Having just discovered climate change is now officially a business, and it's headed by the same man who runs the BBC pension fund, such connections show a complete circle when it comes to the financial flow of money from the law makers at the top who make the laws to collect the money, and then invest in the areas themselves and get the national broadcasters to do the same, and at the same time restrict the broadcasting to anything that supports these actions.
the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change headed by Peter Dunscombe.
Looking even at the few crooks unearthed in politics, like cockroaches if you see a few there are always thousands nearby, and the same goes for the handful of politicians and leaders who get exposed compared to the ones doing far worse. Just imagine you were in the cabinet, had vast tracts of land (as many of them do), and created a law saying people who use their spare land for wind farms get a guaranteed rent for 25 years without having to do anything, and then instal hundreds on their own land, if necessary putting it in your wife's name or children to avoid any official claims of corruption. And you're saving the planet so no one complains even when it earns you millions.
That I'm afraid is how business is done nowadays, the links I keep turning up connecting Al Gore, Rothschilds (about to help run Australia's carbon tax, no surprises there), the BBC and even the bloody Dalai Lama (no longer on my chanukah card list now) are all working as a massive team to squeeze as much cash from a false flag threat of CO2 while everyone's looking the other way adjusting their pants. They don't even need the money- these politicians were millionaires already before they got into it, so as well as ramping up their personal incomes drastically it is taken from government subsidies, ie my money. So basically anything the mafia has done with protection rackets and money laundering can now be shown as the politics of the 21st century. It's not even hidden any more as they know no one can police the police themselves- unless they make a mistake as a few have done. And carbon trading itself had to be removed from the laws of theft as a decade earlier a similar scheme got the Enron management sent down for years. We never seem to learn and keep electing the same people as it hurts too much to imagine they're as dirty as a rock festival toilet.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Saturday, July 16, 2011
Hockey sticks rule the 2000s
< Food prices.
Oil till 2005 >
Gold v
Temperatures?
Fertiliser prices
Spot the odd one out. They all look damn similar don't they, but just one is not reliable, the temperature record. Unfortunately all the prices are absolutely real, as is the world population. The familiar hockey stick, which needed to both compare like with unlike (the temperatures from 1979 onwards were satellite based, land based for 50 years earlier and then proxy) and rewrite history to dispose of the little ice age and medieval warm period, both in textbooks for decades until then, in order to give the impression our temperatures had suddenly started rising. Steve McIntyre followed this up by using the computer algorithm to show whatever data was put in the same shape was guaranteed.
But the 2000s have indeed been the decade of the hockey stick economically. Are they connected? Mostly they are, and not by chance either. Bear in mind the Bilderberg Group planned to use mid-east chaos such as invading Libya and Iraq to raise the oil price artificially to $150, which has been closely reached now twice, and as can be seen the 2005 price here, already the peak of the stick is now double that in 2011. This has been engineered through wars and selective restrictions on exploration and energy taxes, nominally in the name of the environment but actually to allow the same remaining oil to be sold for around double the previous market price or more. Therefore big oil are definitely involved with climate change, as it has made their work a lot easier, gaining twice the price for the identical amount of work. Inflation causes a ripple effect, so food and fertiliser (partly oil based) follow faithfully, while gold has risen simply as the currencies have been puffed up without added production through bailouts and quantitative easing (creating cash from nowhere), meaning they become worth less per pound or dollar as there is no more production behind a greater total sum of cash. That means the money shifts to hard currency, ie commodities, with gold as king.
The final and sharpest rise which is probably the major reason behind the others is world population. As food production remains flat and oil reduces, and the people multiply logarithmically, the shareout ratio is obvious. And bear in mind in nature most sharp peaks end with a sharp fall. If this occurred for any of the prices it would be a welcome miracle, if for the population it would be a disaster.
Wednesday, July 06, 2011
Getting where exactly?
I still do my almost daily blog elsewhere simply as that's where the audience appears to be. But people do still visit here so not planning to give up, but think it's site wide and not just my blog as people move over to Facebook. Partly due to the latest photo site encouraging us to travel as far as possible to extend our coverage, and a gradual return of my energy I've managed more this year already than I had for a few years. If your health's up the creek you're stuffed whoever or whatever you are. And having the blood tests come up clear were a great relief, as has now eliminated most of any of the worst (although being initialized couldn't work out what they were all for) and can relax on that front.
Other than that I am fine when things are going well (which isn't a given when you have other health problems and the like hanging about) and just need to stay up when knocked down by events. Things will always break, fall apart and go against you throughout your life, and with no one normally around to help mean if you're on your own there's no one to share any burden. That must make every event worse as I don't remember them causing so much grief when I still lived at home as I always had the support. Mind you, if you can crack that one there's not much left, and I seem to have covered everything on the way to that hurdle. I didn't ask to be super human, but seem to be being gradually broken down to be rebuilt in true shamanic fashion, except over years instead of days.
Losing faith and belief is another part of these tests- although I've always said how the process is cruel in the short term as however much you advance and see the world becoming more connected (the outward sign of that progress) you still keep on suffering. The traditional result of enlightenment is the end of suffering, though some teachers say there is still suffering but they don't associate with it. That's a typical statement you'll never get until you are so no point attempting to analyse it further. Obviously once you see life is being guided at all then it is being guided. And likely even the seeming gaps where everything returns to random can be looked into further to find a purpose. And even though I'm only on this path for my own benefit if I learn anything new my nature is to share it. I've no idea how many people learn anything from my offerings on screen, but do know it helps people when they come to me directly for help. When I was at my worst points it was the logic of my mother who helped me more than anyone else. Of course mine is inherited from her and her parents, as well as my father's academic mind. Looking at the careers of my family then I can see why they expected so much of me.
I don't know what to expect next if anything. I see myself grow from one issue to the next but the new problems never stop. They aren't unusual ones, but just a constant stream as soon as the last ones are fixed. The old story is whenever everything else is sorted then it's time for the dentist, and tends to be the case sooner or later as now. Nothing major at least and should be fixed in minutes but still have to both go and probably be sent to the hygienist as well as they don't do that as part of the checkup where I go now, plus it's private so have to pay the full price despite being an NHS practice otherwise. So it's been optician, doctor, outpatients and suppose the full set was on the cards really. I suppose at least there's no psychiatrist on the list. Anyway, here are a couple of photos from last week's trip to Oxford.
Other than that I am fine when things are going well (which isn't a given when you have other health problems and the like hanging about) and just need to stay up when knocked down by events. Things will always break, fall apart and go against you throughout your life, and with no one normally around to help mean if you're on your own there's no one to share any burden. That must make every event worse as I don't remember them causing so much grief when I still lived at home as I always had the support. Mind you, if you can crack that one there's not much left, and I seem to have covered everything on the way to that hurdle. I didn't ask to be super human, but seem to be being gradually broken down to be rebuilt in true shamanic fashion, except over years instead of days.
Losing faith and belief is another part of these tests- although I've always said how the process is cruel in the short term as however much you advance and see the world becoming more connected (the outward sign of that progress) you still keep on suffering. The traditional result of enlightenment is the end of suffering, though some teachers say there is still suffering but they don't associate with it. That's a typical statement you'll never get until you are so no point attempting to analyse it further. Obviously once you see life is being guided at all then it is being guided. And likely even the seeming gaps where everything returns to random can be looked into further to find a purpose. And even though I'm only on this path for my own benefit if I learn anything new my nature is to share it. I've no idea how many people learn anything from my offerings on screen, but do know it helps people when they come to me directly for help. When I was at my worst points it was the logic of my mother who helped me more than anyone else. Of course mine is inherited from her and her parents, as well as my father's academic mind. Looking at the careers of my family then I can see why they expected so much of me.
I don't know what to expect next if anything. I see myself grow from one issue to the next but the new problems never stop. They aren't unusual ones, but just a constant stream as soon as the last ones are fixed. The old story is whenever everything else is sorted then it's time for the dentist, and tends to be the case sooner or later as now. Nothing major at least and should be fixed in minutes but still have to both go and probably be sent to the hygienist as well as they don't do that as part of the checkup where I go now, plus it's private so have to pay the full price despite being an NHS practice otherwise. So it's been optician, doctor, outpatients and suppose the full set was on the cards really. I suppose at least there's no psychiatrist on the list. Anyway, here are a couple of photos from last week's trip to Oxford.
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
You live and learn
No matter how bright you are or how much you know you can always learn more. I had a lesson this weekend on my presentation, and how to think like your audience and not like your peers. The message does not change but if you are polarised in your approach the potential pupils just switch off and ignore you. I found it easy to adjust and hope the results are now better as I'd reached the point where I'd given up expecting a single change from the vast amount of material I now have at my fingertips. And despite creating a short but incriminating summary of overt statements declaring global warming was indeed created by an elite to divide and control the masses, nothing, not a reply, reaction or surprise except from a radio presenter. But despite being on a national programme only 10 people checked the website. But I know now and so do they, and if any fucker says 'Why would there be a conspiracy?' as they still do whenever it's mentioned, I just say 'Club of Rome 1991'. It's not isolated of course, it's been repeated by Gorbachev (1996), his second in command and Ottmar Edenhofer, and the Bilderberg 2010 agenda included 'Global Cooling'. Of course we now know the solar minimum is both expected to wipe out the total warming since 1850 and explain the sun does drive temperatures and not you and me. We are still expecting the first new minister for tide control probably in the UK, but that always ignored the evidence and no doubt they'll also be naked except for the wonderful suit of invisible clothes. It all relies on enough twats accepting it, so don't be a twat and they'll eventually go away.
After my eyes, teeth, blood and finances were all inspected and passed fit my house now needs a builder, electrician, plumber and boilerman. The promised deadlines for the electrician and plumber have been and gone with no electrical or plumbing activity (it would be more surprising if it hadn't considering), the builder is Polish so if he says he'll come next week he'll come next week or possibly even sooner, and the boilerman comes from the neighbouring dimension where time is a few months shifted from here. My boiler is in fact virtually no more than a metal box on the wall. I somehow tricked it into providing the hot water for a bath on Thursday, but that was a one off and the system is fucked both heating and hot water and less than four years old.
I do still try and read other blogs when I get the chance, but every time I add one to the list they pack up within months, and any new ones I find aren't active. I use another site where they are now so still get comments, just not usually here. But the quality and unique opportunity to write is still specific to these sites and maybe people are too busy fighting and showing off on Facebook to do something more creative and personal any more. I have in fact now been mentioned in two national papers (no photo so barely noticed) simply by being the only person to complain against a road trap for motorists a few years ago in a local paper. It generated three weeks of letters and stopped. Then a member of staff went national and carried the story with him, it's had no effect on the council who steal money from innocent people, but the media love it. It's been on TV, the radio and mentioned in other articles, but despite the local paper now wanting to campaign against it no lawyer has arrived and unless a case is built in the High Court Camden couldn't care less. But it's growing in awareness and if anyone comes on board to work for nothing we'll be off.
I've barely got any plans now, I've been busier than I have for years, and needed a break, and just a couple of long photo runs to do for the site which need the time and energy. But now I know all the usual suspects for any symptoms I've had are absent I can pretty well get on with things and just be careful.
