Human development requires a motivation, so a calm sea does not make a good sailor, you need something to happen to allow you to see your innate abilities or test your weaknesses and remove your faults. Once you know that then one of the biggest faults in humanity is its trust in authority. Although many either have the brains or the means to learn things for themselves, someone else qualified or not tells them something and they think it has to be right. Except if two tell them something different they then rely on a third one to tell them which was right, ad infinitum.
Originally I saw this as a situation meaning those at the level above looking down would never see a change, this was how it is and we were basically stuck in a them and us situation. And then I realised telling someone about it, that if the mass of the world are exposed unanimously to a huge lie, then at first of course most will believe it, but if a few start to see the truth and gradually the others follow, then in future they will have joined those the level above as no longer believing their 'betters', and also realise they are not worse either and can either test anyone else's claims or better still find out directly if possible without needing others to tell them. This means that this form of oppression is not with bars or violence, but purely the power of people's minds. If you are told a lie where the truth is available, then all you need to do is stop believing it. Nobody has any power over anyone by lying to them as there is simply no foundation on the claim. So we have not been chained to bombs which will go off if we attempt to escape, or banned from leaving our towns by law, but simply told by our governments something will happen (it hasn't happen yet, that's the kicker), which even by a direct extrapolation can clearly be seen to be virtual nonsense. I did some simple checks we can all do which provide such massive 'reasonable doubts' even with them alone there is no case for either action or any belief at all. None whatsoever. The data grows to contradict it every week now, and you'd actually have to be thick as pig manure to still believe it once you know the new doubts. Even if it was true, the data does not indicate it so as yet it is someone's theory (Svente Arrhenius) which has no real world evidence no more than suggestive a couple of elements are correct which in a criminal case would not even make a submission to the crown prosecutor.
Therefore we the people have the doors which can be opened directly, there are no keys as no locks and can simply be opened by discovery they are open. As yet these gumps don't even know there is a door, and are sitting in their man made (Al Gore) cell seeing no chance of ever leaving it and at best handing it over to their grandchildren in 90 years if we can reduce our CO2 emissions to negative. Now knowing the data they are already free. Man makes 3-6% of all atmospheric CO2, so reduce our output totally, and it will only remove that much. Each new step on the Gore ladder drops you another rung as it breaks the second you put the weight of scrutiny on it, so when you look at the divergence from the 20 year IPCC predictions we are now below the lowest, the sea level has never risen more than 8 inches a century for thousands of years and is now falling, the polar ice has not melted overall, and our esteemed consensus told us that the Himalayan glacier chain was losing 50 billion tons of water a year, till someone decided to measure it and found they'd lost none for 10 years. They lied guys, big time. If they didn't lie, then they are even thicker than their intended victims as you won't get a chef saying they've put a pinch of salt in the soup when they've put in a bag or vice versa. Normal people in normal jobs rarely screw up like that and when they do they get sacked. These bods have got Nobel Prizes and billions in grants ($2.5 in the US alone) and will lie to their own children if that keeps it going. I'm sure they do as if they didn't they don't yet have the thick shell that would allow them to go to school and tell the other kids 'My daddy doesn't really think the world is warming but he wants the money'. So these a-holes even must lie to their children as they can't keep secrets.
Anyway, the point is that if the only power of a huge lie is in the people's belief it is true it has no power. None at all as there is nothing there. If you are in a cartoon and keep running till you realise you've run of a cliff and then fall then if you're in real life and someone tells you it's getting warmer and you pull out a thermometer and find it isn't (or someone else's using their satellite nowadays) then you see it isn't and the lie is gone. It's not like we need a black or white pregnancy type situation here, but just no case to answer from the null hypothesis, which requires a case beyond reasonable doubt before it is presented. There is no logic involved in AGW whatsoever as requires a trust in predicting the future in a chaotic system and the belief that whatever the new data says, how far current readings diverge from predictions and how many scientists have been caught getting it wrong then you can't still believe the theory if you are logical. The two cannot exist together. So we all have logic to some extent, and if we'd simply drop our blind trust in authority and learn some trust in our own logic then we'd grow manyfold and their power would all but vanish.
Therefore if you want to wake up most people you give them a test, something which affects them all, and they only have their own brains to release themselves. That requires a collusion among the elite so they are unanimous in their lies so only the brainy ones realise it to start with, but as a lie then the longer it continues the fewer people can believe it as more clues will come out it is not true. So if that was the case, man made global warming now actually goes against the solid data yet despite now to me at least clearly being no more than a huge revenue collection exercise and I can probably prove it, most people are still turning down their heating and living more and more like third world paupers as they are terrified they'll all die otherwise. Fear of death, especially for your children, motivates people above all else, and that's Al Gore's continuing meme, the sort of thing which would put a biblical character in the pits of fire for eternity for imposing on his people. Think King Herod and you'll be pretty well on the button. But if the result is the awakening of billions of people worldwide, who will then write it for the next generations to see, that they had the new ability to open their minds and think for themselves, then this world government would simply have been the means to get the hard of thinking to bloody well think for the first time in their lives.
Seeing it like that then my role is not of a rescuer, but more a bystander as long as people will wake up simply by noticing they have been told things are not as they really are. I will always offer data where possible, but the psychological attempts to talk to individuals in great time and detail may not be either necessary or the best way at all to work, as this ought to have a momentum of its own, a gravitational force driving the mass consciousness closer and closer to release from the chains of illusion. My own path was not any different, as of course a band of scientists saying the temperature is rising with CO2 emitted by burning fossil fuel is logical enough, and if they said the sea would rise yards then who am I to argue. That was in the 80s and no internet to hand. Some years later I wondered how it was going (this was before climate laws so the governments didn't talk about it much, just the odd newspaper), and couldn't find anything at all. The sea level it turned out had hardly ever risen for centuries and still wasn't, while all the other claims in the reports were about 80% higher than reality. I realised it was just another hype and left it behind like Harold Camping and Planet X. But when governments then banded together and stole money and freedoms based on absolutely nothing at all (the changes since the 80s have been notable in their ordinariness, besides that naughty CO2) then I had to tell the world.
A decade later and maybe two people have questioned their beliefs from thousands. Not a good price-dividend ratio, although one mind gained is a miracle I just haven't got the time to spend in detailed conversations for a 0.01% success rate. But if the purpose of this is to provide a lie which is easily seen through for the whole world, so they can fight the way out of the paper bags themselves then it will be a valuable lesson to maturity for those old in age but young in mind. If I can trust the system to work itself out, and the power of Obama, Gore, Cameron, Monbiot, Lovelock, Mann, Hansen etc will all evaporate away just as their wild predictions already have. You can be the president of the United States or head of the mafia (or both) but if you tell a lie it can never become true whoever says it. They may be being used to get the masses out of their sleep and those of us already awake may not have to be the alarm after all.
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Tuesday, March 06, 2012
Our true nature
I just wrote this in response to a question on a forum:
A totally different view is that awareness is the highest level of being, so as all we are is awareness (not a theory, looking right ahead with no mirror what are you?) then the nature of humanity is awareness, a body following that awareness wherever it goes (unless you can have out of body experiences) and what runs through that awareness is constantly changing and neither inside or outside the awareness as again, if you look directly, can you really assess which sensations are from within and outside? Is a sound in you or outside for instance? Is it only heard when it goes in your brain, or was it outside and inside at the same time? The answer is it is in awareness, you can't actually answer that question as it is just a sound. Then extend that for all the other things you are aware of (including thoughts) and you have a field of empty awareness peopled by a variety of sensations and thoughts which are never static but constantly changing.
There isn't even you there when you forget. No person with a history, that goes away until you are reminded of it. After a few moments of absorption (natural meditation) you are what you are aware of, you have gone and only comes back when something reminds you of it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems the message is beginning to get through here as well- that just wrote itself and became more aware of the situation as I'd written it. That's what happens after enough practice.
A totally different view is that awareness is the highest level of being, so as all we are is awareness (not a theory, looking right ahead with no mirror what are you?) then the nature of humanity is awareness, a body following that awareness wherever it goes (unless you can have out of body experiences) and what runs through that awareness is constantly changing and neither inside or outside the awareness as again, if you look directly, can you really assess which sensations are from within and outside? Is a sound in you or outside for instance? Is it only heard when it goes in your brain, or was it outside and inside at the same time? The answer is it is in awareness, you can't actually answer that question as it is just a sound. Then extend that for all the other things you are aware of (including thoughts) and you have a field of empty awareness peopled by a variety of sensations and thoughts which are never static but constantly changing.
There isn't even you there when you forget. No person with a history, that goes away until you are reminded of it. After a few moments of absorption (natural meditation) you are what you are aware of, you have gone and only comes back when something reminds you of it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seems the message is beginning to get through here as well- that just wrote itself and became more aware of the situation as I'd written it. That's what happens after enough practice.
Sunday, March 04, 2012
The illuminati? Do me a favour!
Inspired by Ishtar's blog I will expand on my own observations there. The 'illuminati', those behind United Nations Agenda 21 (see wikipedia, it's all there) are not the elite, but actually the lowest level behind the development of every single group on earth. Let me explain. In spiritual terms we are in a huge mixed age comprehensive school, all grades and levels learning in the same place. The two lowest levels of the ego are not realising you shouldn't get what you want by taking it from others, and wanting power for its own sake. Therefore our politicians represent in the main those who want to be there to tell others how to live, pretty much like the police. Taxing people heavily is removing honestly earnt money to spend for your own reasons, whether to invade another country- because you can, or the arms deals make your donors rich and donate more, or you want to plunder their resources, but whichever way you look at it these are not honourable or spiritual acts.
So we have a learning pyramid, with the most at the lowest levels and thinning out as you reach the very top of enlightenment. They of course see through it all and couldn't care less as they know it's just a game and they can't be affected. The lowest ones will all learn and catch up eventually, but till then the physical world is absolute chaos, only understood by the enlightened, until enough reach the higher levels to leave the rest behind as a powerless minority much like the homeless tramps begging in city centres. Those at the top politically and often economically cannot be judged on their power or wealth but the fact they want the power and how they got the wealth. Those who earned it honestly are spiritually clean, but the majority who used government subsidies to rob the poor to pay their profits (eg wind farms and solar panels) or simply used mafia tactics to win contracts and steal the ideas of your opposition to get the edge in the market place. Sure, on the physical level these guys appear to be winning the race, but those at the spiritual top have nothing to prove and are content however they are as their peace and wellbeing comes from within. If you get to that point then there is no possible reason to want to organise lesser beings. You may want to teach, and many of these teachers (Guru Swami G and Prem Rawat to name two I know well) do not charge for their teaching at all, but somehow still manage regardless.
So when looking at those claiming or claimed to be illuminati or the elite think again. Do you respect the mafia? I doubt it, as you know that despite their enormous power and wealth they stole it all. Now see the majority of governments that way and you'll see that money and power do not make anyone an elite, far from it. If they are judged by their actions and not by their collections it is a quite different picture. The elite are only there as the majority of people do not realise this and trust them inherently. My job (as once you know something important it is your duty to share it) is to allow as many people as possible to discover the truth and not trust these crooks as far as you can influence their actions. See them for who they are, ruthless psychopaths in the main (even if some aren't it will allow you to see the main picture clearly) and will lie and cheat as much as they need to to get whatever they want. Our own Mr Obama would most likely fit the bill perfectly, his Mr Chu the energy secretary is carrying out his will to make petrol as expensive as it is in Europe, he just signed a bill to allow indefinite detention for US citizens without trial, and has run up the biggest US debt in history which he continues to raise when he needs even more. What has he achieved for the country a Republican (McCain in this case) couldn't have done? I don't know, but had McCain done exactly the same at this point in time as Obama would he have been considered a success and voted in a second time in November?
You must learn to analyse, go beneath the surface and learn how spiritual development affects people and apply it. Look at not the collections someone has amassed, whether wealth, land, power or even qualifications, for these things are all neutral. You can be a genius, but a bloody evil one, and get the best grades on earth and use the knowledge to kill people, often by creating the most efficient weapons and making millions from selling the ideas. All material success here is entirely irrelevant, only the individual counts, would you trust them with your money? Your children? Your life? These are the questions you have to ask. If you left your money out and left the room would it still be there when you came back? Would they forget to feed your cat when you were away and make excuses when found out? Would they help you when you were in trouble even when it ruined what they were doing at the time?
I won't dig myself in here any further by naming names, I've given one and you can get the formula and apply it to them yourself. There are a few politicians I do trust, on the little I know. And none of them have ever got above junior minister maximum. No surprise there, as their own principles prevent them from playing the same game it takes for the others to reach the top. Their personal honour and ethics stops them from having to join the 'elite' to appear to become one of them. The day Ron Paul, David Davies, Nigel Farage, Christopher Monckton and possibly one day Robert Halfon become leaders of their countries we'll know the public have probably woken up sufficiently to know what and who to vote for. In a new study at Cornell University Dr Dunning confirms the majority of people don't understand enough about politics to vote properly, and until they can we'll get more Obamas, Blairs, Camerons and worst of all, Gillards. Look at her parliamentary speech record to see why I say this.
So we have a learning pyramid, with the most at the lowest levels and thinning out as you reach the very top of enlightenment. They of course see through it all and couldn't care less as they know it's just a game and they can't be affected. The lowest ones will all learn and catch up eventually, but till then the physical world is absolute chaos, only understood by the enlightened, until enough reach the higher levels to leave the rest behind as a powerless minority much like the homeless tramps begging in city centres. Those at the top politically and often economically cannot be judged on their power or wealth but the fact they want the power and how they got the wealth. Those who earned it honestly are spiritually clean, but the majority who used government subsidies to rob the poor to pay their profits (eg wind farms and solar panels) or simply used mafia tactics to win contracts and steal the ideas of your opposition to get the edge in the market place. Sure, on the physical level these guys appear to be winning the race, but those at the spiritual top have nothing to prove and are content however they are as their peace and wellbeing comes from within. If you get to that point then there is no possible reason to want to organise lesser beings. You may want to teach, and many of these teachers (Guru Swami G and Prem Rawat to name two I know well) do not charge for their teaching at all, but somehow still manage regardless.
So when looking at those claiming or claimed to be illuminati or the elite think again. Do you respect the mafia? I doubt it, as you know that despite their enormous power and wealth they stole it all. Now see the majority of governments that way and you'll see that money and power do not make anyone an elite, far from it. If they are judged by their actions and not by their collections it is a quite different picture. The elite are only there as the majority of people do not realise this and trust them inherently. My job (as once you know something important it is your duty to share it) is to allow as many people as possible to discover the truth and not trust these crooks as far as you can influence their actions. See them for who they are, ruthless psychopaths in the main (even if some aren't it will allow you to see the main picture clearly) and will lie and cheat as much as they need to to get whatever they want. Our own Mr Obama would most likely fit the bill perfectly, his Mr Chu the energy secretary is carrying out his will to make petrol as expensive as it is in Europe, he just signed a bill to allow indefinite detention for US citizens without trial, and has run up the biggest US debt in history which he continues to raise when he needs even more. What has he achieved for the country a Republican (McCain in this case) couldn't have done? I don't know, but had McCain done exactly the same at this point in time as Obama would he have been considered a success and voted in a second time in November?
