How I got dragged into global warming

Long ago I abandoned the news as a source of interest as most of it was space filling and the rest depressing, and having been sucked into it for a few months as Facebook was flooded with US election campaigning, not even my country but affects the world in their case, I really ought to be cured for life. It's nonsense, most is made up (I could explain why but I'd need a few pages) and the rest just demonstrates how totally nasty people can be.

I just read David Icke was told to get out of politics as it was a dirty business and become spiritual, which is exactly what he did over 20 years ago now, and as he taught me in his books a lot of what I know now I am following him but so far only on the internet and reaching a handful of people. I do believe a few stories I find are both pure gold (only as evidence people have been busted cheating in the news, see my earlier making up comment) and unreported beyond the internet, some for over a decade gathering virtual i-dust, and saved by me. There is a weight growing, and rather than people getting it gradually seems it needs a certain amount to build up before everyone suddenly gets it. If you've ever heard of psychics being channeled information, when they are shown a screen and pictures along with telepathic information, that is how it seemed to happen with me. For example, being fascinated by extreme weather (I live in London, we get everything in neutral here) when I read the sea levels were going to rise and flood London I was interested mainly as it was something I could watch. Tornado chasers don't enjoy seeing people's property being destroyed but there's something about nature overwhelming the landscape which pulls the attention of many, or National Geographic wouldn't fill half the day with it.

I kept up with the articles, and after a few years went to check what was going on and even in that period discovered the figures to be about a tenth of the original claims, and by then the internet was available so followed them all up. Bearing in mind my legal training I came across the sort of fabricated nonsense a company would use to defraud their investors and siphon the money to themselves, and then use every trick in the book to divert attention until they'd got to Brazil. I was not happy, and decided to save all this material in a file as I wanted to challenge the claims in some way directly.

That was over ten years ago, I now have pages of material all stored on the computer and here, the claims have never changed since day one in the 80s, and the ensuing time has shown them to continue to have never existed in reality as the reality is within normal variations. The only effect of sharing this information is anyone young enough now to live to the time when the temperature hasn't risen for so long the whole issue quietly evaporates will remember someone kept going on about it back in the 2000s and it wasn't something everyone accepted and believed at the time. That's it. Nothing more, just a few people in 30-40 years will remember that obsessive nutcase who kept quoting figures from other scientists disagreeing with those paid by the politicians was right but too late now as they needed to learn it directly from observation. But they'll all be lighting candles and burning wood to keep alive by then so too late to stop the damage after the event.

But I had no other interest in the topic, and apart from the possibility of a day off work (it never happened) when it snowed I really didn't care about the weather and how it was generated, and forced me into an area of physics I left at 16 as it became too hard to follow. I learnt a lot about debate and psychology, and history of propaganda going back 100 years to its German roots. People in each generation go through the same process of being sorted into the leaders and followers, with the leaders exploiting the followers to believe whatever they need them to to rob them blind. From church indulgences, the South Sea Bubble and then Enron and Bernie Madoff, the people never saw it coming. Unless that pattern can be broken we'll be robbed every single generation as no one looks back and sees how it was done to the last. It's always happened, the pattern was identical except for the particular illusion projected to the public, and people would rather learn from their own direct loss than the suffering of others before them. The illusion becomes more and more sophisticated and complicated, with Al Gore now using the exact methods which got Enron sent down for fraud in carbon trading, but now legalised to 'save the planet', and the worst thing is not that he's doing it as the world's full of crooks, but people believe him. I am so disappointed with humanity I sometimes feel like I'm not part of it.

Michael Mann holds the seeds of his own destruction

One theme going through my life are the seeds of possible future events. Normally they all fall on stony ground but for the second time this month a study has countered Michael Mann's tree ring data, this time a whole pile of genuine peer reviewers who all say what we've said since the details were discovered, they make other scientists look bad as well and want them withdrawn. If something's dead wrong you don't need to be qualified to do so, and it should have happened ages ago as this garbage has not just been floating around for many years but is the sole policy driving the world's political actions via his hockey stick diagram. Without that the whole bogus affair wouldn't have got off the launch pad, but is now orbiting Pluto it's travelled so far.

So if termites are eating away his very foundation, the very lynchpin of world propaganda and rhetoric, despite being discredited by Steve Mackintyre, who took years deciphering it despite not having the original injuncted codes. If they ever get out, only by Mann himself suing people for libel and being forced to disclose his own defence (currently two are pending) the expectation is it would finish his career, technically open him to prosecution and pretty well finish off the whole machine. How long can you keep an illusion going when seven year old children all over the world are saying the temperature isn't going up like he said? The figures are all available at the entry of a search term (nowadays I don't even need to click the mouse), and I've found the believers work from events while the realists work from the data. You induce from events and you deduce from figures, and they have lost the plot. How long will it be before the peers are fed up with the bad publicity making them all look the same? Not so long now apparently?

Full story

This is one example of a potential precedent where a single event can derail an entire mission. The same way as had a country left the Euro the Bilderberg Group would not be omnipotent, but they never did. The climate scammers are far less organised and protected, and can easily become derailed as everyone can see what they're doing but so far not had the weight or numbers to do anything about it. But these guys are having a very good go.

One world government? We already have one.

As someone said yesterday, the Rockefeller led Bildergers and Club of Rome etc have made the agendas sent up to the UN and back via Agenda 21. PC and green are the new Nazism, as between them they restrict freedom of speech and divide society into greens and murderers (like the Jews in Germany). Scapegoating carbon emitters (ie every single human being, it's impossible not to) and promoting and protecting extremism is a worldwide policy, which is why every single western government except the Czech Republic follows the same policies regardless of party leading. Keynesian economics, devaluing currencies and forcing down interest rates siphons money from the people and savers back to the banks and governments (who else borrows at base rate?) and keeps everyone focused on survival so too poor and busy earning to stop and look at anything else.

It can't last forever as one by one people notice, and then you have a revolution. The internet speed the process up hundreds of times.

