Michael Mann holds the seeds of his own destruction

One theme going through my life are the seeds of possible future events. Normally they all fall on stony ground but for the second time this month a study has countered Michael Mann's tree ring data, this time a whole pile of genuine peer reviewers who all say what we've said since the details were discovered, they make other scientists look bad as well and want them withdrawn. If something's dead wrong you don't need to be qualified to do so, and it should have happened ages ago as this garbage has not just been floating around for many years but is the sole policy driving the world's political actions via his hockey stick diagram. Without that the whole bogus affair wouldn't have got off the launch pad, but is now orbiting Pluto it's travelled so far.

So if termites are eating away his very foundation, the very lynchpin of world propaganda and rhetoric, despite being discredited by Steve Mackintyre, who took years deciphering it despite not having the original injuncted codes. If they ever get out, only by Mann himself suing people for libel and being forced to disclose his own defence (currently two are pending) the expectation is it would finish his career, technically open him to prosecution and pretty well finish off the whole machine. How long can you keep an illusion going when seven year old children all over the world are saying the temperature isn't going up like he said? The figures are all available at the entry of a search term (nowadays I don't even need to click the mouse), and I've found the believers work from events while the realists work from the data. You induce from events and you deduce from figures, and they have lost the plot. How long will it be before the peers are fed up with the bad publicity making them all look the same? Not so long now apparently?

Full story

This is one example of a potential precedent where a single event can derail an entire mission. The same way as had a country left the Euro the Bilderberg Group would not be omnipotent, but they never did. The climate scammers are far less organised and protected, and can easily become derailed as everyone can see what they're doing but so far not had the weight or numbers to do anything about it. But these guys are having a very good go.

One world government? We already have one.

As someone said yesterday, the Rockefeller led Bildergers and Club of Rome etc have made the agendas sent up to the UN and back via Agenda 21. PC and green are the new Nazism, as between them they restrict freedom of speech and divide society into greens and murderers (like the Jews in Germany). Scapegoating carbon emitters (ie every single human being, it's impossible not to) and promoting and protecting extremism is a worldwide policy, which is why every single western government except the Czech Republic follows the same policies regardless of party leading. Keynesian economics, devaluing currencies and forcing down interest rates siphons money from the people and savers back to the banks and governments (who else borrows at base rate?) and keeps everyone focused on survival so too poor and busy earning to stop and look at anything else.

It can't last forever as one by one people notice, and then you have a revolution. The internet speed the process up hundreds of times.

So, to summarise, if policies are decided in international regular meetings (Bilderberg, Trilateral Commission, The Council on Foreign Relations, The Club of Isles and others like them) then their members will be levered into top positions worldwide, and employed, like Obama, to carry out their agendas and not yours as voters. This only happens while people are unaware of it. Some people are noticing whoever is in power the policies seem incredibly similar, and over here until Tony Blair got in Labour and Conservative were two utterly different philosophies, as you'd want and expect. Someone who was invited to Bilderberg only as a back bench MP, not a current or past leader of politics or industry was not the norm, John Smith died suddenly, Blair took over and revolutionised his own party and then Britain as a result. Since then his 'Third way' has been followed by both his own Labour Party, combining policies from left and right to attempt to please everyone, but by all others both here and worldwide. So political correctness- restricting criticism based on race or Islam (the other religions seem unaffected), changing words for the disabled, positive discrimination for minorities and women, not mentioning the race of criminals in the media, unlimited immigration, low interest rates and currency values, massive government debt and spending, and an increasing trend to federalism rather than national policies can all be read in the published material of the Club of Rome (all free and online) and Feasta, the group who advise the UN on Agenda 21, creating a world government and currency and energy rationing. That is not possible without a reason, so as admitted and mentioned many times (quite deliberately, people rarely remember before at least the third time, on my sister fraud site) man made global warming was the perfect reason (they said it many times, not me, check Margaret Mead's quote way back in 1974).

So we have a formula for a Nazi style scapegoating world state run on full totalitarian regulations 'to save the planet' (worthy sacrifice for people not born till we're dead). Paris is the first to operate new EU rules to ban cars, starting with the older ones, and planned in every capital in totality. I also read yesterday (before I could check the details) the next plan is to restrict movement in and out of cities, so the old communist plan is apparently going to return to those who escaped it after the war.