After my eyes, teeth, blood and finances were all inspected and passed fit my house now needs a builder, electrician, plumber and boilerman. The promised deadlines for the electrician and plumber have been and gone with no electrical or plumbing activity (it would be more surprising if it hadn't considering), the builder is Polish so if he says he'll come next week he'll come next week or possibly even sooner, and the boilerman comes from the neighbouring dimension where time is a few months shifted from here. My boiler is in fact virtually no more than a metal box on the wall. I somehow tricked it into providing the hot water for a bath on Thursday, but that was a one off and the system is fucked both heating and hot water and less than four years old.
I do still try and read other blogs when I get the chance, but every time I add one to the list they pack up within months, and any new ones I find aren't active. I use another site where they are now so still get comments, just not usually here. But the quality and unique opportunity to write is still specific to these sites and maybe people are too busy fighting and showing off on Facebook to do something more creative and personal any more. I have in fact now been mentioned in two national papers (no photo so barely noticed) simply by being the only person to complain against a road trap for motorists a few years ago in a local paper. It generated three weeks of letters and stopped. Then a member of staff went national and carried the story with him, it's had no effect on the council who steal money from innocent people, but the media love it. It's been on TV, the radio and mentioned in other articles, but despite the local paper now wanting to campaign against it no lawyer has arrived and unless a case is built in the High Court Camden couldn't care less. But it's growing in awareness and if anyone comes on board to work for nothing we'll be off.
I've barely got any plans now, I've been busier than I have for years, and needed a break, and just a couple of long photo runs to do for the site which need the time and energy. But now I know all the usual suspects for any symptoms I've had are absent I can pretty well get on with things and just be careful.
Thursday, June 16, 2011
I am actually still here
Wow, I've just found the background colour button, this is fun. I haven't given up blogging but due to the apparent decline of Blogger have been using another one I have where I know people read it and comment, while in 2004 this was all the rage and now seems to have been left behind. But it costs me nothing and will keep updating here in case anyone reads it.
The main issues since last visit have been the optician found two aneurysms in my retina, nothing in themselves and often go away, but needed to know the cause and diabetes was the possible one. Otherwise it's random but had to have a blood test for anything else as well and thank goodness that all came back clear so can now relax on all the other potential health problems I thought were possible as well as the diabetes. The stronger reading glasses are costing me a month's income or so but what can we do when quizzes are being spoilt online by misreading words?
I also got a photo printer for my birthday, late as it took me that long to decide what I wanted. It was a total mistake for many reasons. The research I did didn't raise a photo printer at all, so when I went to the local superstore (plus I wasn't paying except for the extras) I bought the best one my research had identified, which produces wonderful photos but so far appear to be costing me about 65p each at the combined price of ink and paper compared to 5p plus postage (now 1p) online. The convenience of printing as soon as I've taken the photos is wonderful but talk about a luxury and ongoing cost.
So it turns out I bought something totally useless. I have a very old and good printer and scanner, and have no need for others. Of course you can buy photo printers but are specialised and not sold in large stores, and only discovered their actual existence by chance. I now have a huge photocopying machine (I may use a few times a year) as well as combined printer and scanner, I can't keep it in the same room as the PC as it's like trying to fit two cars in one garage, but thought I'd use the portable memory option in the new conservatory. No way Jose, the Sale of Goods Act states all goods should be fit for their purpose, this only reads 1000 photos and memories store 3000 plus. As I'm not spending months on a court case for an irritation the final option is to leave the printer there and use its wireless facility to receive the photos by a network connected to my PC. I went back to the shop and told them I wanted to do this and they sold me a USB dongle, which appears to be to connect a laptop to receive wireless, it seems they should have sold me a router.
I am now in correspondence with the printer people and the shop as if they've sold me the wrong hardware they have to sort it out, and if not then the company have to explain how to connect it up. I emailed and the first reply told me to use my wireless router via an ethernet cable. As I'm connected via a cable modem I had to reply and tell them what I had and how to connect with that. If they confirm I need a router then it's another potential court case (for £35 or so this time) to swap a presumably useless dongle (I can't carry the PC around to use in the park with a generator) for a probably far more expensive router. I'm not going wireless at home as besides the printer I don't want the computer open to all and sundry and losing speed, as well as paying Virgin for a wireless router, and if not will end up carrying the printer in every few weeks from the spare room to make more prints. If I'd done my research then I'd have spent about £30 (plus the same 65p per photo) on a photo printer I'd have bought online (the superstores won't touch them for some reason, probably as they sell mugs like me photocopiers they don't want or need hoping they'll never realise) which is so small it could sit on the desk next to me here. So for the benefit of a few potential photocopies a year I've got a huge useless printer which won't read memories or connect wirelessly. The prints are bloody good which is why I bought it, but would be identical on a photo printer and I'd have £100 plus left over. How they rip us off as they know we don't know as much as they do...
The main issues since last visit have been the optician found two aneurysms in my retina, nothing in themselves and often go away, but needed to know the cause and diabetes was the possible one. Otherwise it's random but had to have a blood test for anything else as well and thank goodness that all came back clear so can now relax on all the other potential health problems I thought were possible as well as the diabetes. The stronger reading glasses are costing me a month's income or so but what can we do when quizzes are being spoilt online by misreading words?
I also got a photo printer for my birthday, late as it took me that long to decide what I wanted. It was a total mistake for many reasons. The research I did didn't raise a photo printer at all, so when I went to the local superstore (plus I wasn't paying except for the extras) I bought the best one my research had identified, which produces wonderful photos but so far appear to be costing me about 65p each at the combined price of ink and paper compared to 5p plus postage (now 1p) online. The convenience of printing as soon as I've taken the photos is wonderful but talk about a luxury and ongoing cost.
So it turns out I bought something totally useless. I have a very old and good printer and scanner, and have no need for others. Of course you can buy photo printers but are specialised and not sold in large stores, and only discovered their actual existence by chance. I now have a huge photocopying machine (I may use a few times a year) as well as combined printer and scanner, I can't keep it in the same room as the PC as it's like trying to fit two cars in one garage, but thought I'd use the portable memory option in the new conservatory. No way Jose, the Sale of Goods Act states all goods should be fit for their purpose, this only reads 1000 photos and memories store 3000 plus. As I'm not spending months on a court case for an irritation the final option is to leave the printer there and use its wireless facility to receive the photos by a network connected to my PC. I went back to the shop and told them I wanted to do this and they sold me a USB dongle, which appears to be to connect a laptop to receive wireless, it seems they should have sold me a router.
I am now in correspondence with the printer people and the shop as if they've sold me the wrong hardware they have to sort it out, and if not then the company have to explain how to connect it up. I emailed and the first reply told me to use my wireless router via an ethernet cable. As I'm connected via a cable modem I had to reply and tell them what I had and how to connect with that. If they confirm I need a router then it's another potential court case (for £35 or so this time) to swap a presumably useless dongle (I can't carry the PC around to use in the park with a generator) for a probably far more expensive router. I'm not going wireless at home as besides the printer I don't want the computer open to all and sundry and losing speed, as well as paying Virgin for a wireless router, and if not will end up carrying the printer in every few weeks from the spare room to make more prints. If I'd done my research then I'd have spent about £30 (plus the same 65p per photo) on a photo printer I'd have bought online (the superstores won't touch them for some reason, probably as they sell mugs like me photocopiers they don't want or need hoping they'll never realise) which is so small it could sit on the desk next to me here. So for the benefit of a few potential photocopies a year I've got a huge useless printer which won't read memories or connect wirelessly. The prints are bloody good which is why I bought it, but would be identical on a photo printer and I'd have £100 plus left over. How they rip us off as they know we don't know as much as they do...
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Global warming: The conspiracy.
Al Gore was originally fascinated by his lecturer (while doing an arts degree at Harvard, he was poor at science and only took the course due to the American system of minor subjects) Roger Revelle's personal theory that this may be possible and happening, and like a man falls in love instantly across a crowded room, Al took this to his heart and although the late Mr Revelle changed his mind on retirement and told anyone who would listen that he was wrong, it was too late. Al had fallen, and dismissed Revelle as being senile.
To follow Gore to the present, as he joined the parallel bandwagon around the early 90s or before so became the mouthpiece of the movement worldwide, his main interest in global warming was not the environment, but a financial one. His film 'An Inconvenient Truth' was found to have at least ten 'material errors' (ie lies) in a British civil court, and was only the alarmist advertisement for his financial concerns. Right at the beginning, he worked out there was a vast source of profit from this assertion, and worked with Ken Lay, before the collapse of his Enron company, on how best to go about this route. Enron later collapsed after being found to have invented both profits and products, basically paper energy notes based on the collection of non-existent future profits. This worked long enough to collect millions, and I do not know what happened to these after the trial, but can only presume they were not confiscated so the job was done.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/737753/posts
http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/04/30/al-gore-and-enron/
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=22663
"In August 1997, Lay and Browne met with President Bill Clinton and Vice President Gore in the Oval Office to develop administration positions for the Kyoto negotiations that resulted in an international treaty to regulate greenhouse gas emissions."
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1185475433.pdf
The second limb of the conspiracy is that carbon trading, as opposed to credits, is like car insurance in a growing number of countries. It is not something you risk as a seasoned investor (as did the customers of Bernie Madoff who wasn't sanctioned by the UN) but are forced to do by law if your country legislates for it. A win-win situation for the traders.
Video here http://www.youtube.com/user/satguru?feature=mhee#p/a/f/0/pQAc8RteZT4
Their previous report from the 70s was indeed an extremely sensible one, published as a book, to keep world population stable, and received virtually no publicity and absolutely no policy changes, remaining to this day a framework to manage the world's real elephant in the room which is a definite threat as unlike our temperatures it is already spiralling out of control. But their second try, possibly as there is a huge opportunity for financial gain from it rather than simply conserving the planet, was a raving success. Mikail Gorbachev joined the team on retirement from Soviet affairs, as an expert in such areas of oppressing the masses, and in 1996 restated their position:
"The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order"
The Wildlands Project http://www.libertymatters.org/ahri-wildlands-rpt.htm
"The environmental issue will bring far more people into the communist movement than peace ever did" Karl Blau, assistant to Mikhail Gorbachev
Of course, if you're going to con the public, you have to find something with all the required criteria. It firstly and most of all must be something they can't see or measure for themselves. Climate is the perfect example. Then add the fear factor- imagine the Sahara Desert, transfer that to Paris or Watford, and the pinch of supernatural to finish it off: In 2100 it could be over 6C higher than it is now. Yes, and it could also be 6C colder, both are almost impossible due to the previous records, but it doesn't matter as none of us will actually be there to ever see it, you must trust us. And they nearly all do.
So it is not 'Why would there be a conspiracy, who would profit?' or 'Show me a conspiracy' but 'Here's the conspiracy'. Just because getting all the pieces of the jigsaw isn't as easy as watching a scary movie, it is both possible and completed. It won't be shown by the BBC or many other outlets however, as the BBC are now working for the enemy. As I suspected long before it was discovered that carbon trading was no 'like Enron' but was Enron, it was pretty obvious, as well as being confirmed by Peter Sissons, Johnny Ball and David Bellamy, who among others fell foul of their one sided policy, breached their charter by acting as a mouthpiece for an organisation set up to spread the message, Globe International. As the BBC are supposed to be balanced and independent, not in theory but by law, acting for a group who have a single agenda is not within their charter, their argument presumably being as long as they are not being paid to do so then it is fine, is hardly convincing. And to tie up another loose end, an officer of Globe International is Lord Roxborough, the very head of the enquiry who found the CRU at East Anglia University not guilty in the climategate enquiry.This is not just a conflict of interests, but as such legally Ultra Vires. That is a decision where there is the chance of a conflict of interests, whether or not it exists, is void ab initio under equity law. So technically as someone on a board specifically to support the work of the CRU, the main supplier of IPCC figures, is not qualified to judge them when they screw up, that exoneration never existed and must have another enquiry with a new head. as if they would.
