figures are known and certain. But people don't check (we can now, it's all online) and make death threats to others who suggest they do (I would know). So despite the solution being as easy as an hour's clicking and reading they get away with it as 'what's in it for them?' as I get asked whenever I venture into global warming fanatic sites. Unfortunately emotional maturity is a generations long process and those who have completed it have no effect on those who haven't. No wonder I've started relying on angels.

Working with the angels

I don't normally bother with such esoteric concepts- if I'm doing anything with the unseen forces it's straight to the top and nothing between. But if genuine the angels have come to me- first someone told me about a cat called Angel, then I met someone who was reading about them and working with them, and had it confirmed by working for someone called Angel, who turned out to be the same one I'd known for over 20 years, and then a third person saying she felt OK when she moved as she met what she called the angel cat. Of course the best way for the higher levels to communicate with us is through repetition, so if the same weird stuff crops up over and over again we can't miss the message. Then this week I had a psychic reading and was told to work with the angels directly, keep records and make requests, as it's their role to answer them as they have no will of their own but created for our benefit.

I have nothing to lose- where I am so far is a small fraction of what I would like, so while all my plants are short green shoots and buds after 52 years while others have created a jungle, this is a totally painless addition to every other method I use. It is similar to Conversations with God, in that it becomes like another voice speaking to you, and you write down all the results to make sure you remember them properly and can compare what you had at the start with further along. I've got nothing to lose here and will just see how it goes, it really is as simple as that.

Mission complete- what next?

The great risk blogging is separating the readers, we had this conversation years ago I think on the old ones, but besides changing names if you read an account of your life you'd know even if others didn't. Totally legal or newspapers wouldn't exist, but not everyone likes being discussed online despite it purely being a written version of half the conversations on earth (minimum). What's more interesting than talking about the people we know? Facebook caught me out, the first site people I know use, as one person at least has agreed with me to avoid politics for 35 years as we knew our views then and were happy to leave each to them. Now he pops up and tuts sometimes as if he didn't remember I used to support Mrs Thatcher, although purely as the bleach to wipe out the Labour mess rather than her general policies. Once she had done that she went wild and I joined the other lot (not Labour, there were others), until certain of their leaders filled the gap on the left since Blair shifted Labour away, which is not actually the remit of a centre party, so I had to leave.

Anyway, the good news is I spent 5 hours driving to Battle yesterday, and was so tired as the roads after the M25 didn't exceed 50 mph for a mile or so at a time and less on the rest, as I was hoping to carry on to Hastings, but another 7 or so miles, doubling to 14, was pushing me over the edge, and actually found on return I'd only gone 12 miles past my last trip that way. The road sign I needed had had the numbers peeled off, leaving a negative where the dirt hadn't reached the backing, just like a road junction one near Cambridge. And it had a red triangle for the children sign below it rather than the required circle (as on a private road) so only just an addition to the collection to the 'damaged' list (there is a joke there but even I can draw the line occasionally).

The new camera is wonderful, making sharp edges and blue skies most of the time, the faults being manual semi auto focus (ie no control but can't leave it to do the work) and it slants verticals which is pretty much like saying 'Macbeth' in a dressing room or bringing ham to a barmitzvah. And that's on a large digital screen, I will submit a sample to a photo forum and see if they can suggest a tweak. I spent most of today adding them online and just finished (don't look at the time), but nothing on tomorrow. The boilerman returned today, and found what I assumed was the fault hiding behind the fault he fixed, after a little direction from me as to its behaviour as a result of it. It was fixed and covered by the previous work thank goodness, and should now have a warm winter. If it works it won't need a service for another year anyway now.

So my map is full for 2012, and if I feel like it next spring would bag another 100km square which is at least 70 miles as the crow flies in any direction. There are methods to get two as the nodes touch so if you aim for one can do it that way, west is too far off the main road but north is a small detour west just before (cough) Peterborough. That's a fun ride I remember, but would prefer a luxury car (one with a boot and engine over 1300cc that is) as it does make a difference on a long run. But till then it's now whatever I like as the coast stops me going any further where the routes would be easier. The house and garden will now benefit, and whatever else I do when I'm here on the creative side. Although it's the exception (slightly above women asking men out) apart from other people finding road signs for me I haven't really achieved anything I can remember this year beyond my own work. Nothing else has really changed or happened to help, the news has been dire- apart from a new law making squatting a crime (as if it just occured to people having other people take your house over and stopping you living there, using the gas and electricity and not paying any tax) and anyone else I know's decisions have pretty much not been in ways I'd benefit from either. Of course when for instance a friend moves abroad it isn't personal, but then again neither would it be if they chose to come back, but I'd benefit. People don't do things to pee us off much, they do what they have to and we are caught in the crossfire as collateral damage. Maybe I should use that as a screen name, as from the day my mother left us to the day my friend left Britain probably for good I have had the roll of paper to wipe up after them. Thank god the most important decisions have been good, ie my exams, and then the successful TV work, but outside the business area which I've always had covered pretty well, the personal side has been scraps. Besides my good friends who have now dwindled as described in great detail long ago, the women have been worse than anyone could ever have written in a novel. Whatever could go wrong did, almost without an exception, hence my long history of being single, and each new attempt following the same end regardless of the means- mental illness, emigration, parent pressure, ex boyfriends, you name it and many more ways I couldn't have thought up beforehand it's gone wrong. I'm even going to the wedding of the one who left me the second her ex found out I'd caught her on the rebound in 1993. I'd possibly have been married to her nearly 20 years and had children otherwise, instead of a series of cats. Not that I couldn't have had them both.

So this woman (see how smoothly I got back on track there?) appears to fit the same pattern I've had since the day I dumped my first girlfriend as she was boring (she was) and changed my mind the day after but she didn't want to know. I've been punished for that ever since, and even accepted boring women at 30 (I planned to drop faults from the list every decade), but can't yet accept dim ones. As I learnt long ago you need something to talk about afterwards (you know), it's the second most important thing (at least I'm honest in admitting it) to me, and may drop that requirement at 60 if no one else has arrived. The routine so far has been each decade when I drop a deal breaker from the list those women are no longer interested in me instead. The formula has been better than any scientific one besides putting vinegar in baking soda. It is infinitely repeatable and have as yet found no way to interrupt its constant action. If I have enough money I'll ask CERN to create one for me now they've found the Higgs Boson and have to find something else to use it for. Publishing one of my articles would be nice as well. Stranger things have happened

Spiritual update 9/12

Having had messages when I didn't visit for a while, and seen the hits go up again I can come back and actually trust I am being read, although apart from Roger hardly anyone seems to comment now, partly as most old bloggers have left and haven't found any new ones to replace them when I used to comment on theirs in return.

Anyway, spiritual journey time, and writing it down makes it clearer for me to see as well. Besides the caveat 'you can't rely on the unreliable' ie everything outside yourself, I met someone who has had pretty much the same path and discoveries than me, but in half the time I took. She took my details a week ago and have I heard back, have I buggery. OK, two or three possible reasons do exist which may have caused the delay, but the reason I used the screen name satguru 11 years ago was because with all the conflicting outside teaching only we could sort it out, and we are the satguru while they are the outer guru. I am still the satguru, and Neale Donald Walsch says we are all perfect at birth, and enlightened when we realise we never needed to add anything to be so. I will add from the next teacher that we also leave the dimensional frequency matrix to gradually see and affect more and more until we become adepts as well. One major school says the powers come before enlightenment, but he says that was to stop too many people using them so they could. That makes far more sense to you, as Walsch says, we're not given toys and expected not to play with them.