You must learn to analyse, go beneath the surface and learn how spiritual development affects people and apply it. Look at not the collections someone has amassed, whether wealth, land, power or even qualifications, for these things are all neutral. You can be a genius, but a bloody evil one, and get the best grades on earth and use the knowledge to kill people, often by creating the most efficient weapons and making millions from selling the ideas. All material success here is entirely irrelevant, only the individual counts, would you trust them with your money? Your children? Your life? These are the questions you have to ask. If you left your money out and left the room would it still be there when you came back? Would they forget to feed your cat when you were away and make excuses when found out? Would they help you when you were in trouble even when it ruined what they were doing at the time?
I won't dig myself in here any further by naming names, I've given one and you can get the formula and apply it to them yourself. There are a few politicians I do trust, on the little I know. And none of them have ever got above junior minister maximum. No surprise there, as their own principles prevent them from playing the same game it takes for the others to reach the top. Their personal honour and ethics stops them from having to join the 'elite' to appear to become one of them. The day Ron Paul, David Davies, Nigel Farage, Christopher Monckton and possibly one day Robert Halfon become leaders of their countries we'll know the public have probably woken up sufficiently to know what and who to vote for. In a new study at Cornell University Dr Dunning confirms the majority of people don't understand enough about politics to vote properly, and until they can we'll get more Obamas, Blairs, Camerons and worst of all, Gillards. Look at her parliamentary speech record to see why I say this.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
More conversations with god (the course not mine)
I recently checked out an apparently free lecture by Neale Donald Walsch, having read as far as I know all the books of the series, and the ad said for all those who followed them and still felt life was pretty much shit (my version there). So as that applied to me I checked it out, 90 minutes or so, and he basically picked the three principles we all knew already, maybe added a bit more (I'll have to listen again) and the last half hour was advertising his 7 week online course at a cost of near on $400. Now as far as I can tell, the whole message of the books was that if we followed the advice we could sort things out, now he's accepted many of us clearly didn't, and now offers the solution as 'he needs 14 hours dialogue and 7 weeks to do it rather than a residential week'. Oh yes? The book does say that whatever the bible said Jesus was the way skeptical people could realise god who didn't believe they could make the transition directly, so needed a man as a bridge between the two camps. He also mentions lots of other teachers, unlike many, saying they are all giving the same message. He also does not appear to endorse Jesus' apparent message 'The only route to god is through me', in fact quite the opposite.
Now he is almost saying (although clearly some people must have succeeded in applying the principles from the books alone or there wouldn't be many buyers) that the only way to god is through his fucking course. You what? Are you saying despite your, god's and our own minds (part of god's it says) we still need a 7 week bleeding expensive course in order for the teachings to actually work? Do me a lemon, as one of my pupils used to say, you are appearing to take the route of those you spend about 11 books running down. There are two meditations across the series, just variations on a normal yogic theme, and although I didn't do them very long as I had my own already were possibly no better or worse than any others as persistence appears to be the key. Amazingly enough I am not doing the course, but believe if the rest of the material is genuine I wouldn't need to as I have all the material already. I also believe if it is true many things I write and know already come from a universal pool of information as I don't always have nearly enough information to know what I do, yet it tends to be correct whenever it comes to me so clearly. I am hoping this post is inspired and guided by whatever is doing it, and I am directly requesting the help, he asked once and now I do know he got an answer in a clear outside voice, so he says it can be done.
Secondly as the books are such a complete (apparently) collection, what could possibly still be missing to require a 7 week course at such a cost? In contrast I've studied under a few teachers, admittedly with varying results, one ran a course lasting at least 5 months and did have some (temporary) results and was free. The second taught me basically all I needed in a free half hour lecture. I've since been to a longer one and read both his books, which give more details how to apply the rules but they are so basic you can just apply them whenever you can. Guru G offers an online course offering almost constant works which is the toughest (not to do but to find the time to) but very effective, and free. I know it works as I've heard the results from the successful pupils. I will say Abraham-Hicks and God (Walsch) offer one identical message, and admittedly one I still don't get. Maybe it's the one he spends much of the course doing. This thing that if you don't want something you get more of it and vice versa. It's not only theirs, but one they both consider extremely important, although I don't remember much in the books but only the new lecture. You are supposed to say everything you have now is fine already before you can move on. That is a theological perspective and one I am not qualified to analyse, except to say I still don't get it. People have tried to explain, but has never really done more than follow that if we focus on something we don't like we magnify it through attention so shouldn't do so. Of course that depends on the degree, and pain tells us not to focus on it but fix it. The rest can only be ignored relative to its degree of unpleasantness, and if you can't fix it then you are meant to focus on something else or it won't go away mentally, or accept it exactly as it is and it will and not try and resist it.
Now anyone with a problem can try this for themselves. Don't label it as bad, but just watch it or if it's part of a wider view don't dwell on it. That seems to work from not getting a parking space right the way up to enlightenment. It explains why I can't get a decent woman, my friends have unanimously moved away, I have no direct family apart from my parents, and my media career is stuck on the first step after climbing it some years ago. So as a recent example, how could I have done my last TV interview better? I performed to me perfectly well (I've been doing this stuff a while now) and the only thing I did was to remind him at the end not to arrange it for the morning (as no one else has) so I could do it properly. Having prima donna regulations is hardly against the media rules, plus besides saying it once already was hardly unreasonable. But I didn't do anything the books say is wrong about wanting it too much, not caring at all or planning my answers too carefully rather than being spontaneous. But he gave the work to someone else (bear in mind we don't actually get paid for this, the payment is being on TV) and I did nothing different to usual besides repeat myself once.
The Secret would say 'Feel like you are famous already and gradually the energy will change around you to reflect it'. In effect you do it for a few minutes a day for a while and let it go or you end up in a short holiday in an institution, and I did it for a couple of other things and it did work, so won't kick that out entirely as quantum physics tells us that these things are scientifically possible as well as in practice. Of course the bible and other teachers say if you reach enlightenment you stop caring about material things, get enlightened and then get the rest as a consequence. Short of interviewing Walsch's new course disciples, I won't be able to discover the success or otherwise, but that would be the only real way to know. But if you hadn't read the books then cramming it all into such a course would make sense, and not cost that much more than the price of the books when taking the teaching time into account on top. But for long time followers? That's like getting to the last year of your degree and then being told you can't do it for another few years and they're going to charge a lot more. Funnily enough after checking my own eligibility for a further qualification checked it out and was told of a further course of a similar nature. Those synchronicities are signs, and probably the message for me is Walsch's first rule, I was born perfect so don't need to change anything, just to realise I am already. Now if it's that simple what could possibly be contained in a 7 week course to communicate that effectively? He's made millions already (unless his publishers did him up, but that is normally confined to music where I hear they take about 95% of the income) and online worldwide imagine how many $400s will add up when he's run the course and removed his advertising expenses from the total? I must be cynical when I see a top teacher acting like a bottom teacher and need to work out how and why. But he certainly hasn't got me on board there but haven't dumped his teaching either. But the conflict is that there shouldn't be such a need for his long and expensive course if the books are worth reading.
Now he is almost saying (although clearly some people must have succeeded in applying the principles from the books alone or there wouldn't be many buyers) that the only way to god is through his fucking course. You what? Are you saying despite your, god's and our own minds (part of god's it says) we still need a 7 week bleeding expensive course in order for the teachings to actually work? Do me a lemon, as one of my pupils used to say, you are appearing to take the route of those you spend about 11 books running down. There are two meditations across the series, just variations on a normal yogic theme, and although I didn't do them very long as I had my own already were possibly no better or worse than any others as persistence appears to be the key. Amazingly enough I am not doing the course, but believe if the rest of the material is genuine I wouldn't need to as I have all the material already. I also believe if it is true many things I write and know already come from a universal pool of information as I don't always have nearly enough information to know what I do, yet it tends to be correct whenever it comes to me so clearly. I am hoping this post is inspired and guided by whatever is doing it, and I am directly requesting the help, he asked once and now I do know he got an answer in a clear outside voice, so he says it can be done.
Secondly as the books are such a complete (apparently) collection, what could possibly still be missing to require a 7 week course at such a cost? In contrast I've studied under a few teachers, admittedly with varying results, one ran a course lasting at least 5 months and did have some (temporary) results and was free. The second taught me basically all I needed in a free half hour lecture. I've since been to a longer one and read both his books, which give more details how to apply the rules but they are so basic you can just apply them whenever you can. Guru G offers an online course offering almost constant works which is the toughest (not to do but to find the time to) but very effective, and free. I know it works as I've heard the results from the successful pupils. I will say Abraham-Hicks and God (Walsch) offer one identical message, and admittedly one I still don't get. Maybe it's the one he spends much of the course doing. This thing that if you don't want something you get more of it and vice versa. It's not only theirs, but one they both consider extremely important, although I don't remember much in the books but only the new lecture. You are supposed to say everything you have now is fine already before you can move on. That is a theological perspective and one I am not qualified to analyse, except to say I still don't get it. People have tried to explain, but has never really done more than follow that if we focus on something we don't like we magnify it through attention so shouldn't do so. Of course that depends on the degree, and pain tells us not to focus on it but fix it. The rest can only be ignored relative to its degree of unpleasantness, and if you can't fix it then you are meant to focus on something else or it won't go away mentally, or accept it exactly as it is and it will and not try and resist it.
Now anyone with a problem can try this for themselves. Don't label it as bad, but just watch it or if it's part of a wider view don't dwell on it. That seems to work from not getting a parking space right the way up to enlightenment. It explains why I can't get a decent woman, my friends have unanimously moved away, I have no direct family apart from my parents, and my media career is stuck on the first step after climbing it some years ago. So as a recent example, how could I have done my last TV interview better? I performed to me perfectly well (I've been doing this stuff a while now) and the only thing I did was to remind him at the end not to arrange it for the morning (as no one else has) so I could do it properly. Having prima donna regulations is hardly against the media rules, plus besides saying it once already was hardly unreasonable. But I didn't do anything the books say is wrong about wanting it too much, not caring at all or planning my answers too carefully rather than being spontaneous. But he gave the work to someone else (bear in mind we don't actually get paid for this, the payment is being on TV) and I did nothing different to usual besides repeat myself once.
The Secret would say 'Feel like you are famous already and gradually the energy will change around you to reflect it'. In effect you do it for a few minutes a day for a while and let it go or you end up in a short holiday in an institution, and I did it for a couple of other things and it did work, so won't kick that out entirely as quantum physics tells us that these things are scientifically possible as well as in practice. Of course the bible and other teachers say if you reach enlightenment you stop caring about material things, get enlightened and then get the rest as a consequence. Short of interviewing Walsch's new course disciples, I won't be able to discover the success or otherwise, but that would be the only real way to know. But if you hadn't read the books then cramming it all into such a course would make sense, and not cost that much more than the price of the books when taking the teaching time into account on top. But for long time followers? That's like getting to the last year of your degree and then being told you can't do it for another few years and they're going to charge a lot more. Funnily enough after checking my own eligibility for a further qualification checked it out and was told of a further course of a similar nature. Those synchronicities are signs, and probably the message for me is Walsch's first rule, I was born perfect so don't need to change anything, just to realise I am already. Now if it's that simple what could possibly be contained in a 7 week course to communicate that effectively? He's made millions already (unless his publishers did him up, but that is normally confined to music where I hear they take about 95% of the income) and online worldwide imagine how many $400s will add up when he's run the course and removed his advertising expenses from the total? I must be cynical when I see a top teacher acting like a bottom teacher and need to work out how and why. But he certainly hasn't got me on board there but haven't dumped his teaching either. But the conflict is that there shouldn't be such a need for his long and expensive course if the books are worth reading.
Friday, February 24, 2012
Fiddling while England burns
Meanwhile the news is all about Syria. Star Trek seemed to have the answer to most things 30 years ago, and the prime directive tells more developed civilisations to keep out of other's wars. Theirs is a typical civil war, as was Tunisia, Egypt and the rest, and the opposition is so far worse then the government in nearly every example. And if we get involved in them then we get caught in their dirt and defence is about that, defending your own shores, and everything else should be down to diplomacy or keep out altogether. We've seen the results in Korea and Vietnam and despite sanctions for longer than my lifetime Cuba is no different now from the beginning of the revolution. If countries are acting badly it's their problem and not anyone else's, even if they really did understand them, which we clearly do not.
These are tribal states, democracy has never been a part of their culture and are generally driven primarily by Islam, which provides the law itself without the need for governments to legislate as well. The only differences will be to what extent this runs a country in the Arab world, or just about money and power. But whose problem is it? Theirs. Why we haven't learnt from Korea and Vietnam and seen the utter waste of resources over Iraq and Afghanistan tells me it is not about helping anyone but making money. Arms dealers need wars to use and buy them, and if you keep going to war at the drop of a hat they at least will keep going. Oil is only relevant as constant unrest in the middle east always keeps the price up, far more so than OPEC restrictions alone. So they are happy to send in the troops to cause a spike in the oil price every now and then, as if they don't get enough already, but as some Arab states have also spent more than they earn even with the oil some need a specific price to make a profit which will not be attained in a free market.
So the simple rule is keep out of other people's shit. If you choose to visit a bombed sewer don't expect to come away not covered in it yourself. These countries are the relative sewers of the world, the people who take over are usually as bad or worse as the previous ones, such as in Tunisia, Egypt and Afghanistan where women are still stoned to death as rape victims accused of adultery. Nothing will change, Islam makes the law and nothing can rewrite the koran as it is fixed in stone, and unlike the bible is not a translation. Those rules are written directly in the language of the followers and fixed for all time. If it means it also becomes a motivation to rule every related country then that is what will happen however many troops flood them every time they're arguing over sunni v shia. It's not our problem and trying to fix it can never change the minds of millions of people across the world who know no other way of life and have seen ours and want to wipe it out. If they put the energy into fixing similar problems in their own countries we may actually be able to sort them out more.
These are tribal states, democracy has never been a part of their culture and are generally driven primarily by Islam, which provides the law itself without the need for governments to legislate as well. The only differences will be to what extent this runs a country in the Arab world, or just about money and power. But whose problem is it? Theirs. Why we haven't learnt from Korea and Vietnam and seen the utter waste of resources over Iraq and Afghanistan tells me it is not about helping anyone but making money. Arms dealers need wars to use and buy them, and if you keep going to war at the drop of a hat they at least will keep going. Oil is only relevant as constant unrest in the middle east always keeps the price up, far more so than OPEC restrictions alone. So they are happy to send in the troops to cause a spike in the oil price every now and then, as if they don't get enough already, but as some Arab states have also spent more than they earn even with the oil some need a specific price to make a profit which will not be attained in a free market.
