My comments

This lot didn't deserve to be hiding in the shadows so I've posted it here.

Anonymous said...
I seem to recall in one of your earlier blog posts, that you had already "bumped" into Roach at a local store? Was that the truth or was it a lie?

Remember when you said that he gave you permission to post his teachings? Again is that true? or is that a lie?

So if you already met him, and received permission from him to post his teachings, then how is that you only "first" met him at your enlightenment class?

Well, which is it?

6:21 PM


David said...
This posting is weird, one of us appears paranoid and it's not me.

If you think I said I 'bumped into Nick Roach at a local store' please copy and paste it into your reply, as it's news to me.

Why the fuck would I say I'd got permission from him when I hadn't? Do you have some sort of campaign against me, because I can tell you now, it's not me that has the problem.

6:29 PM


Anonymous said...
My high is a possible first for FT- I wrote about an enlightenment teacher called Nick Roach I saw on the religion board, and he just emailed me to say he'd read it!
I said to my father after I saw him that I understood him so well that though I'm not enlightened I could help him with the teaching as I could present it the same way he does. Well guess what, Nick said he'd send me emails to post for him plus I can add my own ideas if I want. The next part is I recommended him to a radio show who has similar guests and the next day they called him! If they use him I'll be so pleased something I did actually worked, and who knows, I may be able to watch him there if I'm very lucky.

Look familiar? Notice how in the top part you say you received an email, then in the next paragraph you tell your father that when you saw Roach, that although you understand Roach so well, but are not enlightened you could help him with his teaching?

Remember those words that were typed by you? Or maybe you are too paranoid to admit it, because heaven forbid that your dear lovely follwers of your blog finally realise that you are totally full of it.

Oh, and what I quoted by you was typed by you on 31 December 2004.

How's that for throwing your own words back at you, uh?

P.S. This is not who you think it is, but it someone that knows you are full of shit.

P.P.S. And if you have any spinal cord at all, you won't delete this, because if you do, then I know that you are truly whacked and want to deceive the ones that read your blog. Obviously, you forget what you post and where...and you are the same one that prints out every single one of your posts right? So, how could you have forgotten the words in bold above?

A~

11:11 AM


David said...
Fair enough, I won't delete you as you do a better job of looking mentally ill by leaving it there than anything else I could do as well.

I didn't actually meet Nick in October by speaking to him, I was just an anonymous face in his audience. I meant 'met' this time as I spoke to him face to face. As if that's important to you?

When I said cut and paste, I actually meant the bit about 'bumping into him in a store'. Where did you get that from? Well, if it's not person one posting it must be related, if you get my drift. No one else I know has such a unique style. Personal insults aren't allowed in FT but they're fine on other people's blogs, where you have no real status to diss the writer, and if you don't like it why bother reading it and then spraying manure about it? A real tough guy/gal would face the writer in person, not make an issue in public. That shows a total lack of decency and guts. If you want an argument, I'll play along, but try and base it on something both relevant and accurate, not something you know apparently not enough about to comment on. Why not ask Nick himself if you're so concerned about it, though to be honest I wouldn't want him disturbed by someone out to get him. By the way, in five years I've never insulted anyone I've met online, least of all in public. Partly as until you (whoever the hell you are as if I actually care...) came along I'd never met anyone that ignorant. But I still wouldn't stoop to that level.

11:30 PM


David said...
By the way, if you'd read this http://www.jimmyvincent.com/cgi-local/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=25&t=000253
you could see everything again, but written by Nick as well as me. Knowing where to look before you accuse would help.

12:10 AM


David said...
And I only print out a few important posts, not every one. It shows you're not paying any attention to detail, especially when it doesn't support your campaign.

OK, I barely need to comment after posting it, but being the analytical type have to say a few things.

It's interesting how this person has picked on a totally irrelevant issue to pin all her venom on. Nick Roach is just a teacher I have publicised since I saw him talk last October, and he agreed to let me use his teaching in forums (as he did himself already). Why pick holes in my dubious grammar that doesn't always convey what I want to say perfectly (which I'm fully aware of) to imply all sorts of libellous things rather than actually (if it's possible) choose something I may actually have done? And posting it in public with no evidence isn't very clever either, but people who would persecute someone just because of a personal grudge don't do the right things, do they?