So, to summarise, if policies are decided in international regular meetings (Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, The Club of Isles and others like them) then their members will be levered into top positions worldwide, and employed, like Obama, to carry out their agendas and not yours as voters. This only happens while people are unaware of it. Some people are noticing whoever is in power the policies seem incredibly similar, and over here until Tony Blair got in Labour and Conservative were two utterly different philosophies, as you'd want and expect. Someone who was invited to Bilderberg only as a back bench MP, not a current or past leader of politics or industry was not the norm, John Smith died suddenly, Blair took over and revolutionised his own party and then Britain as a result. Since then his 'Third way' has been followed by both his own Labour Party, combining policies from left and right to attempt to please everyone, but by all others both here and worldwide. So political correctness- restricting criticism based on race or Islam (the other religions seem unaffected), changing words for the disabled, positive discrimination for minorities and women, not mentioning the race of criminals in the media, unlimited immigration, low interest rates and currency values, massive government debt and spending, and an increasing trend to federalism rather than national policies can all be read in the published material of the Club of Rome (all free and online) and Feasta, the group who advise the UN on Agenda 21, creating a world government and currency and energy rationing. That is not possible without a reason, so as admitted and mentioned many times (quite deliberately, people rarely remember before at least the third time, on my sister fraud site) man made global warming was the perfect reason (they said it many times, not me, check Margaret Mead's quote way back in 1974).

So we have a formula for a Nazi style scapegoating world state run on full totalitarian regulations 'to save the planet' (worthy sacrifice for people not born till we're dead). Paris is the first to operate new EU rules to ban cars, starting with the older ones, and planned in every capital in totality. I also read yesterday (before I could check the details) the next plan is to restrict movement in and out of cities, so the old communist plan is apparently going to return to those who escaped it after the war.

Knowledge is power. Every country either has an existing free party from the UN agenda or can form one. We have UKIP, growing rapidly for the obvious reason of being the only alternative, so when enough people learn this more will vote for the new parties (as all the old are run by the same people anyway) and they will be gone. That is the new form of revolution, a democratic one. They work for us. If they want to do us over and you know it you kick them out. They can't wreck our lives if they're not in power, and whatever else has happened we still give them that, so can take it away.

Don't mess with our lives

Politicians are elected to look after the areas which need national attention we cannot organise ourselves. As such they work for us, and only have the ability to interfere in our social and moral affairs as the voters are so weak minded they believe they cannot rely on individuals to do it for themselves, despite the criminal law protecting them from any harm already. Until the voters are convinced moral and social issues are outside the scope of a free country's government we will continue to be oppressed by corrupt and psychopathic leaders who rarely follow any of the rules themselves they impose on us. It's a very slow process of education but when we get there everyone will wonder how we managed before we did.

Once the laws are written to protect the people from harm, they only need occasional updating. Otherwise governments run national affairs such as transport and utilities (oh, they don't do that now do they?), and dealing with the rest of the world. They have no rights (besides the ones we have given them) to decide what is right morally or socially, that is up to every single individual to choose for themselves (as the laws stop them taking any views too far) and not anyone else. Until then we will never live in a free country, and will mark our evolution from superstitious primitive people to enlightened.

Mysterious ways

If the angels are still or were ever working with me, they are also doing it via tough lessons. This is the end, the PhD top level of dealing with shit. Like you've graduated to the full JCB excavator and given the highest pile of elephant's dos and told to go and clear it before you qualify. Fuck that for a lark. So my angels apparently (if you or I even believe in them) think by making me go to the dentist for a crown and cope with it better than before in order to make me stronger is their idea of help I refer the readers to my previous expletive. So my tooth breaks on Tuesday right in the middle of the US election results, and with an interminable time to repair I am supposed to improve myself by 'dealing with it'.

This raises the next point, I'm impressed it's not just my madness (it can't as two people I know got me into it themselves) but once I'd mentioned angels many other extremely normal people also said they worked with them and trusted them implicitly. Now god and angels are no different really, in fact angels could be considered God's switchboard rather than separate lower entities. And equally unknowable, so why are they so widely accepted as real? The major difference is unlike god angels are obliged to follow our requests, no discretion, as that is their only role in existence. But to believe in them someone scientifically at least ought to have spent a very long time keeping a journal and only deciding something was true after they had delivered consistently. The synchronicities in my life and those around me shows something is controlling it, although it was only quite recently they started working in my benefit in the one area at least, having been random till then just to show me they were real. My system is simply a standard evidential enquiry, whatever claims are made I run them through it and have certainly added some positive conclusions to synchronicity, telepathy and clairvoyance as I have seen them happen. I've never seen more than two people manage psychokinesis, or similar manipulations of matter, so that is on the pending file, as however unlikely it seems using the mind to interact with atomic bonds is not outside quantum physics, so tells me it's just a matter of raising the power high enough to make a visible change.

But the general belief in angels appears to be to most before any event. Not like the people who have died and seen heaven and even god, they know, even if they can't take us there. And unless we ask them for help they can't, unless we're about to die before our time. I'm asking now officially as advised, and before my tooth broke there were no great gains but no losses. And don't start imagining angels have limits, you can either bring about miracles or not, materialising a penny or a million pounds is no different to each other as both are miracles whatever appears from nowhere. So we can't just expect little changes or reasonable ones, but full blown miracles. Beyond our imaginations. In fact normally I always keep records and checks, but none of my previous requests had been organised in any way, and now are. I was told this was how to do it, and look back and see if they really have done things or not compared with the results in response. Now from experience I know if I get something better than what I've lost it'll take over my attention, so obviously I'll know if that has happened, so the angels can be told exactly what it takes to sort thing out. You have to be specific, and The Secret (as opposed to traditional angel working) says you should feel the request has already been carried out or it won't work. But that's not angel work, that's doing it ourselves, angels shouldn't need us to become masters or we wouldn't actually need them.

Many religious people say testing god is blasphemy, but really we were designed to test everything, imagine animals dying from eating the wrong food growing on trees as they couldn't test it first. They smell or taste right, so we know whether they can be eaten in most cases, except may Big Macs... Anyway, science is based on testing, and testing spiritual claims is identical to me, imagine meeting a man online who made similar claims to god and taking it on trust without checking for yourself. And people want us to do the same thing for the supposed most powerful force in existence without doing what we could to investigate its existence? God doesn't give enquiring minds if not to be used for everything.

Government officials under investigation

While I'm on the subject I'm listing all the current politicians and their staff who are on the cusp of lawsuits and their progress I can think of. Please help me add to the list of any others you may have come across:

Michael Mann: IPCC lead contributor, creator of the official IPCC hockey stick world temperature diagram. Currently involved in two libel suits, one in the US and one in Canada. However both have requested disclosure of his secret methods to create the hockey stick, and is currently deciding whether to give them or pull out of the cases. Either way he loses.

