Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Look below the surface

Here's a phenomenon I've noticed which everyone goes through, but not all are either aware of or cured in the slightest. I noticed as a child when everything was new to me each new discovery looked as it was, and then sooner or later I discovered what they really meant. I'd need some time to think of lists of examples as once I looked beneath the surface of each I no longer saw the presentation but the content and mainly forgot how I'd got to that point.

One example today reminded me, not a particularly good one but should work to illustrate the point, was interest rates. People look at the economy and assume if no knowledge beyond that the lower the better, and if they charge less to borrow then it must be a good thing. Then you look into it and find it's both not simple or accurate as

1) People only borrow relative to the interest rates headlined, they are only for banks to borrow at and not people. Banks can charge whatever the market will take regardless.

2) Interest rates affect borrowers, is it a good thing to encourage borrowing by making them lower than otherwise?

3) If you exclude everything besides mortgages then how do they affect them? They are lower than otherwise but is that a good thing? In any system nothing works in isolation, so by pulling one string others will be pulled connecting them. So by reducing interest rates it increases demand for houses as the monthly payments are less for the same price. Increase demand and all that happens is the price rises and they end up paying the same anyway, just more on the principal and less on the interest. Then the interest rate is volatile, so buy when it's low and if you are already at your limit you'll go broke if it inevitably rises. Keep it high and then no one can ever be caught out as it will rarely rise and usually fall within the life of the loan. And prices will stay reasonable and people will only buy what they can afford as the fixed amount of the cost will not change, so constant, but the variable will and they can already afford it at the higher level.

4) Who else is affected by interest rates? Everyone who saves and invests. The lower the rate, the lower their income, and the smaller the overall economy.  So it means by keeping rates low more people have less and those who borrow only save a marginal amount as it inflates prices in the first place.

So just this one example is attempting to illustrate hundreds more, all demonstrating the point that many things are not what they seem on the surface. Left wing politics, reduce poverty, help the workers etc sounds wonderful on the surface but of course how does it reduce poverty? By taking money from those who on the whole earn it. They give to the poor by stopping people from becoming rich, maybe less so now but a 97% top rate of tax in the 70s looks like stealing to me, and simply means people either go abroad or pay accountants to hide their earnings and it doesn't go where intended anyway. The point of this is not to teach economics, but not to judge anything on its immediate impact. You wouldn't trust a person you didn't know just because they impressed you on first meeting, as you know people are complex and have many hidden depths, and most things are the same, plus many advertisers understand this so package their frauds and ripoffs as beneficial, adding yet another layer to the fog hiding what shite lies behind.

I don't want you to either learn from experience or worse still not learn at all, but avoid the trouble as much as possible in advance by learning a formula. Never judge what you hear about for the first time on appearance, check what it really means. Most people hooked in are sucked in so deep they can't even see there is a way out let alone look for one. Believing political rebels want freedom, joining them and finding, like the IRA or Basque separatists they really want to run the country like the mafia and murder their opponents and deal arms and drugs unhindered by another country's authority as they would become the authority. Like Egypt for example today. One tyrant has been replaced by a different one from a different tribe of Arab mafiosi. The internet is a great help as everything you need to know can be found without much effort and really once you know to check no excuse to get caught out many times.

Anything which looks too good on the surface usually is, and like politicians most offers are probably more likely to provide the exact opposite of what they claim once you check them. Another example is locals nearly always oppose all new developments in their area. If they all succeeded we'd have no motorways, railways, airports, supermarkets or much else we'd be stuck without. All these rabid activists, who all use said facilities, would also be lost without them, and would they really rather travel a few miles to them than have them nearby? People are so stuck in this mindset they are quite prepared to deprive themselves of such facilities on the surface although had they ever succeeded would probably miss whatever they had either deprived the area of altogether or forced elsewhere beyond their reach. You need a bit of lateral thinking to help, think what you would be like if they got what they wanted compared to the alternative- would you really want to go to east Kent to fly abroad rather than Heathrow, or pay much more in the local grocer's than save in a new supermarket? People really have to think of every consequence beyond the surface before jumping on every bandwagon, and not end up getting themselves in more trouble than they would have otherwise.

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Government fraud? You decide

I am interested in politics, and sometimes (pointlessly) will debate the merits of left v right, but of course that is personal opinion and may as well spend hours trying to persuade people to like strawberries. But my angle is criminal activity which isn't part of left or right, but the filth which has got in and wrecked them both. I saw the seeds back in 1975 with the vote to leave the Common Market which the advertisers had about 80% more resources not to than the opposite, and appeared the advertising did far better than the actual facts.

This thread has now been followed for nearly 40 years, and now the whole thing has spread far beyond the bounds of the European version of the iron curtain worldwide. UN Agenda 21 is the plan, and whatever the wording it is about bringing world industry back to the 18th century more or less, and have what is the equivalent of a subsistence society. My legal training means once I say something it's because I've discovered it true 'beyond reasonable doubt'. In this case it's caught red handed, or better still direct confession, as many who believe they are above the will of the people have said so on record and in writing.