I am personally a great fan of Buddhism, although know little about the Dalai Lama assumed he was working both for them and Tibet, until he recently made a speech about global warming being a major threat. Guess who he works for, yes, he's in the Club of Rome. They've even bagged a religious leader. Without a forensic accountant and a warrant I can't state the exact investments of all its members along with Globe International, but public shareholder records are not secret and David Cameron, along with other cabinet members and their families, have all got large investments in the very 'green energy' projects they have legislated to subsidies with our taxes. Not an illegal conflict of interests but still wrong. And remember black Monday, when the British economy lost billions in a single day due to speculation crashing the pound when it joined the ERM? The main player (again, simply playing the system as we all can if have enough to risk on it) was George Soros, who recently joined the campaign and invested vast sums himself in wind and solar power. Just look what happened to his last investment to see the likely results.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/notes/carrie-spurgeon/hows-this-for-conflicts-of-interest-guys-how-both-the-met-and-the-bbc-are-playin/10150624666950262
If drawn as a spider's web going downwards with time, you can see a general birth around 1990, as I can't say exactly who decided the Club of Rome decision (although its members are known and the report is all online as linked here). Don't be diverted by trees in the wood looking for individual motives and actions, they are all the fruit of a single tree, a decision to invent a problem to create a reaction and then offer the pre-written solution we would never have accepted had there not been a problem, much like losing our liberty for security after 9/11, something Benjamin Franklin said over 100 years earlier, whoever does this deserves neither. It's an old trick and one despite being exposed time after time will always succeed as long as people trust those in authority. Once those at the top go bad, it is very difficult for those lower down not to follow or lose their children's school fees. Even the most honest and genuine scientists don't want to go bankrupt as those mortgages have to be paid and won't be if they are ostracised from the profession as a handful such as David Bellamy already claim to have been. The reason 'senile' (to quote Al Gore) ex-professors have always been the most vociferous opponents of global warming is they have nothing to lose. Think about it.
http://www.real-science.com/1855-northwest-passage
To follow Gore to the present, as he joined the parallel bandwagon around the early 90s or before so became the mouthpiece of the movement worldwide, his main interest in global warming was not the environment, but a financial one. His film 'An Inconvenient Truth' was found to have at least ten 'material errors' (ie lies) in a British civil court, and was only the alarmist advertisement for his financial concerns. Right at the beginning, he worked out there was a vast source of profit from this assertion, and worked with Ken Lay, before the collapse of his Enron company, on how best to go about this route. Enron later collapsed after being found to have invented both profits and products, basically paper energy notes based on the collection of non-existent future profits. This worked long enough to collect millions, and I do not know what happened to these after the trial, but can only presume they were not confiscated so the job was done.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/737753/posts
http://www.blurtdaily.com/2009/04/30/al-gore-and-enron/
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=22663
"In August 1997, Lay and Browne met with President Bill Clinton and Vice President Gore in the Oval Office to develop administration positions for the Kyoto negotiations that resulted in an international treaty to regulate greenhouse gas emissions."
http://www.capitalresearch.org/pubs/pdf/v1185475433.pdf
http://www.climategate.com/enron-helped-develop-carbon-trading-scheme
Rather than dying with the company, Enron energy credits were reborn, now legally with UN/IPCC assent as carbon credits, buying something that does not belong to the seller, cannot be delivered and conveys no actual benefit. This is the perfect crime. In addition to creating a fictional exchange system Al didn't stop there, but set up his own company, to which he now pays his own massive credits into, as well as collecting from others. This has made him from a millionaire to a billionaire so clearly works. The compliance from the authorities has been to let carbon trading and credits work on voluntary regulation so there is (as in 2011) no contract or guarantee as to where your money goes. I have since discovered Enron itself was set up as a merger between two energy companies, and the individual behind it was the notorious junk bond crook, Michael Milken.
Rather than dying with the company, Enron energy credits were reborn, now legally with UN/IPCC assent as carbon credits, buying something that does not belong to the seller, cannot be delivered and conveys no actual benefit. This is the perfect crime. In addition to creating a fictional exchange system Al didn't stop there, but set up his own company, to which he now pays his own massive credits into, as well as collecting from others. This has made him from a millionaire to a billionaire so clearly works. The compliance from the authorities has been to let carbon trading and credits work on voluntary regulation so there is (as in 2011) no contract or guarantee as to where your money goes. I have since discovered Enron itself was set up as a merger between two energy companies, and the individual behind it was the notorious junk bond crook, Michael Milken.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Enron,_Taliban_&_Warburg:_The_Untold_Story/17154/0/38/38/Y/M.html
The second limb of the conspiracy is that carbon trading, as opposed to credits, is like car insurance in a growing number of countries. It is not something you risk as a seasoned investor (as did the customers of Bernie Madoff who wasn't sanctioned by the UN) but are forced to do by law if your country legislates for it. A win-win situation for the traders.
And of course it comes as no surprise the investors are many of the very politicians who set it up and make their profits from compulsory taxes.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Gore dealt with, there is a collective conspiracy not even needing a hacker to discover as with Climategate, although there is a connection between the two I will mention soon. The 1991 report The First Global Revolution, of the Club of Rome, an international policy group manned by some of the most powerful people in the world, openly stated:
“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
"Founded in 1968 at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, the CoR describes itself as "a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity." It consists of current and former Heads of State, UN beaureacrats, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe."
http://www.green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13088153/Club-of-Rome-The-First-Global-Revolution
Here are some more quotes from the above link:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Gore dealt with, there is a collective conspiracy not even needing a hacker to discover as with Climategate, although there is a connection between the two I will mention soon. The 1991 report The First Global Revolution, of the Club of Rome, an international policy group manned by some of the most powerful people in the world, openly stated:
“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
"Founded in 1968 at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, the CoR describes itself as "a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity." It consists of current and former Heads of State, UN beaureacrats, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe."
http://www.green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13088153/Club-of-Rome-The-First-Global-Revolution
Here are some more quotes from the above link:
“The data doesn't matter. We're not basing our recommendations on the data. We're basing them on the climate models.”
- Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
- Dr David Frame, Climate modeler, Oxford University
"It doesn't matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true."
- Paul Watson, Co-founder of Greenpeace
"Unless we announce disasters no one will listen."
- Sir John Houghton, First chairman of IPCC
"No matter if the science of global warming is all phony... climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world."
- Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment
The names here met back in 1971 to set this up, James Lovelock John Holdren, Stephen Schneider and other familiar names to those who have read the history of the development and whenever I find a meeting planning the details another turns up even earlier. Maybe another will now before these.
1971 conference Limits To Growth; 1975 the “Endangered Atmosphere”
Video here http://www.youtube.com/user/satguru?feature=mhee#p/a/f/0/pQAc8RteZT4
Their previous report from the 70s was indeed an extremely sensible one, published as a book, to keep world population stable, and received virtually no publicity and absolutely no policy changes, remaining to this day a framework to manage the world's real elephant in the room which is a definite threat as unlike our temperatures it is already spiralling out of control. But their second try, possibly as there is a huge opportunity for financial gain from it rather than simply conserving the planet, was a raving success. Mikail Gorbachev joined the team on retirement from Soviet affairs, as an expert in such areas of oppressing the masses, and in 1996 restated their position:
"The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order"
The Wildlands Project http://www.libertymatters.org/ahri-wildlands-rpt.htm
"The environmental issue will bring far more people into the communist movement than peace ever did" Karl Blau, assistant to Mikhail Gorbachev
Of course, if you're going to con the public, you have to find something with all the required criteria. It firstly and most of all must be something they can't see or measure for themselves. Climate is the perfect example. Then add the fear factor- imagine the Sahara Desert, transfer that to Paris or Watford, and the pinch of supernatural to finish it off: In 2100 it could be over 6C higher than it is now. Yes, and it could also be 6C colder, both are almost impossible due to the previous records, but it doesn't matter as none of us will actually be there to ever see it, you must trust us. And they nearly all do.
So it is not 'Why would there be a conspiracy, who would profit?' or 'Show me a conspiracy' but 'Here's the conspiracy'. Just because getting all the pieces of the jigsaw isn't as easy as watching a scary movie, it is both possible and completed. It won't be shown by the BBC or many other outlets however, as the BBC are now working for the enemy. As I suspected long before it was discovered that carbon trading was no 'like Enron' but was Enron, it was pretty obvious, as well as being confirmed by Peter Sissons, Johnny Ball and David Bellamy, who among others fell foul of their one sided policy, breached their charter by acting as a mouthpiece for an organisation set up to spread the message, Globe International. As the BBC are supposed to be balanced and independent, not in theory but by law, acting for a group who have a single agenda is not within their charter, their argument presumably being as long as they are not being paid to do so then it is fine, is hardly convincing. And to tie up another loose end, an officer of Globe International is Lord Roxborough, the very head of the enquiry who found the CRU at East Anglia University not guilty in the climategate enquiry.This is not just a conflict of interests, but as such legally Ultra Vires. That is a decision where there is the chance of a conflict of interests, whether or not it exists, is void ab initio under equity law. So technically as someone on a board specifically to support the work of the CRU, the main supplier of IPCC figures, is not qualified to judge them when they screw up, that exoneration never existed and must have another enquiry with a new head. as if they would.
I am personally a great fan of Buddhism, although know little about the Dalai Lama assumed he was working both for them and Tibet, until he recently made a speech about global warming being a major threat. Guess who he works for, yes, he's in the Club of Rome. They've even bagged a religious leader. Without a forensic accountant and a warrant I can't state the exact investments of all its members along with Globe International, but public shareholder records are not secret and David Cameron, along with other cabinet members and their families, have all got large investments in the very 'green energy' projects they have legislated to subsidies with our taxes. Not an illegal conflict of interests but still wrong. And remember black Monday, when the British economy lost billions in a single day due to speculation crashing the pound when it joined the ERM? The main player (again, simply playing the system as we all can if have enough to risk on it) was George Soros, who recently joined the campaign and invested vast sums himself in wind and solar power. Just look what happened to his last investment to see the likely results.
http://www.facebook.com/#!/notes/carrie-spurgeon/hows-this-for-conflicts-of-interest-guys-how-both-the-met-and-the-bbc-are-playin/10150624666950262
And it now turns out climate change has become an official international business, the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change is managed by Peter Dunscombe and does exactly what it says on the tin, makes people rich from climate change. Get rid of the story and the money goes away with it. Our money that is. http://www.annaraccoon.com/politics/the-times-cant-see-the-dead-wood-for-the-trees/
----------------------------------------------------------------
Despite open and less open statements and acts being revealed, I still find a blank response by believers who would rather trust data than the people who generated it, in an interview just before the Cancun Summit in 2010, a top IPCC officer, Ottmar Edenhofer, was interviewed and simply stated:
"...one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..."