Julia Gillard: Currently is fighting claims of financial fraud from her previous legal career. There is no solid evidence for a case but the more she denies any wrongdoing more details are coming out. Could go either way.

Chris Huhne: UK energy minister, his charge may only be perverting the course of justice over a speeding fine, but can we trust anyone if convicted of not generally running their lives that way? I wouldn't.

Rebecca Brooks: News of the World editor, up for bribing police or somesuch charges over the phone hacking in her paper. Main point is she couldn't have done it alone, it would have needed police cooperation at a very high level so if she goes down many others will follow.

Yorkshire Police: 23 years after the event, they have been exposed altering evidence. No prosecutions are pending so far but the alleged (or admitted?) crimes are a very high level of fraud and break most rules of the profession. Like Brooks, the conspiracy is bad enough, but if the orders are proved to have come from the top as claimed, then what will it say about our police?

Libor fixing: Barclay's admitted fixing interest rates for many years, and supposedly not just with the consent of the Bank of England but under their orders to suppress the market rate and reduce the rate the banks themselves borrowed at. Insiders trace the orders to the very top, and despite breaking the 1968 Theft Act of obtaining financial services by deception, the government claim it was not a criminal act. That alone would require a separate act of parliament removing interest rate fixing from the act. No such clause is known.

America no more. Post-Obama 2016

OK, I'm saying this tonight and never again. Since the US election result here is what will happen by the next one, not based on prediction but simply projecting the current policies but many times greater as the second term will be free to do as he wants.

I will be as specific as I can be. Unemployment, way up. National debt, way up. Energy prices, possibly triple today's if not higher. Credit rating probably down one if not two notches. Dollar no longer world default currency, oil probably measured in Euros or Yuan. The home oil exploration will be so severely restricted that imports will cripple the economy and force the oil price up due to restricted supply from US. Coal will become an industry of the past, mining will likely be made illegal and closed down and usage so expensive shale gas will have to take up the slack.

Secondary possibilities will be growing restrictions on freedom of speech and assembly, beginning with SOPA and PIPA ostensibly written to stop media piracy but informally (with sanctions) to be enforced worldwide in order to work, and slowly extending to other violations. New laws on security will restrict free assembly and movement, as well as potential imprisonment without trial for their breach. Home grown food and water collected naturally may become subject to strict banning regulations, as well as GM becoming the norm as it is not labelled so no one can decide to avoid it. Immigration will increase, legally and amnesties given to illegals making little or no difference between them, creating a growing underclass of low wage or unemployed citizens, often barely speaking English and including many organised criminals, but nearly all becoming good Democrats to increase the small advantage margin created between 2008-2012 and made the difference for the win.

I suggest everyone copies and saves this to their documents, and in maybe a year or two take it out again to see how far it's progressed before completion in 2016. I have been making these projections since 1975 for the Common Market vote, and so far have a pretty good track record, so can now make it official and testable. Don't judge me today, judge me around 2014. This is not based on political opinion, but simply extending the existing trends to their inevitable conclusions. And if anyone finds some or most of these familiar then they are living in the EU.

Less than a day after winning, Obama is already planning laws for a carbon tax and to restrict opposition power in congress. What would have happened had he done this a day earlier? Would everyone still have voted for him, and how do they feel or will they feel when they've learnt of these policies they wouldn't have voted for? Maybe this is a lesson for the American people not to judge politics on presentation and spin, and never let this happen again.

Banning freedom of speech

Recently a new phenomenon (for Britain anyway) has arrived, the opinion of those on the far left that some subjects are beyond discussion, such as immigration (Gordon Brown called a woman who tried a bigot), gay marriage (Nick Clegg said anyone who objects is a bigot) and global warming ('the science is settled').

This means a self appointed authority figure, often and usually not one of the group they claim to represent, such as Camden or Islington councils banning words such as 'blind' or 'disabled' (words are also chosen from removal as well as topics) despite most blind and disabled people realising they are valid descriptions. 'Differently sighted' or 'visual difficulties' could mean having astigmatism and losing your glasses, blind means you can't see. These bans can actually become dangerous and actually hurt the people they pretend to help.

But stopping discussion on anything but inciting crime or direct hatred, like promoting genocide or holocaust denial, where thousands of survivors and millions of bodies still tell the genuine story, is the most sinister development of the 21st century. Those on the right may be considered by some to be opinionated and bigoted, but so far have yet to find a single topic off limits. If someone wants to call Israel apartheid rather than get Shirley Williams or Nicky Gavron from the people's republics of Haringey or Williams world of leftist sociology to slap a ban notice on them I simply let them ramble, offer them a few facts showing they are deranged, and move on. I wasn't hurt, they weren't hurt, and in a perfect world they may even have learnt something. But there are topics I believe are equally 'settled' on my own side, such as car usage, where some nutter yet again wanted to ban them yesterday on the radio, which to me is like banning blood or oxygen, but I'd still never try and shut them down. After all, they'd still think it and try and carry it out even if they couldn't mention the 'c' word (car).

I'll pitch two against each other here, cars and gay marriage. Now if you restrict the use of cars then people across the country will lose their jobs as it's the only way to get there, not see their friends and families, and all the other normal activities possible in a civilised society. Stop gay marriage and what happens? You have gay men living in civil partnerships with the rights of married people. The difference being married would be?

This is not about promoting gay marriage or saving the planet, but controlling the masses, and getting the loony left to do their dirty work as useful idiots. No one on the right or centre has or would ever dream of banning discussion on any non-criminal topic, so what does this say about the left?

I'm an agoraphobic, get used to it

Up till now the angels have been good (with my own help of course), as despite not having the chance to get the signs 'up north' Tuesday or Wednesday despite not getting the chance till it was getting late yesterday decided the new camera may well manage tasks beyond the compact and risked it anyway as I had the whole day free. Apart from one photo in the light on the way on a road I hadn't covered yet it was dark by the time I got there, and raining. The signs were up on a wall, beyond the flash meaning it only had half the power it needed, but took a bunch and then selected the best angles, and overexposed the results till they looked as if the flash had reached them. That wasn't possible with the compact as the pixels would probably have appeared making it unusable. I used the night vision capability (combined with flash as otherwise it may need a long exposure I didn't bother to stand in the rain testing before trying) and got reasonable results covered with little white spots which wasn't ich (anyone got tropical fish?) as looked like it but the flash reflected by the rain. It did mean I only covered two spots in the town and none on the couple of miles off the main road to get there, as it had no buildings to illuminate or anywhere to stop but really just needed the signs.