Technically I have reached a point where all my main work has been done this year (as photography needs long days if going many miles to get them), so apart from one optional trip I can only do when free and fit to do so I am catching up with everything else. Meeting her confirmed my path must be universal, as it was close enough to know it was the same as mine, and being guided by whatever is doing so must be in our best interests and not pointing us over a cliff or poverty. But isn't it better to keep this going rather than being ships which pass in the night? That would only work if we'd learnt all we could in one go from each other and then move on again, and I'd see it as a waste in this case. Part of the system no doubt, but not part of one I'd have chosen unless she turns out to be booby trapped and would blow part of me off if I touched her. If not then I am still bloody waiting.

I am certainly not at the stage of having any control of life using any powers, I can just about see static auras now (the best ones move) so getting somewhere (after having the third eye opened in 1991 and then not much since) and will certainly work on it more when I'm not on the road. I'm not complaining as being free is the best place to start, but I have run out of ideas for now. I got the new camera after completing the big ones (the old one is packing up gradually and couldn't wait for the final convulsion) and now just filling in spaces locally and there are now no trips under about 80 miles besides the final 2012 one so wouldn't be till next spring. This will be directed, and currently not even at the 24 hour point with a clue for tomorrow, but that always takes care of itself somehow, besides an eye test and gardening, and waiting for the boilerman to see why the boiler still goes out after spending nearly as much as a new one. Being married if nothing else would share these events, and whatever happened wouldn't have to deal with them all on my own. Even when the sole candidate appears not to fulfil one of my criteria (maybe if I wait till 60 only one will remain and the rest will be wiped off, maybe this should be brought forward?).

In the past and probably present things seem to return to the middle, the official place of the ego, where good and bad always cancel to neutral, so must escape it to enlightenment. But I've seen a little more than that and still remember it's possible, but not yet in power to find it myself.

Look below the surface

Here's a phenomenon I've noticed which everyone goes through, but not all are either aware of or cured in the slightest. I noticed as a child when everything was new to me each new discovery looked as it was, and then sooner or later I discovered what they really meant. I'd need some time to think of lists of examples as once I looked beneath the surface of each I no longer saw the presentation but the content and mainly forgot how I'd got to that point.

One example today reminded me, not a particularly good one but should work to illustrate the point, was interest rates. People look at the economy and assume if no knowledge beyond that the lower the better, and if they charge less to borrow then it must be a good thing. Then you look into it and find it's both not simple or accurate as

1) People only borrow relative to the interest rates headlined, they are only for banks to borrow at and not people. Banks can charge whatever the market will take regardless.

2) Interest rates affect borrowers, is it a good thing to encourage borrowing by making them lower than otherwise?

3) If you exclude everything besides mortgages then how do they affect them? They are lower than otherwise but is that a good thing? In any system nothing works in isolation, so by pulling one string others will be pulled connecting them. So by reducing interest rates it increases demand for houses as the monthly payments are less for the same price. Increase demand and all that happens is the price rises and they end up paying the same anyway, just more on the principal and less on the interest. Then the interest rate is volatile, so buy when it's low and if you are already at your limit you'll go broke if it inevitably rises. Keep it high and then no one can ever be caught out as it will rarely rise and usually fall within the life of the loan. And prices will stay reasonable and people will only buy what they can afford as the fixed amount of the cost will not change, so constant, but the variable will and they can already afford it at the higher level.

4) Who else is affected by interest rates? Everyone who saves and invests. The lower the rate, the lower their income, and the smaller the overall economy.  So it means by keeping rates low more people have less and those who borrow only save a marginal amount as it inflates prices in the first place.

So just this one example is attempting to illustrate hundreds more, all demonstrating the point that many things are not what they seem on the surface. Left wing politics, reduce poverty, help the workers etc sounds wonderful on the surface but of course how does it reduce poverty? By taking money from those who on the whole earn it. They give to the poor by stopping people from becoming rich, maybe less so now but a 97% top rate of tax in the 70s looks like stealing to me, and simply means people either go abroad or pay accountants to hide their earnings and it doesn't go where intended anyway. The point of this is not to teach economics, but not to judge anything on its immediate impact. You wouldn't trust a person you didn't know just because they impressed you on first meeting, as you know people are complex and have many hidden depths, and most things are the same, plus many advertisers understand this so package their frauds and ripoffs as beneficial, adding yet another layer to the fog hiding what shite lies behind.

I don't want you to either learn from experience or worse still not learn at all, but avoid the trouble as much as possible in advance by learning a formula. Never judge what you hear about for the first time on appearance, check what it really means. Most people hooked in are sucked in so deep they can't even see there is a way out let alone look for one. Believing political rebels want freedom, joining them and finding, like the IRA or Basque separatists they really want to run the country like the mafia and murder their opponents and deal arms and drugs unhindered by another country's authority as they would become the authority. Like Egypt for example today. One tyrant has been replaced by a different one from a different tribe of Arab mafiosi. The internet is a great help as everything you need to know can be found without much effort and really once you know to check no excuse to get caught out many times.

Anything which looks too good on the surface usually is, and like politicians most offers are probably more likely to provide the exact opposite of what they claim once you check them. Another example is locals nearly always oppose all new developments in their area. If they all succeeded we'd have no motorways, railways, airports, supermarkets or much else we'd be stuck without. All these rabid activists, who all use said facilities, would also be lost without them, and would they really rather travel a few miles to them than have them nearby? People are so stuck in this mindset they are quite prepared to deprive themselves of such facilities on the surface although had they ever succeeded would probably miss whatever they had either deprived the area of altogether or forced elsewhere beyond their reach. You need a bit of lateral thinking to help, think what you would be like if they got what they wanted compared to the alternative- would you really want to go to east Kent to fly abroad rather than Heathrow, or pay much more in the local grocer's than save in a new supermarket? People really have to think of every consequence beyond the surface before jumping on every bandwagon, and not end up getting themselves in more trouble than they would have otherwise.

Government fraud? You decide

I am interested in politics, and sometimes (pointlessly) will debate the merits of left v right, but of course that is personal opinion and may as well spend hours trying to persuade people to like strawberries. But my angle is criminal activity which isn't part of left or right, but the filth which has got in and wrecked them both. I saw the seeds back in 1975 with the vote to leave the Common Market which the advertisers had about 80% more resources not to than the opposite, and appeared the advertising did far better than the actual facts.

This thread has now been followed for nearly 40 years, and now the whole thing has spread far beyond the bounds of the European version of the iron curtain worldwide. UN Agenda 21 is the plan, and whatever the wording it is about bringing world industry back to the 18th century more or less, and have what is the equivalent of a subsistence society. My legal training means once I say something it's because I've discovered it true 'beyond reasonable doubt'. In this case it's caught red handed, or better still direct confession, as many who believe they are above the will of the people have said so on record and in writing.

As long as the media and masses believe anyone making these claims are crazy they will continue to do it, but the Libor cheating is the first example of highest level organised crime and once the highest names making the orders are exposed no doubt many more similar will follow, as that is just like finding a cockroach, if you do there's always a city of them close by. That is how things were done, and once Libor catches the main operators as being at the top and not the alleged rogue operators unknown by certain leaders who have frequently be named as ordering it to happen, on top of that the fact it continued unchallenged over five years says that unless you believe our authorities are so incompetent they can't spot a massive long term fraud they had asked them to do it and as a result (as in all similar) kept it quiet and kept it going. Therefore you can't have an investigation or legal challenge if it's a government run fraud can you? Libor currently stands as a test case, and if proven (well, it is proven, only the structure remains to be discovered fully) will again not be an exception but a rule. More evidence for those still in doubt, why is manipulating Libor not a crime if those writing the law didn't want to avoid criminal proceedings (as they have)?