As long as the media and masses believe anyone making these claims are crazy they will continue to do it, but the Libor cheating is the first example of highest level organised crime and once the highest names making the orders are exposed no doubt many more similar will follow, as that is just like finding a cockroach, if you do there's always a city of them close by. That is how things were done, and once Libor catches the main operators as being at the top and not the alleged rogue operators unknown by certain leaders who have frequently be named as ordering it to happen, on top of that the fact it continued unchallenged over five years says that unless you believe our authorities are so incompetent they can't spot a massive long term fraud they had asked them to do it and as a result (as in all similar) kept it quiet and kept it going. Therefore you can't have an investigation or legal challenge if it's a government run fraud can you? Libor currently stands as a test case, and if proven (well, it is proven, only the structure remains to be discovered fully) will again not be an exception but a rule. More evidence for those still in doubt, why is manipulating Libor not a crime if those writing the law didn't want to avoid criminal proceedings (as they have)?

Friday, August 10, 2012

War on the astral planes

As I was inspired by Ishtar's blog on the battles in the astral planes, reflected here, I'd describe the situation, long demonstrated in Star Trek, of the two types of wars. There are the standard baddies vs goodies, but at least as many or more are baddies against baddies, as war is far likelier between bloody idiots who know no better than decent people who can often find ways of avoiding it. Therefore from the lowest level of drug gang wars, mafia infighting and ice cream turf wars to Syria and Egypt where both sides are part of a single primitive tribal mafia of bad and worse versions of the same things fighting for their particular branch of the family shite to take over power. So these Arab springs simply replace one set of bastards with even worse, and kill many in the process, and every single one we should keep out of as it's like trying to separate black and red ants fighting with the same hopeless results.

The same is going on in politics, with the equally astral illuminati Obama and Romney supposedly fighting to do almost exactly the same thing as simply doing someone else's dirty work whichever wins. Like the devil they must do some good or would never survive, but only to divert attention from what they're both really doing. The EU and British governments are all part of the same astral monster, led from the pits of hell and purely about trying to dominate what they see as 'useless eaters' while they both reduce the population from staged wars and terrorist attacks, food shortages and unaffordable energy prices, all in UN Agenda 21.

Knowledge is power, and the formula is simple. The dark forces are called so as they can't work outside the dark, shine the light and expose what they're doing and they can't do it any more, the devil and the evil forces all work with illusions created by fear and pretence. Of course leaving the EU won't hurt any country any more than removing a malignant tumour, proved by the current state of the Euro and vast improvement in Britain who didn't join despite being warned of failure forever if they didn't. Of course no one remembered that, just as they believe not being in the EU would cause the same disaster even more so although it didn't happen with not being in the Euro. Anyone bothered to find the full accounts would see Britain ends up billions in the red every year from being members and always will. But once each person (it only works one at a time) learns the truth then it won't be possible to delude them any more. Who would vote to have cancer once they knew EU meant cancer and carbon taxes meant death?

I have tuned into this frequency as many others have, and as such can explain how every part of politics currently operates as it's only one well oiled machine and like an engineer can see each part and how they all fit together to make it work. Obama is controlled by George Soros, David Rockefeller and others who really make the rules not in one country as a head of state but the world via the UN. Europe is exactly the same, and they all operate by legalising crimes such as fraud and extortion (carbon taxes and credits, interest rate fixing etc.), telling lies (CO2 will change the climate, it can't, I've spent longer than most scientists learning why), and repeating the same Nazi-style buzz words to maintain the illusion and divide the weak of mind against the minority who are immune to mind control. It's clever compared to the majority who fall for it, but bloody basic in reality as once you start telling a lie you both have to keep remembering it (as there's no real data there to draw on) and be consistent, which can't be done and diverges from the known the longer it's attempted. I enjoy the intellectual experience of learning and sharing the material, only blunted by the utter indifference (at best) and murderous intent at worst in response. If they didn't know already people either don't believe or trust me or simply don't care either way- 'So what's wrong with a world government anyway?'. But I can't give up, as the astral is the spiritual sewer presumably somewhere above the floating fecal material has given me the ability to tune in to see exactly what these excuses for humanity are doing and how. Most people don't even believe it's possible (they've forgotten the Nazis and think only black people like Robert Mugabe can do such things in modern times) but white educated men in suits who speak perfect English could never be mafia bosses and mass murderers. That's only because they get other people to do it for them and don't say anything to make it clear they have.

I could go on, and if offered a degree would do so, but this is the general picture and can always add more depth and examples. If I had the strength and support I'd do some lectures as no one reads much more than the few existing writers but anyone can do a lecture if sponsored, but currently do it online including on video. My personal response is as the lotus flower, to float above the mud and filth and not care what happens as you can't become personally attached to anything down here, but we also prefer success so enjoy any good results although expect or wish for none actively.

Monday, August 06, 2012

Back to normal?