Despite this being able to stand alone, the background and history is essential to see to show Edenhofer is not speaking as a rogue individual (despite representing one of the most powerful groups on earth) but simply stating what has always been. Why he chose to 'come out' as he did remains uncertain, but around a year later can say this was not read beyond the internet, and there was absolutely no reaction among the believers, just as if Santa had dropped his beard and shown to be your father yet you still put the stocking out every following year. That is a human failing rather than a failing of the evidence, as pride and kudos will blind most people to actual facts, especially combined with the most powerful evil of all, fear, and not just for yourself (as we'll be ok) but your unborn grandchildren. But remove the mist of emotion and greed and these are the facts, take them or leave them.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Despite open and less open statements and acts being revealed, I still find a blank response by believers who would rather trust data than the people who generated it, in an interview just before the Cancun Summit in 2010, a top IPCC officer, Ottmar Edenhofer, was interviewed and simply stated:
"...one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..."
Despite this being able to stand alone, the background and history is essential to see to show Edenhofer is not speaking as a rogue individual (despite representing one of the most powerful groups on earth) but simply stating what has always been. Why he chose to 'come out' as he did remains uncertain, but around a year later can say this was not read beyond the internet, and there was absolutely no reaction among the believers, just as if Santa had dropped his beard and shown to be your father yet you still put the stocking out every following year. That is a human failing rather than a failing of the evidence, as pride and kudos will blind most people to actual facts, especially combined with the most powerful evil of all, fear, and not just for yourself (as we'll be ok) but your unborn grandchildren. But remove the mist of emotion and greed and these are the facts, take them or leave them.
There is also, along with the long planned world government, the associated world currency. But who would accept that? A few extremists and crooks who know how to fix or milk a market, but tell them it's to save the planet and they cave in. Carbon credits are not for business, that is the trial period, the plan is to be for everyone. Energy rationing first, followed by currency rationing. Wealth will disappear overnight, as unlike conventional currency, carbon credits will (and already do) last a year. So even if you start getting ten times more than average, at the end of the year they expire. And who decides what you get the following years? Search me. They don't actually care, they will give you what they want to at the time.
Another group arose recently, one I'd previously never come across and had a sole website dating to 1998. The Club of Isles is an organisation loosely managed around the international royal family and related aristocracy (there is only one big family as they keep the bloodline throughout history by intermarriage) and it's nominal head is no other than Prince Philip, who set up the World Wildlife fund as a vehicle for carrying out its agenda, roughly reducing the population of the world to 1 billion. How they intend to do this is debatable, but the terms 'useless eaters', the non-aristocrats and plebs, and the view humans are a cancer on the earth, much promoted since by James Lovelock and George Monbiot, and the driving force behind Greenpeace appears to have its routes right there.
http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/fallhous.htm
"Going green" is nothing more than an excuse to destroy civilization and depopulate the planet because they consider us all a bunch of "useless eaters."
"A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States. De-development means bringing our economic system into line with the realities of ecology and the world resource situation." - Paul Ehrlich, Professor of Population Studies
"The only hope for the world is to make sure there is not another United States. We can't let other countries have the same number of cars, the amount of industrialization, we have in the US. We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are." - Michael Oppenheimer, Environmental Defense Fund
"The big threat to the planet is people: there are too many, doing too well economically and burning too much oil." – Sir James Lovelock, BBC Interview
"We require a central organizing principle - one agreed to voluntarily. Minor shifts in policy, moderate improvement in laws and regulations, rhetoric offered in lieu of genuine change - these are all forms of appeasement, designed to satisfy the public’s desire to believe that sacrifice, struggle and a wrenching transformation of society will not be necessary." - Al Gore, Earth in the Balance
"Global Sustainability requires the deliberate quest of poverty, reduced resource consumption and set levels of mortality control." - Professor Maurice King
If drawn as a spider's web going downwards with time, you can see a general birth around 1990, as I can't say exactly who decided the Club of Rome decision (although its members are known and the report is all online as linked here). Don't be diverted by trees in the wood looking for individual motives and actions, they are all the fruit of a single tree, a decision to invent a problem to create a reaction and then offer the pre-written solution we would never have accepted had there not been a problem, much like losing our liberty for security after 9/11, something Benjamin Franklin said over 100 years earlier, whoever does this deserves neither. It's an old trick and one despite being exposed time after time will always succeed as long as people trust those in authority. Once those at the top go bad, it is very difficult for those lower down not to follow or lose their children's school fees. Even the most honest and genuine scientists don't want to go bankrupt as those mortgages have to be paid and won't be if they are ostracised from the profession as a handful such as David Bellamy already claim to have been. The reason 'senile' (to quote Al Gore) ex-professors have always been the most vociferous opponents of global warming is they have nothing to lose. Think about it.
More confessions: Direct from the CRU, used in the graphs sent to the IPCC to make world policy.
"plot past 1960 because these will be artificially adjusted to look closer to the real temperatures."
" Specify period over which to compute the regressions (stop in 1960 to avoid the decline"
"-- Here, the expected 1990-2003 period is MISSING - so the correlations aren't so hot! Yet the WMO codes and station names /locations are identical (or close). What the hell is supposed to happen here? Oh yeah - there is no 'supposed', I can make it up. So I have :-)"
" Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!"
James Hansen, the one who gave the speech to US congress back in 1988 which led to the creation of the IPCC, has been caught tweaking so much data (with no consequences) that he now deserves a growing column here to himself. After filling in missing temperature data where there were no measurements around the world with red instead of the average temperature which is the only (and I mean only) way to do it, he actually created 75% of the result by making it up as the real data was only a quarter of that in the total. He has now gone a step further not by adding wrong figures but removing them. This is arguably worse as if the world is now cooling then by pretending it isn't the policies will continue unabated, despite the fact the real figures are now diverging further and further from the models. How long can it take before some independent authorities are able to call the data into question and put him in front of a court to explain himself. If these allegations are correct he is not just lying to the world but putting his whole profession in jeopardy both by collusion (the peer review process is clearly absent here as everyone in the know can see exactly what he's done on both occasions (and how many more?) yet sat on their hands and whistled. That shows a degree of agreement which has to go way above the climate community and to the very top of the tree.
http://www.real-science.com/hansen-tampering-data-planet ie Hansen is probably not doing this for his own reasons, but as he is being ordered to. Clearly that is not done for nothing, so must be a secondary gain, but a scientist of his standing to openly flout the law on more than one occasion and gain full immunity from consequences is clearly a 'made man', one who has risen so high he is free to make the rules for himself. In a civilised society there is no place for made men. They are from the mafia and we do not want them to spread into our governments and academic institutions.
http://www.real-science.com/hansen-tampering-data-planet ie Hansen is probably not doing this for his own reasons, but as he is being ordered to. Clearly that is not done for nothing, so must be a secondary gain, but a scientist of his standing to openly flout the law on more than one occasion and gain full immunity from consequences is clearly a 'made man', one who has risen so high he is free to make the rules for himself. In a civilised society there is no place for made men. They are from the mafia and we do not want them to spread into our governments and academic institutions.
There's a constant stream of claims about losing summer ice in the Arctic (10% or so of the world's total), and quote the opening of the northwest passage in recent years. What they failed to mention (ie clear evidence of a deliberate attempt to mislead) is this happens every so often going back to at least 1855.
Attempting to cover up history, as with the 1995 IPCC graph of the medieval warm period suddenly vanishing, is negligent to the extreme as the original data always remains and will expose them as frauds when surfaces.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The big oil myth
Anyone who says big oil funds skeptical propaganda doesn't know economics. Restricting supply raises prices plus free carbon credits are giving them subsidised windfalls. They also invest and develop alternatives- wind, solar and biofuel, as they are also subsidised so again give them our tax money as guaranteed profits. So all green measures help the fossil fuel industry as it doesn't stop them selling it but allows them to at higher prices, and they are quite free to diversify as they always have. In fact I just discovered the CRU, the global warming engine of propaganda, is funded by many of the biggest names in said industry. They don't invest a single penny in a losing cause.
"The UN panel’s members include billionaire globalist George Soros, who has been calling for a carbon tax for years. Soros has $811 million of his own money invested in Petrobras, the Brazilian oil company."
This list is not fully exhaustive, but we would like to acknowledge the support of the following funders (in alphabetical order)
British Council,
British Petroleum,
Broom’s Barn Sugar Beet Research Centre,
Central Electricity Generating Board,
Centre for Environment,
Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS),
Commercial Union,
Commission of European Communities (CEC, often referred to now as EU),
Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils (CCLRC),
Department of Energy, Department of the Environment (DETR, now DEFRA),
Department of Health,
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI),
Eastern Electricity,
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC),
Environment Agency,
Forestry Commission,
Greenpeace International,
International Institute of Environmental Development (IIED),
Irish Electricity Supply Board,
KFA Germany,
Leverhulme Trust (Trust was originally endowed with a shareholding in Lever Brothers, which subsequently became part of Unilever.)
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF),
National Power,
National Rivers Authority,
Natural Environmental Research Council (NERC),
Norwich Union,
Nuclear Installations Inspectorate,
Overseas Development Administration (ODA),
Reinsurance Underwriters and Syndicates,
Royal Society,
Scientific Consultants, (?)
Science and Engineering Research Council (SERC),
Scottish and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research,
Shell,
Stockholm Environment Agency,
Tate and Lyle,
UK Met. Office,
UK Nirex Ltd., (UK based ‘independent’ ‘radioactive waste’ management consultants.)
United Nations Environment Plan (UNEP),
United States Department of Energy,
United States Environmental Protection Agency,
Wolfson Foundation and the
World Wildlife Fund for Nature (WWF).
Global warming: The conspiracy
There have been two overt threads leading to the current hysteria about man made CO2 emissions causing global warming, which joined together around the time they began but can't be sure which came first, although that is not important.
Al Gore was originally fascinated by his lecturer (while doing an arts degree at Harvard, he was poor at science and only took the course due to the American system of minor subjects) Roger Revelle's personal theory that this may be possible and happening, and like a man falls in love instantly across a crowded room, Al took this to his heart and although the late Mr Revelle changed his mind on retirement and told anyone who would listen that he was wrong, it was too late. Al had fallen, and dismissed Revelle as being senile.
To follow Gore to the present, as he joined the parallel bandwagon around the early 90s or before so became the mouthpiece of the movement worldwide, his main interest in global warming was not the environment, but a financial one. His film 'An Inconvenient Truth' was found to have at least ten 'material errors' (ie lies) in a British civil court, and was only the alarmist advertisement for his financial concerns. Right at the beginning, he worked out there was a vast source of profit from this assertion, and worked with Ken Lay, before the collapse of his Enron company, on how best to go about this route. Enron later collapsed after being found to have invented both profits and products, basically paper energy notes based on the collection of non-existent future profits. This worked long enough to collect millions, and I do not know what happened to these after the trial, but can only presume they were not confiscated so the job was done.
Rather than dying with the company, Enron energy credits were reborn, now legally with UN/IPCC assent as carbon credits, buying something that does not belong to the seller, cannot be delivered and conveys no actual benefit. This is the perfect crime. In addition to creating a fictional exchange system Al didn't stop there, but set up his own company, to which he now pays his own massive credits into, as well as collecting from others. This has made him from a millionaire to a billionaire so clearly works. The compliance from the authorities has been to let carbon trading and credits work on voluntary regulation so there is (as in 2011) no contract or guarantee as to where your money goes.