War on the astral planes

As I was inspired by Ishtar's blog on the battles in the astral planes, reflected here, I'd describe the situation, long demonstrated in Star Trek, of the two types of wars. There are the standard baddies vs goodies, but at least as many or more are baddies against baddies, as war is far likelier between bloody idiots who know no better than decent people who can often find ways of avoiding it. Therefore from the lowest level of drug gang wars, mafia infighting and ice cream turf wars to Syria and Egypt where both sides are part of a single primitive tribal mafia of bad and worse versions of the same things fighting for their particular branch of the family shite to take over power. So these Arab springs simply replace one set of bastards with even worse, and kill many in the process, and every single one we should keep out of as it's like trying to separate black and red ants fighting with the same hopeless results.

The same is going on in politics, with the equally astral illuminati Obama and Romney supposedly fighting to do almost exactly the same thing as simply doing someone else's dirty work whichever wins. Like the devil they must do some good or would never survive, but only to divert attention from what they're both really doing. The EU and British governments are all part of the same astral monster, led from the pits of hell and purely about trying to dominate what they see as 'useless eaters' while they both reduce the population from staged wars and terrorist attacks, food shortages and unaffordable energy prices, all in UN Agenda 21.

Knowledge is power, and the formula is simple. The dark forces are called so as they can't work outside the dark, shine the light and expose what they're doing and they can't do it any more, the devil and the evil forces all work with illusions created by fear and pretence. Of course leaving the EU won't hurt any country any more than removing a malignant tumour, proved by the current state of the Euro and vast improvement in Britain who didn't join despite being warned of failure forever if they didn't. Of course no one remembered that, just as they believe not being in the EU would cause the same disaster even more so although it didn't happen with not being in the Euro. Anyone bothered to find the full accounts would see Britain ends up billions in the red every year from being members and always will. But once each person (it only works one at a time) learns the truth then it won't be possible to delude them any more. Who would vote to have cancer once they knew EU meant cancer and carbon taxes meant death?

I have tuned into this frequency as many others have, and as such can explain how every part of politics currently operates as it's only one well oiled machine and like an engineer can see each part and how they all fit together to make it work. Obama is controlled by George Soros, David Rockefeller and others who really make the rules not in one country as a head of state but the world via the UN. Europe is exactly the same, and they all operate by legalising crimes such as fraud and extortion (carbon taxes and credits, interest rate fixing etc.), telling lies (CO2 will change the climate, it can't, I've spent longer than most scientists learning why), and repeating the same Nazi-style buzz words to maintain the illusion and divide the weak of mind against the minority who are immune to mind control. It's clever compared to the majority who fall for it, but bloody basic in reality as once you start telling a lie you both have to keep remembering it (as there's no real data there to draw on) and be consistent, which can't be done and diverges from the known the longer it's attempted. I enjoy the intellectual experience of learning and sharing the material, only blunted by the utter indifference (at best) and murderous intent at worst in response. If they didn't know already people either don't believe or trust me or simply don't care either way- 'So what's wrong with a world government anyway?'. But I can't give up, as the astral is the spiritual sewer presumably somewhere above the floating fecal material has given me the ability to tune in to see exactly what these excuses for humanity are doing and how. Most people don't even believe it's possible (they've forgotten the Nazis and think only black people like Robert Mugabe can do such things in modern times) but white educated men in suits who speak perfect English could never be mafia bosses and mass murderers. That's only because they get other people to do it for them and don't say anything to make it clear they have.

I could go on, and if offered a degree would do so, but this is the general picture and can always add more depth and examples. If I had the strength and support I'd do some lectures as no one reads much more than the few existing writers but anyone can do a lecture if sponsored, but currently do it online including on video. My personal response is as the lotus flower, to float above the mud and filth and not care what happens as you can't become personally attached to anything down here, but we also prefer success so enjoy any good results although expect or wish for none actively.

Back to normal?

Keeping anyone who's been following up to date the last month has been the busiest for at least a decade. Not by choice but just had a constant stream of arrangements which weren't beyond me (many are), a school and internet reunion, two olympic cycle races, various distant trips to find old road signs, my first football match for four years, an afternoon of open houses for an art exhibition, a photo exhibition and anything else I may have forgotten. It's now over and besides a trip to the Cotswolds planned as my last long photo trip (as all directions will have been covered) I am pretty well done. I have no idea what I'll do instead besides collecting all the squares on the local London map photos for the same website where you score for getting them all per 10km square, and I'm nearly finished on my second.

Of course the thing about collecting is it doesn't change your life one bit, except meaning you don't have to do certain things again once you've done them, but have a distant photo of Bradley Wiggins and the British team, the best possible road signs barely in existence for 50 miles of London, and met lots of people which is probably the most beneficial as every person online who becomes a real face is no longer a mystery. On the politics front the quotes from the Club of Rome I started sending round are now coming back to me, and from some major websites as well as individuals. They can't keep doing it once enough people know.

I have learnt we can all assess any professional subject we can understand as long as they do the technical stuff first, they can work out the data but we can all judge it. As science has become the new Spanish Inquisition, you're either with us or against us, it's become what is now far closer to the mafia than the people who spent most of their lives curing illnesses and saving lives. Now the most visible side of science is ordering us around and telling everyone else they know nothing and are the enemy if they question what are such manipulated findings a small child could see what they're doing. I am not a scientist but then again it takes an investigator to pick out a fraud in any area, so it's police and accountants who can blow apart long term scientific frauds, as two just have, as scientists tend to be trusting, and supportive of all their colleagues.

The only part missing in my personal education was having to drop a master's degree (sociology) due to poor health and switch to a diploma which only had classes once a week instead of twice. It did mean I qualified as a therapist but somehow postgraduate qualifications somehow mean you are listened to and accepted by all simply as you have learnt more than most in your field. As Anthony Davis (no degree) said on his radio show to me, you don't even need a degree to do this, just common sense. He has collected the climate data, and unlike me who has to call the show to share it he can do so as and when he chooses on his show so has the chance to win over the uncertain. But studying law just to degree level teaches you two things, one is to assess evidence and the other is never to produce evidence until it's almost definite. Those two alone can wreck any careless or dishonest professional's productions as we are trained to spot crap and not to say so till we're sure and can prove it beyond reasonable doubt. This means when I share information it's already known and not smoke or secondhand stories. As far as I'm concerned the information speaks for itself, my only personal input is choosing the right stuff and fitting it into the big picture of world political control.

So I can be anonymous like many bloggers, and post things people can check for themselves and see they are genuine, that's all you need in the investigation business, no one needs any more than the ability to do so and totally judged on their results. So when a doctor can misdiagnose the same person three times so they die, their qualification doesn't make a bit of difference, but when a journalist spends months investigating a bogus company you needn't know who they are but could use their findings for a successful prosecution. I've learnt all this as a result of the climate investigation, so pick up all sorts of knowledge along the way. As my first job after graduation was teaching, which is my nature, I will always do so. I saw the faults in my own teachers and made sure I remedied them. No training, as you need O level maths, but can teach anywhere except state schools. I've also learnt cult busting from the climate scam as the mind control used to persuade people a slight rise in temperature is dangerous (it's not, it's beneficial, look at history) is the same as the most evil cults in history as well as Goebbels who wrote the modern rules. They change minds by the million, I undo it one at a time. Clearly not long enough to make a difference alone, but each convert tends to add to the flock and join the mission. In the end you can't keep any lie going very long as the results people discover are not the same, and now climate data is coming in showing steady temperatures, CO2 being ineffective and half the data being made up (at least). The media then have to see enough has come out to change sides (as they always like to back the winners) and once they switch to the truth then it can't last long as an illusion.