Keeping anyone who's been following up to date the last month has been the busiest for at least a decade. Not by choice but just had a constant stream of arrangements which weren't beyond me (many are), a school and internet reunion, two olympic cycle races, various distant trips to find old road signs, my first football match for four years, an afternoon of open houses for an art exhibition, a photo exhibition and anything else I may have forgotten. It's now over and besides a trip to the Cotswolds planned as my last long photo trip (as all directions will have been covered) I am pretty well done. I have no idea what I'll do instead besides collecting all the squares on the local London map photos for the same website where you score for getting them all per 10km square, and I'm nearly finished on my second.

Of course the thing about collecting is it doesn't change your life one bit, except meaning you don't have to do certain things again once you've done them, but have a distant photo of Bradley Wiggins and the British team, the best possible road signs barely in existence for 50 miles of London, and met lots of people which is probably the most beneficial as every person online who becomes a real face is no longer a mystery. On the politics front the quotes from the Club of Rome I started sending round are now coming back to me, and from some major websites as well as individuals. They can't keep doing it once enough people know.

I have learnt we can all assess any professional subject we can understand as long as they do the technical stuff first, they can work out the data but we can all judge it. As science has become the new Spanish Inquisition, you're either with us or against us, it's become what is now far closer to the mafia than the people who spent most of their lives curing illnesses and saving lives. Now the most visible side of science is ordering us around and telling everyone else they know nothing and are the enemy if they question what are such manipulated findings a small child could see what they're doing. I am not a scientist but then again it takes an investigator to pick out a fraud in any area, so it's police and accountants who can blow apart long term scientific frauds, as two just have, as scientists tend to be trusting, and supportive of all their colleagues.

The only part missing in my personal education was having to drop a master's degree (sociology) due to poor health and switch to a diploma which only had classes once a week instead of twice. It did mean I qualified as a therapist but somehow postgraduate qualifications somehow mean you are listened to and accepted by all simply as you have learnt more than most in your field. As Anthony Davis (no degree) said on his radio show to me, you don't even need a degree to do this, just common sense. He has collected the climate data, and unlike me who has to call the show to share it he can do so as and when he chooses on his show so has the chance to win over the uncertain. But studying law just to degree level teaches you two things, one is to assess evidence and the other is never to produce evidence until it's almost definite. Those two alone can wreck any careless or dishonest professional's productions as we are trained to spot crap and not to say so till we're sure and can prove it beyond reasonable doubt. This means when I share information it's already known and not smoke or secondhand stories. As far as I'm concerned the information speaks for itself, my only personal input is choosing the right stuff and fitting it into the big picture of world political control.

So I can be anonymous like many bloggers, and post things people can check for themselves and see they are genuine, that's all you need in the investigation business, no one needs any more than the ability to do so and totally judged on their results. So when a doctor can misdiagnose the same person three times so they die, their qualification doesn't make a bit of difference, but when a journalist spends months investigating a bogus company you needn't know who they are but could use their findings for a successful prosecution. I've learnt all this as a result of the climate investigation, so pick up all sorts of knowledge along the way. As my first job after graduation was teaching, which is my nature, I will always do so. I saw the faults in my own teachers and made sure I remedied them. No training, as you need O level maths, but can teach anywhere except state schools. I've also learnt cult busting from the climate scam as the mind control used to persuade people a slight rise in temperature is dangerous (it's not, it's beneficial, look at history) is the same as the most evil cults in history as well as Goebbels who wrote the modern rules. They change minds by the million, I undo it one at a time. Clearly not long enough to make a difference alone, but each convert tends to add to the flock and join the mission. In the end you can't keep any lie going very long as the results people discover are not the same, and now climate data is coming in showing steady temperatures, CO2 being ineffective and half the data being made up (at least). The media then have to see enough has come out to change sides (as they always like to back the winners) and once they switch to the truth then it can't last long as an illusion.

I've learned a lot on this job, what people do and don't need to know and how to present it. And more rules, especially if you are put in a position where you discover something is wrong if you don't do something about it you have become part of the problem. There are almost as many people who hear about global warming who work out it's crap but do nothing, many who work in the field and would lose their jobs or promotion, and others who see the investment potential while wind and solar are guaranteeing money for a small outlay. Whatever the reasons once someone knows they are being dishonest they've let the side down. The Euro has ruined the lives of many people but is continuing as they want a united Europe and that needs a united currency, at any cost. So they sacrifice southern Europe for the sake of a dishonest goal. The dimwits who live in these countries (I've seen hours of interviews) have no idea this is the case, but can you imagine them being worse off than they are now with the Euro?

I wish I had the ears of a newspaper instead of yet another blog, I see some of my stories picked up by one or two but it's the exception rather than the rule. I don't know of anyone else outside the odd obscure magazine preaching to the converted who mentions Agenda 21 and the Club of Rome, the mechanism which has been setting this up for centuries (the first divide and rule propaganda has been traced back to publicity material from 1970, but the meetings themselves go back many decades before at least) but the methods they use make most immature people think their claims are genuine and people must police each other for their carbon emissions. That's breathing out, so the aim is to stop people breathing out before they cause more pollution, and of course there's only one way of doing that, and that, most appropriately, is the ultimate aim of them all.