The ex has vowed to come tomorrow but as I'm free I'll just have to suck it up, and have to have dinner (you'll love this) next week with my mother's local rabbi who invited the neighbours over. That'll be fun... Had I permission to film it and edit the best bits for Youtube I'd see it as a project, but otherwise for me needs to be tolerated like the upcoming wedding. As far as weddings and funerals go I'd rather only go to my own now as had more than enough for one lifetime. I suppose besides getting up for it as long as the ex doesn't make me go anywhere dodgy I can manage tomorrow and not missing anything else, and will just carry on regardless after considering the clocks are going back and won't be going anywhere new for photos much past London till late March.

Beyond tomorrow is a mystery within the normal boundaries, diminished for the autumn. I can make local videos before it gets dark, meditate and do my compulsory annual professional courses online, and hopefully am taking Grace to the gym as she's probably the only person left who would use the free ticket. I'm seeing the new one the following week and hope she's happy where I want to take her, and if not accepts the few possible alternatives I will insist on, as she doesn't know my anxiety issues and won't until she knows me far better. If I told everyone I met maybe two would understand and 98 wouldn't want to see me again, that's how it works and people mistrust others not like them in any way. I also wonder if you have one problem they assume you must have others, eg- depression and psychosis, or deaf and stupid etc, it appears to be human nature and seen many psychiatric patients who still don't get others with different problems as if theirs is the only one that's real.

It's a tough situation but my situation, a bit like a stain on a carpet you can't replace or cover up, and have to explain to every visitor the first time they see it for the rest of your life. Of course here only a few people will meet me and have to work round it, but will have got to know me well enough by then to get it, but not someone who's only known me a short time. First impressions count and weird isn't ever the best one to start with.

Hearing voices

Mentioning no names, it is interesting I had one conversation about what I can only call aspects of paranoia and how to deal with them, and the next call was exactly the same almost word for word but from a different viewpoint and quite a bit of insight into what may be going on.

Now that has told me that the standard symptoms of paranoia of nasty voices and the idea your mind is being probed are clearly something which needs to be treated, and exploit a physical weakness in the brain, and as a result allows in all sorts from wherever it's coming from. As we all have different dreams each night, let alone different from other people, which are usually generated internally, then surely if people who hear voices were accessing the same sort of mechanism then they'd get totally different things but they don't. Having both worked with and known many typical paranoids the similarity in what they are hearing is so close you'd assume it was all coming from the same place, although we really don't know where. But if someone has a problem with the brain which normally blocks out such communications, why would it all be negative? The answer of course is that it isn't, but if you hear positive and helpful voices you are considered a channeler and great teacher, and would very rarely complain or be diagnosed with mental illness as you are being given genuine information with practical benefits.

So the first likely conclusion is that due to physical weaknesses in the brain these communications enter the awareness, but depending if positive or negative are either diagnosed with paranoia or seen as a great mind. On a personal note I have found very little quality in such teachings myself, most seems like recycled commonsense or judgment which is almost as negative as the other type but dressed up as beneficial. When I've looked further into it it usually tells people they are doing things wrong and if they think right they'll get better results in life. Then they almost kill themselves trying to change, get no better results, and then feel even worse.

So basically you start with the similarities which imply the voices people hear are more likely to have an external than internal source, although we can't yet locate it. Then the nature is either destructive or apparently positive, but maybe similar material posing in different ways. I expect a little of it would be genuinely helpful but having teased through a few decades of channeled material most is trite truism and of little practical use although there is probably a small fraction which is the real thing, but anyone connecting to something positive wouldn't normally be considered mentally ill although still receiving voices but not disturbed by it. But it's all very real one way or another.

Philosophy not politics

In case people draw the wrong conclusions, I am not connected to a single political movement or ideology. I work on a foundation of freedom, and buildings of 'do we need it' for individual policies which do or do not breach the principle of freedom. Secondly my natural mind plus legal training have allowed me to see where we are being lied to, and if the people we employ to look after us prefer to

rip us off or worse still harm people that is nothing to do with politics but crime.

Libertarianism is a relatively new movement, especially in Britain, but comes closest to anarchism in that it questions the requirements for government at all, the main difference being it accepts there is a need but only for the most basic functions. In fact the majority of my politics is negative, fighting those who want governments to dictate how we live, as if one person has the right to tell millions what is right in the short time they are alive on this planet just on the basis of where they happen to live at the time. The rules can change a mile away of you are near a border, and why is one lot better than another?

So ultimately I am far more motivated by philosophy and any politics I express are a reflection of that, plus the point that many political opinions are based on ignorance of the facts, as if people know the true figures and details many opinions would vanish as a result. If you aren't sure of the facts then there should be no opinion, either admit you don't know or if determined then do what you can to find out the truth. But don't promote rules and regulations based on areas you have little or no knowledge on, in areas such as education, finance etc, where if you don't know the inside details directly you are simply not qualified to have an opinion. For example, certain types of school either work better than others. Unless tested over many years and assessed for every area of performance, simply advocating comprehensive or streaming is based far more on ideology than which system makes the best of everyone who goes through it. There is simply no room in areas of fact for the distorted lenses of ideology, which end up doing no more than oppress and restrict people's opportunities.

I see the future, and it is red

I would have been out for a walk now but it's raining, so will continue analysing life until I get some decent answers. My friend is convinced angels and many other things I have no experience or knowledge of like reincarnation are real, and certainly prepared to have my own gaps filled in around the angels although I think what happens after we die isn't important for what we do here so not much benefit speculating about as if we could find out anyhow. I collect so much information and although it helps a few people who need it it doesn't get me any professional benefits I know of. I'm past the stage of insecurity where I don't know if it's good enough for publication as it has been already, but the lack of connections and working alone means there simply is no market for new writers unless have some special status which would need years back at university.

It does seem a bit of a waste to create so much and see so little results from it, it does mean I also learn the same information to write it so have grown my own data, but when I see some which can undo a problem and no one wants to know it does make you wonder how people can suffer so much at times yet when offered a possible way out don't even believe it much of the time. I know ultimately it's all a film and everyone are the cast with roles based on standard characters, and as long as we are not burnt by the screen fire or shot by the guns it's fine. I look at the material I learn, and the main effect it has on me directly is higher costs for energy of all types. That in turn meant I bought a smaller car and can't travel as far for photos or anything else as it crawls along the motorway rattling as it wasn't designed for it. I also earn a fraction of my investment income as the interest rates are about 5% lower than market rates would dictate, so have under half as much as I ought to to pay for said energy costs. I could even move house if the income was higher, which has been an ambition ever since I left the area I grew up in.