Knowledge is power. Every country either has an existing free party from the UN agenda or can form one. We have UKIP, growing rapidly for the obvious reason of being the only alternative, so when enough people learn this more will vote for the new parties (as all the old are run by the same people anyway) and they will be gone. That is the new form of revolution, a democratic one. They work for us. If they want to do us over and you know it you kick them out. They can't wreck our lives if they're not in power, and whatever else has happened we still give them that, so can take it away.

Don't mess with our lives

Politicians are elected to look after the areas which need national attention we cannot organise ourselves. As such they work for us, and only have the ability to interfere in our social and moral affairs as the voters are so weak minded they believe they cannot rely on individuals to do it for themselves, despite the criminal law protecting them from any harm already. Until the voters are convinced moral and social issues are outside the scope of a free country's government we will continue to be oppressed by corrupt and psychopathic leaders who rarely follow any of the rules themselves they impose on us. It's a very slow process of education but when we get there everyone will wonder how we managed before we did.

Once the laws are written to protect the people from harm, they only need occasional updating. Otherwise governments run national affairs such as transport and utilities (oh, they don't do that now do they?), and dealing with the rest of the world. They have no rights (besides the ones we have given them) to decide what is right morally or socially, that is up to every single individual to choose for themselves (as the laws stop them taking any views too far) and not anyone else. Until then we will never live in a free country, and will mark our evolution from superstitious primitive people to enlightened.

Mysterious ways

If the angels are still or were ever working with me, they are also doing it via tough lessons. This is the end, the PhD top level of dealing with shit. Like you've graduated to the full JCB excavator and given the highest pile of elephant's dos and told to go and clear it before you qualify. Fuck that for a lark. So my angels apparently (if you or I even believe in them) think by making me go to the dentist for a crown and cope with it better than before in order to make me stronger is their idea of help I refer the readers to my previous expletive. So my tooth breaks on Tuesday right in the middle of the US election results, and with an interminable time to repair I am supposed to improve myself by 'dealing with it'.

This raises the next point, I'm impressed it's not just my madness (it can't as two people I know got me into it themselves) but once I'd mentioned angels many other extremely normal people also said they worked with them and trusted them implicitly. Now god and angels are no different really, in fact angels could be considered God's switchboard rather than separate lower entities. And equally unknowable, so why are they so widely accepted as real? The major difference is unlike god angels are obliged to follow our requests, no discretion, as that is their only role in existence. But to believe in them someone scientifically at least ought to have spent a very long time keeping a journal and only deciding something was true after they had delivered consistently. The synchronicities in my life and those around me shows something is controlling it, although it was only quite recently they started working in my benefit in the one area at least, having been random till then just to show me they were real. My system is simply a standard evidential enquiry, whatever claims are made I run them through it and have certainly added some positive conclusions to synchronicity, telepathy and clairvoyance as I have seen them happen. I've never seen more than two people manage psychokinesis, or similar manipulations of matter, so that is on the pending file, as however unlikely it seems using the mind to interact with atomic bonds is not outside quantum physics, so tells me it's just a matter of raising the power high enough to make a visible change.

But the general belief in angels appears to be to most before any event. Not like the people who have died and seen heaven and even god, they know, even if they can't take us there. And unless we ask them for help they can't, unless we're about to die before our time. I'm asking now officially as advised, and before my tooth broke there were no great gains but no losses. And don't start imagining angels have limits, you can either bring about miracles or not, materialising a penny or a million pounds is no different to each other as both are miracles whatever appears from nowhere. So we can't just expect little changes or reasonable ones, but full blown miracles. Beyond our imaginations. In fact normally I always keep records and checks, but none of my previous requests had been organised in any way, and now are. I was told this was how to do it, and look back and see if they really have done things or not compared with the results in response. Now from experience I know if I get something better than what I've lost it'll take over my attention, so obviously I'll know if that has happened, so the angels can be told exactly what it takes to sort thing out. You have to be specific, and The Secret (as opposed to traditional angel working) says you should feel the request has already been carried out or it won't work. But that's not angel work, that's doing it ourselves, angels shouldn't need us to become masters or we wouldn't actually need them.