I've learned a lot on this job, what people do and don't need to know and how to present it. And more rules, especially if you are put in a position where you discover something is wrong if you don't do something about it you have become part of the problem. There are almost as many people who hear about global warming who work out it's crap but do nothing, many who work in the field and would lose their jobs or promotion, and others who see the investment potential while wind and solar are guaranteeing money for a small outlay. Whatever the reasons once someone knows they are being dishonest they've let the side down. The Euro has ruined the lives of many people but is continuing as they want a united Europe and that needs a united currency, at any cost. So they sacrifice southern Europe for the sake of a dishonest goal. The dimwits who live in these countries (I've seen hours of interviews) have no idea this is the case, but can you imagine them being worse off than they are now with the Euro?

I wish I had the ears of a newspaper instead of yet another blog, I see some of my stories picked up by one or two but it's the exception rather than the rule. I don't know of anyone else outside the odd obscure magazine preaching to the converted who mentions Agenda 21 and the Club of Rome, the mechanism which has been setting this up for centuries (the first divide and rule propaganda has been traced back to publicity material from 1970, but the meetings themselves go back many decades before at least) but the methods they use make most immature people think their claims are genuine and people must police each other for their carbon emissions. That's breathing out, so the aim is to stop people breathing out before they cause more pollution, and of course there's only one way of doing that, and that, most appropriately, is the ultimate aim of them all.

Our prison and how to escape

I've pretty much decided fate has stepped in, and if Grace (the one who wanted to marry me but do nothing otherwise, and has major problems) is all there is (whatever I've done to bring in new material) and she doesn't send me running for the exit like the other offers made over the years and improves over time I may as well keep going. It's nothing like I wanted or expected from a relationship (actually a marriage as that's the only relationship she's having) but then again how many people marry someone thinking it is and find otherwise sooner or later?

Which leads me to today's lesson (I haven't much activity to report, but can use what there was for it), and it's not a personal one about me, but an example everyone can use. For the lucky few who are happy with all aspects of their lives, they've probably got there already without even realising how. But how many can really say that? I always put our lives as a prison, each cell being provided with different facilities and each prison having different people and freedoms within it, and we must make the most of them but know we cannot leave so that is our life for the forseeable future.

Obviously the one difference is prisons only have single sexes, but then again so does my life so pretty similar in that area as well for some of us. The women we all see around us don't count as they have female staff in most male prisons, but they are not for the pleasure of the inmates, as are none of the women around me with rare exceptions. The interesting part begins when the prison authorities start to change the rules and facilities, and one day you get a colour TV, or lose some priviliges. This is random stuff which evens out over time. The guidance then begins when your release time comes close, and you start being prepared for the outside world, with maybe day releases or full access to the garden. It's nothing about what you've done, these things happen and someone is doing it. Some even get released altogether, but only in books and anecdotes, and no one even can be certain there is a world outside as all they are aware of is their prison.

Human beings have prison guards and governors, but they never see them or even know who they are. It's either like a joint effort, where a million people buy a lottery ticket and one wins, or one sided where you dig up the money when doing the garden. The guidance comes when you are supposed to be going to an arrangement, it's cancelled, you find out after you've left and make a detour to do some shopping, realise it's lunchtime and go somewhere you'd never been to before as you're in an area you'd never normally stop but the call came half way there not to carry on and that was where you turned round, see a cafe over the road, go for a meal, and are about to leave when someone phones and delays you for ten more minutes. They are about to hang up and an old girlfriend you hadn't seen for 20 years walks in who's come back home to visit her family after moving abroad, and she's just got divorced and no longer has a reason to stay there, you get talking, exchange numbers and it takes off.

Now take every single step on that story. If one single element had not taken place you wouldn't have met her, as you never go to that area and she was going back abroad later that week. You basically had to be in that exact spot at that exact moment or nothing would ever have happened. You can't arrange that by chance many times, and when it starts happening for different gifts, large and small, over and over again, you realise it can't be random any more, that wouldn't make sense. And if it's not random then someone must be controlling it, it couldn't happen otherwise.

Spiritual development July 2012

Time to catch up with the spiritual development. I've spent the year from spring onwards (due to the long days) working on my photo project, and now covered enough of the map to be satisfied, and means I can now both relax locally again and work on myself. This involves being constantly directed from one situation to another, mainly to give me the chance to learn how to deal with them and occasionally to reward me.

I know where I'm aiming, probably higher than 99.9r% of the population, but because I'm not satisfied with the alternative. I don't want to react to anything any more. Masters have no response at all to news at all, good or bad, but are at peace. You can enjoy the good stuff but no longer affected by the outside as if it actually matters personally. You can access this for moments through meditation and it can happen, you are so calm you know anything could occur and it wouldn't make any difference. I would rather have that all the time now. I'm adding new methods the whole time now I've found a decent teacher who emphasises the powers over enlightenment, as few reach enlightenment but anyone can learn powers one at a time. I now see auras most times when I try, despite seeing them very clearly a few times when with my teacher and a few without. That all but stopped after I stopped lessons 20 years ago, and finally able to do it again albeit rarely as bright so far but happy to see anything at all.

The stress level is always tested after a few day's relief at most. That's the string of situations where I must learn not to react. That's like telling someone not to eat the meal in front of them when they're hungry. I'm being tested now at the highest level, being made to attempt to challenge and ignore the survival instinct itself. It does mean I've covered every other level, but until you beat the devil nothing changes inside, you don't yet feel any different to before but have learnt how to handle everything else besides the worst. I don't even know if the last level is possible besides hearing it from others, but can't do very well otherwise. My patience does wear out at times as my ultimate aim is to reach the end (again, so I've been told) and am running out of energy to handle more tests as like anything else the more you do, like driving miles for my photos, the more you wear out. No teacher pushes the student further than they can manage or it's wasting everyone's time, so am hoping I reach the stage where outside events compensate for the dreadful ones. I don't want or need to be perfect, for example I simply don't care if I ever sit in an audience or go on a holiday again. I've literally been there done that to the maximum and now content without ever doing either. I don't want some new age therapist saying I can't make it until I can happily do everything I can't, as you'd have people picking up spiders and snakes and jumping with parachutes before they could even prepare for enlightenment. We're not designed to be perfect, we are human and have a list of things we can and can't do for everyone, and no one becomes enlightened because they've learnt how to cope with everything life can throw at them. That's not just a psychological process but physically impossible as no one is made to do that, ask yourself what I can't do and you can, and then think what I may do and you can't, it probably evens itself out in nearly all the examples.

So I'm not attempting the impossible by trying to fix nearly all my issues, as a few I know try and make me do, I am however being presented with the regular challenges to my sanity by events arriving I would far rather not attend but know I need to or miss out on something as a result, ie paying a HUGE fucking price for something I need but technically can't afford. It's the same as offering a starving man a sandwich for £10,000 and expecting them to pay or die, but not quite as clear cut. Referring to my point, no teacher ever makes the lessons that tough, but like weightlifting you must work your way up gradually so no single step is too much. I know my boundaries and of course life crosses them for everyone, but I can see how it's being done to me now as a pattern and wonder what I need to do (the teaching says we ought to be able to take over the control as an adept) to stop it. Adeptship comes before enlightenment, and many stop there as the power is almost omnipotent and leaves little desire to continue to full liberation. In the end you get bored with writing your own script and want to release from the outside world altogether, and you are liberated, but may be some time to do so.