But worse still is where this path will lead. We are heading for energy rationing and travel restrictions (all planned by the EU and UN, car bans, road pricing etc), meaning I will rarely be able to travel at all and have little to write about as I haven't actually done much to come back and report. I see the solutions to these problems, and people either know already, don't believe me or simply couldn't care less until it happens. Then it will be too late and they won't even remember I warned them.

How long anyone can go on dribbling the same genuine information before they either give up or get heard is not known, I find more material confirming what I said years ago every day, the EU are facing power cuts in a couple of years now as they are closing coal power stations with nothing to replace them. It is an arbitrary loss, much like the genocide in the last war, simply a symptom of a twisted power base ruling with a rod of iron over gullible subjects. I mean, do people really believe it's better to freeze and have someone's life support machine cut off than risk global warming? Oh yes, they do, that's why they voted for these laws in the first place. Except the EU ones, no one votes for them, it's made by the Commission who are permanent members and not subject to any investigation from outside. I said this would happen when we had our vote in 1975 and no one listened then, they still don't now.

2012 roundup

With the map completed for 2012 having taken photos on each compass point and getting dark too early for more till next spring I now have more time here to do things like write my blogs. It's been the most active year since my post-viral (I am guessing it was a virus unless bacterial infections can knock you back for a year as well) decline in 2005, managing to drive 80 miles by the end in each direction without any bad effects. Prior to that I could drive up to 500 miles in a day without a second thought but had to pretty much start again from scratch. Although I've had nothing new (on top of the existing synchronicity) from the angels so far someone I know woke up last night to see a bunch of human entities around her bed she was able to talk to, she had no idea who they were but apparently a rare view of other dimensionals. So I asked for a sign and she got it although not aware until I explained its probable meaning.

Now the photos are done distance wise I've kept up finding old road signs like this one on Sunday




and then with no sense of guilt remaining have kicked around locally doing shopping, gardening and anything else which needs doing like catching up on recorded TV. I am being made to detach from the news, it's not as if much of it affects me if I know it or not, the only change I've suffered has been having to buy a small car to save money as petrol went up so much. The EU and UN make laws gradually catching up with those in pre-war Germany (I've read some of Hitler's speeches and he pretty well wrote the foreword to Agenda 21 which comes as no surprise), but having learnt all this it's not my place to do more than write it up, let people know and fuck off. If they aren't interested I can't make them, so have had to leave both the spreading of the material and the interest in it behind and return to the spiritual path I was forced to leave when they faked global warming. I've established anyone can investigate a fraud adequately without the need to be qualified in the area it originated from, an investigator looks for inconsistencies and standard patterns people follow when making stuff up, once you are familiar with them you can see it in the results rather than the need to originate the material yourself.

So whatever I've collected it means nothing in the present as I return to the same thing when I have, only meaning I don't have to visit somewhere I've done already. Spiritual development however opens up new abilities and feelings and although they haven't lasted for more than minutes in most cases and very far apart at that, I know they are possible and unless I meet a woman and can afford to move back where I came from before I had to leave the only changes can be in me rather than outside. Having reread the basics of Buddhism have confirmed I both understood it correctly and have been following it, the only exception being I believe karma/reincarnation is a throwback to previous religious relics and has no place in spiritual progress. After all, the past lives would be irrelevant anyway once you learnt the path and applying it breaks you free of it regardless of the bad deeds and other crap you aren't actually aware of so couldn't correct if you wanted to. Therefore just following the rules stop you making more karma and free you of whatever you remember or not so there's no need to theorise where it came from or not. It recognises all the psychic powers (unlike western religion except the Kaballa) but once you are enlightened are happy without anything from the outside world.

So I have a blank space ahead, I am free, nothing is wrong, and still have no more than usual so am just apparently adding nothing new. There is at least time to meditate a lot more and that is really the only known route to non-physical benefits, and if the angels can bring some of the physical where my own influence cannot reach all the better. I've got till the spring to work on it before I can do some more big journeys again.

Ed Miliband? Nein Danke!

I will start with a few credentials, I have enough experience to be able to pick up certain qualities in people simply as a musician would pick out notes or chords. There are only so many and not exactly hard to recognise after 52 years looking. So with everyone discussing the next prime minister Ed Miliband all it does is show a) how busy most people are with their own lives to really notice what happens elsewhere and b) how easy it is to be believed whatever you say.

Ed Miliband seems actually one of the few genuine top politicians. Unfortunately this means he is a genuine Forrest Gump. He believes whatever he is told and despite having an academic mind few could better, his awareness of the real world outside his paperwork is no better than the average seven year old. He has absolutely no maturity or human interaction, but is an information machine, sucking it in and spewing it out with little or no actual understanding of what the great machine of his brain is passing along from its theoretical mouth to its anus. He is a believer in whatever his elders and betters (starting with his communist parents and whiz kid brother) tell him, and has fallen hook line and sinker for the Rockefeller led UN agendas running Obama and the whole of the three main parties here. Combined with the power and influence he clearly has, then to get the equivalent of Frank Spencer as head of Health and Safety to one of the potentially most powerful positions in the world he is clearly a dangerous potential leader as he is apparently so plausible people are phoning the radio in droves during the conference calling for his appointment.

As Obama's speeches are robotic, his are childlike. Clearly even today what we would have called at primary school the 'class spazz', he clearly took to academia like a duck to water, but not in the way of a genius but of Rain Man, like the tedious nimrod in most degree classes or A level who can trot out paragraphs of books at length while clearly doing little more than repeating them blindly. "The climate is changing! We must do everything to avoid dangerous climate change", and I think he is one of the few above local councillor who actually believes it, which is actually even worse as it's like letting a child handle explosives. It's one thing having evil but intelligent people trying to screw you over, but the village idiot who just happens to have an autistic gift at memorising facts who thinks he really has to do something is far more dangerous as he actually means it.