The second limb of the conspiracy is that carbon trading, as opposed to credits, is like car insurance in a growing number of countries. It is not something you risk as a seasoned investor (as did the customers of Bernie Madoff who wasn't sanctioned by the UN) but are forced to do by law if your country legislates for it. A win-win situation for the traders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Gore dealt with, there is a collective conspiracy not even needing a hacker to discover as with Climategate, although there is a connection between the two I will mention soon. The 1991 report The First Global Revolution, of the Club of Rome, an international policy group manned by some of the most powerful people in the world, openly stated:
“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
"Founded in 1968 at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, the CoR describes itself as "a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity." It consists of current and former Heads of State, UN beaureacrats, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe."
http://www.green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13088153/Club-of-Rome-The-First-Global-Revolution
Video here http://www.youtube.com/user/satguru?feature=mhee#p/a/f/0/pQAc8RteZT4
Their previous report from the 70s was indeed an extremely sensible one, published as a book, to keep world population stable, and received virtually no publicity and absolutely no policy changes, remaining to this day a framework to manage the world's real elephant in the room which is a definite threat as unlike our temperatures it is already spiralling out of control. But their second try, possibly as there is a huge opportunity for financial gain from it rather than simply conserving the planet, was a raving success. Mikail Gorbachev joined the team on retirement from Soviet affairs, as an expert in such areas of oppressing the masses, and in 1996 restated their position:
"The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order"
The Wildlands Project http://www.libertymatters.org/ahri-wildlands-rpt.htm
"The environmental issue will bring far more people into the communist movement than peace ever did" Karl Blau, assistant to Mikhail Gorbachev
So it is not 'Why would there be a conspiracy, who would profit?' or 'Show me a conspiracy' but 'Here's the conspiracy'. Just because getting all the pieces of the jigsaw isn't as easy as watching a scary movie, it is both possible and completed. It won't be shown by the BBC or many other outlets however, as the BBC are now working for the enemy. As I suspected long before it was discovered that carbon trading was no 'like Enron' but was Enron, it was pretty obvious, as well as being confirmed by Peter Sissons, Johnny Ball and David Bellamy, who among others fell foul of their one sided policy, breached their charter by acting as a mouthpiece for an organisation set up to spread the message, Globe International. As the BBC are supposed to be balanced and independent, not in theory but by law, acting for a group who have a single agenda is not within their charter, their argument presumably being as long as they are not being paid to do so then it is fine, is hardly convincing. And to tie up another loose end, an officer of Globe International is Lord Roxborough, the very head of the enquiry who found the CRU at East Anglia University not guilty in the climategate enquiry.This is not just a conflict of interests, but as such legally Ultra Vires. That is a decision where there is the chance of a conflict of interests, whether or not it exists, is void ab initio under equity law. So technically as someone on a board specifically to support the work of the CRU, the main supplier of IPCC figures, is not qualified to judge them when they screw up, that exoneration never existed and must have another enquiry with a new head. as if they would.
I am personally a great fan of Buddhism, although know little about the Dalai Lama assumed he was working both for them and Tibet, until he recently made a speech about global warming being a major threat. Guess who he works for, yes, he's in the Club of Rome. They've even bagged a religious leader. Without a forensic accountant and a warrant I can't state the exact investments of all its members along with Globe International, but public shareholder records are not secret and David Cameron, along with other cabinet members and their families, have all got large investments in the very 'green energy' projects they have legislated to subsidies with our taxes. Not an illegal conflict of interests but still wrong. And remember black Monday, when the British economy lost billions in a single day due to speculation crashing the pound when it joined the ERM? The main player (again, simply playing the system as we all can if have enough to risk on it) was George Soros, who recently joined the campaign and invested vast sums himself in wind and solar power. Just look what happened to his last investment to see the likely results.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Despite open and less open statements and acts being revealed, I still find a blank response by believers who would rather trust data than the people who generated it, in an interview just before the Cancun Summit in 2010, a top IPCC officer, Ottmar Edenhofer, was interviewed and simply stated:
"...one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..."
Despite this being able to stand alone, the background and history is essential to see to show Edenhofer is not speaking as a rogue individual (despite representing one of the most powerful groups on earth) but simply stating what has always been. Why he chose to 'come out' as he did remains uncertain, but around a year later can say this was not read beyond the internet, and there was absolutely no reaction among the believers, just as if Santa had dropped his beard and shown to be your father yet you still put the stocking out every following year. That is a human failing rather than a failing of the evidence, as pride and kudos will blind most people to actual facts, especially combined with the most powerful evil of all, fear, and not just for yourself (as we'll be ok) but your unborn grandchildren. But remove the mist of emotion and greed and these are the facts, take them or leave them.
If drawn as a spider's web going downwards with time, you can see a general birth around 1990, as I can't say exactly who decided the Club of Rome decision (although its members are known and the report is all online as linked here). Don't be diverted by trees in the wood looking for individual motives and actions, they are all the fruit of a single tree, a decision to invent a problem to create a reaction and then offer the pre-written solution we would never have accepted had there not been a problem, much like losing our liberty for security after 9/11, something Benjamin Franklin said over 100 years earlier, whoever does this deserves neither. It's an old trick and one despite being exposed time after time will always succeed as long as people trust those in authority. Once those at the top go bad, it is very difficult for those lower down not to follow or lose their children's school fees. Even the most honest and genuine scientists don't want to go bankrupt as those mortgages have to be paid and won't be if they are ostracised from the profession as a handful such as David Bellamy already claim to have been. The reason 'senile' (to quote Al Gore) ex-professors have always been the most vociferous opponents of global warming is they have nothing to lose. Think about it.
Al Gore was originally fascinated by his lecturer (while doing an arts degree at Harvard, he was poor at science and only took the course due to the American system of minor subjects) Roger Revelle's personal theory that this may be possible and happening, and like a man falls in love instantly across a crowded room, Al took this to his heart and although the late Mr Revelle changed his mind on retirement and told anyone who would listen that he was wrong, it was too late. Al had fallen, and dismissed Revelle as being senile.
To follow Gore to the present, as he joined the parallel bandwagon around the early 90s or before so became the mouthpiece of the movement worldwide, his main interest in global warming was not the environment, but a financial one. His film 'An Inconvenient Truth' was found to have at least ten 'material errors' (ie lies) in a British civil court, and was only the alarmist advertisement for his financial concerns. Right at the beginning, he worked out there was a vast source of profit from this assertion, and worked with Ken Lay, before the collapse of his Enron company, on how best to go about this route. Enron later collapsed after being found to have invented both profits and products, basically paper energy notes based on the collection of non-existent future profits. This worked long enough to collect millions, and I do not know what happened to these after the trial, but can only presume they were not confiscated so the job was done.
Rather than dying with the company, Enron energy credits were reborn, now legally with UN/IPCC assent as carbon credits, buying something that does not belong to the seller, cannot be delivered and conveys no actual benefit. This is the perfect crime. In addition to creating a fictional exchange system Al didn't stop there, but set up his own company, to which he now pays his own massive credits into, as well as collecting from others. This has made him from a millionaire to a billionaire so clearly works. The compliance from the authorities has been to let carbon trading and credits work on voluntary regulation so there is (as in 2011) no contract or guarantee as to where your money goes.
The second limb of the conspiracy is that carbon trading, as opposed to credits, is like car insurance in a growing number of countries. It is not something you risk as a seasoned investor (as did the customers of Bernie Madoff who wasn't sanctioned by the UN) but are forced to do by law if your country legislates for it. A win-win situation for the traders.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Al Gore dealt with, there is a collective conspiracy not even needing a hacker to discover as with Climategate, although there is a connection between the two I will mention soon. The 1991 report The First Global Revolution, of the Club of Rome, an international policy group manned by some of the most powerful people in the world, openly stated:
“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself."
"Founded in 1968 at David Rockefeller’s estate in Bellagio, Italy, the CoR describes itself as "a group of world citizens, sharing a common concern for the future of humanity." It consists of current and former Heads of State, UN beaureacrats, high-level politicians and government officials, diplomats, scientists, economists, and business leaders from around the globe."
http://www.green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
http://www.scribd.com/doc/13088153/Club-of-Rome-The-First-Global-Revolution
Video here http://www.youtube.com/user/satguru?feature=mhee#p/a/f/0/pQAc8RteZT4
Their previous report from the 70s was indeed an extremely sensible one, published as a book, to keep world population stable, and received virtually no publicity and absolutely no policy changes, remaining to this day a framework to manage the world's real elephant in the room which is a definite threat as unlike our temperatures it is already spiralling out of control. But their second try, possibly as there is a huge opportunity for financial gain from it rather than simply conserving the planet, was a raving success. Mikail Gorbachev joined the team on retirement from Soviet affairs, as an expert in such areas of oppressing the masses, and in 1996 restated their position:
"The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key that will unlock the New World Order"
The Wildlands Project http://www.libertymatters.org/ahri-wildlands-rpt.htm
"The environmental issue will bring far more people into the communist movement than peace ever did" Karl Blau, assistant to Mikhail Gorbachev
So it is not 'Why would there be a conspiracy, who would profit?' or 'Show me a conspiracy' but 'Here's the conspiracy'. Just because getting all the pieces of the jigsaw isn't as easy as watching a scary movie, it is both possible and completed. It won't be shown by the BBC or many other outlets however, as the BBC are now working for the enemy. As I suspected long before it was discovered that carbon trading was no 'like Enron' but was Enron, it was pretty obvious, as well as being confirmed by Peter Sissons, Johnny Ball and David Bellamy, who among others fell foul of their one sided policy, breached their charter by acting as a mouthpiece for an organisation set up to spread the message, Globe International. As the BBC are supposed to be balanced and independent, not in theory but by law, acting for a group who have a single agenda is not within their charter, their argument presumably being as long as they are not being paid to do so then it is fine, is hardly convincing. And to tie up another loose end, an officer of Globe International is Lord Roxborough, the very head of the enquiry who found the CRU at East Anglia University not guilty in the climategate enquiry.This is not just a conflict of interests, but as such legally Ultra Vires. That is a decision where there is the chance of a conflict of interests, whether or not it exists, is void ab initio under equity law. So technically as someone on a board specifically to support the work of the CRU, the main supplier of IPCC figures, is not qualified to judge them when they screw up, that exoneration never existed and must have another enquiry with a new head. as if they would.
I am personally a great fan of Buddhism, although know little about the Dalai Lama assumed he was working both for them and Tibet, until he recently made a speech about global warming being a major threat. Guess who he works for, yes, he's in the Club of Rome. They've even bagged a religious leader. Without a forensic accountant and a warrant I can't state the exact investments of all its members along with Globe International, but public shareholder records are not secret and David Cameron, along with other cabinet members and their families, have all got large investments in the very 'green energy' projects they have legislated to subsidies with our taxes. Not an illegal conflict of interests but still wrong. And remember black Monday, when the British economy lost billions in a single day due to speculation crashing the pound when it joined the ERM? The main player (again, simply playing the system as we all can if have enough to risk on it) was George Soros, who recently joined the campaign and invested vast sums himself in wind and solar power. Just look what happened to his last investment to see the likely results.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Despite open and less open statements and acts being revealed, I still find a blank response by believers who would rather trust data than the people who generated it, in an interview just before the Cancun Summit in 2010, a top IPCC officer, Ottmar Edenhofer, was interviewed and simply stated:
"...one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore..."
Despite this being able to stand alone, the background and history is essential to see to show Edenhofer is not speaking as a rogue individual (despite representing one of the most powerful groups on earth) but simply stating what has always been. Why he chose to 'come out' as he did remains uncertain, but around a year later can say this was not read beyond the internet, and there was absolutely no reaction among the believers, just as if Santa had dropped his beard and shown to be your father yet you still put the stocking out every following year. That is a human failing rather than a failing of the evidence, as pride and kudos will blind most people to actual facts, especially combined with the most powerful evil of all, fear, and not just for yourself (as we'll be ok) but your unborn grandchildren. But remove the mist of emotion and greed and these are the facts, take them or leave them.