So the simple rule is keep out of other people's shit. If you choose to visit a bombed sewer don't expect to come away not covered in it yourself. These countries are the relative sewers of the world, the people who take over are usually as bad or worse as the previous ones, such as in Tunisia, Egypt and Afghanistan where women are still stoned to death as rape victims accused of adultery. Nothing will change, Islam makes the law and nothing can rewrite the koran as it is fixed in stone, and unlike the bible is not a translation. Those rules are written directly in the language of the followers and fixed for all time. If it means it also becomes a motivation to rule every related country then that is what will happen however many troops flood them every time they're arguing over sunni v shia. It's not our problem and trying to fix it can never change the minds of millions of people across the world who know no other way of life and have seen ours and want to wipe it out. If they put the energy into fixing similar problems in their own countries we may actually be able to sort them out more.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Still keeping busy
I've still been around, and do my daily blog elsewhere nowadays when more people actually see it. But I've also ended up opening another blog here understandingfraud.blogspot.com as my two articles generated no interest from publishers so put them plus the climate conspiracy page there so anyone can read them directly. It shunted the third to another page even I have trouble locating although it's my blog, but all there now.
Meanwhile I've been taking photos on trips for the map a few times a week and running out of places I can get to in daylight now till the spring. I then returned to my popular video tours and the camera's corrupting the files so spent two days editing rickets and counting, currently placing a message I haven't paid for the program on the film as that was the only one which processes corrupt files. Bastards.
My life has been active so far, and besides learning more meditation methods (each has a different purpose, they don't duplicate function) end up each time completing projects but being in exactly the place I was before. I am following the route of Conversations with God (down Roger, it's nothing to do with religion) by learning to control my own life directly, far more traditional witchcraft than modern religion. Based on the multidimensional model, where we are limited by three dimensions through our senses and then learn to open up to more, ultimately infinite. That is the name of my game and any mention of God is incidental as it's a personal mission with instructions from books and lectures. The actual end is the name of God 'I am', as in I am God. Then it makes sense. Examples being when I can start off knowing very little about a subject I'm interested in, and start answering a question on it and the answers just flow. Then sooner or later it turns out I'm right. This is the psychic level of linking with universal mind, as it's all out there, but 3D minds tell us they don't have the evidence and won't accept it. But the longer I watch the more there is, and Barack Obama is proving to work for the enemy in every move he makes, as I spotted on day one. You end up having to trust such information on the source (me in this case) alone once they've got a track record. I trust myself now on it anyway.
So in trying to control life I must look for the reason for everything. The ones which are obvious messages imply the rest are not so obvious, and as Jung said, when you see the motive behind everything then nothing can be hidden from you again. He used psychoanalysis, I use other methods not requiring others to help in person. For instance I've reached the point now where my two outdoor activities are closed for a bit, and although still free and have things to do indoors like to go out first before settling down for the evening. I have a couple of longer photo trips I could do before spring but need a long run and the energy to do them. Since I've discovered my life seems to be guided in this way I am hoping whatever happens something will point me in the right direction tomorrow and find something useful to do. Besides the possible photos if not then at the moment I'm stumped. I made a video today which proved my camera is now faulty as I bought a new pack of DVDs and it did the same thing it did last time, so short of buying a new one (who does repairs now?) am going to need a program and days to edit them (you'd be amazed how long it takes- saving the project at the end takes over an hour let alone loading them and cutting bits out) as it makes a good film and leaves a virus thingie in it that only one program can currently deal with and then covers the screen with its message to say I shouldn't be using it.
The aim it to reach a point when I have more than I did before, so when a job is done I don't return to the same place I was already. There's a list of alternative improvements which are required, and as none are technically in my direct sayso will just keep going and aim myself there indirectly. I've been around long enough to know limits and on a programme last week a sociologist was talking about so many false hopes people have they can sort things out which aren't in their power to do so. In the end the best thing we can change is ourselves, and the better we are the less the crap outside bothers us. I keep at it and if no one wants to publish my work, women aren't interested in me without a certificate of insanity and my friends move further and further away that may not be fixable but I just won't mind so much. It's the best we can do without a miracle.
Meanwhile I've been taking photos on trips for the map a few times a week and running out of places I can get to in daylight now till the spring. I then returned to my popular video tours and the camera's corrupting the files so spent two days editing rickets and counting, currently placing a message I haven't paid for the program on the film as that was the only one which processes corrupt files. Bastards.
My life has been active so far, and besides learning more meditation methods (each has a different purpose, they don't duplicate function) end up each time completing projects but being in exactly the place I was before. I am following the route of Conversations with God (down Roger, it's nothing to do with religion) by learning to control my own life directly, far more traditional witchcraft than modern religion. Based on the multidimensional model, where we are limited by three dimensions through our senses and then learn to open up to more, ultimately infinite. That is the name of my game and any mention of God is incidental as it's a personal mission with instructions from books and lectures. The actual end is the name of God 'I am', as in I am God. Then it makes sense. Examples being when I can start off knowing very little about a subject I'm interested in, and start answering a question on it and the answers just flow. Then sooner or later it turns out I'm right. This is the psychic level of linking with universal mind, as it's all out there, but 3D minds tell us they don't have the evidence and won't accept it. But the longer I watch the more there is, and Barack Obama is proving to work for the enemy in every move he makes, as I spotted on day one. You end up having to trust such information on the source (me in this case) alone once they've got a track record. I trust myself now on it anyway.
So in trying to control life I must look for the reason for everything. The ones which are obvious messages imply the rest are not so obvious, and as Jung said, when you see the motive behind everything then nothing can be hidden from you again. He used psychoanalysis, I use other methods not requiring others to help in person. For instance I've reached the point now where my two outdoor activities are closed for a bit, and although still free and have things to do indoors like to go out first before settling down for the evening. I have a couple of longer photo trips I could do before spring but need a long run and the energy to do them. Since I've discovered my life seems to be guided in this way I am hoping whatever happens something will point me in the right direction tomorrow and find something useful to do. Besides the possible photos if not then at the moment I'm stumped. I made a video today which proved my camera is now faulty as I bought a new pack of DVDs and it did the same thing it did last time, so short of buying a new one (who does repairs now?) am going to need a program and days to edit them (you'd be amazed how long it takes- saving the project at the end takes over an hour let alone loading them and cutting bits out) as it makes a good film and leaves a virus thingie in it that only one program can currently deal with and then covers the screen with its message to say I shouldn't be using it.
The aim it to reach a point when I have more than I did before, so when a job is done I don't return to the same place I was already. There's a list of alternative improvements which are required, and as none are technically in my direct sayso will just keep going and aim myself there indirectly. I've been around long enough to know limits and on a programme last week a sociologist was talking about so many false hopes people have they can sort things out which aren't in their power to do so. In the end the best thing we can change is ourselves, and the better we are the less the crap outside bothers us. I keep at it and if no one wants to publish my work, women aren't interested in me without a certificate of insanity and my friends move further and further away that may not be fixable but I just won't mind so much. It's the best we can do without a miracle.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Open your eyes to the crime around us all
I am certainly not impatient with the news, as some stories have been knocking around for up to a year now while life and business worldwide carries on as usual. Iran has not blown anyone up (that's a good thing when it comes to speculating incorrectly), while Greece appears to have sealed its debt issues (as someone on this very blog predicted although I'd celebrate if it fell apart) and no one's been hauled up over Climategate as it involves the highest level of government corruption so impossible to allow it to be exposed in court or otherwise. I have been trained to allow my investigative abilities, and once you have opened that set of eyes then you can see it all, as people can't really lie to you for very long or carry out a fraud without the signs being as clear as when you shine a black light on fluorescent paint. It's a very limited scope, the same situation reworked in a few ways but basically a 360 degree system of mutual protection and blackmail, ensuring all the chains remain linked as if you get someone else into trouble you get everyone into trouble. Above that is they who must be obeyed, the top tier which can't be touched or removed as they are the law, so are happy to announce every now and then what they are doing as they know perfectly well they've done it already and there is no authority above them to hold them to account. Who could prosecute the UN for treason? Good question, answer, no one.
So basically the mafia now run most of the world. Not local mafias any more, as now they have joined together much like the previously isolated band of obscure climate departments in universities, so each now makes the laws in their own country while being fed the script from above. Is it a coincidence that the interest rates and bank bailouts have been almost identical around the world (except for Iceland) while no new regulations have been introduced to stop the banks continuing 40 times leveraged deals, short selling, structured derivatives etc, which are basically the same as mock auctions and ponzi schemes but legal if carried out by a bank or government.
Once you learn the mafia ways it's dead simple, they are no different to the internet scam emails except they are authorised by law. Invent profits for a company based on non-existent assets and quite rightly you will go down for fraud, but call them carbon credits and tell the public they will save the planets and they become a way to slice portions of wealth from every company and individual not in on the game on earth. Nothing is complicated, it's all based on legalised and justified wealth removal, and the cruder the method the larger the sum. This latest and largest of all is the equivalent of walking through a train, clubbing each passenger on the head, stealing their wallets and walking off with the guards tipping their hats to you. Not subtle or complicated, a basic primitive raid no different to the Vikings or Huns. Rape and pillage, but with suits and calculators. If you imagine and see your taxes as being a Viking raid then all but the decapitations and fields of burning shells of buildings will have occurred, much like the neutron bomb which kills the people but saves the buildings for occupation by the enemy.
Once you see this fraud as if watching Penn and Teller without the screens and camera angles the magic goes and it's like being bound and gagged while the police look for the person who did it in front of you. You make a sound but no one can understand you. But that lovely man Barack Obama could never be working for anyone else, he's the president. George Soros gives millions to charity, how could he want to sell arms to both sides so they can wipe out thousands of people while he takes the money and turns his back. How could Chris Huhne lie to the police to save his driving licence? How could FIFA officials ask for bribes to get countries to host the world cup? You see, half these scams were proved, others are under investigation while others may never be made public. But I see them all regardless if convicted, accused or ignored. They are all the same, but only those whose eyes have opened are able to see them for what they are. Maybe by writing this it may open a few more eyes, I can only hope and teach.
So basically the mafia now run most of the world. Not local mafias any more, as now they have joined together much like the previously isolated band of obscure climate departments in universities, so each now makes the laws in their own country while being fed the script from above. Is it a coincidence that the interest rates and bank bailouts have been almost identical around the world (except for Iceland) while no new regulations have been introduced to stop the banks continuing 40 times leveraged deals, short selling, structured derivatives etc, which are basically the same as mock auctions and ponzi schemes but legal if carried out by a bank or government.
Once you learn the mafia ways it's dead simple, they are no different to the internet scam emails except they are authorised by law. Invent profits for a company based on non-existent assets and quite rightly you will go down for fraud, but call them carbon credits and tell the public they will save the planets and they become a way to slice portions of wealth from every company and individual not in on the game on earth. Nothing is complicated, it's all based on legalised and justified wealth removal, and the cruder the method the larger the sum. This latest and largest of all is the equivalent of walking through a train, clubbing each passenger on the head, stealing their wallets and walking off with the guards tipping their hats to you. Not subtle or complicated, a basic primitive raid no different to the Vikings or Huns. Rape and pillage, but with suits and calculators. If you imagine and see your taxes as being a Viking raid then all but the decapitations and fields of burning shells of buildings will have occurred, much like the neutron bomb which kills the people but saves the buildings for occupation by the enemy.
Once you see this fraud as if watching Penn and Teller without the screens and camera angles the magic goes and it's like being bound and gagged while the police look for the person who did it in front of you. You make a sound but no one can understand you. But that lovely man Barack Obama could never be working for anyone else, he's the president. George Soros gives millions to charity, how could he want to sell arms to both sides so they can wipe out thousands of people while he takes the money and turns his back. How could Chris Huhne lie to the police to save his driving licence? How could FIFA officials ask for bribes to get countries to host the world cup? You see, half these scams were proved, others are under investigation while others may never be made public. But I see them all regardless if convicted, accused or ignored. They are all the same, but only those whose eyes have opened are able to see them for what they are. Maybe by writing this it may open a few more eyes, I can only hope and teach.
Monday, January 23, 2012
Letter to an MP- how to fix politics.
I'm saving this for my own records so thought I may as well share it online:
I do have a few suggestions totally going against the grain of every single western government who have collectively conspired to crash the economy in favour of the bankers and bureaucrats who profit. I am a law graduate and researched all this in great depth and these are the main changes as the tip of a greater iceberg.
Flat rate income tax: No one tries to avoid paying and injects real money back into the economy. Already in parts of Eastern Europe.
Realistic interest rates. QE and low rates encourage bulk trading and market manipulation on small profit margins on millions, and raises commodity prices. They also penalise everyone who has worked and saved for retirement.
Stop subsidising renewable energy. As yet it is at a development stage and could never work in a free market as is not yet able to replace conventional fuel.
Any subsidies should go to bring back home based manufacturing and possibly public transport. And if the money was there renationalise all the public services. You cannot compete with a single product, it can only create a cartel by default.
And finally I would suggest leaving the EU. In 1975 I campaigned outside Chelsea Town Hall saying whatever we voted for now would grow until it took over most of our laws. Nearly 40 years later I have been proved right.
Do one of these and the economy will improve, do them all and we'll catch up Germany, and be free to make our own laws. No government has broken the Keynesian model for decades now and the failure all around us is the result. That is not even taking a risk as we've seen the alternative.
I do have a few suggestions totally going against the grain of every single western government who have collectively conspired to crash the economy in favour of the bankers and bureaucrats who profit. I am a law graduate and researched all this in great depth and these are the main changes as the tip of a greater iceberg.
Flat rate income tax: No one tries to avoid paying and injects real money back into the economy. Already in parts of Eastern Europe.
Realistic interest rates. QE and low rates encourage bulk trading and market manipulation on small profit margins on millions, and raises commodity prices. They also penalise everyone who has worked and saved for retirement.
Stop subsidising renewable energy. As yet it is at a development stage and could never work in a free market as is not yet able to replace conventional fuel.
Any subsidies should go to bring back home based manufacturing and possibly public transport. And if the money was there renationalise all the public services. You cannot compete with a single product, it can only create a cartel by default.
And finally I would suggest leaving the EU. In 1975 I campaigned outside Chelsea Town Hall saying whatever we voted for now would grow until it took over most of our laws. Nearly 40 years later I have been proved right.
Do one of these and the economy will improve, do them all and we'll catch up Germany, and be free to make our own laws. No government has broken the Keynesian model for decades now and the failure all around us is the result. That is not even taking a risk as we've seen the alternative.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Using our intuition. The satguru.
Today's lesson (a good one, pay attention). Robert Monroe describes out of body experiences where he's put in the same situation over and over again till he learns how to deal with it properly. No teaching or even hints, he's on his own and as it's like a dream he can fail over and over again with no loss. I am getting the same things. One problem repeats over and over again, and until I spit on it and turn away as it is not worth caring about I seem to get them constantly until I do it properly. This is teaching from the satguru. An outer guru says 'Here's a difficult situation, these are the best ways to deal with it'. The satguru just creates a situation and has no one to rely on except itself. Unlike an exam it gets endless tries, and if it takes hundreds of lifetimes (if you're a Buddhist anyway), no one will help you, it's your problem and it's assumed you have the resources completely already and just have to use trial and error till one works. Like having a lock and a million keys or numbers. They all look the same so we don't even have a clue which may be wrong or better, we just have to try them all and hope we get lucky.