One thing was the general public till this conference can pick it up as well, as even the least aware members of society can pick up a wrong 'un just as they did in the playground at primary school. Most ugly ducklings do grow out of it and are generally impossible to compare with the class wally they used to be, but he instead has allowed the wallydom to grow with age to complete maturity. The reason till now so many people consistently said (even as some rampant Labour supporters) they couldn't vote for him was he was simply too much of a prat to be missed. How the team have rebranded him over a weekend to become a credible possibility to lead Labour into the next election, and god forbid stand a chance of election is something even I thought was too much of a credibility gap to bridge.

Had he been around in medieval times there would have been songs and poems around like 'Ed who's head is as dim as an ass, his mind is lost among the pixies and can't find his backside with both hands' or somesuch, and children and adults alike would make Ed Miliband faces and unless he withdrew from public office sharpish would have ended up being pelted by rotten fruit. Now they may not have had plumbing or refrigeration but the medievals knew how to take the mickey out of someone who really deserved it. Had they had TV news back then instead of doing everything they could to take him as seriously as anyone possibly can despite the subject being only a hair's breadth away from Benny from Crossroads with a degree from Harvard, they would have reported something like 'Ed the Miliband of Labour today made a speech at Manchester which would have made a maiden wette herself with lack of bladder control as if seeing a donkey trying to ride a bicycle (had they also been invented). Sad to say such a chump would be hard pushed to lead a small child to the privy let alone try and become the leader of the country.' Now that's honest reporting, instead of the fawning drivel we must put up with on every channel as well as the Labour run (I don't know how but they seem to do it whoever's in power) BBC actually attempting to talk about him as if a credible alternative to such greats as Churchill and Thatcher.

As a bonus if my exposee of what can only be described as either the biggest joke in British politics or the equivalent of landing a 747 without a pilot depending if he wins or not actually makes a few people notice the bleedin' obvious and realise before it's too late they can't encourage someone with the discretion and insight of a breast implant to suddenly be in charge of making laws it will have been a work of deliverance. And if you need a little more to shift, two words, Mr Bean.

Angel progress2

I've been on the phone with my friend who trusts the angels implicitly, and as a more scientific type am happy to try the experiment out as I have nothing to lose and an open mind. She also drifted off to talking about how much we have to do, and in the end had gone full circle to taking our own initiative, while the angels just make things work more easily. Now to me either they are angels (virtually omnipotent) or nothing, and if you believe in angels you hand stuff over to them. Not just 'make this bloody hard job a bit easier' but 'do this bloody hard job for me as it's actually something you're a lot better at and assigned to do it'. No buying dogs and barking yourself.

Nothing out of the ordinary as such, but it is at least an interesting experiment. My theory on it if correct is instead of being bounded by our physical sphere of influence, eg you ask a woman out and she decides, or write an exam and someone else marks it, angels and any other tricks extend this boundary so we don't just do our bit but ask for outside help to influence it the way we want. I think I'd notice if they did, especially as I now write a daily record of it to do it properly. But as long as I remember if I was waiting for anything I knew was possible I'd be distracted from everything else even if it was weeks away. It's my nature and as a child I pulled my carrots up to see how they were growing, and tried to get some of my plastic models out of the moulds before they were set. Having wrecked them both as a result I learnt not to do that again, but when I make a request and see any chance of even the first step on a distant horizon I do the maths and say 'nothing's happened', which technically is correct. I am talking supernatural here, ie no physical laws apply. My books have numerous examples, including verified timeslips and teleportation, as there was someone at each end who saw the person at point A and then point B either instantly or far sooner than they could have got there normally. Not being possible at will you simply can't subject any of this to a scientific test as until someone volunteers themself who says they can do it when asked, it's only those lucky enough to be there at the time who can confirm each story one by one. Quantum physics is still at the root of it all, as if you shift the bonds of these atoms which all vibrate at one frequency, you then open a space to others. Observation affects the position of atoms, one of the earliest ever findings when possible to see with electron microscopes, so combine observation with focused thought and you may well be able to shift the frequency locally into a different one. I am actually studying a course teaching this myself and will report as and when anything happens.

So I will know when something happens, but without probably the first or two events will not have much confidence in it yet. My friend does even though I don't think she's had many more results than me, but there's only one way to know and until it does happen nothing has happened.

More angel progress

My friend who channels the masters (judge a channeler by the quality not the sources they claim) said the angels can only work slowly and gradually as so many things have to be put together, and people can only change gradually from one level to the next rather than get somewhere all at once. I have certainly see my plans run far more smoothly and connectedly than usual, with everything actually fitting in together rather than missing out or getting in the way of each other. Last week I managed to squeeze everything in without spreading things out over days but managing to do two in one and get a lot more as a result. The next arrangement seems fairly certain now, and will just get on with other things till it happens at the end of next week.

If you were told the angels were not just working for you, but had to if you asked, what would you ask for? My first and to me obvious request was a clear sign, and not just the usual synchronicity I am already fully aware of, but a little miracle which was more than usual and clearly unlikely to have happened otherwise. I have just read on Facebook that even though we are aware the authorities lie and cheat it doesn't matter as if we evolve personally we will be far more powerful and not affected by it anyway. That was good advice and maybe I can let the lot drop now and use my existing information for my media career if possible and not give another damn whether people learn about it as they can right now anyway if they really wanted to.

There is the view that miracles don't have sizes, as once you work outside science it's all equal, if you materialise a coin or a million pounds from nowhere they are no bigger, if the money wasn't for you you'd be just as impressed with either. So to me this wait and see attitude is more earthly than spiritual, and the very shlock which holds us back as we are- wait for this to happen, that to happen, be patient. That is the old work ethic and you only get out what you put in, except you rarely do even that, it should be about thinking and believing big, that can happen and I will make it happen one way or another regardless. Small thinking keeps us where we are, so although logically we must wait for everything to mature on the other side there is no time or space so they can do what Dr Who did on Saturday and take the business out of time and return it a minute later after doing all the complicated work. Now if we lived as long as him I wouldn't mind waiting weeks or years, but every day I'm 'consolidating' (read doing F.A.) that's another day off my allotted time and would rather use it with new abilities and knowledge. I've read all the books in this library and played with all the toys, it's time for some serious action. Please?