If drawn as a spider's web going downwards with time, you can see a general birth around 1990, as I can't say exactly who decided the Club of Rome decision (although its members are known and the report is all online as linked here). Don't be diverted by trees in the wood looking for individual motives and actions, they are all the fruit of a single tree, a decision to invent a problem to create a reaction and then offer the pre-written solution we would never have accepted had there not been a problem, much like losing our liberty for security after 9/11, something Benjamin Franklin said over 100 years earlier, whoever does this deserves neither. It's an old trick and one despite being exposed time after time will always succeed as long as people trust those in authority. Once those at the top go bad, it is very difficult for those lower down not to follow or lose their children's school fees. Even the most honest and genuine scientists don't want to go bankrupt as those mortgages have to be paid and won't be if they are ostracised from the profession as a handful such as David Bellamy already claim to have been. The reason 'senile' (to quote Al Gore) ex-professors have always been the most vociferous opponents of global warming is they have nothing to lose. Think about it.
Thursday, May 12, 2011
A cautionary tale
Just imagine this scenario. Some nutjob state (eg the UK) under orders from a higher authority (eg the EU) hooks up a small town to 100% renewables. Because of a newly elected Green council (high on rhetoric, but painfully low on facts) they want to prove their commitment to clean energy and zero emissions, so rely entirely on wind and solar, as one of their older members refused to pass the law if nuclear was included (despite being on their approved list).
What their lack of application allowed through was to include the local hospital on to this grid. Soon after the coal fired station was bulldozed and a statue of Stalin erected on its rubble one of the council leader's elderly parents suffered a heart attack and had to go on life support. That night (ie the solar panels, like most of the people, were sleeping) the wind increased (ie not stopped or dropped below the threshhold) so much that it breached the maximum working limit on the windmills (how many people know it has that?) and as built, they cut out to stop the system overloading. As the only two sources of power had run out within minutes the whole town went dark, and as the old hospital backup generator, used during the power cuts of the 70s had been disconnected when the law was passed as it ran on dangerous diesel, every machine in the hospital suddenly ground to a halt, and within a couple of minutes the woman was dead, as were all the other patients on life support.
In an interview the following day the councillor said that 'Although of course I deeply regret the death of my mother, the cost benefit of lives saved now and in the future from climate change mean far fewer people will die overall from this policy than have died last night. As a result we will continue with our policy for the sake of the planet.'
How long will it take before each of these scenarios becomes reality?
What their lack of application allowed through was to include the local hospital on to this grid. Soon after the coal fired station was bulldozed and a statue of Stalin erected on its rubble one of the council leader's elderly parents suffered a heart attack and had to go on life support. That night (ie the solar panels, like most of the people, were sleeping) the wind increased (ie not stopped or dropped below the threshhold) so much that it breached the maximum working limit on the windmills (how many people know it has that?) and as built, they cut out to stop the system overloading. As the only two sources of power had run out within minutes the whole town went dark, and as the old hospital backup generator, used during the power cuts of the 70s had been disconnected when the law was passed as it ran on dangerous diesel, every machine in the hospital suddenly ground to a halt, and within a couple of minutes the woman was dead, as were all the other patients on life support.
In an interview the following day the councillor said that 'Although of course I deeply regret the death of my mother, the cost benefit of lives saved now and in the future from climate change mean far fewer people will die overall from this policy than have died last night. As a result we will continue with our policy for the sake of the planet.'
How long will it take before each of these scenarios becomes reality?
Thursday, May 05, 2011
Practice and theory
I am crossing my fingers blogger isn't in terminal decline as it really is a unique and free way to write literally whatever you want, with optional pictures, for the world to see and interact with. Facebook doesn't, although has now created a blog option is hardly as easy to follow as these.
I've continued my photo trips as per, with the rest of the day entering them on the map which mops up any remaining time to do anything else online. Late grandma's house is going on Tuesday at last, so also spent many days there clearing out junk and doing the garden, that has been hard work for two years now and wonderful when actually over but still at least one visit left. Outside the news has been busy but on closer scrutiny meaningless to us. Bin Laden's dead, yes, so what? Will the fanatics give up now? The best that will happen is they'll lose some funding, but presumably most of his money will be shifted long before anyone else can get their hands on it and continue paying for arms.
The other news like the royal wedding isn't actually news at all, as people get married every day and also divorced as most of his family have done already. It's not as if I'm going to be offered a crack at her as well so why should I care? My news has had to remain personal, mainly in the way of insights and discoveries, and as a result filter through to friends and clients who often use them for themselves as the truths of life are universal.
The best one I read at the weekend explains why so many scientists are both up themselves and so frequently wrong despite often having doctorates. They can see the small picture very clearly but very few people overall can put the pieces together. That is the difference between learning and originating, and the academics can never be at the top of the pile. I had to get a degree simply as I knew no one would ever listen to me without one, and ideally a master's as nowadays any cunt can get a BA in the UK now they've replaced the dole for school leavers.
So my specific area has been highlighted, I add each part of new information to the jigsaw, while others simply file them separately and can't even follow the connections when spelled out to them. The vast majority of idiots who despite three now being convicted of fraud (ie those set up as an example while many more escaped) believe most politicians are still honest is one example, and while people accept the shit fed to them from above will never get any better than we have now. David Icke's reptilian theory is a good analogue, hold them up to the light and you'll see the equivalent of a snake inside, but only in how their minds work. If you know what to look for- the small lies, inconsistencies and other slipups you'll soon realise who you're dealing with, much like bad boyfriends or husbands where everyone else can see what they're like except their woman, until possibly she's in intensive care.
Well we are almost there now. Carbon taxes and the EU are going to make basket cases of us all, and the old eastern bloc will be repeated now throughout the west as well. The leaders in their cars and the citizens driving ox carts through the street with bicycles for the party members. History has begun to repeat itself, I see the big picture and like all higher intelligence, the view is shared by so many people there aren't anywhere near enough to do a thing about it besides come on blogs and tell everyone. At least you've been told and I've made my point to be confirmed possibly long after I've gone and it's all happened. Unless we stop them.
I've continued my photo trips as per, with the rest of the day entering them on the map which mops up any remaining time to do anything else online. Late grandma's house is going on Tuesday at last, so also spent many days there clearing out junk and doing the garden, that has been hard work for two years now and wonderful when actually over but still at least one visit left. Outside the news has been busy but on closer scrutiny meaningless to us. Bin Laden's dead, yes, so what? Will the fanatics give up now? The best that will happen is they'll lose some funding, but presumably most of his money will be shifted long before anyone else can get their hands on it and continue paying for arms.
The other news like the royal wedding isn't actually news at all, as people get married every day and also divorced as most of his family have done already. It's not as if I'm going to be offered a crack at her as well so why should I care? My news has had to remain personal, mainly in the way of insights and discoveries, and as a result filter through to friends and clients who often use them for themselves as the truths of life are universal.
The best one I read at the weekend explains why so many scientists are both up themselves and so frequently wrong despite often having doctorates. They can see the small picture very clearly but very few people overall can put the pieces together. That is the difference between learning and originating, and the academics can never be at the top of the pile. I had to get a degree simply as I knew no one would ever listen to me without one, and ideally a master's as nowadays any cunt can get a BA in the UK now they've replaced the dole for school leavers.
So my specific area has been highlighted, I add each part of new information to the jigsaw, while others simply file them separately and can't even follow the connections when spelled out to them. The vast majority of idiots who despite three now being convicted of fraud (ie those set up as an example while many more escaped) believe most politicians are still honest is one example, and while people accept the shit fed to them from above will never get any better than we have now. David Icke's reptilian theory is a good analogue, hold them up to the light and you'll see the equivalent of a snake inside, but only in how their minds work. If you know what to look for- the small lies, inconsistencies and other slipups you'll soon realise who you're dealing with, much like bad boyfriends or husbands where everyone else can see what they're like except their woman, until possibly she's in intensive care.
Well we are almost there now. Carbon taxes and the EU are going to make basket cases of us all, and the old eastern bloc will be repeated now throughout the west as well. The leaders in their cars and the citizens driving ox carts through the street with bicycles for the party members. History has begun to repeat itself, I see the big picture and like all higher intelligence, the view is shared by so many people there aren't anywhere near enough to do a thing about it besides come on blogs and tell everyone. At least you've been told and I've made my point to be confirmed possibly long after I've gone and it's all happened. Unless we stop them.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Global logic
As a therapist and hypnotist I am depressed and horrified with the ease the majority of the world have been persuaded to accept vast costs and restrictions for something which is 100% undetectable, and in fact not actually real as our current climate is completely within historic patterns of change.
That aside the saddest part is failure to analyse. What does a slightly warmer world mean to me? Firstly you look at warmer places here. The worst are the desert regions and the simple answer is people don't live there very much. Logical captain. Warm the planet and they indeed increase, while the polar deserts, where even less can live (the Antarctic landmass (ie not the surrounding sea) has no animals or plants larger than your fingertip as permanent residents), would decrease accordingly. That would be expected to roughly even out.
Then the chaotic weather. What is the weather where you live like? Predictable? Regular? Always harmless? I doubt it, you have a prevailing climate (ie local annual average seasons) with the weather variations within. There is no new weather, you will just get more or worse of what there is already. No more is possible. Then look to history to see the planet in past warm conditions. There was no chaos, more people survived and food production increased. That is all.
So, I ask, what are people worried about? Clearly they believe everything Al Gore has told them, despite it not bearing any connection to either what we know about the past or any threat of it happening in our lifetimes if at all. It simply shows me the world has been given an IQ test and failed dramatically. I don't know how we can fix this, once infected few have so far returned to reality, and while people worry about non-existent bad weather after they're all dead then they can't notice the real threats the authorities don't want us to worry about. Terrifying.
That aside the saddest part is failure to analyse. What does a slightly warmer world mean to me? Firstly you look at warmer places here. The worst are the desert regions and the simple answer is people don't live there very much. Logical captain. Warm the planet and they indeed increase, while the polar deserts, where even less can live (the Antarctic landmass (ie not the surrounding sea) has no animals or plants larger than your fingertip as permanent residents), would decrease accordingly. That would be expected to roughly even out.
Then the chaotic weather. What is the weather where you live like? Predictable? Regular? Always harmless? I doubt it, you have a prevailing climate (ie local annual average seasons) with the weather variations within. There is no new weather, you will just get more or worse of what there is already. No more is possible. Then look to history to see the planet in past warm conditions. There was no chaos, more people survived and food production increased. That is all.
So, I ask, what are people worried about? Clearly they believe everything Al Gore has told them, despite it not bearing any connection to either what we know about the past or any threat of it happening in our lifetimes if at all. It simply shows me the world has been given an IQ test and failed dramatically. I don't know how we can fix this, once infected few have so far returned to reality, and while people worry about non-existent bad weather after they're all dead then they can't notice the real threats the authorities don't want us to worry about. Terrifying.
Sunday, April 17, 2011
Too busy to blog?
I am beginning to suspect with all the competition from Facebook etc Blogger is finally winding down, with fewer people writing and apparently even fewer reading what the last of us who do write. As there is a counter that seems to be more than a suspicion but as long as it is above zero will keep turning up.