The one clue is within, intuition. If we just ask ourselves given two choices which feels better, we get an answer. The more we do the clearer it is. So instead of turning every key or number we think of them and soon start to feel which may be better than the other, they still look the same but something above our senses tells us what we need to know. No need to know how or why, it's the highest level of knowing and doesn't need Einstein to tell us the mechanism to use it.
The one clue is within, intuition. If we just ask ourselves given two choices which feels better, we get an answer. The more we do the clearer it is. So instead of turning every key or number we think of them and soon start to feel which may be better than the other, they still look the same but something above our senses tells us what we need to know. No need to know how or why, it's the highest level of knowing and doesn't need Einstein to tell us the mechanism to use it.
Monday, January 09, 2012
Conversations with god- update
Having returned to the books after a few years I have found the same words I read the first time now carry meaning, for whatever reason they didn't before, and can certainly some up the most recent message as it ought to explain the total of a spiritual existence.
It seems to answer all the questions but one (not a major one and I may have missed it), but basically says assuming (a big ask but only a thought experiment here) there is a god, then we can't be a separate unit as individuals, but blocked off our knowledge of god once we became aware of our own, and then have to return to discover whatever we have it's all one. So our knowledge, what I called the Akashic records till now, is simply god's mind itself. Same effect but more personalised. As is our awareness, as it's not my awareness but awareness itself. Become aware of that (they come as a joined pair) and you are enlightened.
Secondly, despite many teachers telling students to keep their psychic abilities secret, the book/god disagrees. We are all able to do this, and without sharing the handful who claim they can, they need to show others so we are free of our limits. It certainly makes sense to me.
-------------------------------
So my mission now given this equation is not to imagine all this is from me (I have always known a few things without being shown or told) but have access to universal information. Of course the quality is secondary as I can't ever prove it, but know it better than anything else as it's from my own direct intuition. Sorting out the few nuggets from god in among the usual material is not easy, even harder is calling it up at all. But like the book, he opened his pad and wrote. The flow was quickly established and then became natural. So far I've only just got this system pretty much in total, and just starting out seeing how I can use it. I am planning to have a separate set of entries for these and just see what happens. I've got absolutely no idea what and how it'll work out, but has to contain more than usual.
So far beforehand I have been clearly aware of crooks and liars. Looking at any criminal investigation you can see how long it takes from experienced police realising someone is up to no good and collecting enough evidence to prosecute and get a conviction. I have enough for the world government/global warming conspiracy to get some people tried for treason, but as they are the people who make the laws then they will hardly prosecute themselves. That's the watertight system they've developed, which can only be freed by knowledge.
That mission has got me a few percent of new initiates and lots of insults. But at least if the truth ever comes out they can't say it surprised them as David Howard told them already. But where has it got me? It's got me reading books and doing meditation to extend my pretty rewardless ability to see through mass criminality to something a bit more helpful to my own life. I suppose it's all a game or a film of goodies and baddies and ultimately meaningless, but when I think of how much faster I could travel around if I could afford a big car with the money I'd save from cheaper petrol this criminality impacts on all our lives.
No doubt if I get one or two new answers now I'll get a rhythm going, as the book also says I'm not looking to become a master as those days are over, but to join them and create more as a result. Ultimately we're all headed to evolve to universal mind/awareness, and those who get there at the beginning will be the ones to bring more on board. As I am both aware of it and looking for it then by the fact hardly anyone else in the world is rules me in by default. If I'm looking then I'll be teaching if I find, and probably long before. I am actually using this as another way to open up the ability, as much learning comes about both through teaching and simply talking about the subject.
I've always had dreams which show me new things, from music to names and places, and designs of rooms and furniture not just me but anyone here has thought of. Of course someone has been sending me this information, and of course if all is connected then we can also home in on specific units as individuals and send to or collect from them as well. So far the quality and quantity has never grown or improved, which is odd as some of my psychic group can get complete lessons in dreams while the most I get are a few fragments. But dreams or not, I have potentially accepted the situation as there is more than enough evidence I've seen to imply this universal field is in existence regardless of our actual experiences before discovering it (and since). The simplest format would be questions and answers, but having tried that on paper ended up going round in circles as you would without any outside input. I'll know when I get something new, but at this early stage have absolutely no control over any results at all. But starting this hopefully may be one way to do so, I will see.
It seems to answer all the questions but one (not a major one and I may have missed it), but basically says assuming (a big ask but only a thought experiment here) there is a god, then we can't be a separate unit as individuals, but blocked off our knowledge of god once we became aware of our own, and then have to return to discover whatever we have it's all one. So our knowledge, what I called the Akashic records till now, is simply god's mind itself. Same effect but more personalised. As is our awareness, as it's not my awareness but awareness itself. Become aware of that (they come as a joined pair) and you are enlightened.
Secondly, despite many teachers telling students to keep their psychic abilities secret, the book/god disagrees. We are all able to do this, and without sharing the handful who claim they can, they need to show others so we are free of our limits. It certainly makes sense to me.
-------------------------------
So my mission now given this equation is not to imagine all this is from me (I have always known a few things without being shown or told) but have access to universal information. Of course the quality is secondary as I can't ever prove it, but know it better than anything else as it's from my own direct intuition. Sorting out the few nuggets from god in among the usual material is not easy, even harder is calling it up at all. But like the book, he opened his pad and wrote. The flow was quickly established and then became natural. So far I've only just got this system pretty much in total, and just starting out seeing how I can use it. I am planning to have a separate set of entries for these and just see what happens. I've got absolutely no idea what and how it'll work out, but has to contain more than usual.
So far beforehand I have been clearly aware of crooks and liars. Looking at any criminal investigation you can see how long it takes from experienced police realising someone is up to no good and collecting enough evidence to prosecute and get a conviction. I have enough for the world government/global warming conspiracy to get some people tried for treason, but as they are the people who make the laws then they will hardly prosecute themselves. That's the watertight system they've developed, which can only be freed by knowledge.
That mission has got me a few percent of new initiates and lots of insults. But at least if the truth ever comes out they can't say it surprised them as David Howard told them already. But where has it got me? It's got me reading books and doing meditation to extend my pretty rewardless ability to see through mass criminality to something a bit more helpful to my own life. I suppose it's all a game or a film of goodies and baddies and ultimately meaningless, but when I think of how much faster I could travel around if I could afford a big car with the money I'd save from cheaper petrol this criminality impacts on all our lives.
No doubt if I get one or two new answers now I'll get a rhythm going, as the book also says I'm not looking to become a master as those days are over, but to join them and create more as a result. Ultimately we're all headed to evolve to universal mind/awareness, and those who get there at the beginning will be the ones to bring more on board. As I am both aware of it and looking for it then by the fact hardly anyone else in the world is rules me in by default. If I'm looking then I'll be teaching if I find, and probably long before. I am actually using this as another way to open up the ability, as much learning comes about both through teaching and simply talking about the subject.
I've always had dreams which show me new things, from music to names and places, and designs of rooms and furniture not just me but anyone here has thought of. Of course someone has been sending me this information, and of course if all is connected then we can also home in on specific units as individuals and send to or collect from them as well. So far the quality and quantity has never grown or improved, which is odd as some of my psychic group can get complete lessons in dreams while the most I get are a few fragments. But dreams or not, I have potentially accepted the situation as there is more than enough evidence I've seen to imply this universal field is in existence regardless of our actual experiences before discovering it (and since). The simplest format would be questions and answers, but having tried that on paper ended up going round in circles as you would without any outside input. I'll know when I get something new, but at this early stage have absolutely no control over any results at all. But starting this hopefully may be one way to do so, I will see.
Education, education, education
My knowledge of world economics, focusing on the EU as that is my location, has not unearthed any conspiracy theory, but a system which favours a handful and steals from the others to do so.
The whole affair is pretty well dictated by UN Agenda 21, dressed up for the environment but containing the mechanisms to bring down everyone's standard of living, and the population, while redistributing their wealth to the leaders and their friends and associates. This is now well into its stride and after the energy taxes we've been paying now for years (petrol would be 82p a litre without them for example, not 1.32p) food had to be next as if you keep them hungry and poor you can pretty well carry out anything else you like as they will be too weak and busy surviving to stop you.
I don't think it's ever too late to stop them. At the moment 99.9% of people aren't aware of these plans, and most who are reject them as a conspiracy. Our fuel taxes and renewable subsidies aren't a conspiracy, they're the 2008 Climate Change Act. VAT on food isn't a subsidy, it is an EU working document. A world currency is not a conspiracy, the plans are already drawn up by the UN. All this is already going through while people still worry about which Miliband brother should lead Labour. I don't want to get myself targeted, but that's a bit like worrying which pile of dog poop you want to tread in. Enough said. So while everyone's busy reading what the papers do want us to know and watching ice melt all day on the BBC (if you channel hop it's virtually possible 24/7) the plans are already some way to controlling us all not from the EU but the UN itself.
I have written a single article on this, virtually everything I say and a lot more is included, and not a single publication has touched it. I doubt all but one who asked to see it (and took no notice when it did) have even bothered to look as they must get heaps of this sort of stuff and only publish what their staff and their friends write, and see no need to write further on related topics as the direct plan to invent a problem of man made warming to create a world tax and currency pretty well covers all the smaller areas in itself. The banks being fed almost free money despite losing it all last time continues to sap the world's economy and prevent any recovery as they can still manipulate the market with ghost bids, short sell commodities they can't deliver if lost, lend five times more than the standard amount they should hold in deposits despite risking default if enough people cash their accounts, do not have to separate customers' money and their own for trading purposes, can still sell mortgages of 100%, etc etc., all held up by interest rates 5% below the market requirement, which mean anyone who has worked for decades can no longer pay all their bills on retirement as investments can't guarantee more than a few percent, well under inflation.
You can teach most people basic economics if they want to learn, my problem is not they can't follow all this, but no one wants to. That is how and why it is still happening. I actually believe just my single article (with maybe a page of the economics of market manipulation based on the structure of the mafia) is enough to show everyone that their governments are working for the same ends, pretty much the opposite of what they say they are doing, and as working on a majority vote the few honest dissenters are always cancelled out. So you don't need everyone to be dishonest, just those with the power to make policy. And people can't say they haven't noticed it now. Energy prices across the board have more than doubled regardless of wholesale prices. And if they manage to get VAT on food then everyone will pay 20% more for it overnight. That will drop Britain a good few places on the richest country list instantly as the power of the same income will be reduced accordingly so we will be drifting towards Poland and once the petrol taxes come in again in August maybe the Poles will start leaving and British people will head there to work instead. It's all relative and Britain is getting relatively poorer.
Some economic disasters are unavoidable, oil shortages, strikes and the like. But low interest rates and high taxes are not out of control outside events, they are policies. The same policies which caused he crash the last time and unchanged since. Who can spend your money better, you or the government? And they can't even spend it on railways and water pipes now as they don't own them. So besides the NHS and benefit payments, a huge amount of government spending vanished when they sold off the public services. And why train and bus fares are now the highest in the world. Those two alone should tell people all they need to know, but the Post Office will follow when they find a way to do it, and Air Traffic Control if they didn't do that already and I missed it. So basically we have the lightning strike, the act of god, and then the flood, and the differences are whether or not you can be insured for them as to the consequences. But the low interest rates and travel taxes are not acts of god, but had David Icke been right acts of the devil. Someone has chosen to impose these austerity measures on us all and actually make the vast majority of the population poorer. Of course the kickbacks to energy companies and EU mafiosi mop this excess cash up continuously, and like a tapeworm continue to collect a portion of our wealth and for all I know may even cause segments to come out in our shit. But these are all concrete planned methods to cause a worse economic problem for nearly everyone when they don't have to.
All prices are driven up by fuel costs so the money the government gain in the short term is lost in the long term as people simply have less to spend and the retailers net less overall as more has gone on energy. They then have to lay people off so more claim benefits and don't buy things and it just feeds on itself like cancer. House prices go up as interest rates are so low, so mean people spend more on them anyway as the principal is higher before the interest is added. O level maths, maybe even primary school if my own experience is anything to go by. If you add the sale price and total interest paid over the 25 years or whatever then a graph used by all mortgage brokers shows you the comparison between higher prices and lower interest rates. But when you come to buy it becomes obvious. And over 25 years throughout history interest rates pretty well even out from high to low, and probably still will over the same period ahead. But the selling price is fixed the day you buy it, and you pay interest on that so if it's higher then the total interest will be higher regardless of rates as it's 5% of a higher number for the term of the mortgage. Obvious when pointed out but missed by the wallies who spend £250,000 on a house at 5% when they may well not be able to cope when it hits 7% let alone 12. If they spent £200,000 at 7% or so they would pay more for the first few years, and then less and less as it is only a percentage of 200,000 and is just as likely to go down in the future whereas if you buy when low can only pay more ahead.
Governments know exactly who gains and loses from their policies, and as well as using fuel everyone has to live somewhere. So put house prices up even more by lowering interest rates then people will all be poorer. Except those who buy and sell them for a living. So 100% of people live somewhere, less those on the streets and the like, while a few percent are property developers or estate agents, who get a percentage for selling whether high or low, and valuers. So utilitarianism (benefitting the most people overall) is not part of modern politics. High house prices help a few groups of business people. High fuel prices help even fewer as the energy companies still have to buy everything affected by inflation including their own fuel. Only the top executives make so much they clear a massive profit, plus the oil sheiks, while everyone else can't. So high fuel prices hurt more people than any other policy, yet is the greatest source of revenue for the British government and increasing annually. It's just a shame maybe 100 people will read this hear than a million or more in a newspaper. I am ready.
The whole affair is pretty well dictated by UN Agenda 21, dressed up for the environment but containing the mechanisms to bring down everyone's standard of living, and the population, while redistributing their wealth to the leaders and their friends and associates. This is now well into its stride and after the energy taxes we've been paying now for years (petrol would be 82p a litre without them for example, not 1.32p) food had to be next as if you keep them hungry and poor you can pretty well carry out anything else you like as they will be too weak and busy surviving to stop you.
I don't think it's ever too late to stop them. At the moment 99.9% of people aren't aware of these plans, and most who are reject them as a conspiracy. Our fuel taxes and renewable subsidies aren't a conspiracy, they're the 2008 Climate Change Act. VAT on food isn't a subsidy, it is an EU working document. A world currency is not a conspiracy, the plans are already drawn up by the UN. All this is already going through while people still worry about which Miliband brother should lead Labour. I don't want to get myself targeted, but that's a bit like worrying which pile of dog poop you want to tread in. Enough said. So while everyone's busy reading what the papers do want us to know and watching ice melt all day on the BBC (if you channel hop it's virtually possible 24/7) the plans are already some way to controlling us all not from the EU but the UN itself.
I have written a single article on this, virtually everything I say and a lot more is included, and not a single publication has touched it. I doubt all but one who asked to see it (and took no notice when it did) have even bothered to look as they must get heaps of this sort of stuff and only publish what their staff and their friends write, and see no need to write further on related topics as the direct plan to invent a problem of man made warming to create a world tax and currency pretty well covers all the smaller areas in itself. The banks being fed almost free money despite losing it all last time continues to sap the world's economy and prevent any recovery as they can still manipulate the market with ghost bids, short sell commodities they can't deliver if lost, lend five times more than the standard amount they should hold in deposits despite risking default if enough people cash their accounts, do not have to separate customers' money and their own for trading purposes, can still sell mortgages of 100%, etc etc., all held up by interest rates 5% below the market requirement, which mean anyone who has worked for decades can no longer pay all their bills on retirement as investments can't guarantee more than a few percent, well under inflation.