My greatest gap is feeling the same now as I started 21 years ago. The day after I left college and started my spiritual classes I picked up the basics in clairvoyance and meditation very quickly and never got much further. I can tune in better and more reliably now (that's just practice) but still feel like shit when life is, and get extremely little from any meditation I do. I am clearly being guided, if not all but most of the time, as I see the clues more and more now, but so far have been on the train 21 years and yet to reach the first station. That's not impatience, quite the opposite, as many people give up at that point. I didn't, half because I don't want to stay as I am, and half because I've been given enough gifts from outside to know I've earned something, but those are like Christmas presents, they are nice when they arrive but your life is the same the next day. Nothing yet to change my life, and it seems if the outside world reflects the inner world mine is stuck, all the outer situations, the politics and people's attitudes in general have reached rock bottom, with criminal psychopaths in charge and a majority of simple minded fools underneath who believe they're all father christmas while having their pockets picked by them. Having taught myself how 21st century politics works and posted it here I and many people know the truth, but we're the high IQ brigade, and the nature of high IQ is it's only distributed in a minority, those who are outvoted.

Until the fraud and corruption is exposed and punished we are stuck with vast prices and restrictions on our lives, and it's as if my life and the world's are both stuck and can't free ourselves of the dark energy. Personally you detach and no longer affected whatever the energy outside, but as above so below each is simply a reflection of the other, so when one breaks the other will follow as linked. So I look at my own life and see it stuck, and outside. And know when either shifts the other will as a result. But can they ever do that at all?

Recent activity

Firstly the politics. It has become clear there is a standard pattern for wrongdoing. First someone notices, then someone complains, then they are sacked or bribed (or possibly killed) for doing so, then it leaks out, then the insiders know and tell others who don't believe them, and eventually it becomes common knowledge, like Barclays Bank fixing the libor rate. Considering they both did it for over 5 years without let or hindrance, and all in the know say it was on government and Bank of England orders then it sets a standard example. The worst part is the mafia and other organised crime is endemic throughout history, but only lasts so long as so many people around them allow it to once discovered. In fact they are worse than the original criminals as anyone without a conscience will commit a crime given the chance, but when anyone witnesses one and refuses to act they are encouraging it, which to me is worse as they have become willing secondary parties.





Mount Pleasant Villas

Back to personal life, my freedom is now the result of completing my photo mission, with none left under 60 miles now and all optional. Last week was just over 60 and the furthest yet, and have another planned soon. The first local trip since then was on uncharted territory (by yards) as I remembered the old railway line south hadn't been covered from Highgate to Finsbury Park, so did that and will add some photos if this eventually allows me to. Besides the next photo trip it's pretty much planning a day at a time again, and so far the usual excitement is ahead, including a trip to the local dump and doing the garden. I see it as a lesson to remember I am free and should make the best of it regardless of how boring and stressful it inevitably gets. The usual arrangements I'm not interested in, nagging, and whatever else is par for the course in all our lives are still going on, and have to deal with them without having things ruined for me in the process. Still seeming things are guided more and more people report the same experiences around me, so that means I should trust it hasn't stopped and whatever gaps there are are still sending me in the right directions.

As far as the news goes it's just crumbs as always, a British winner in the Wimbledon men's doubles and Barclay's being caught for cheating. I can't think of any more as something bad not happening isn't news as you haven't gained anything, so only profit counts and you don't watch the news for that normally. No aliens revealed or carbon taxes repealed, or countries leaving the Euro. Of the three I expect one country will abandon a carbon tax following an election, but the domino effect doesn't work there as each is independent, unlike a collective like the Euro or all or nothing situation like proof of aliens. I said ages ago they can't allow a country to leave the Euro and it is now sailing through the storms without a single casualty. It's not about money, they can supply as much of that as they need as it's all ours and they can remove it freely, so however poor the economies become they won't allow them to break free.

So I am in a vacuum at the moment, between one project and the next, and at least have the time to meditate again which is the solution for everything if it works. I only know it works occasionally for a few minutes, but the aim is to extend that to most of the time.

I'm still here

Have you missed me? I was just reminded I'd lost track how long I'd been here, although in my defence I have been posting on the connected blog which is purely technical not anecdotal. I'd still add regularly but things have changed, few read here nowadays and even fewer post, and almost no one comments. That is no incentive to produce more if it feels no one is taking any notice, so I keep the regular blog here now if anyone still wants to keep up. They lost their blog format some time ago but still have the material there. My other blog But I've been far busier in real life as my photo project to cover as much of the south of England has been every week or so and now covered as much of the map grid as planned, with just distance records now when I get the chance. They all need locating exactly so when you've spent a day on the road you then need another day on the computer getting them all on.

My other blog here is my work priority (voluntary that is) as now it's written and complete the easy work is to spread it until enough people know to stop it. If I'm lucky (and the world, it's for everyone's benefit if not directly involved) eventually a media outlet will adopt it and do the work for me, as it's a complete picture of how the international mafia (led by David Rockefeller) runs the world with the knowledge of a handful of people. Even though in true mafia style they admit it and boast about it in the open while the media take no notice and leave it to people like me to do it instead.

So since last time I've covered Essex and south Cambridgeshire, including some old red triangle warning signs meaning I've now completed all within 50 miles except a couple similar I couldn't find when out, and generally far more active now my energy has rturned to closer what it ought to be at my age, although much less compared to most. But once you've done a few and managed OK it becomes more of a routine and more to come. I'm still meditating of course and will have more time to now, and using many from Higher Balance which are the closest to what I was aiming for originally. They work just enough to know they are genuine. For the first time in ages yesterday's now annual school reunion had half the class below me as was organised by someone, so wasn't the same couple of people I didn't bother with before (they were there but didn't need to take any notice) plus one or two random others if I was lucky. I didn't take the camera after the last few years but everyone else took photos and am waiting for them now. Meanwhile here is the most remote place on the east coast you can take a photo before the road stops.

If you try and leave the road an go beyond you may risk getting shot, and very few people have going by the lack of other photos.

How the fuck do they get away with it?

This week there has been a procession of climate errors coming to light. We have the melting Himalayan glaciers which didn't melt now growing already, Arctic ice crossing the limit of positive growth before someone was caught altering the data at the last minute, plus a new study which suggests the reason the Arctic ice had been showing a decline were the measuring equipment had been drifting into open sea while the ice remained pretty much the same, akin to David Copperfield making the Statue of Liberty disappear, and another list of errors in James Hansen's graphs, all within a week.

It is basically asking the question how many gross and glaring errors, on top of blatant alterations which have been caught are the indication of a genuine scientific issue? I've never come across any other since Piltdown Man which has raised so much controversy within the profession (I don't think Piltdown Man did actually, it was accepted by consensus and then discredited all in one go decades later, lesson to be learnt there) and was so rough it kept turning up greater and greater inconsistencies of all types and levels. If your bank or doctor worked with so many breaches of standards you'd change wouldn't you? How many mistakes would you allow them to make before you lost confidence and decided to pack them in? For me I'd just go back to my own jobs and those who have worked for myself and my family.

I've done a year studying accounting before switching, and have done little bits ever since as you don't need to be qualified unlike many other professions as you get the work signed off after doing it by someone who is. Accounting is probably the easiest area to pick up errors, but they are still made, and believe it or not the size is not actually such an element of them, as a massive one can just as easily get through as a few small ones. But the point being that the means are extremely simple using balance sheets to reveal them. Extend that to other professions, science, medicine, law and the like. The deeper you get into them the more of a professional you would need to be to pick up errors. I studied law and when a friend has had bad advice it can often be clear to us and not to anyone else simply as it's what we've had to learn.