I've been too busy to get on the computer for a week or so besides uploading my photos, the long days allow longer trips and takes hours to map reference every one before adding to the site. We've also had to return to my late grandma's to clear the final tut out before it's sale, and they now want the garden done despite it being empty for nearly two years. Not a reasonable request, our gardener just gave up and I can't do it as it's like clearing a forest. It's a shame Roger doesn't still read here as like all weather even mine changes sooner or later, and started seeing more friends again after the first ever barren period in nearly 50 years. As people aren't sheep (unless they believe in global warming) you can't simply corrall them to your life when the old flock has broken up, they are more like cats in they come and go as they please and choose who they associate with. Everyone reading needed patience.
I have more arrangements for the next few days with photo trips either side planned, and is pretty good to be able to see the places I haven't seen for years now I'm getting out and about more again. We all discover sooner or later nothing lasts for ever, whether it be people, abilities or anything else. Impermanence, as Buddha said, and we can only do what we can now and not get attached to anything lasting. Like comments on your blog I suppose...
I've been too busy to get on the computer for a week or so besides uploading my photos, the long days allow longer trips and takes hours to map reference every one before adding to the site. We've also had to return to my late grandma's to clear the final tut out before it's sale, and they now want the garden done despite it being empty for nearly two years. Not a reasonable request, our gardener just gave up and I can't do it as it's like clearing a forest. It's a shame Roger doesn't still read here as like all weather even mine changes sooner or later, and started seeing more friends again after the first ever barren period in nearly 50 years. As people aren't sheep (unless they believe in global warming) you can't simply corrall them to your life when the old flock has broken up, they are more like cats in they come and go as they please and choose who they associate with. Everyone reading needed patience.
I have more arrangements for the next few days with photo trips either side planned, and is pretty good to be able to see the places I haven't seen for years now I'm getting out and about more again. We all discover sooner or later nothing lasts for ever, whether it be people, abilities or anything else. Impermanence, as Buddha said, and we can only do what we can now and not get attached to anything lasting. Like comments on your blog I suppose...
Wednesday, April 06, 2011
How far will the guidance go?
I am watching the system closely at the moment. All's well that ends well has always been my view, and should a system able to deliver that in the short term represent the whole, then it could be possible for every single area of my life to fall into place on its own, as it has the last two days already. I'm not calling this God or any other label as the best logic would tell us it is only our own subconscious pulling the strings and as such not external to our own being. But regardless of source my conscious mind made plans, possibly inspired in themselves, but with only those two specific plans ended up with every possible outcome I hadn't planned or expected and couldn't have if I tried. The road signs are a hobby like any valuable antique collector. They were abandoned in 1963, and the main prohibition and warning signs were replaced soon after, except for a few mainly private roads where they weren't covered by the rules or a few where they were overlooked. Direction signs did better as they are telling you the identical information whatever the style, and each is unique as specific to that location. Streetview has allowed me to now drive roads online and then anything that turns up is visited and photographed if still there. Half or so I've come across since 2008 are gone already, and would have no record if not photographed first.
So, having streetviewed nearly all the feasible areas I moved on to a new project of driving as far as I could to cover more map squares for a different site. With my physical limitations an hour or so each way is enough before I can feel like I've come down with something so 30 miles is pretty well it at the moment and fast running out of places as a result. My last reasonable one was planned for Sunday but as I was up too late had to think of an alternative. The map told me Purley was the only quick one I had left to do down that way, and set off, planning to turn right where I normally turn left. Except there was a straight on on the same bend hidden by the corner where I normally turn, and we took that and ended up on the same road we'd just turned off as it was a loopback. The map said turn right on the next main road which also went to Purley, via a smaller road, and half way down I stopped to take photos and saw an old sign on the corner, becoming two on closer inspection. No one else had posted them or I'd have gone, and had apparently missed that spot on Streetview as I hadn't coloured the map in on the yellow or orange roads and trusted my memory by pencilling all new signs discovered. That alone needed about three or more steps to get to that point, but the next day I did the longer trip.
A month ago someone took about six old signs in Surrey where I was and lost the notes, and I located a few bar one with few clues as to its location, and after three weeks on Streetview had only eliminated half of Surrey. I planned an exact route and the very final point where I expected to turn, not possible to get lost as a single long main road, had that sign I'd spent weeks searching for. The chance of planning a route finishing at the exact spot a random sign was located after I'd seen a photo of the road to recognise the setting rather than before where it may have been missed are almost zero. So as well as doing both planned trips had mopped up three signs I'd probably not have come across otherwise except if he'd remembered where the last one was eventually (and if not after a month wouldn't be that likely).
Extending from there, I was aimed at these signs regardless of my intent and plans. I planned to take photos in new areas, and virtually lost all hope of finding any more signs. If weird stuff happens enough it tells me it's actually not weird but happening outside our previous knowledge of the world. If so then the signs are only one demonstration among everything. Why not everything else? Today I was inundated with jobs to do before I even woke up as all the messages were waiting for me. Granted today was my day off after two on the road, and just planned to take the bike out to get some food. I ended up working this afternoon, being booked for two more jobs and having to drive across London tomorrow as I left my camera somewhere. Normally it would be pissed off but if life is sending me in these directions and can place rewards there maybe each apparent task is to get me something I couldn't have got otherwise. It's got me a heap of signs so I know it can.
So, having streetviewed nearly all the feasible areas I moved on to a new project of driving as far as I could to cover more map squares for a different site. With my physical limitations an hour or so each way is enough before I can feel like I've come down with something so 30 miles is pretty well it at the moment and fast running out of places as a result. My last reasonable one was planned for Sunday but as I was up too late had to think of an alternative. The map told me Purley was the only quick one I had left to do down that way, and set off, planning to turn right where I normally turn left. Except there was a straight on on the same bend hidden by the corner where I normally turn, and we took that and ended up on the same road we'd just turned off as it was a loopback. The map said turn right on the next main road which also went to Purley, via a smaller road, and half way down I stopped to take photos and saw an old sign on the corner, becoming two on closer inspection. No one else had posted them or I'd have gone, and had apparently missed that spot on Streetview as I hadn't coloured the map in on the yellow or orange roads and trusted my memory by pencilling all new signs discovered. That alone needed about three or more steps to get to that point, but the next day I did the longer trip.
A month ago someone took about six old signs in Surrey where I was and lost the notes, and I located a few bar one with few clues as to its location, and after three weeks on Streetview had only eliminated half of Surrey. I planned an exact route and the very final point where I expected to turn, not possible to get lost as a single long main road, had that sign I'd spent weeks searching for. The chance of planning a route finishing at the exact spot a random sign was located after I'd seen a photo of the road to recognise the setting rather than before where it may have been missed are almost zero. So as well as doing both planned trips had mopped up three signs I'd probably not have come across otherwise except if he'd remembered where the last one was eventually (and if not after a month wouldn't be that likely).
Extending from there, I was aimed at these signs regardless of my intent and plans. I planned to take photos in new areas, and virtually lost all hope of finding any more signs. If weird stuff happens enough it tells me it's actually not weird but happening outside our previous knowledge of the world. If so then the signs are only one demonstration among everything. Why not everything else? Today I was inundated with jobs to do before I even woke up as all the messages were waiting for me. Granted today was my day off after two on the road, and just planned to take the bike out to get some food. I ended up working this afternoon, being booked for two more jobs and having to drive across London tomorrow as I left my camera somewhere. Normally it would be pissed off but if life is sending me in these directions and can place rewards there maybe each apparent task is to get me something I couldn't have got otherwise. It's got me a heap of signs so I know it can.
Saturday, April 02, 2011
World domination has come
I wonder how many people here have been blogging for nearly 7 years (it would have been longer had I know of this site earlier) without a gap- none of the people I read at the start even have blogs mainly let alone add to them, and most of the ones I've followed since haven't posted in months or years. I do find more at Facebook myself now as well as blogging on a small site where I know everyone as well as this, but it's in the archives and Sky-Hi Lee is still one of the only mentions of him on the web and gets regular hits, like my main site which was built to fill spaces where other data hadn't been posted anywhere else.
I am currently in the first stages of my latest spiritual work, but one I believe to be capable of delivery. I'll mention more if there's more to mention but the results seem to be fairly hard to question so far. In the material world I've been making long photo runs a few times a week now this year, and starting to run out of reasonable trips within my current capabilities. No doubt something else will turn up and as long as I've completed that mission will be quite happy as it is. The news outside is dismal, on the verge of a nuclear disaster in Japan, not if but when of course as it's a monster only safe while contained. And the bill do decommission our own in the UK came out today, many billions over decades to mop up any savings while they were working. Madness.
Otherwise we have Libya, where the whole Arab world operates in more or less the same way (as they are today) simply replacing one savage dictator and regime with another as that is their personal version of government and should be left to rot in their own filth. Many who do object to such regimes do not challenge them but escape and come here and similar places like Norway and Canada who revel in welcoming refugees from around the world regardless of quality and room available (precisely zero in the UK for one). Despite fraud cropping up in virtually every graph the global warming wars are ploughing ahead full speed- the EU will ban cars from cities now by 2050, confirming their total hatred of freedom and in fact turning Europe tomorrow into exactly the same as the Arab world today. Indeed, instead of trying to raise the Arabs up to our current level (as if it was possible) in fact we are falling towards theirs and the Chinese levels of totalitarian collectivism and god help all of us if they complete this mission.
I am currently in the first stages of my latest spiritual work, but one I believe to be capable of delivery. I'll mention more if there's more to mention but the results seem to be fairly hard to question so far. In the material world I've been making long photo runs a few times a week now this year, and starting to run out of reasonable trips within my current capabilities. No doubt something else will turn up and as long as I've completed that mission will be quite happy as it is. The news outside is dismal, on the verge of a nuclear disaster in Japan, not if but when of course as it's a monster only safe while contained. And the bill do decommission our own in the UK came out today, many billions over decades to mop up any savings while they were working. Madness.
Otherwise we have Libya, where the whole Arab world operates in more or less the same way (as they are today) simply replacing one savage dictator and regime with another as that is their personal version of government and should be left to rot in their own filth. Many who do object to such regimes do not challenge them but escape and come here and similar places like Norway and Canada who revel in welcoming refugees from around the world regardless of quality and room available (precisely zero in the UK for one). Despite fraud cropping up in virtually every graph the global warming wars are ploughing ahead full speed- the EU will ban cars from cities now by 2050, confirming their total hatred of freedom and in fact turning Europe tomorrow into exactly the same as the Arab world today. Indeed, instead of trying to raise the Arabs up to our current level (as if it was possible) in fact we are falling towards theirs and the Chinese levels of totalitarian collectivism and god help all of us if they complete this mission.
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Left wing- politics of misery
Try as I might, for all my life I never understood the left. I think some are misguided in assuming taking money from the rich willl somehow make the poor better off, but Robin Hood was only a legend and that money goes to governments and their friends and rarely seen by anyone lower down. But the actual views I hear every day make me wonder if their proponents are sharing the same dimension and race as I do, as everything they appear to recommend would make our lives worse if put into practice. Just look at Cuba. It is divided into a few basic tenets. No one should have 'too much' money, whatever that means, or if communist, everyone should have the same, unless they run the country in some way. Or to each according to their needs. Well unless you're old or disabled I'd say they're pretty similar so not that different.