You can teach most people basic economics if they want to learn, my problem is not they can't follow all this, but no one wants to. That is how and why it is still happening. I actually believe just my single article (with maybe a page of the economics of market manipulation based on the structure of the mafia) is enough to show everyone that their governments are working for the same ends, pretty much the opposite of what they say they are doing, and as working on a majority vote the few honest dissenters are always cancelled out. So you don't need everyone to be dishonest, just those with the power to make policy. And people can't say they haven't noticed it now. Energy prices across the board have more than doubled regardless of wholesale prices. And if they manage to get VAT on food then everyone will pay 20% more for it overnight. That will drop Britain a good few places on the richest country list instantly as the power of the same income will be reduced accordingly so we will be drifting towards Poland and once the petrol taxes come in again in August maybe the Poles will start leaving and British people will head there to work instead. It's all relative and Britain is getting relatively poorer.
Some economic disasters are unavoidable, oil shortages, strikes and the like. But low interest rates and high taxes are not out of control outside events, they are policies. The same policies which caused he crash the last time and unchanged since. Who can spend your money better, you or the government? And they can't even spend it on railways and water pipes now as they don't own them. So besides the NHS and benefit payments, a huge amount of government spending vanished when they sold off the public services. And why train and bus fares are now the highest in the world. Those two alone should tell people all they need to know, but the Post Office will follow when they find a way to do it, and Air Traffic Control if they didn't do that already and I missed it. So basically we have the lightning strike, the act of god, and then the flood, and the differences are whether or not you can be insured for them as to the consequences. But the low interest rates and travel taxes are not acts of god, but had David Icke been right acts of the devil. Someone has chosen to impose these austerity measures on us all and actually make the vast majority of the population poorer. Of course the kickbacks to energy companies and EU mafiosi mop this excess cash up continuously, and like a tapeworm continue to collect a portion of our wealth and for all I know may even cause segments to come out in our shit. But these are all concrete planned methods to cause a worse economic problem for nearly everyone when they don't have to.
All prices are driven up by fuel costs so the money the government gain in the short term is lost in the long term as people simply have less to spend and the retailers net less overall as more has gone on energy. They then have to lay people off so more claim benefits and don't buy things and it just feeds on itself like cancer. House prices go up as interest rates are so low, so mean people spend more on them anyway as the principal is higher before the interest is added. O level maths, maybe even primary school if my own experience is anything to go by. If you add the sale price and total interest paid over the 25 years or whatever then a graph used by all mortgage brokers shows you the comparison between higher prices and lower interest rates. But when you come to buy it becomes obvious. And over 25 years throughout history interest rates pretty well even out from high to low, and probably still will over the same period ahead. But the selling price is fixed the day you buy it, and you pay interest on that so if it's higher then the total interest will be higher regardless of rates as it's 5% of a higher number for the term of the mortgage. Obvious when pointed out but missed by the wallies who spend £250,000 on a house at 5% when they may well not be able to cope when it hits 7% let alone 12. If they spent £200,000 at 7% or so they would pay more for the first few years, and then less and less as it is only a percentage of 200,000 and is just as likely to go down in the future whereas if you buy when low can only pay more ahead.
Governments know exactly who gains and loses from their policies, and as well as using fuel everyone has to live somewhere. So put house prices up even more by lowering interest rates then people will all be poorer. Except those who buy and sell them for a living. So 100% of people live somewhere, less those on the streets and the like, while a few percent are property developers or estate agents, who get a percentage for selling whether high or low, and valuers. So utilitarianism (benefitting the most people overall) is not part of modern politics. High house prices help a few groups of business people. High fuel prices help even fewer as the energy companies still have to buy everything affected by inflation including their own fuel. Only the top executives make so much they clear a massive profit, plus the oil sheiks, while everyone else can't. So high fuel prices hurt more people than any other policy, yet is the greatest source of revenue for the British government and increasing annually. It's just a shame maybe 100 people will read this hear than a million or more in a newspaper. I am ready.
Tuesday, January 03, 2012
Political correctness my arse
While I sit here the radio has police saying certain departments don't have enough diversity, and the presenter calling a London suburb a racist area.
English and logic seem to have left the entire country nowadays. Firstly, diversity is not a virtue, quality is. You don't want a random mixture of anything, but the best, or at least what you want. If you buy a box of strawberry creams and they throw in a few truffles that's diversity. It's not what you want but what they authorities tell you you should have. The Soviet bloc has broken up and being replaced by Europe. As for calling a racist area, then if Eltham is racist, Putney is musical, Finchley is depressed, Wembley is creative and Peckham is sporting. What utter total nonsense. An area is a plot of land inhabited by people of similar economic and partially cultural groups. But not racists. Can you imagine the estate agent's ads? House for sale in Eltham, membership of the BNP recommended, whites only? For god's sake, as every year passes I see the sanity of the people deteriorate. If people were stronger the governments wouldn't be able to force this junk on us.
English and logic seem to have left the entire country nowadays. Firstly, diversity is not a virtue, quality is. You don't want a random mixture of anything, but the best, or at least what you want. If you buy a box of strawberry creams and they throw in a few truffles that's diversity. It's not what you want but what they authorities tell you you should have. The Soviet bloc has broken up and being replaced by Europe. As for calling a racist area, then if Eltham is racist, Putney is musical, Finchley is depressed, Wembley is creative and Peckham is sporting. What utter total nonsense. An area is a plot of land inhabited by people of similar economic and partially cultural groups. But not racists. Can you imagine the estate agent's ads? House for sale in Eltham, membership of the BNP recommended, whites only? For god's sake, as every year passes I see the sanity of the people deteriorate. If people were stronger the governments wouldn't be able to force this junk on us.
Monday, January 02, 2012
Why the US president is not fit for his position
The unfaithful husband principle, or why Barack Obama cannot ever be trusted.
The principle goes once someone has broken your trust, whether by unfaithfulness, stealing or violence, they are usually like that generally and would do it again more likely than not.
Just after becoming elected he made CO2 a pollutant. The dictionary definition is 'A noxious substance which has found its way into the environment and needs to be removed'.
Therefore, Barack Obama, a lawyer who learned definitions in his first year of college, has just lied to you. If CO2 was a pollutant we'd want to remove it entirely from the atmosphere which by his own definition is the only end for all pollution. There are no degrees or levels of pollutant, it is an absolute term, much like pregnancy. He further dismisses the carbon cycle and the fact if we don't breathe a certain amount we'd die as fast as we would without oxygen.
He doesn't stop there, they never do. He also refers to nuclear radiation as 'clean energy', but would not visit Fukushima to demonstrate how clean it was when he had the opportunity.
------------------------------
Regardless of your belief in climate change or otherwise, Barack Obama is a liar on at least these two occasions. He has openly stated falsehoods and as a result should never be trusted on any issue whatsoever as he is a simple cheat.
The principle goes once someone has broken your trust, whether by unfaithfulness, stealing or violence, they are usually like that generally and would do it again more likely than not.
Just after becoming elected he made CO2 a pollutant. The dictionary definition is 'A noxious substance which has found its way into the environment and needs to be removed'.
Therefore, Barack Obama, a lawyer who learned definitions in his first year of college, has just lied to you. If CO2 was a pollutant we'd want to remove it entirely from the atmosphere which by his own definition is the only end for all pollution. There are no degrees or levels of pollutant, it is an absolute term, much like pregnancy. He further dismisses the carbon cycle and the fact if we don't breathe a certain amount we'd die as fast as we would without oxygen.
He doesn't stop there, they never do. He also refers to nuclear radiation as 'clean energy', but would not visit Fukushima to demonstrate how clean it was when he had the opportunity.
------------------------------
Regardless of your belief in climate change or otherwise, Barack Obama is a liar on at least these two occasions. He has openly stated falsehoods and as a result should never be trusted on any issue whatsoever as he is a simple cheat.
2011 roundup
Having thought of what I did last year basically it was my photo project, taking new photos for the mapping site as far and wide as possible. That was enough really in itself as got me to many places old and new I hadn't seen for ages where I had. I got a good number of old road signs as well, mainly found by other people or come across completely by chance. The news and politics slightly improved, with our Tory government finally doing something you'd expect from the party, vetoing the new EU treaty and attempting to halve solar panel subsidies but stopped from doing so in court. But at least they have begun some real changes from the London borough of Haringey style government we'd had for almost as long as I remember. That celebrates wrongness and is terrified of all personal freedom as being collectivist individual freedoms threaten the collective, make some people richer than others, and lets them spread information that could break individuals from the soviet style ranks. It's a very small step towards freedom and can only hope this year circumstances force greater changes as none will be made voluntarily.
Of course a year is only a number so can't assess anything on arbitrary criteria, but otherwise I seem to have been busier than I have for years, mainly as more of my energy is coming back, and if nothing else have started going out for tea and the odd cafe with friends again which was something I always used to, only avoiding restaurants, as I like to eat when I sit down and not approaching the next day. If I want to eat I don't intend to spend an unmeasurable time talking to people and then receive the meal at a random range of 5 minutes (Chinese restaurant, Surbiton) to 2 hours (Greek restaurant, Mill Hill, 18th birthday). Having a meal lottery to me is pretty much like being a hostage, and besides the Turkish places where they make it in front of you almost as soon as you order the others remain only acceptable if self service. I never liked pubs as it was like sitting in a working class person's lounge with the whole of the street turning up. Why would I want to do that? Now the handful of decent places near me are all blocks of flats or derelict/vacant lots, and the others which were just tolerable or not that local have become restaurants with a tiny pub area tucked away and prices three times higher than before. Waste of time there as well then.
Looking ahead, as I've pretty well exhausted behind, there is no specific plan or expectation ahead, I will keep writing, as one article was published in 2010 I know it can be done, and wrote a heap last year but no more success as yet. My prediction (based on the fact the whole thing has been planned from start to finish) is the Euro will be kept alive at all costs, as the EU can write the law to suit them and collect money in the same way. The value will fall as will cause greater inflation, but they don't care as long as they can still rule us without an election (who runs Greece and Italy now? EU bureacrats, the Greek leader and the entire Italian cabinet. One or two more to follow won't surprise me either, maybe Portugal and Spain when their debts keep growing. I have learnt enough about politics now to be able to see the big picture, and it's basically money moving around from taxes to the bankers and their friends, national laws being overridden by EU and UN regulations, and a small group of individuals making the same policies in all the countries who hold influence. No coincidence they've all chosen left wing Keynesian inflationary economics, low interest rates and devalued currency, regardless of the governments, as banks can borrow at almost zero and then gamble millions on a deal that makes a few thousand, but still higher than the interest they paid to borrow the money. Do that every day and you get an awful lot over a year.
Climategate 2 was the highlight of the year though, after the new IPCC report doubled the levels of uncertainty in the climate the big guns arrived and unlike the first had complete conversations about the inadequacy of modelling and how to hide information that didn't fit 'the cause'. Every other issue dealt with in this way would have produced a state investigation and suspension for all involved, but as this was carried out on behalf of the states who ordered the work to be done, they can't prosecute themselves. So nothing happened, but the world can now see clearly how little confidence the scientists really have in their data, as they are paid to produce it, not to believe it. And if that's how they run guess how all the other areas do. If nothing else the global warming machine has allowed me the material to learn and understand the big picture, a world mafia with an international secret committee and national branches plus the EU which is rooted and branched with the actual mafia itself and run the identical way. People who haven't worked it out don't want to know so pretty well can only learn for myself and let the facts come out on their own, as only facts can come out from under covers, not anything else.
My main daily blog is now on another site as blogger has pretty well dried up in the last couple of years. I had 50 hits a day when I first got the counter, now I'm lucky to get 10, most people I followed stopped posting and only had one person making comments this year from what I can remember. But as long as people still do visit I'll keep writing, and as this is my site I can say what I like unlike the other one. It's still a long way off but America will be having its IQ test later this year, Obama has managed to drag the country half way to the third world and as it has what I'd consider the most informed voters in the world and greatest freedom how could they vote for socialism? "Energy prices will be higher" he said on arrival, and he delivered. Who would announce and admit that before it happened? Most politicians intent on price rises would lie and then apologise profusely for world conditions (like Gordon Brown did) when it all went tits up. He actually said he was going to do it! Then he made CO2 a pollutant, dictionary definition 'a noxious substance in an unwanted place that ought to be removed', so go ahead Yannick, try and remove all the nasty CO2, it would kill everything except a few bacteria but at least the planet will be clean. To end the entry all I can say is 'What a cunt'.
Of course a year is only a number so can't assess anything on arbitrary criteria, but otherwise I seem to have been busier than I have for years, mainly as more of my energy is coming back, and if nothing else have started going out for tea and the odd cafe with friends again which was something I always used to, only avoiding restaurants, as I like to eat when I sit down and not approaching the next day. If I want to eat I don't intend to spend an unmeasurable time talking to people and then receive the meal at a random range of 5 minutes (Chinese restaurant, Surbiton) to 2 hours (Greek restaurant, Mill Hill, 18th birthday). Having a meal lottery to me is pretty much like being a hostage, and besides the Turkish places where they make it in front of you almost as soon as you order the others remain only acceptable if self service. I never liked pubs as it was like sitting in a working class person's lounge with the whole of the street turning up. Why would I want to do that? Now the handful of decent places near me are all blocks of flats or derelict/vacant lots, and the others which were just tolerable or not that local have become restaurants with a tiny pub area tucked away and prices three times higher than before. Waste of time there as well then.
Looking ahead, as I've pretty well exhausted behind, there is no specific plan or expectation ahead, I will keep writing, as one article was published in 2010 I know it can be done, and wrote a heap last year but no more success as yet. My prediction (based on the fact the whole thing has been planned from start to finish) is the Euro will be kept alive at all costs, as the EU can write the law to suit them and collect money in the same way. The value will fall as will cause greater inflation, but they don't care as long as they can still rule us without an election (who runs Greece and Italy now? EU bureacrats, the Greek leader and the entire Italian cabinet. One or two more to follow won't surprise me either, maybe Portugal and Spain when their debts keep growing. I have learnt enough about politics now to be able to see the big picture, and it's basically money moving around from taxes to the bankers and their friends, national laws being overridden by EU and UN regulations, and a small group of individuals making the same policies in all the countries who hold influence. No coincidence they've all chosen left wing Keynesian inflationary economics, low interest rates and devalued currency, regardless of the governments, as banks can borrow at almost zero and then gamble millions on a deal that makes a few thousand, but still higher than the interest they paid to borrow the money. Do that every day and you get an awful lot over a year.