The climate is hard to measure but fairly simple to read when measurements are made. I'd say it's fairly close to accounting in that sense, except you're dealing with estimates and future budgeting, complex income statements etc which are many times beyond even the most complicated areas of accounting, but nonetheless able to go through the balance sheet test. Basically it should not be possible to make most of the errors at all. If science or a builder or tailor measured a glacier or an iceberg you'd actually expect them to get it right, especially if you were making a coat for it or more so a bridge to take its weight. I've seen the result of miscalculations in architecture, where a suspended walkway collapsed killing a number of people as the equations hadn't been done properly.

If a builder makes an error, or the architect instructing them, people can die, like the bridge over the river in Ohio which did almost exactly the same thing some years ago. They are wise after the event by working out why the structures failed, but too late for the victims. And you wouldn't employ the firm again I'd hope. The same goes for a misdiagnosis or botched operation. The glacier situation alone is no different to amputating the wrong leg, but the scientists don't ruin anyone's life directly with their errors, and apparently for 99% of the world neither their credibility.

Psychologically what exactly puts these mavens above all others? Is it because they don't directly injure or maim anyone when they stuff up, combined with the almost unanimous support by politicians worldwide? The sheer credibility of the believers who, like a parent, excuse their children of every crime and misdeed as they appear to offer climatologists unconditional love and trust, and however many people the Kray twins killed they were always good to their mother who loved them through it all.

So with a record of not just errors but such which would get your banker, accountant, architect, builder, doctor and especially an airline pilot sacked and possibly imprisoned for gross negligence (a crime at certain levels) climatologists are excused every single one as 'it doesn't affect the science'. Hold on, it IS the science! The whole theory relies on observation and when those observations become wrong, then how much of an error margin should people accept (above and beyond the professions mentioned) before the same standards everyone else is kept to are upheld? It's like some sort of Mafia-like immunity, in fact I'd go one step further and say not even 'like'. That or nearly everyone has been hypnotised, much like Paul McKenna tells people they can't count the number 7. But hypnotism always wears off on its own yet this has lasted decades, in the face of more and more new and incredibly wrong data. That really takes some doing.

Beating the system

I've just been reading a blog predicting the downfall of the New World Order, which of course is one of the rare optimistic views around, and does have a few potential points. The main one being the simple one that only the truth exists, and as the whole system relies on people believing lies which are now freely possible to refute one by one online then one way or another eventually enough people will learn the truth which will destroy the illusions. The second, which also makes perfect sense, is that the good guys not only exist (they ought to, they are after all the vast majority) but a group are working actively to bring it down from the inside by taking over the corrupt organisations and cleansing them from within. That is the sort of thing that although is quite logical we'd only know when it had already happened as you can't expose an investigation while in progress or the rats would get away as well.

It's good to see an optimistic note, although David Icke always said they can never win as only able to lie to gain power, which by its nature is temporary. So the IPCC simply used Goebbel's knowledge of the mass IQ and said global warming wouldn't really kick in till 2100. Even though to anyone with a three digit IQ (or maybe not as they still vote green) could see that it's impossible to ever find out, they fooled the people with a lie they'd never expose directly. Except it's fucking stupid. How even the green voters (the whole of Europe and now Australia at least, plus of course those great contributors to world culture, the Canadians) with three digit IQs couldn't see through that one as Al Gore said it was their unborn grandchildren who would suffer they forgot the human lifespan altogether. It's the same as Paul McKenna's trick where he hypnotises people to forget the number 7 so count their fingers and can't finish. We won't see 2100? But surely we'd be able to see the terrible climate chaos if it happened even if it's not till 2100. Duh, no, you won't.

My mission is over now, as I've complied around 50 pages of A4 on the topic and wallowing in shite all day makes you smell nasty. I am now back to my spiritual work and my climate and fraud investigations are all on this very blog for no one to read. As for the climate that will look after itself, the speed of new data overturning guesses is increasing weekly, the penguins are now spreading after models said they'd lose 95%, the melting glaciers that never did are now growing despite expectations in the models they'd be gone some time before lunch/2350/2525 depending who you read. The models are only valid until the day the results come in, and as Harold Camping gave exact dates although so soon he was made to look like a total dick (although more so the people who believed him) in months, and again when he got it wrong a second time. The IPCC are looking like total dicks every time a new measurement comes in now, as their best case scenario for 2010 was some way above the actual temperature despite the CO2 itself being their worst case scenario. But they still cling to the connection as they want more money and the same people are so darn stupid they believe a stable temperature is global warming as long as someone says it is.

If blown apart then this generation would wake up overnight, sack all the politicians, put the climatologists in prison and sweep the old cancer away. It can happen and I will guarantee it must by 2100 as those models were written in stone and at some point between now and 2100 the people will see they are so different from reality they will become obsolete and worthless, as will the idiots who produced them. I'd love to be here when it happens, but even if not it has to happen as if the sea level is falling now it's going to take a decade of rising just to get back what it's lost, except it's still falling. Ditto for the temperature and as the ice has never lost more than 2% which lasted a few years before coming back all three fronts are not indicating anything more than natural variability.

Then as well as climate false money will die a death when the currencies become so devalued by debt they become worthless and people have to barter goods again, after sacking all their politicians. The economics behind the current levels of debt (the US alone is so high it can't cover the world GDP a few times over once you take into account the non-recorded financial instruments) [see Max Keiser for details] are providing short term liquidity to delay repayments, but increase the money supply without a corresponding increase in capital. All this does it make things into currency, so while currency falls commodities rise, and the results are, unlike the climate, totally predictable. Gold is the thermometer and oil and food follow in unison. The same money buys less, as interest earned is lower than inflation and inflation rises above wages. The results are guaranteed.

So this blogger says it's all being taken care of, the fake accounts and stolen gold are being reclaimed as I speak, and eventually when the mission is complete we'll all know about it as many big names will no longer be in office but behind bars. Of course if you make the laws all you do is decide what you want to do and make it legal, but that sort of selective protection can only ever be temporary as eventually the victims will enforce their own versions as they did in Egypt. The fact the Egyptians replaced a corrupt individual with a group of gangsters just reflects local conditions, but in the west we've got the gangsters already so what would replace them would not be anything like the originals. I've no idea how long they think this operation will take, but the punchline is the mass arrest of the bankers and their support system, and as the governments are the major part of this support by keeping interest rates low so their margins are greatly widened and they can borrow at next to nothing to manipulate the markets overnight and make enough to pay it back and still make a profit, not to mention the total lack of regulation which allows structured financial instruments (ie hidden), naked short selling (check it out), gambling with depositor's money, bailing out business to business investment banks, all fraud but legalised. There is enough to not just go round but remove poverty everywhere, and one day it may be released and not part of the rulers' wealth while everyone else rots.

How much are our rulers elected?

I wrote this in answer to a forum question, and something we all need to know in Britain:

The sum total of who makes our rules is on a sliding scale of election. The MPs themselves have been covered, while the powers of the unelected lords are negligible unless appointed as ministers. But most of our new laws (eg the latest deregulating of postage prices) are made by the EU, and as such we must consider who votes for them? Their structure is on two main levels, the parliament and the commission. To be honest I don't actually know the legislative power of the parliament as the little research I have done appears to indicate they discuss existing decisions made by the commission and little else. Unless someone can put me right I am wondering if they can do anything at all. But the EU regulations are made by the commission directly, they are unelected and can stay for many years as they are civil servants given the role of legislators, instantly breaking the rule of separation of powers.