Then you have the state control and collectivism. Don't choose when and where you want to go, but have it restricted by law and enforced by police. Why is that exactly? Didn't we vote these people in to look after us and carry out the policies we chose, why should they be allowed to issue travel permits and fuel rations? Apart from places like Soviet Russia most of these are the wishes of the extremists rather than actual policies, but they don't seem to realise if they make everyone else suffer whatever restrictions they believe are necessary for man's sinful ways, they will be affected as well! No, many of these guys do not live in tents or mud huts and go to work by horse and cart or bus, they live in the same suburbs as me and usually have far more expensive cars. But they want other people to get the bus and burn wood in their houses but so would they if it became law.
They also seem to have a very liberal view of human nature. It's roughly called moral relativism, otherwise known as accepting all cultures as both equal and able to share spaces together. The fact that before arriving on our shores within their own countries the standard culture in many parts of the world is to kill the neighbouring tribe as they are ethnically different. Eastern Europe as well as Asia and Africa have small enclaves of ethnic tribes who consider themselves outsiders in whichever place they share, while the socialists accept such as equal when they flee to the London boroughs of red, and somehow forget every fight they've had with the infidels and oppressors since birth when they suddenly start earning a living wage. And amazingly the ethnic minorities the socialists tell us are equal do not follow their own beliefs in their own countries, but ones normally associated with the opposite end of the political spectrum. Multicultural actually means we can all hate the others equally and avoid them even when they move in next door. And hear black people running down Asians and vice versa, and Chinese running down everyone else.
If you set up a camp where everyone had to live by the sort of principles normally associated with victims of remote plane crashes, no private vehicles, renewable power, no income above the average etc, these people would nearly all wake up within a few days, and the ones left over would probably end up like the men who live in the woods with beards made of matted wool and talking to themselves as people cross the path to avoid them. And the number who actually earn well above the average wage now would be the first to pay an accountant should a new socialist government actually raise taxes the way they request, as the general rule appears to be on the left that every idea is for you, and not for me. You mustn't drive to work, earn so much, have two houses, send your children to private school, have a gas boiler, make successful investments (they destroy the third world economy you see), complain when the waiting list for the doctor runs into weeks as the local borough of Havana on Thames invites a few more Pakistani villages to relocate to the newly built stalags which used to contain private housing, whinge when your five year old struggles to handle English grammar as he is one of only three English speaking children in the class and the teachers have to concentrate on the others, or take your holiday in Brighton or Blackpool instead of flying abroad to save the planet, encouraged by the fact the taxes would make flying so expensive it would only be possible by party members.
It seems freedom is anathema to such people, who fear so much the idea of other people encroaching on their lifestyles or causing some kind of damage to their planet that we must impose such dire rules and regulations on every areas of our lives lest other human beings become so wild and uncontrolled their animal instincts make their lives a living hell. That's apparently political altruism for you, and a type only a few weeks in North Korea could cure. I wish I could arrange it for every single one I know.
Then you have the state control and collectivism. Don't choose when and where you want to go, but have it restricted by law and enforced by police. Why is that exactly? Didn't we vote these people in to look after us and carry out the policies we chose, why should they be allowed to issue travel permits and fuel rations? Apart from places like Soviet Russia most of these are the wishes of the extremists rather than actual policies, but they don't seem to realise if they make everyone else suffer whatever restrictions they believe are necessary for man's sinful ways, they will be affected as well! No, many of these guys do not live in tents or mud huts and go to work by horse and cart or bus, they live in the same suburbs as me and usually have far more expensive cars. But they want other people to get the bus and burn wood in their houses but so would they if it became law.
They also seem to have a very liberal view of human nature. It's roughly called moral relativism, otherwise known as accepting all cultures as both equal and able to share spaces together. The fact that before arriving on our shores within their own countries the standard culture in many parts of the world is to kill the neighbouring tribe as they are ethnically different. Eastern Europe as well as Asia and Africa have small enclaves of ethnic tribes who consider themselves outsiders in whichever place they share, while the socialists accept such as equal when they flee to the London boroughs of red, and somehow forget every fight they've had with the infidels and oppressors since birth when they suddenly start earning a living wage. And amazingly the ethnic minorities the socialists tell us are equal do not follow their own beliefs in their own countries, but ones normally associated with the opposite end of the political spectrum. Multicultural actually means we can all hate the others equally and avoid them even when they move in next door. And hear black people running down Asians and vice versa, and Chinese running down everyone else.
If you set up a camp where everyone had to live by the sort of principles normally associated with victims of remote plane crashes, no private vehicles, renewable power, no income above the average etc, these people would nearly all wake up within a few days, and the ones left over would probably end up like the men who live in the woods with beards made of matted wool and talking to themselves as people cross the path to avoid them. And the number who actually earn well above the average wage now would be the first to pay an accountant should a new socialist government actually raise taxes the way they request, as the general rule appears to be on the left that every idea is for you, and not for me. You mustn't drive to work, earn so much, have two houses, send your children to private school, have a gas boiler, make successful investments (they destroy the third world economy you see), complain when the waiting list for the doctor runs into weeks as the local borough of Havana on Thames invites a few more Pakistani villages to relocate to the newly built stalags which used to contain private housing, whinge when your five year old struggles to handle English grammar as he is one of only three English speaking children in the class and the teachers have to concentrate on the others, or take your holiday in Brighton or Blackpool instead of flying abroad to save the planet, encouraged by the fact the taxes would make flying so expensive it would only be possible by party members.
It seems freedom is anathema to such people, who fear so much the idea of other people encroaching on their lifestyles or causing some kind of damage to their planet that we must impose such dire rules and regulations on every areas of our lives lest other human beings become so wild and uncontrolled their animal instincts make their lives a living hell. That's apparently political altruism for you, and a type only a few weeks in North Korea could cure. I wish I could arrange it for every single one I know.
Friday, March 25, 2011
Out and about
My new photography project has kept me busy this year, although with the object being to extend my map coverage as far as possible gets harder each time as I run out of reasonable trips to make. But I've done 2-4 trips a week so far and then spend a good few hours posting them with exact map locations when I get in. Here's a selection from yesterday's trip to Ware, primarily to get one of the last three known no entry signs with catseyes, changed in 1953 and abolished altogether ten years later.
Otherwise it's business as usual, one more article on the system now and working on the spiritual as usual, and worked out one thing from experiences online that I am able to see through scams most people accept until the trick's been explained to them. That gets you a lot of abuse as qualified people don't like being made to feel stupid so just call you a liar as they can't see it. I'd rather know it and at least not be surprised when our money is stolen than assume everyone in authority is there to help us. My arse they are. A few are, many are turned once they get there to fit in, and the rest join for the power and money they get out of it. No thanks. My new conservatory is planned for completion in a couple of weeks, and the house will then have some space in it at last when some junk can be cleared from the other rooms. That's about it so far and hope things keep adding new material.
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Blogger update
This is my first post using the new format, firstly the font is already illegible so will probably have to redo the lot, but otherwise will see how it looks. My current hobby this year is filling in as many places on the map as I can with new photos, so keeps me out and about and managed Hampshire over the weekend which was my west extreme since I began on digital at the end of 2005. I needed a rest after two days in a row as the minimum distance is 15 miles for anywhere new and that's where the worst roads are, the others are 20-40 miles which is what I did on Sunday, so have to ration it a bit or I'll knacker myself. I also wrote another article which appears to be given a positive response, and otherwise more or less looking around for stuff to do. I caught up on shopping duties at least and got some exercise as I use the bike to get there, and just seeing my lists for whatever's built up while I was on the road for the past week or so.
The new room is being worked on again after a 2 week gap, and seems once the roof goes on the walls and floor will almost be ready. The space it'll free up in the house once I move the books and things in there will make it almost civilised. I hope to do another photo run tomorrow, the easier one won't fill much new space on the map but the one which will is quite a hard one in comparison and will need a good day before I take that on. There's an old road sign around the A25 in Surrey that only has a half remembered rough location and picture of the row of houses and sign for upcoming T junction to go on Streetview, and have done a 10 mile sweep after two weeks and nothing. Losing a sign on it is very easy but not a whole row of houses, there aren't many round there as it's in the sticks, and can even satellite view from above on the roads without a view. It would be nice to go at the weekend but would need something to turn up if I do.
So I've had a couple of busy weeks and with it being harder and harder to find places I can get to for new photo areas have had to wind it in a bit for now. No doubt something will turn up sooner or later, but no idea what.
The new room is being worked on again after a 2 week gap, and seems once the roof goes on the walls and floor will almost be ready. The space it'll free up in the house once I move the books and things in there will make it almost civilised. I hope to do another photo run tomorrow, the easier one won't fill much new space on the map but the one which will is quite a hard one in comparison and will need a good day before I take that on. There's an old road sign around the A25 in Surrey that only has a half remembered rough location and picture of the row of houses and sign for upcoming T junction to go on Streetview, and have done a 10 mile sweep after two weeks and nothing. Losing a sign on it is very easy but not a whole row of houses, there aren't many round there as it's in the sticks, and can even satellite view from above on the roads without a view. It would be nice to go at the weekend but would need something to turn up if I do.
So I've had a couple of busy weeks and with it being harder and harder to find places I can get to for new photo areas have had to wind it in a bit for now. No doubt something will turn up sooner or later, but no idea what.
Saturday, March 05, 2011
Progress report
Let's see if I can get some followers back. I've been doing some new spiritual practices offered free online, and seem to be getting insights about all sorts of things one after another which once taken on board are permanent. Things are noticed and click into place. I've been told about a couple more treatments to wipe out other issues and will see if any results come, I'm very pleased people are prepared to offer them all free.
Otherwise with the improving light I've started going to take new places for my photo map, as a collector anything will do and gets me seeing places I haven't been to for ages again. I also had my garage roof finally repaired and the extension is half finished on the back so making plenty of progress. That's about it really but some pretty big stuff sorted out, as well as the car service which now makes a lot less noise than it did before. So I'll continue the work and sorting the house out, I think I'm starting to get my act together now and the interesting part is no effort is involved. The practices are very easy and the results seem to follow either coincidentally or automatically, either way it hasn't been from actively contorting my mind (against the grain) as recommended to, but doing the equivalents of yoga and astral work and the changes just seem to follow. That's the way I've suspected would work if anything did and all this positive thought crap which simply deludes the mind which snaps back in seconds has never seemed right to me. That intuition seemed to work and can now tell anyone else what has and hasn't passed my tests.
And by the way, don't be shy to comment even if you've got nothing to say, once we all got comments and found new blogs to read as a result, it's a dry as a witch's tit nowadays, everyone seems to have gone to Facebook and forgotten the few of us left here.
Otherwise with the improving light I've started going to take new places for my photo map, as a collector anything will do and gets me seeing places I haven't been to for ages again. I also had my garage roof finally repaired and the extension is half finished on the back so making plenty of progress. That's about it really but some pretty big stuff sorted out, as well as the car service which now makes a lot less noise than it did before. So I'll continue the work and sorting the house out, I think I'm starting to get my act together now and the interesting part is no effort is involved. The practices are very easy and the results seem to follow either coincidentally or automatically, either way it hasn't been from actively contorting my mind (against the grain) as recommended to, but doing the equivalents of yoga and astral work and the changes just seem to follow. That's the way I've suspected would work if anything did and all this positive thought crap which simply deludes the mind which snaps back in seconds has never seemed right to me. That intuition seemed to work and can now tell anyone else what has and hasn't passed my tests.
And by the way, don't be shy to comment even if you've got nothing to say, once we all got comments and found new blogs to read as a result, it's a dry as a witch's tit nowadays, everyone seems to have gone to Facebook and forgotten the few of us left here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