Many religious people say testing god is blasphemy, but really we were designed to test everything, imagine animals dying from eating the wrong food growing on trees as they couldn't test it first. They smell or taste right, so we know whether they can be eaten in most cases, except may Big Macs... Anyway, science is based on testing, and testing spiritual claims is identical to me, imagine meeting a man online who made similar claims to god and taking it on trust without checking for yourself. And people want us to do the same thing for the supposed most powerful force in existence without doing what we could to investigate its existence? God doesn't give enquiring minds if not to be used for everything.

Government officials under investigation

While I'm on the subject I'm listing all the current politicians and their staff who are on the cusp of lawsuits and their progress I can think of. Please help me add to the list of any others you may have come across:

Michael Mann: IPCC lead contributor, creator of the official IPCC hockey stick world temperature diagram. Currently involved in two libel suits, one in the US and one in Canada. However both have requested disclosure of his secret methods to create the hockey stick, and is currently deciding whether to give them or pull out of the cases. Either way he loses.

Julia Gillard: Currently is fighting claims of financial fraud from her previous legal career. There is no solid evidence for a case but the more she denies any wrongdoing more details are coming out. Could go either way.

Chris Huhne: UK energy minister, his charge may only be perverting the course of justice over a speeding fine, but can we trust anyone if convicted of not generally running their lives that way? I wouldn't.

Rebecca Brooks: News of the World editor, up for bribing police or somesuch charges over the phone hacking in her paper. Main point is she couldn't have done it alone, it would have needed police cooperation at a very high level so if she goes down many others will follow.

Yorkshire Police: 23 years after the event, they have been exposed altering evidence. No prosecutions are pending so far but the alleged (or admitted?) crimes are a very high level of fraud and break most rules of the profession. Like Brooks, the conspiracy is bad enough, but if the orders are proved to have come from the top as claimed, then what will it say about our police?

Libor fixing: Barclay's admitted fixing interest rates for many years, and supposedly not just with the consent of the Bank of England but under their orders to suppress the market rate and reduce the rate the banks themselves borrowed at. Insiders trace the orders to the very top, and despite breaking the 1968 Theft Act of obtaining financial services by deception, the government claim it was not a criminal act. That alone would require a separate act of parliament removing interest rate fixing from the act. No such clause is known.

America no more. Post-Obama 2016

OK, I'm saying this tonight and never again. Since the US election result here is what will happen by the next one, not based on prediction but simply projecting the current policies but many times greater as the second term will be free to do as he wants.

I will be as specific as I can be. Unemployment, way up. National debt, way up. Energy prices, possibly triple today's if not higher. Credit rating probably down one if not two notches. Dollar no longer world default currency, oil probably measured in Euros or Yuan. The home oil exploration will be so severely restricted that imports will cripple the economy and force the oil price up due to restricted supply from US. Coal will become an industry of the past, mining will likely be made illegal and closed down and usage so expensive shale gas will have to take up the slack.

Secondary possibilities will be growing restrictions on freedom of speech and assembly, beginning with SOPA and PIPA ostensibly written to stop media piracy but informally (with sanctions) to be enforced worldwide in order to work, and slowly extending to other violations. New laws on security will restrict free assembly and movement, as well as potential imprisonment without trial for their breach. Home grown food and water collected naturally may become subject to strict banning regulations, as well as GM becoming the norm as it is not labelled so no one can decide to avoid it. Immigration will increase, legally and amnesties given to illegals making little or no difference between them, creating a growing underclass of low wage or unemployed citizens, often barely speaking English and including many organised criminals, but nearly all becoming good Democrats to increase the small advantage margin created between 2008-2012 and made the difference for the win.

I suggest everyone copies and saves this to their documents, and in maybe a year or two take it out again to see how far it's progressed before completion in 2016. I have been making these projections since 1975 for the Common Market vote, and so far have a pretty good track record, so can now make it official and testable. Don't judge me today, judge me around 2014. This is not based on political opinion, but simply extending the existing trends to their inevitable conclusions. And if anyone finds some or most of these familiar then they are living in the EU.

Less than a day after winning, Obama is already planning laws for a carbon tax and to restrict opposition power in congress. What would have happened had he done this a day earlier? Would everyone still have voted for him, and how do they feel or will they feel when they've learnt of these policies they wouldn't have voted for? Maybe this is a lesson for the American people not to judge politics on presentation and spin, and never let this happen again.