Angel progress

Having been harnessing the divine power now for a couple of weeks how am I doing? I've certainly kept busy, with more old road signs turning up within easy reach and using up the last weeks before it gets too dark for photos more than round the corner till the spring. Otherwise it's been pretty well business as usual, nothing's actually gone wrong which is at the high end of normal, but the current issue is 'no finishes'. There are some small ones which don't change my life like finding more old road signs,

but major ones which do make a difference never quite get there. I fully accept they don't for anyone else, but as they are possible and see others who have them then as I've aimed myself in those directions have completed my half (the starts) while normally the other half is out of our hands calling on the angels is supposed to add the extra power to complete the missions. I know exactly the sort of jobs I would like done, and would like to have enough time and energy left if I ever do to actually enjoy them. It's also a scientific experiment as part of my research, so for the first time keep official records of requests and results to prove one way or another after a reasonable amount of time if it helps. One or two new starts have happened, every one has the potential to complete but like buying a house or applying for a job we all know how many reach the end of the road to the destination. This goes for outside events as well as my own life. I watch the world being openly run by liars and cheats and no one believes me. I can present 50 pages of properly collected evidence and they still couldn't get the point. Only this week after 23 years they found the police altered all their evidence after Hillsborough, and as well as being the first example of this revealed to the public outside the private sector it to me stands not as an exception but a precedent showing how business is always done.

If it works just to ridicule your accusers to stop an inquiry then the system is clearly run by the crooks or accusations would be followed up and dealt with. Obama alone has a list of unanswered questions, his and his family's records have been wiped from the public domain, even to his alleged college alumni. This is not normal business, and am guessing if you check any other president in the western world their college records will not just be complete but proudly displayed. And why wouldn't they be? He is the prime example of a stooge with absolutely no personal influence who is purely there to do a job he has been put there to do, by George Soros, David Rockefeller and all their friends and associates working for a world government with no national powers remaining. It's all on record and proudly announced by some as if they expect the world to agree with them, but the media don't like it and only come across a single article on all places as The Guardian. The IPCC admitted openly it's now about economic redistribution and not the environment, yet the media haven't caught on. When an authority knows so well it can admit its true plans and get no effect then it means everyone who counts is looking after them. Maybe a local paper could sneak in a small paragraph somewhere with no relevant headline but if The Times (run by Murdoch) had an article anywhere "IPCC admit they are about money not climate" he'd be under concrete by the following day. Now for someone, a single person, to be above Murdoch at all means there is a level even worse and stronger than the antichrist of the 20th century himself. Al Gore has taken that mantle, although being such a figure of fun makes him appear harmless that's a simple clown costume hiding the devil behind. Obama's not exactly evil, as he's an empty shell like a newsreader who just reads off his autocue and if it said we are going to kill all the first born sons wouldn't raise an eyebrow. If human cloning was possible I'd say he'd been made in a lab and just designed to do the job and has no past to record. That's certainly what you'd think if looking for it as well.

So one task for the angels is to get people to discover what I already know, whether from my work or generally, and have been told (I have a channel speaking to them for me as well) to summarise it on a single page and send it door to door. That is fairly expensive and takes weeks of damn hard work as I've done it before for my own business and got one reply from an old friend who lived in a house I leafletted. I can't see that as a good idea somehow but breaking it up into a few gradually growing lessons and one short page does make sense. I'm learning a lot though and each new idea becomes part of the teaching. Looking past the surface is the biggest lesson, like wind turbines or electric cars. Good selling, bad product. Don't buy the product to find out the truth. Misleading advertising is illegal unless by the government, so they have taken over the wind industry and force it on us although unlike the climate (another area people must do their own checking) the figures are known and certain. But people don't check (we can now, it's all online) and make death threats to others who suggest they do (I would know). So despite the solution being as easy as an hour's clicking and reading they get away with it as 'what's in it for them?' as I get asked whenever I venture into global warming fanatic sites. Unfortunately emotional maturity is a generations long process and those who have completed it have no effect on those who haven't. No wonder I've started relying on angels.

Working with the angels

I don't normally bother with such esoteric concepts- if I'm doing anything with the unseen forces it's straight to the top and nothing between. But if genuine the angels have come to me- first someone told me about a cat called Angel, then I met someone who was reading about them and working with them, and had it confirmed by working for someone called Angel, who turned out to be the same one I'd known for over 20 years, and then a third person saying she felt OK when she moved as she met what she called the angel cat. Of course the best way for the higher levels to communicate with us is through repetition, so if the same weird stuff crops up over and over again we can't miss the message. Then this week I had a psychic reading and was told to work with the angels directly, keep records and make requests, as it's their role to answer them as they have no will of their own but created for our benefit.

I have nothing to lose- where I am so far is a small fraction of what I would like, so while all my plants are short green shoots and buds after 52 years while others have created a jungle, this is a totally painless addition to every other method I use. It is similar to Conversations with God, in that it becomes like another voice speaking to you, and you write down all the results to make sure you remember them properly and can compare what you had at the start with further along. I've got nothing to lose here and will just see how it goes, it really is as simple as that.

Mission complete- what next?

The great risk blogging is separating the readers, we had this conversation years ago I think on the old ones, but besides changing names if you read an account of your life you'd know even if others didn't. Totally legal or newspapers wouldn't exist, but not everyone likes being discussed online despite it purely being a written version of half the conversations on earth (minimum). What's more interesting than talking about the people we know? Facebook caught me out, the first site people I know use, as one person at least has agreed with me to avoid politics for 35 years as we knew our views then and were happy to leave each to them. Now he pops up and tuts sometimes as if he didn't remember I used to support Mrs Thatcher, although purely as the bleach to wipe out the Labour mess rather than her general policies. Once she had done that she went wild and I joined the other lot (not Labour, there were others), until certain of their leaders filled the gap on the left since Blair shifted Labour away, which is not actually the remit of a centre party, so I had to leave.

Anyway, the good news is I spent 5 hours driving to Battle yesterday, and was so tired as the roads after the M25 didn't exceed 50 mph for a mile or so at a time and less on the rest, as I was hoping to carry on to Hastings, but another 7 or so miles, doubling to 14, was pushing me over the edge, and actually found on return I'd only gone 12 miles past my last trip that way. The road sign I needed had had the numbers peeled off, leaving a negative where the dirt hadn't reached the backing, just like a road junction one near Cambridge. And it had a red triangle for the children sign below it rather than the required circle (as on a private road) so only just an addition to the collection to the 'damaged' list (there is a joke there but even I can draw the line occasionally).