Climategate 2 was the highlight of the year though, after the new IPCC report doubled the levels of uncertainty in the climate the big guns arrived and unlike the first had complete conversations about the inadequacy of modelling and how to hide information that didn't fit 'the cause'. Every other issue dealt with in this way would have produced a state investigation and suspension for all involved, but as this was carried out on behalf of the states who ordered the work to be done, they can't prosecute themselves. So nothing happened, but the world can now see clearly how little confidence the scientists really have in their data, as they are paid to produce it, not to believe it. And if that's how they run guess how all the other areas do. If nothing else the global warming machine has allowed me the material to learn and understand the big picture, a world mafia with an international secret committee and national branches plus the EU which is rooted and branched with the actual mafia itself and run the identical way. People who haven't worked it out don't want to know so pretty well can only learn for myself and let the facts come out on their own, as only facts can come out from under covers, not anything else.
My main daily blog is now on another site as blogger has pretty well dried up in the last couple of years. I had 50 hits a day when I first got the counter, now I'm lucky to get 10, most people I followed stopped posting and only had one person making comments this year from what I can remember. But as long as people still do visit I'll keep writing, and as this is my site I can say what I like unlike the other one. It's still a long way off but America will be having its IQ test later this year, Obama has managed to drag the country half way to the third world and as it has what I'd consider the most informed voters in the world and greatest freedom how could they vote for socialism? "Energy prices will be higher" he said on arrival, and he delivered. Who would announce and admit that before it happened? Most politicians intent on price rises would lie and then apologise profusely for world conditions (like Gordon Brown did) when it all went tits up. He actually said he was going to do it! Then he made CO2 a pollutant, dictionary definition 'a noxious substance in an unwanted place that ought to be removed', so go ahead Yannick, try and remove all the nasty CO2, it would kill everything except a few bacteria but at least the planet will be clean. To end the entry all I can say is 'What a cunt'.
Friday, December 30, 2011
Beginner's summary on global warming
Someone just asked about whether climate change was man made or natural, and as requested I provided a short summary based on the latest data, which I think everyone should copy and paste for future times when the same question is asked:
----------------------------------------
There are two single figures here which were used. First the sharp rise in CO2, albeit not from known sources as since discovered by Japan's Ibuki satellite. The jury's still technically out on that one. Secondly, if you didn't check behind it, a slight rise in temperatures for the same 150 year period.
After that it is literally all down to interpretation. Using logical methods rather than scientific (although the two should be the same they are not always) what would we say about the changes, from the temperature to the ice and sea levels, had CO2 not risen:
Temperature rise: 0.8C in 150 years
Sea level rise: 10 inches a century
Global ice level: Stable, although totally unbalanced from north (warmer) to south (colder).
Compare those with historical charts going back thousands of years, and you will see minus the red herring of CO2 figures they look almost flat, and definitely relatively stable. These figures have swung wildly by a few degrees a decade and up to 100 feet of sea level a century after an ice age, while remove the error bars and today's changes almost vanish altogether.
Therefore, like always, people have looked at the birdie and not the sniper pointing his gun or the pot of gold in front of you. The attention has always focused on the definitely unusual but clearly harmless (a 50% rise in 150 years has produced the above figures, and physics says a 100% rise would produce a 1C rise with no positive feedback, their trump card). However, observation and deduction are keystones of physics. We observe an experiment, one here which is well within a primary school science level of understanding, and say "If CO2 adds a degree to the average temperature by doubling without positive feedback, and the experiment is half run and it has added about half a degree, what do you expect the second half to show?"
I'll conclude my presentation here so as not to muddy the water with what are no more than background figures behind the main picture I have given.
----------------------------------------
There are two single figures here which were used. First the sharp rise in CO2, albeit not from known sources as since discovered by Japan's Ibuki satellite. The jury's still technically out on that one. Secondly, if you didn't check behind it, a slight rise in temperatures for the same 150 year period.
After that it is literally all down to interpretation. Using logical methods rather than scientific (although the two should be the same they are not always) what would we say about the changes, from the temperature to the ice and sea levels, had CO2 not risen:
Temperature rise: 0.8C in 150 years
Sea level rise: 10 inches a century
Global ice level: Stable, although totally unbalanced from north (warmer) to south (colder).
Compare those with historical charts going back thousands of years, and you will see minus the red herring of CO2 figures they look almost flat, and definitely relatively stable. These figures have swung wildly by a few degrees a decade and up to 100 feet of sea level a century after an ice age, while remove the error bars and today's changes almost vanish altogether.
Therefore, like always, people have looked at the birdie and not the sniper pointing his gun or the pot of gold in front of you. The attention has always focused on the definitely unusual but clearly harmless (a 50% rise in 150 years has produced the above figures, and physics says a 100% rise would produce a 1C rise with no positive feedback, their trump card). However, observation and deduction are keystones of physics. We observe an experiment, one here which is well within a primary school science level of understanding, and say "If CO2 adds a degree to the average temperature by doubling without positive feedback, and the experiment is half run and it has added about half a degree, what do you expect the second half to show?"
I'll conclude my presentation here so as not to muddy the water with what are no more than background figures behind the main picture I have given.
Thursday, December 29, 2011
Beating the new world order
Knowledge of the way they do their tricks is the only real power the people have over magicians. These do not really print more money, they just devalue what they have and know most people think there's more. In fact commodities and resources are measured daily by organisations worldwide to set prices, and are incredibly price sensitive. If supply goes down the price goes up, and if cash goes down the price goes up as you need a certain number of calories a day for life, but the cost of them will change from week to week. Therefore the true value lies in the constants with actual physical functions and benefits.
In Britain they pretend renewable power works. They apply the same trick to firstly tax fossil fuel till it's a lot closer to wind and solar, then subsidise renewables with the money they've taken from fossil, and Chris Huhne lies to millions on TV and says they now cost almost the same. Now if you own Persil and buy Omo and Daz, and then own all three, then any price changes can be evened out and you still get it all, and the same amount. If Omo can wash 10 shirts and Daz can wash 100, if you just buy both companies and prefer to sell Omo as the profits are far higher, you just fix the market and hope people don't notice.
The trouble is people are like alcoholics. They rarely wake up till it's too late and they are in such deep trouble they may die. When the idiots paying the price of a car for a solar panel can't heat their houses a few years down the line they'll wake up one day and realise they've been had. I could see it before they even called the bank to make a loan, and before the salesmen even knocked on their door, but all they could see was the promise of 'free energy'. Now the word 'free' is an absolute term, like 'pregnant'. It is not subject to qualifications, something is free or not. Solar power is a very clear set of figures. You spend a lot up front, and due to government subsidies, if you go away during the spring or summer, they will pay 10 times over the market price for the power you generate and are not there to use.
Otherwise you both have already paid, and are then paying maintenance costs and actually discover that the percentage of your total household energy a panel produces (I must check the new figures now) is under 10%. The only free option is simply because someone else pays for you, if the company use your house as a site and collect all the power profits it generates. So technically it still isn't free as someone else has paid for you hoping they can make a profit.
I use solar power as one of the clearest examples where the knowledge is already out there but cannot explain this to a single person who is blinded by fear of the climate. Unfortunately we don't have the time to wait for these weak minds to climax, as the majority of the civilised world will be broke long before enough of them have their personal epiphanies. If there was such a thing it really would be time for divine intervention. I hadn't even reached world tax and government yet.
I write these as source materials for everyone. I have been slowly putting these together for years and now is the time we all need to be fully informed. Copy, paste and share!
In Britain they pretend renewable power works. They apply the same trick to firstly tax fossil fuel till it's a lot closer to wind and solar, then subsidise renewables with the money they've taken from fossil, and Chris Huhne lies to millions on TV and says they now cost almost the same. Now if you own Persil and buy Omo and Daz, and then own all three, then any price changes can be evened out and you still get it all, and the same amount. If Omo can wash 10 shirts and Daz can wash 100, if you just buy both companies and prefer to sell Omo as the profits are far higher, you just fix the market and hope people don't notice.
The trouble is people are like alcoholics. They rarely wake up till it's too late and they are in such deep trouble they may die. When the idiots paying the price of a car for a solar panel can't heat their houses a few years down the line they'll wake up one day and realise they've been had. I could see it before they even called the bank to make a loan, and before the salesmen even knocked on their door, but all they could see was the promise of 'free energy'. Now the word 'free' is an absolute term, like 'pregnant'. It is not subject to qualifications, something is free or not. Solar power is a very clear set of figures. You spend a lot up front, and due to government subsidies, if you go away during the spring or summer, they will pay 10 times over the market price for the power you generate and are not there to use.
Otherwise you both have already paid, and are then paying maintenance costs and actually discover that the percentage of your total household energy a panel produces (I must check the new figures now) is under 10%. The only free option is simply because someone else pays for you, if the company use your house as a site and collect all the power profits it generates. So technically it still isn't free as someone else has paid for you hoping they can make a profit.
I use solar power as one of the clearest examples where the knowledge is already out there but cannot explain this to a single person who is blinded by fear of the climate. Unfortunately we don't have the time to wait for these weak minds to climax, as the majority of the civilised world will be broke long before enough of them have their personal epiphanies. If there was such a thing it really would be time for divine intervention. I hadn't even reached world tax and government yet.
I write these as source materials for everyone. I have been slowly putting these together for years and now is the time we all need to be fully informed. Copy, paste and share!
Thursday, December 22, 2011
What the satguru means and how to find it
How to find the satguru.
The satguru is your inner wisdom, the source of intuition and all knowledge. We are all in touch with it at times, but do not usually know it or trust it. The easiest way to find it directly is to read or listen to a number of spiritual teachers on the same subject. You will find the more you hear the more they disagree and teach different things about the path to enlightenment. Of course they can't all be right, and all are equally qualified, so rather than give up what do you do? Ask yourself which one feels and seems right. When you get the answer it was not by logic or evidence as all the knowledge was unknown to you. But you were still able to pick the best one.
Once found, keep using it for every situation you need it in. It will get better and more frequent information, and may tell you thinks you had no way of learning directly which turn out to be exactly correct. There is little point ever trying to convince others of what this has told you as it is the highest form of knowledge and only for your own benefit and to advise others without them needing to know how you found out about it.
If we could all learn to do this we'd never vote for the wrong people or trust ones who are dangerous, and gradually as a result they would lose their power. I have used it for most of my life. It doesn't require asking, it comes to me. Once you recognise the feeling, which is quite different from every others as a calm certainty, you know when it is working. I have picked up criminals, liars, scams, impending disasters etc more and more all my life, and at times is almost enough evidence physically around to at least demonstrate it to others as a possibility. But unlike the satguru they can never be certain unless they see it proved. But then it is always too late as they have trusted the wrong people and couldn't risk letting them go in case I was wrong. Therefore each person has to develop their own satguru as you can't expect to rely on someone else's.
The satguru is your inner wisdom, the source of intuition and all knowledge. We are all in touch with it at times, but do not usually know it or trust it. The easiest way to find it directly is to read or listen to a number of spiritual teachers on the same subject. You will find the more you hear the more they disagree and teach different things about the path to enlightenment. Of course they can't all be right, and all are equally qualified, so rather than give up what do you do? Ask yourself which one feels and seems right. When you get the answer it was not by logic or evidence as all the knowledge was unknown to you. But you were still able to pick the best one.
Once found, keep using it for every situation you need it in. It will get better and more frequent information, and may tell you thinks you had no way of learning directly which turn out to be exactly correct. There is little point ever trying to convince others of what this has told you as it is the highest form of knowledge and only for your own benefit and to advise others without them needing to know how you found out about it.
If we could all learn to do this we'd never vote for the wrong people or trust ones who are dangerous, and gradually as a result they would lose their power. I have used it for most of my life. It doesn't require asking, it comes to me. Once you recognise the feeling, which is quite different from every others as a calm certainty, you know when it is working. I have picked up criminals, liars, scams, impending disasters etc more and more all my life, and at times is almost enough evidence physically around to at least demonstrate it to others as a possibility. But unlike the satguru they can never be certain unless they see it proved. But then it is always too late as they have trusted the wrong people and couldn't risk letting them go in case I was wrong. Therefore each person has to develop their own satguru as you can't expect to rely on someone else's.
Wednesday, December 21, 2011
The amateur professional
I've been able to become far more educated since getting the internet, and basically like having access to all the libraries in the world, and being able to learn far more in the subjects of interest indefinitely. And believe me, I can show quite definitively that no one needs to be qualified in most areas to follow any of them, they just wouldn't be employed in them. But 100 plus years ago it was different. Few professionals studied at college but did articles or apprenticeships. They watched the existing professionals and gradually allowed to try more and more themselves until the time was up and they qualified. Not an element of examination as far as I know. But they carried on, in fact professions like accountancy, dentistry and medicine were practiced by many people possibly into living memory if learnt early enough.
So the point is there is more than one way to learn a subject, and if anyone with a little help now and then wants to teach themselves then the actual reliance comes from the source material plus the possibility of a mentor to explain problems directly. You may not be able to become a professional directly but can guarantee you will be able to understand a good deal of what they say. That is like an amateur version, not qualified or able to practice, but fully able to follow the work and carry out some of the basics, a bit like Patrick Moore, considered one of the greatest astronomers of the time, and totally unqualified. He even became the president of the British Astronomical Association, hardly a soft profession either.
Climate is pretty much on a par. Like driving a car we don't need to know the details under the bonnet besides self preservation for breakdowns, but know what all the buttons do. You don't need to know the bios level to operate a computer when it goes wrong to do many fixes, it's just the programming levels few people can do without proper training. Climate does not need an ability to do the equations required, just to understand the results. They are free to produce the data and work out where the atmosphere collects certain gases, how much heat they react to (they don't hold it in, they heat up and absorb it temporarily) and why our planet is 33C above the temperature of space solely due to the sun's heat. Now even a primary school pupil can follow if you introduce a gas into the atmosphere at a few hundred parts per million then unless it has almost explosive properties (compare to methane which is one of the most absorbent gases to rising heat from the surface) as the existing qualities are known then adding a little more is a massive median point of what a reasonable person would expect to happen, 11 year olds included.
11 year olds can still keep up, as it's easy to see through tricks at that age as you don't tend to trust others as much as haven't developed such a mystical view of professionals and much happier to trust their own judgement. So if professor sir doctor Albert Gore (dammit, he's not a scientist!) tells you unlike the first 260ppm the second will raise the water from the ocean and form a warm blanket to melt the atmosphere and kill all the bears many children and adults will cautiously say (or should) well it hasn't happened before, why don't we wait and see. That is not just the reasonable conclusion, but the only scientific one.
I would invite 7 and 8 year olds to the party now. IF you increase the CO2 by 50% and temperature then rises by under a degree, then what is the conclusion? I'll hand that over to the audience.
So the point is there is more than one way to learn a subject, and if anyone with a little help now and then wants to teach themselves then the actual reliance comes from the source material plus the possibility of a mentor to explain problems directly. You may not be able to become a professional directly but can guarantee you will be able to understand a good deal of what they say. That is like an amateur version, not qualified or able to practice, but fully able to follow the work and carry out some of the basics, a bit like Patrick Moore, considered one of the greatest astronomers of the time, and totally unqualified. He even became the president of the British Astronomical Association, hardly a soft profession either.