As a result they are free to legislate pretty well unhindered, and there is a further ability above and beyond where they can meet and draft material in private and their records are not open to the public. As this is their primary role (legislature and executive combined) I am as I say unsure if the parliament do any more than the Queen or presidents of countries like Ireland, as the actual regulations originate from above them and don't know if they can even amend them let alone veto any.

Above the EU is the UN. in 1991 they wrote Agenda 21 for sustainability, and as such every member state is bound by the regulations, usually applied through local councils through the body titled ICLEI. Fortnightly bin collections,  compulsory recycling, road narrowing and restricting new parking spaces are all influenced directly by Agenda 21 as one plank is to reduce dependence on private transportation, hence EU plans to ban cars from city centres and flight taxes. So one can say that at the scope of the UN and Agenda 21 (all unelected) there is no accountability, or with anything which comes from the EU as once joined and new treaties accepted we have signed away greater and greater functions previously assigned to our elected parliaments, if you read about any new laws or regulations like the postal charges just check the source and you'll find most are direct from the EU and only applied by our parliament.

Global warming data

Global warming graphs for use in the articles

One world government, the current position

I do sometimes wonder if as well as a vehicle for my pleasure it is also a vehicle for my discovery, as the utter madness I sometimes come across drives me to get to the bottom of it. I would also dearly love to cure it, but as an individual with only the internet and a small group of people to share with am hardly personally qualified to do more than plant a few seeds and hope they in turn multiply. I've basically never seen such a climate of organised control over the general public in my life. We've had it in localised areas throughout history with a single regime like the Soviet Union and China, but never before across what would like to call the free world.

Think about it, democratic countries worldwide are moving more and more away from national government and more to international policies, often from a perceived problem which needs a universal solution to solve, ie we all must join together or nothing can be fixed. This goes from the world credit crash to global warming, and simply allows this excuse every single time for a tier of government above the national, from the EU to the UN, losing the Soviet Union and simply swapping the principle for others elsewhere, despite its abject failure and lack of freedom and human rights.

Well I expose and call them on it. While the majority happily work together (the internet now publishes many of the minutes and publications, so can see the cogs behind the watchface) a few like Ron Paul and Nigel Farage appear to stand outside the system trying to change it from within. But trust and group dynamics means it takes a shift of at least 10% or more away from the crowd before anything can change. Currently I am aware of no politician in a position of power (one name quoted is in opposition while the other is a fringe European member with no powers anyhow regardless) who campaigns against the status quo- quantitative easing, bank bailouts (besides Iceland, who have bounced back simply by not paying their debts), carbon taxes, low interest rates, high levels of national debt and creeping travel restrictions.

These freedoms and improvements have grown over centuries of breaking the power of the factory owners during the industrial revolution (which, as Marx said, swung so far the other way it needed a return to the centre), improving technology, faster travel and the general ability to live one's life free of excessive government interference. This is all going backwards now, with what is the United Nations Agenda 21, a blueprint for sustainability, actually described thus: "Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control." - Professor Maurice King
Which pretty well sums it up. Reduce the population and effects of technology and development on the planet in any possible way. If anyone wants to learn more check ICLEI online which is how they apply the rules locally through council regulations. This again is not a national plan, but international, applying equally to every single UN country. No one even knows about it, let alone had a chance to vote on it, and it is now one of the general policies under which many others are made. Of course until more people learn this and read it (it's all on Wikipedia), they won't even know it's been running in the background, like a Trojan Horse program, since 1996. It is dressed up to appear to be about caring for the environment, but the quote (and many more similar) I added is the true nature and if you want to see then look at the fruits of the plan rather than the words.

This is not the only reason for it, but the Club of the Isles, Club of Rome, Bilderberg Group etc etc, all real entities and some happy to publish their material, are not a national group but behind national policies worldwide. Why bother trying to change a country or two when you can get it to the UN and send it showering down like a manure spreader? Anyway, I do my bit sharing it and leave it to others to make their own minds up.

Catching up 3/2012 #2

Bit of a loose end so decided to do one of my old style posts and hope a few people read it, and one day someone new (or old) comments like the old days when it was a community here. I've had a week free after a few weeks of visitors and arrangements, first diverted by a call to the doctor for an annual tablet review, and now they want a second blood pressure test as it was up 5 above normal. Caution over the required level possibly? The tablets they give are far worse than the alternative, my late grandma had record figures for years but only ill from the medication they gave her for it and made 99 despite them not because of them. After another long photo trip on Sunday I'm sorted for a week, although felt like going on another had the doctor yesterday and work today and won't be back in time for my weekly family meal tomorrow. I hope to break the east record over the weekend anyway and if so will be good enough.

I have definitely established the majority of my issues going out the last few years were due to my physical health problems which caused the anxiety rather than vice versa. It's all very well being a hypochondriac but even they get ill sometimes and mine lasted a couple of years. It's such a relief now feeling OK enough to do many more things again, there's still some way to go before I'm even half way back, and age alone will blunt my power compared to how it was naturally. But I appreciate it all now remembering when much was rarely possible. I still keep a skeleton of plans for the short term, which works so far and pretty essential with no one else to make arrangements with me besides friends calling with ideas occasionally (not all are welcomed). I have definitely accepted how the world is outside is not my field, and can only work on personal growth so I can face the world better exactly as it is, as if it goes to the dogs it's not part of my area of influence. I can't avoid observing this trend, have concluded a level of energy around the world as chaotic and like any other tension can break at any time and everything simply goes back to normal. I don't think whatever I do or don't do is able to alter any of that so better to be of the world but not part of it.

In my personal world it is impossible to dismiss past experiences of guidance when it goes a bit quiet. So I missed a chance (again, not my field of influence) to interview a celebrity on TV, but so many things do not happen in life only the ones which do exist. There should be a lesson in every negative experience if we look for it, and if the result is any damage is temporary but the lesson is permanent it also means we could have had a nicer way to learn but it didn't register. So the same problems keep coming back larger and larger till we finally learn which random combination of actions fixes it. Everyone is out of their depth in a new situation without much information, just watch Star Trek to see. You start with a new and apparently insoluble problem, and over time get a small hook in to change a small part, and then help from outside to see something else, and eventually after a group effort a few people find different solutions separately and the first one applied solves it. But it never prepares you for the next one ad infinitum. And in guidance we only get the big problems when we've solved the others, like a PhD. Those with the greatest problems to solve would be the ones at the end of their learning, as they'd climbed all the other mountains and only the highest ones left. That's the same with all areas, weights, education or climbing. It seems you've gone right back to the beginning but in fact if you get worse problems after the last apparently its so you learn to handle them, as otherwise you may reach spiritual levels for now, and it all falls apart when you hit a situation you couldn't handle and lose it all. Therefore you need to be immune to all the outside shit as any inner development can be lost if only subject to outside forces. There is the counter-theory that by reaching the spiritual peak then the same stuff happens and you simply don't care, so gives a dual route but not so easy to choose which to be on.

So these new situations are either random or for a purpose, and with enough repetition the evidence becomes a bit too great to be random. I can't help teaching what I know anyway and people ask me regardless so as long as it helps I am serving a secondary purpose. And if I can learn by trial and error but teach the same lessons to people to learn from my experience how many people's suffering could be avoided? The next thread is about where I get my information from. Most spiritual teachers combine what they know at the point they begin speaking without thought, as you start a subject on lessons learnt officially, and then spin off to the source of that knowledge and meaning of it even though you'd never heard it or worked it out beforehand. That is when you seem to cross to the universal level of knowledge, joining with the pool in the frequency you've hooked into, and it takes over. I do it all the time and can tell now when I am. It's very satisfying to see after you've begun a subject you look back and wonder how you managed to write that. You can also be asked a question and feel the answer come before you had time to stop and think, and put together loads of areas and new data to complete a picture way beyond what you actually knew, and fits together almost perfectly. I teach myself as well when that happens as it's basically following a thread from the beginning and into its next level.