The new camera is wonderful, making sharp edges and blue skies most of the time, the faults being manual semi auto focus (ie no control but can't leave it to do the work) and it slants verticals which is pretty much like saying 'Macbeth' in a dressing room or bringing ham to a barmitzvah. And that's on a large digital screen, I will submit a sample to a photo forum and see if they can suggest a tweak. I spent most of today adding them online and just finished (don't look at the time), but nothing on tomorrow. The boilerman returned today, and found what I assumed was the fault hiding behind the fault he fixed, after a little direction from me as to its behaviour as a result of it. It was fixed and covered by the previous work thank goodness, and should now have a warm winter. If it works it won't need a service for another year anyway now.

So my map is full for 2012, and if I feel like it next spring would bag another 100km square which is at least 70 miles as the crow flies in any direction. There are methods to get two as the nodes touch so if you aim for one can do it that way, west is too far off the main road but north is a small detour west just before (cough) Peterborough. That's a fun ride I remember, but would prefer a luxury car (one with a boot and engine over 1300cc that is) as it does make a difference on a long run. But till then it's now whatever I like as the coast stops me going any further where the routes would be easier. The house and garden will now benefit, and whatever else I do when I'm here on the creative side. Although it's the exception (slightly above women asking men out) apart from other people finding road signs for me I haven't really achieved anything I can remember this year beyond my own work. Nothing else has really changed or happened to help, the news has been dire- apart from a new law making squatting a crime (as if it just occured to people having other people take your house over and stopping you living there, using the gas and electricity and not paying any tax) and anyone else I know's decisions have pretty much not been in ways I'd benefit from either. Of course when for instance a friend moves abroad it isn't personal, but then again neither would it be if they chose to come back, but I'd benefit. People don't do things to pee us off much, they do what they have to and we are caught in the crossfire as collateral damage. Maybe I should use that as a screen name, as from the day my mother left us to the day my friend left Britain probably for good I have had the roll of paper to wipe up after them. Thank god the most important decisions have been good, ie my exams, and then the successful TV work, but outside the business area which I've always had covered pretty well, the personal side has been scraps. Besides my good friends who have now dwindled as described in great detail long ago, the women have been worse than anyone could ever have written in a novel. Whatever could go wrong did, almost without an exception, hence my long history of being single, and each new attempt following the same end regardless of the means- mental illness, emigration, parent pressure, ex boyfriends, you name it and many more ways I couldn't have thought up beforehand it's gone wrong. I'm even going to the wedding of the one who left me the second her ex found out I'd caught her on the rebound in 1993. I'd possibly have been married to her nearly 20 years and had children otherwise, instead of a series of cats. Not that I couldn't have had them both.

So this woman (see how smoothly I got back on track there?) appears to fit the same pattern I've had since the day I dumped my first girlfriend as she was boring (she was) and changed my mind the day after but she didn't want to know. I've been punished for that ever since, and even accepted boring women at 30 (I planned to drop faults from the list every decade), but can't yet accept dim ones. As I learnt long ago you need something to talk about afterwards (you know), it's the second most important thing (at least I'm honest in admitting it) to me, and may drop that requirement at 60 if no one else has arrived. The routine so far has been each decade when I drop a deal breaker from the list those women are no longer interested in me instead. The formula has been better than any scientific one besides putting vinegar in baking soda. It is infinitely repeatable and have as yet found no way to interrupt its constant action. If I have enough money I'll ask CERN to create one for me now they've found the Higgs Boson and have to find something else to use it for. Publishing one of my articles would be nice as well. Stranger things have happened

Spiritual update 9/12

Having had messages when I didn't visit for a while, and seen the hits go up again I can come back and actually trust I am being read, although apart from Roger hardly anyone seems to comment now, partly as most old bloggers have left and haven't found any new ones to replace them when I used to comment on theirs in return.

Anyway, spiritual journey time, and writing it down makes it clearer for me to see as well. Besides the caveat 'you can't rely on the unreliable' ie everything outside yourself, I met someone who has had pretty much the same path and discoveries than me, but in half the time I took. She took my details a week ago and have I heard back, have I buggery. OK, two or three possible reasons do exist which may have caused the delay, but the reason I used the screen name satguru 11 years ago was because with all the conflicting outside teaching only we could sort it out, and we are the satguru while they are the outer guru. I am still the satguru, and Neale Donald Walsch says we are all perfect at birth, and enlightened when we realise we never needed to add anything to be so. I will add from the next teacher that we also leave the dimensional frequency matrix to gradually see and affect more and more until we become adepts as well. One major school says the powers come before enlightenment, but he says that was to stop too many people using them so they could. That makes far more sense to you, as Walsch says, we're not given toys and expected not to play with them.

Technically I have reached a point where all my main work has been done this year (as photography needs long days if going many miles to get them), so apart from one optional trip I can only do when free and fit to do so I am catching up with everything else. Meeting her confirmed my path must be universal, as it was close enough to know it was the same as mine, and being guided by whatever is doing so must be in our best interests and not pointing us over a cliff or poverty. But isn't it better to keep this going rather than being ships which pass in the night? That would only work if we'd learnt all we could in one go from each other and then move on again, and I'd see it as a waste in this case. Part of the system no doubt, but not part of one I'd have chosen unless she turns out to be booby trapped and would blow part of me off if I touched her. If not then I am still bloody waiting.

I am certainly not at the stage of having any control of life using any powers, I can just about see static auras now (the best ones move) so getting somewhere (after having the third eye opened in 1991 and then not much since) and will certainly work on it more when I'm not on the road. I'm not complaining as being free is the best place to start, but I have run out of ideas for now. I got the new camera after completing the big ones (the old one is packing up gradually and couldn't wait for the final convulsion) and now just filling in spaces locally and there are now no trips under about 80 miles besides the final 2012 one so wouldn't be till next spring. This will be directed, and currently not even at the 24 hour point with a clue for tomorrow, but that always takes care of itself somehow, besides an eye test and gardening, and waiting for the boilerman to see why the boiler still goes out after spending nearly as much as a new one. Being married if nothing else would share these events, and whatever happened wouldn't have to deal with them all on my own. Even when the sole candidate appears not to fulfil one of my criteria (maybe if I wait till 60 only one will remain and the rest will be wiped off, maybe this should be brought forward?).

In the past and probably present things seem to return to the middle, the official place of the ego, where good and bad always cancel to neutral, so must escape it to enlightenment. But I've seen a little more than that and still remember it's possible, but not yet in power to find it myself.