Climate is pretty much on a par. Like driving a car we don't need to know the details under the bonnet besides self preservation for breakdowns, but know what all the buttons do. You don't need to know the bios level to operate a computer when it goes wrong to do many fixes, it's just the programming levels few people can do without proper training. Climate does not need an ability to do the equations required, just to understand the results. They are free to produce the data and work out where the atmosphere collects certain gases, how much heat they react to (they don't hold it in, they heat up and absorb it temporarily) and why our planet is 33C above the temperature of space solely due to the sun's heat. Now even a primary school pupil can follow if you introduce a gas into the atmosphere at a few hundred parts per million then unless it has almost explosive properties (compare to methane which is one of the most absorbent gases to rising heat from the surface) as the existing qualities are known then adding a little more is a massive median point of what a reasonable person would expect to happen, 11 year olds included.
11 year olds can still keep up, as it's easy to see through tricks at that age as you don't tend to trust others as much as haven't developed such a mystical view of professionals and much happier to trust their own judgement. So if professor sir doctor Albert Gore (dammit, he's not a scientist!) tells you unlike the first 260ppm the second will raise the water from the ocean and form a warm blanket to melt the atmosphere and kill all the bears many children and adults will cautiously say (or should) well it hasn't happened before, why don't we wait and see. That is not just the reasonable conclusion, but the only scientific one.
I would invite 7 and 8 year olds to the party now. IF you increase the CO2 by 50% and temperature then rises by under a degree, then what is the conclusion? I'll hand that over to the audience.
Sunday, December 18, 2011
The death of climatology
I can now explain why climate change can never become genuine. Measuring the present is science. Measuring the past is science. Measuring a linear track into the future is science. Measuring a complex set of linear interactions is science.
Trying to predict a future complex, non-linear system with countless influences, huge unknowns including massive gaps in temperature coverage, ice thickness, and most of all future feedback on top of the known CO2 effect is not scientific.
By pretending that they can guess the temperatures up to and beyond 100 years, plus the associated sea levels they have abandoned science for superstition. Our world, courtesy of the UN, is now being run by superstition. The sacrifices of current human beings for unborn ones in that imaginary future are the same as the Mayan sacrifices for a good year of crops ahead.
They may fool most people most of the time, but basing an ostensible scientific theory, claiming the status of gravity, heliocentrism and evolution the climatologists have dropped to the level of the Spanish Inquisition except the people see them as heroes saving them from the threat of frying under an identical sun to the one we have today and had yesterday. The time has come to take that trust and reliance away. There is no longer a discipline called climatology, they have deliberately chosen to leave the constraints of science and now no better than mock auctioneers.
The main criteria that need adding include: El Nino, La Nina, the oceanic oscillations over a decade to 30 years or so, plus their strength which of course is different every time and FOLLOWS NO KNOWN PATTERN. Solar rays and sunspot activity (different every cycle) and the distance from the sun which works on about a 100,000 year cycle plus the tilt which also varies over time. Then the geological continental drift and faultline activity which also affects the balance of the climate through shifting the previous figures around and affecting sea level when plates rise and fall. The land is also rising from the melting of the ice age glaciers and is subtracted from total sea level rise as a consequence. Undersea volcanic vents must be taken into account for the oceanic warming they add. You also need to factor in the existing trend, without which it would be impossible to know how much man may or may not have been able to alter it.
Then they have to know the saturation point of added CO2 (the as yet unknown concentration which fills its IR absorption spectrum), the reaction of water vapour to CO2 at all levels of the atmosphere (unexpectedly found to be replaced by it by the Aqua satellite, ie negative feedback effect) and potential cloud seeding effects, the possible reaction (or not) of the Gulf Stream, all delay mechanisms of ice melts to temperature rises, added CO2 dwell time (currently estimated between 3 and 500 years apparently...), oceanic and vegetative uptake (including the effects from added vegetation adding to the uptake), every single jet stream (ie the mechanisms which make it impossible to predict the season ahead by more than 50% certainty), and most of all the potential added water vapour predicted to be released by the oceans to the atmosphere as positive feedback. This is the climate sensitivity which in fact is the sole criterion the IPCC exist and fear additional CO2, but although the whole equation of multiplying CO2 can be done on a primary school level equation of 1C per 260ppm the rest is feedback which as yet has never been seen. By including positive feedback in the models all they have done is create the ending they required. And finally (but not least) they have to imagine the existing trend from the past and both extend that ahead and separate it, in the IPCC's case, from any alleged future man made element. Looking back in history the climate and temperature graphs are not exactly stable, in fact as I stated at the beginning, chaotic as that is their nature. Seeing how they alone project forward, add unknown effects from rising CO2, and then try and subtract one from the other to get an accurate separation between the two (based on at least the above criteria and many more) adds another even greater dimension to the task.
Expecting to take the variables, gaps in data and sheer unknowns (such as CO2/cloud sensitivity alone) and get anything meaningful is one beyond all reason and sense. The IPCC and associated scientists announce through the media and government spokespersons every day how policies must be made to stop these results happening solely based on this list of criteria it doesn't seem so sensible then.
Trying to predict a future complex, non-linear system with countless influences, huge unknowns including massive gaps in temperature coverage, ice thickness, and most of all future feedback on top of the known CO2 effect is not scientific.
By pretending that they can guess the temperatures up to and beyond 100 years, plus the associated sea levels they have abandoned science for superstition. Our world, courtesy of the UN, is now being run by superstition. The sacrifices of current human beings for unborn ones in that imaginary future are the same as the Mayan sacrifices for a good year of crops ahead.
They may fool most people most of the time, but basing an ostensible scientific theory, claiming the status of gravity, heliocentrism and evolution the climatologists have dropped to the level of the Spanish Inquisition except the people see them as heroes saving them from the threat of frying under an identical sun to the one we have today and had yesterday. The time has come to take that trust and reliance away. There is no longer a discipline called climatology, they have deliberately chosen to leave the constraints of science and now no better than mock auctioneers.
The main criteria that need adding include: El Nino, La Nina, the oceanic oscillations over a decade to 30 years or so, plus their strength which of course is different every time and FOLLOWS NO KNOWN PATTERN. Solar rays and sunspot activity (different every cycle) and the distance from the sun which works on about a 100,000 year cycle plus the tilt which also varies over time. Then the geological continental drift and faultline activity which also affects the balance of the climate through shifting the previous figures around and affecting sea level when plates rise and fall. The land is also rising from the melting of the ice age glaciers and is subtracted from total sea level rise as a consequence. Undersea volcanic vents must be taken into account for the oceanic warming they add. You also need to factor in the existing trend, without which it would be impossible to know how much man may or may not have been able to alter it.
Then they have to know the saturation point of added CO2 (the as yet unknown concentration which fills its IR absorption spectrum), the reaction of water vapour to CO2 at all levels of the atmosphere (unexpectedly found to be replaced by it by the Aqua satellite, ie negative feedback effect) and potential cloud seeding effects, the possible reaction (or not) of the Gulf Stream, all delay mechanisms of ice melts to temperature rises, added CO2 dwell time (currently estimated between 3 and 500 years apparently...), oceanic and vegetative uptake (including the effects from added vegetation adding to the uptake), every single jet stream (ie the mechanisms which make it impossible to predict the season ahead by more than 50% certainty), and most of all the potential added water vapour predicted to be released by the oceans to the atmosphere as positive feedback. This is the climate sensitivity which in fact is the sole criterion the IPCC exist and fear additional CO2, but although the whole equation of multiplying CO2 can be done on a primary school level equation of 1C per 260ppm the rest is feedback which as yet has never been seen. By including positive feedback in the models all they have done is create the ending they required. And finally (but not least) they have to imagine the existing trend from the past and both extend that ahead and separate it, in the IPCC's case, from any alleged future man made element. Looking back in history the climate and temperature graphs are not exactly stable, in fact as I stated at the beginning, chaotic as that is their nature. Seeing how they alone project forward, add unknown effects from rising CO2, and then try and subtract one from the other to get an accurate separation between the two (based on at least the above criteria and many more) adds another even greater dimension to the task.
Expecting to take the variables, gaps in data and sheer unknowns (such as CO2/cloud sensitivity alone) and get anything meaningful is one beyond all reason and sense. The IPCC and associated scientists announce through the media and government spokespersons every day how policies must be made to stop these results happening solely based on this list of criteria it doesn't seem so sensible then.
Thursday, December 15, 2011
The myth of big oil opposing climate laws
All the time the soggy wets on the warming side roll out the stock neo-fascist phrase 'well of course this study to dismiss global warming is funded by the fossil fuel industry'. It's simplistic and moronic mindsets like that which allow the thieves to come to our houses while the residents have left the doors open, the keys for their car and the bedroom door to their wives and daughters open with a free pack of condoms ready. Exploitation is cruel and immoral. This is the true situation.
1) There is no such thing as 'big oil'. The accused companies are actually 'energy companies'. They produce and sell power. They do not care how they do it as their sole motive is profit.
2) Therefore Shell, BP, Exxon-Mobil etc will sell as much 'green energy' as they can if it makes them a profit. The fact that these have been promoted (enforced in many countries by law) using tax subsidies guarantees a level of profit above and beyond fossil fuel.
3) Climate policies restrict the use and exploration of fossil fuel. This has one single effect. It raises the price of the reserves. Consumption remains stable as fuel is an essential, and as a result is not sensitive to price rises.
4) Therefore existing gas and oil reserves are now worth way over their market price, ramping up the value of all oil companies' assets for no added effort.
5) Carbon credits made billions for energy companies in the EU as they were given free and sold on the markets, again, for absolutely no added work. If at a future date, they are paid for this all just gets passed onto the consumers as energy is not price sensitive as we would die without it.
6) Knowing 1-5 it comes as no surprise that much of the funding for research to promote the theory of man made warming comes as much from energy companies as activist groups. They know they are not against it even if everyone here does not.
1) There is no such thing as 'big oil'. The accused companies are actually 'energy companies'. They produce and sell power. They do not care how they do it as their sole motive is profit.
2) Therefore Shell, BP, Exxon-Mobil etc will sell as much 'green energy' as they can if it makes them a profit. The fact that these have been promoted (enforced in many countries by law) using tax subsidies guarantees a level of profit above and beyond fossil fuel.
3) Climate policies restrict the use and exploration of fossil fuel. This has one single effect. It raises the price of the reserves. Consumption remains stable as fuel is an essential, and as a result is not sensitive to price rises.
4) Therefore existing gas and oil reserves are now worth way over their market price, ramping up the value of all oil companies' assets for no added effort.
5) Carbon credits made billions for energy companies in the EU as they were given free and sold on the markets, again, for absolutely no added work. If at a future date, they are paid for this all just gets passed onto the consumers as energy is not price sensitive as we would die without it.
6) Knowing 1-5 it comes as no surprise that much of the funding for research to promote the theory of man made warming comes as much from energy companies as activist groups. They know they are not against it even if everyone here does not.
Friday, December 09, 2011
Rome is burning
Meanwhile Rome is figuratively burning, as the future of individual EU countries is about to be signed away tomorrow, with the potential fate of Italy to follow us all by having our governments replaced by unelected EU officials, many from the very banks that wrecked the world economy- three alone are from Goldman Sachs. That's pretty much like allowing the most successful thieves in a country to join the cabinet as in financial terms they are qualified to do the same for the country. That means Nick Leeson could soon become our prime minister if anything happens to Cameron like being offered something better on the continent. He's clearly working for the other side (ie Axis powers) as he's said he's putting the survival of the Euro over all other considerations. As he's in charge no one under him has a single chance to challenge it.
So by the weekend the EU will be run by the Axis, Germany, France (they were not really against the nazis, they were roughly split in practice, the resistance probably evened out by the collaborators from what I've learnt), with Italy swinging sides as usual. Everywhere else will simply do as they're told, with the rules coming from the top whatever government happens to be in charge, pretty much what the last two wars attempted to do unsuccessfully. Germany, to their credit, know how to run a country, and if we were all run the same way would probably have never had a recession. However, in a democracy they would travel the world teaching others how to do the same, much like the better parts of the British Empire, than simply taking us over.
So by the weekend the EU will be run by the Axis, Germany, France (they were not really against the nazis, they were roughly split in practice, the resistance probably evened out by the collaborators from what I've learnt), with Italy swinging sides as usual. Everywhere else will simply do as they're told, with the rules coming from the top whatever government happens to be in charge, pretty much what the last two wars attempted to do unsuccessfully. Germany, to their credit, know how to run a country, and if we were all run the same way would probably have never had a recession. However, in a democracy they would travel the world teaching others how to do the same, much like the better parts of the British Empire, than simply taking us over.
Thursday, December 01, 2011
Seeing through the illusions
It's taken me some time but now realised what I've been doing. I am naturally able to see through much deception, and if not then learn the first time it happens and apply it in the future, there aren't many variations so mopped up the remainder pretty quickly and can now see straight away something is a shit in a velvet jacket, from the wildest African emails many people I know personally who run businesses believed first time, to claims and deals to good to be true, to every single prediction (as they can't be done).
This means I can and should be used as a lens to correct perception for others, as if I see a steaming turd behind a pretty face I expose it every time and tell everyone, and will perform this happily to order. But pride gets in the way and most people have the view that they don't want it to be pointed out as it makes them look stupid as they didn't see it. So with most people having that attitude all I get when I regularly do point out scams is get told off and insulted by everyone who hasn't already worked it out for themselves. As this probably covers about 70% of the population the scammers know this and take full advantage as pointing it out makes no difference and as long as most people believe a lie the others suffer as a result if it affects us all. As I simply work things out one at a time I only really just realised what I was doing, the abuse it actually attracts is because people both can't work it out themselves, and then when explained how its done unless you actually provide signed confessions and following convictions they say I'm making it up. No, they've been fooled, and unless either the authorities or perpetrators admit it directly no messenger can get through.
I've found my position and will now work from the top down, and taking my findings to the media for them to take or leave. They are only interested in a story and if interesting will publish absolutely anything, so my only hope as far as making more people aware of what is being done to them. But it's a natural ability and I'll use it in full knowledge now.
This means I can and should be used as a lens to correct perception for others, as if I see a steaming turd behind a pretty face I expose it every time and tell everyone, and will perform this happily to order. But pride gets in the way and most people have the view that they don't want it to be pointed out as it makes them look stupid as they didn't see it. So with most people having that attitude all I get when I regularly do point out scams is get told off and insulted by everyone who hasn't already worked it out for themselves. As this probably covers about 70% of the population the scammers know this and take full advantage as pointing it out makes no difference and as long as most people believe a lie the others suffer as a result if it affects us all. As I simply work things out one at a time I only really just realised what I was doing, the abuse it actually attracts is because people both can't work it out themselves, and then when explained how its done unless you actually provide signed confessions and following convictions they say I'm making it up. No, they've been fooled, and unless either the authorities or perpetrators admit it directly no messenger can get through.
I've found my position and will now work from the top down, and taking my findings to the media for them to take or leave. They are only interested in a story and if interesting will publish absolutely anything, so my only hope as far as making more people aware of what is being done to them. But it's a natural ability and I'll use it in full knowledge now.