My current gap is simply the way I feel. Until that does not crash like a brick every time something big or small goes wrong and often take a day or so to recover I am fucked. You can't become enlightened with blockages, and although this is a natural human reaction it has to go before I can advance. So every so often I get something to break the calm and see the reaction, now like an observer, understand the reason and the result, and simply wait for it to go away. That was actually the essence of my teaching, to just observe and not get involved directly, and if that's all I need to do it may kill it off alone. My mind suspects there's something else I need to do on top, but no clues as to what it is (meditate, the inner voice says), so this is a cue to stop spending 99% of my free time either online or watching TV and bloody well apply all the methods I learnt, often at a financial cost and usually at a time one. There is a perfect and very concise example of the greater self kicking in when required, as my conscious mind hadn't a clue what else to do, and apparently these little drops in frequency have been to remind me to keep it going more often however much fun I'm having online. The mind now says what if even that doesn't work, but it would wouldn't it.

Material errors in climate science discovered

Known errors committed by climate scientists so far (and growing):

 

James Hansen predicted temperature and sea level rises of a few degrees and feet by 2020 at the latest in the 80s. In 2012 the temperature rose less than half a degree and the sea by a couple of inches. He continues to make similar predictions to this day although clearly nowhere close to reality from the beginning.

 

Hansen's claims

 

After claiming (unanimously) the largest chain of glaciers on earth was melting at a very specific 50 billion tons of water a year, a study in 2012 actually measuring it directly found it had not changed at all in a decade. Some scientists expressed surprise but no apologies were forthcoming.

"The world's greatest snow-capped peaks, which run in a chain from the Himalayas to Tian Shan on the border of China and Kyrgyzstan, have lost no ice over the last decade, new research shows.

The discovery has stunned scientists, who had believed that around 50bn tonnes of meltwater were being shed each year and not being replaced by new snowfall."

 

Imaginary ice loss

 

Until 1995 the warmer than present medieval warm period was part of the official UN data, one day it vanished from their records, replaced with the hockey stick, which could not function with a higher period previously. It remains in all textbooks and studies from the period and earlier but no longer acknowledged by the converts to the hockey stick. But in order to accept the hockey stick it was necessary to rewrite the past.

 There are slews of 'adjusted' before and after climate records on my other entries, but this probably takes the biscuit as they were issued by none other than the IPCC, one until 1995 and then replaced by the more familiar 'hockey stick'. Clearly both can't be right, so one must be wrong, and they have clearly made a mistake either way. 

Medieval warm period is here

 

In March 2012 a report came out predicting massive sea level rises as usual, but quoted the current sea levels as being “ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (CBS) — A new report shows sea levels are rapidly rising and the study predicts the Jersey Shore could be underwater in a matter of decades.”

 

Another wild claim, with material error

 

Except the rapidly rising sea levels they quote have fallen as much in the last couple of years than they had risen in the previous three, bringing them back to 2005 levels. In fact the sea level has been rising at around 8 inches a century and currently could barely reach that at the current rate, and the stalled temperature and world ice levels all correspond with each other as stable within normal variations.

 

Actual sea level figures

 

The IPCC created a graph predicting temperatures under varying levels of CO2, and come 2012 the actual temperature was below that of the stable level with none added, despite the actual CO2 rising steadily for decades.

 

IPCC predictions vs reality

Catching up 3/2012

Just in case anyone was wondering I will update my personal life after some while. Gone are the days when there was an active blog community with someone always adding something to read and plenty of comments, but if people still read then I still write. After the long time of health problems my energy is gradually coming back, and recently done far more than I have for a good few years, just because I could. That's not phobias, but not being well enough to do very much for some time. I've driven all over the place for photos, had plenty of visitors and made a few visits although have very few old friends left locally now. On the other side I've decided I need to collate my spiritual results as besides knowing most of the theory need to know how much has actually worked in all the time I've been using it.


The books claim the sky's the limit and we are smaller versions of god, and identical in nature and power. Everything else is a lesser level of the same, while my current requirement is to reach a level high enough so when things are going well and something happens to wreck it and the whole thing falls apart. That is still relying on the unreliable, as it all evens out as every up has a down. So however good a Monday may be it can all be gone by Tuesday. Nothing has changed, I still live on my own with no partner or many local friends, so whatever I do manage is a short term gain with no long term benefits. There is certainly a level just above the normal, better feelings through meditation (which wears off minutes later after the rare times it happens), seeing outside the visual spectrum, seeing parts of life which have to be arranged, getting information from dreams, knowing all sorts of things directly before learning any evidence, so more a pool of information and an ability to tune into it, and an extension of our existing sense ranges.


That is the start, maintaining those levels is the advanced level, as is the conscious creation and manipulation of physical matter which is supposed to be the final point of what comes alongside enlightenment, as if everything's your dream or part of you then you can control it all, after all it's all made of energy and quantum physics observes observation affects matter and everything is connected and reacts outside space and time, so we are just tuning into that up at the macro level. Totally scientific, not weird or strange at all, and if we see ourselves as energy and everything within that made from that energy in makes more sense. There's no conflict between spiritual development and science as we are only talking quantum effects and tuning into different frequencies. My job now is to raise my own so high I am above the everyday ups and downs of life, as however often or good the ups are they all go down and every corner we turn can have a pile of shit waiting for us to walk in. Growth is the equivalent of shit proof boots, so when the same things happen we aren't affected.


I have spent months trawling teachers online and have a pretty good collection of work for specific areas, as unless your own method works you need many more as well, not instead of. Not all masters were faithful to a single one, and many were until they could go no further and found another until they were completed. But others simply have to take what they can from wherever they can and add them all to the mix, as they all come at it from different angles. Some teach a single technique, others many, and others different ones for different areas. Falun Gong may well be an exception and complete, but as I need the computer to follow the exercises and they seem to have removed the link then that's taken a back seat as so hard to get it happening. But it's probably all guided and anything I do or don't do is aiming in the right direction. When I teach (as technically I am like a swimming teacher who can't swim but knows enough about the theory to teach others) I realised I need to know if any of it can actually be evidenced by my own experience before carrying on repeating empty theories, as most others can actually describe it all directly. I think there's just enough, the first step but still a step above normal, and once you leave normal you're outside the physical rules and still beyond the huge majority of individuals who aren't even aware there is any more than they know.


I was admittedly disappointed with the hard sell class pushed last week by Neale Donald Walsch, packaging the failure of his own course into a new solution costing more than the whole set of books altogether. Would god do that? Of course not. In fact, I've seen many teachers offer solutions to the failings in other people's methods, but this is the very first and certainly unique example of someone creating a course to address their own course's failings! No shit! Regardless of the messenger there's enough plausible stuff in the books already, and unless they are so diverse some people need 7 weeks/ 40 hours whatever tuition to put it all together then if he's dragged up new stuff only possible to teach in person for a fucking arm and a leg then he's drifted off the track and god hasn't told him! Now I'm not throwing the baby out with the bathwater, and keeping the teaching I've learnt, but lost total confidence in the messenger. But I won't give up. I can't ever see beyond the horizon to the future to how far I can get, but simply spending my life getting a few prizes and then a stream of manure in between is not my idea of making the best of things. Teachers say there is an alternative, I have seen the edge of it and working my way to the middle, if there actually is one.