Wednesday, November 09, 2011
Consensus politics
The longer time indoors has ended me spending more time on political research for questions asked online than anything else. I'm learning a lot even if no one new who reads it wants to know. Looking back on my education I do actually use the majority of what I learnt as I do still remember it when required, and whatever the level I stopped at is still extremely useful to me when I need it. Having done a year of accounting before switching to law I also learnt economics, plus sociology as we needed a minor subject for law as well. Constitutional law and jurisprudence join together to find political systems and motivations for law, so as well as my A level could put that all together to pretty well see how vested interests and power connections make the real world policies.
As we are painted as a democracy people vote and think it makes a difference. Over time the common policies grow, so we actually vote on the few differences while getting the same general plans whoever gets in. This is a gradual process much increased since the 60s, and Britain joined when in the Common Market from 1971 onwards, gradually handing over all its main functions. So we vote for very little now, the Tea Party appears to be the sole opposition in the western world currently, as look around and the EU is unified by regulation, Australia and New Zealand follow like sheep, Canada unfortunately seem to miss the radar entirely (but Leonard Cohen gets a lot of material from it if nothing else), and really there's no one else left who isn't either impoverished, totalitarian or both.
Thank goodness nothing stays fixed. However cynical I can't believe that things are stuck forever however powerful vested interests are, but is more a matter of luck to me than people power somehow overturning the corruption at the top levels as people only jump up and shout if corruption is discovered in the X Factor vote, when politicians do it they say 'so what, they always do' and return to their pint. That attitude lets the worst of the worst get in and stay in (I'd name names here but we can all think of plenty) while training their successors. Mafia politics basically and as the internet now allows people to find a few investments of top politicians and their families, you'll see how they change the law to make their pensions grow while they are still working. It's not only third world dictators who do this, they just don't care who knows as they would simply kill anyone who complained. Here it's a lot more subtle but no less criminal.
Sunday, November 06, 2011
Latest EU harmonisation plans
Should the current EU attempt to metricate heartbeat measurements succeed then the next item on the list is music. Bear in mind the trial in Nazi Germany, which successfully reduced the permitted music to Wagner and military marches, this will have a similar effect in eliminating all unnecessary or non-permitted notation and timings from all EU published music.
As a result 4/4 would become 5/5, 6/8 would become 0.75, blue notes would become illegal under EU regulations, and a Europe-wide mission would be set up to rewrite all the classical music to convert it. The scale would be altered from A-G to kilohertz, so not only would you know the note (by association once you learnt the new tables) but which octave it was. 261hz- middle C etc.
So you'd get efforts like Bach's prelude in 466hz, Air on a 392hz string etc, and if the Germans got their way you could have 'Take the 440hz train' as well. I should suggest it to them, it would certainly earn a Nobel Prize if adopted and make billions for the minions changing all the equipment.
As a result 4/4 would become 5/5, 6/8 would become 0.75, blue notes would become illegal under EU regulations, and a Europe-wide mission would be set up to rewrite all the classical music to convert it. The scale would be altered from A-G to kilohertz, so not only would you know the note (by association once you learnt the new tables) but which octave it was. 261hz- middle C etc.
So you'd get efforts like Bach's prelude in 466hz, Air on a 392hz string etc, and if the Germans got their way you could have 'Take the 440hz train' as well. I should suggest it to them, it would certainly earn a Nobel Prize if adopted and make billions for the minions changing all the equipment.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Is Australia still a democracy?
In all democracies there are two simple rules of law. You can neither backdate the law to make innocent people criminals nor bind future governments to make changing a law impossible. This separates the democracies from the dictatorships, and although many democracies include a higher level of law which is entrenched, a constitution, there will always be methods to change this when it proves unjust or incorrect. There may have been attempts in the past to do so around the democratic world, but till now they were no more than a speculative foot in the water which was rapidly removed by one way or another. But today, October the 11th 2011 marks a new stage in western and indeed world democracy.
Today Australia has, as fully expected, voted to introduce a carbon tax. This in itself is quite unremarkable, but looking within the act itself, in ways only lawyers would think to do, it contains clauses which, without going into the legal side, would charge a future government so much to buy back the rights of the individuals handed over to the state by this act it would de facto be virtually impossible to afford. Being on a relatively shaky ground, Julia Gillard has a minority coalition government likely to fall at the slightest push. There was no real mandate for this law, she in fact promised not to introduce it at all (although this is also not unusual for any politician) but relying on the Green party for her position of Prime Minister ended up with no choice. Attempting to entrench this law meant however short her personal or party leadership lasted, one thing which was not going to fall was her essential law.
“The function of independent judges charged to interpret and apply the law is universally recognised as a cardinal feature of the modern democratic state, a cornerstone of the rule of law itself”
- Lord Bingham of Cornhill
Today Australians woke up as normal, heard the law had been passed, most heaved a sigh of reluctant acceptance, and carried on with their daily business. But besides a handful of interested lawyers, none realised they were now living in a de facto dictatorship. Technically binding the future, even if not expressed, is equivalent to cheating and getting top marks if in the future those marks are relied on. Therefore in effect this law has now set the precedent that Australia can and has retrenched its law. Having a single law entrenched is bad enough to lose your democratic status, but as now on the statute book unchallenged and unquestioned, it means it can be repeated ad infinitum should a similar situation and PM choose to do so. The genie is out of the bottle and it will take the knowledge and action of the Australian people to truly put it back and stop such a scandal from ever happening anywhere in the democratic world in the future.
‘under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.’(Dicey, The Law of the Constitution 1885 p39-40)
Additionally, Britain does not have a constitution, although the Magna Carta and Bill of Rights still hold a similar position in their own limited areas, but Australia however does. And as far as a constitution is concerned, the method of breach is not relevant, only the breach itself. Whether a law deliberately or indirectly binds the future is not the point, only whether that is the likely effect, so that will be no defence if attempted in a future challenge to Gillard’s law.
This clause in the Australian constitution alone casts doubt on the binding effect in the face of a future challenge, in fact the carbon tax itself:
"just terms" for the compulsory "acquisition" of property by the Commonwealth (section 51(xxxi))
Again, without going into complex details, this means that by removing the right of Australians to use energy without an additional tax they have, in a roundabout way, breached this section already, as the minutiae of the act uses this method to both legalise and bind the tax itself. As it was the route taken in the relevant clauses to tie up the ownership of the carbon credits then allowing their return would be an almost priceless task. This reflects the similar US fifth amendment:
"nor shall private property be taken ... without just compensation"
Therefore before even using Dicey’s long-accepted principles of democracy, their own constitution implies by removing the rights of companies (and potentially individuals) to their own energy use methods without penalty, they are possibly in prima facie breach of their own constitution without compensation (which of course would negate any profit from the tax’s collection, so effectively negating the Act itself), that is up to interested parties in Australia to pursue as they would any other potentially unconstitutional law. But I would have to search long and hard, as would the combined legal forces of the western world, to find an example where a country has successfully made a new law impossible to overturn. And even if they do then all that would mean is that country (unless it was also Australia) has simply beaten Australia in the race to a western dictatorship. Whichever way you try and look at it, today is a crucial and tragic day for both the people of Australia but the whole civilised world, as what they have managed first will now spread the world over if not stopped as soon as practically possible.
Today Australia has, as fully expected, voted to introduce a carbon tax. This in itself is quite unremarkable, but looking within the act itself, in ways only lawyers would think to do, it contains clauses which, without going into the legal side, would charge a future government so much to buy back the rights of the individuals handed over to the state by this act it would de facto be virtually impossible to afford. Being on a relatively shaky ground, Julia Gillard has a minority coalition government likely to fall at the slightest push. There was no real mandate for this law, she in fact promised not to introduce it at all (although this is also not unusual for any politician) but relying on the Green party for her position of Prime Minister ended up with no choice. Attempting to entrench this law meant however short her personal or party leadership lasted, one thing which was not going to fall was her essential law.
“The function of independent judges charged to interpret and apply the law is universally recognised as a cardinal feature of the modern democratic state, a cornerstone of the rule of law itself”
- Lord Bingham of Cornhill
Today Australians woke up as normal, heard the law had been passed, most heaved a sigh of reluctant acceptance, and carried on with their daily business. But besides a handful of interested lawyers, none realised they were now living in a de facto dictatorship. Technically binding the future, even if not expressed, is equivalent to cheating and getting top marks if in the future those marks are relied on. Therefore in effect this law has now set the precedent that Australia can and has retrenched its law. Having a single law entrenched is bad enough to lose your democratic status, but as now on the statute book unchallenged and unquestioned, it means it can be repeated ad infinitum should a similar situation and PM choose to do so. The genie is out of the bottle and it will take the knowledge and action of the Australian people to truly put it back and stop such a scandal from ever happening anywhere in the democratic world in the future.
‘under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.’(Dicey, The Law of the Constitution 1885 p39-40)
Additionally, Britain does not have a constitution, although the Magna Carta and Bill of Rights still hold a similar position in their own limited areas, but Australia however does. And as far as a constitution is concerned, the method of breach is not relevant, only the breach itself. Whether a law deliberately or indirectly binds the future is not the point, only whether that is the likely effect, so that will be no defence if attempted in a future challenge to Gillard’s law.
This clause in the Australian constitution alone casts doubt on the binding effect in the face of a future challenge, in fact the carbon tax itself:
"just terms" for the compulsory "acquisition" of property by the Commonwealth (section 51(xxxi))
Again, without going into complex details, this means that by removing the right of Australians to use energy without an additional tax they have, in a roundabout way, breached this section already, as the minutiae of the act uses this method to both legalise and bind the tax itself. As it was the route taken in the relevant clauses to tie up the ownership of the carbon credits then allowing their return would be an almost priceless task. This reflects the similar US fifth amendment:
"nor shall private property be taken ... without just compensation"
Therefore before even using Dicey’s long-accepted principles of democracy, their own constitution implies by removing the rights of companies (and potentially individuals) to their own energy use methods without penalty, they are possibly in prima facie breach of their own constitution without compensation (which of course would negate any profit from the tax’s collection, so effectively negating the Act itself), that is up to interested parties in Australia to pursue as they would any other potentially unconstitutional law. But I would have to search long and hard, as would the combined legal forces of the western world, to find an example where a country has successfully made a new law impossible to overturn. And even if they do then all that would mean is that country (unless it was also Australia) has simply beaten Australia in the race to a western dictatorship. Whichever way you try and look at it, today is a crucial and tragic day for both the people of Australia but the whole civilised world, as what they have managed first will now spread the world over if not stopped as soon as practically possible.
Saturday, October 08, 2011
How to fix the UK economy
We were just asked on the radio for our five year plan to fix the UK economy, I called in and here is mine. I have studied all the topics involved, some to degree level, and seen both in my life besides one and know the difference.
1) Leave the EU- all it does is suck our very life breath and restrict what we can do without any representation from our votes.
2) Raise interest rates to a sensible amount. Currently borrowing got us in this state already and more will continue it. Savers need to earn money so they can spend it back into the economy and borrowing discouraged. I'd actually ban it for personal use except for one house, but didn't say that bit.
3) One flat rate of income tax, 20%. It would come in around £15-20,000 and then the rich would have no reason not to pay theirs and the total income would probably increase. Everyone would have more to spend and create liquidity in the economy.
4) Use the Keynesian policy as Keynes intended, ie to create production not give to the banks. Use the same billions to set up manufacturing and we will then not be dependent on imports.
5) Nationalise all public utilities. You cannot compete in a closed market as you are selling the identical product- phone calls, railway track journeys etc, and have wrecked our utilities since privatised. Previously there was a 10% profit margin and then the prices were fixed and dropped if it increased. Now we pay as much as they can get.
Current policies help bankers and borrowers and the rest lose big time. All corruption and vote catching as there are historically more borrowers than savers so screw up the economy but get the votes from the fools who did it so they can do it again. No way Jose.
1) Leave the EU- all it does is suck our very life breath and restrict what we can do without any representation from our votes.
2) Raise interest rates to a sensible amount. Currently borrowing got us in this state already and more will continue it. Savers need to earn money so they can spend it back into the economy and borrowing discouraged. I'd actually ban it for personal use except for one house, but didn't say that bit.
3) One flat rate of income tax, 20%. It would come in around £15-20,000 and then the rich would have no reason not to pay theirs and the total income would probably increase. Everyone would have more to spend and create liquidity in the economy.
4) Use the Keynesian policy as Keynes intended, ie to create production not give to the banks. Use the same billions to set up manufacturing and we will then not be dependent on imports.
5) Nationalise all public utilities. You cannot compete in a closed market as you are selling the identical product- phone calls, railway track journeys etc, and have wrecked our utilities since privatised. Previously there was a 10% profit margin and then the prices were fixed and dropped if it increased. Now we pay as much as they can get.
Current policies help bankers and borrowers and the rest lose big time. All corruption and vote catching as there are historically more borrowers than savers so screw up the economy but get the votes from the fools who did it so they can do it again. No way Jose.
Sunday, October 02, 2011
Getting things right
If anyone's read Robert Monroe's books, one trip involved being put in the same situation over and over again until he worked out how to get it right. Possibly for the first time in my life I've been using the usual sort of setbacks as a reason to do something rather than get in a state. It wasn't even a conscious decision, after the first it was the same reaction as normal, but then I got something to compensate (an old road sign to replace one too far to return to), and decided to go and get a bunch across London I'd probably not have bothered to otherwise.
More setbacks occurred, but with the new approach which actually worked, to make lemons out of lemonade, made each one motivate me to carry on and possibly do more, rather than bend and break as I always did before. This shit hits everyone. Roads are the best example, if you drive all day for work as I once did, you have accidents. None were my fault, but being out there means every so many miles some twat will hit you. A drunk postman, a new driver, and a vandal who cut me up and then attacked the van as I didn't give way to him. You can't avoid being hit by drunks or treading in shit, but you can learn what to do when it happens.
So, I'm learning new tricks even at my advanced age, plenty of shit out there but carrying on regardless. I've also dropped the politics mission now I've seen no one new wants to know, so can and have returned to the far superior spiritual path. The dreadful happenings around the world affect me as much as everyone, but like I know I can't have what I never did but only what I do, I have half the income I would without the recession, but can manage on it so what the heck. The world will survive or fall, but it's not my problem now. Maybe a seed I've planted in someone will sprout at some point and they'll get it like I did, but that's not my problem either. I've done my bit and now will do it for myself.
More setbacks occurred, but with the new approach which actually worked, to make lemons out of lemonade, made each one motivate me to carry on and possibly do more, rather than bend and break as I always did before. This shit hits everyone. Roads are the best example, if you drive all day for work as I once did, you have accidents. None were my fault, but being out there means every so many miles some twat will hit you. A drunk postman, a new driver, and a vandal who cut me up and then attacked the van as I didn't give way to him. You can't avoid being hit by drunks or treading in shit, but you can learn what to do when it happens.
So, I'm learning new tricks even at my advanced age, plenty of shit out there but carrying on regardless. I've also dropped the politics mission now I've seen no one new wants to know, so can and have returned to the far superior spiritual path. The dreadful happenings around the world affect me as much as everyone, but like I know I can't have what I never did but only what I do, I have half the income I would without the recession, but can manage on it so what the heck. The world will survive or fall, but it's not my problem now. Maybe a seed I've planted in someone will sprout at some point and they'll get it like I did, but that's not my problem either. I've done my bit and now will do it for myself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
